Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of different pre-processing methods on the PLM validation set

From: Automatic damage identification of Sanskrit palm leaf manuscripts with SegFormer

Method

Class IoU (%)

mIoU (%)

INC

BRE

FIB

CON

IMP

Cropping

512 × 512

49.5

33.3

41.2

29.3

69.2

44.5

512 × 768

42.2

36.1

35.3

23.6

85.0

44.4

Resizing

512 × w

47.2

35.0

31.6

27.6

91.9

46.7

512 × 976

45.0

31.0

22.4

22.9

89.2

42.1

512 × 3072

41.3

31.4

23.2

23.7

89.1

41.7

Resizing and cropping

512 × 512

46.3

31.6

38.9

26.1

87.9

46.2

512 × 768

54.8

34.7

41.4

29.8

91.8

50.5

  1. “512 × w” indicates that the short side of the image is resized to 512, and the aspect ratio of the image is maintained. “INC”, “BRE”, “FIB”, “CON”, and “IMP” indicate incompleteness, break, fiber delamination and warping, contamination, and improper restoration, respectively. The CE loss was the default setting when comparing the different pre-processing methods. Best scores are highlighted in bold