Skip to main content
Heritage Science
Heritage Science Cover Image
Download PDF

Synthetic arsenic sulfides in Japanese prints of the Meiji period

Heritage Science volume 4, Article number: 17 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

A multi-analytical investigation of Japanese woodblock prints ranging in date from 1864 to 1895 and covering essentially the time span between the very end of the Edo period and the middle of the Meiji period showed a widespread use of arsenic sulfides for yellow and green colored areas (the latter obtained by mixing Prussian blue to the yellow arsenic sulfides). Analysis by optical microscopy, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, Raman microscopy, and Scanning Electron Microscopy confirmed that the yellow pigment is usually a compound belonging to the solid solution series (As8S8)–(As8S9). The poor crystallinity of the pigment as shown by Raman microscopy, the non-stoichiometric As/S ratio, as well as the presence of excess uncombined sulfur point to a synthetic origin for the pigment. Period literary sources suggest that synthetic arsenic sulfide pigments manufacture might have started in the Iwashiro province in 1846. This is to our knowledge the first conclusive evidence for the use of synthetic arsenic sulfides in woodblock prints in Japan.

Background

Because of their vivid colors, ranging from yellow to red, arsenic sulfides were used as pigments since ancient times [1, 2]. Natural arsenic sulfide pigments differ for their As:S ratios, and include realgar (α-AsS), pararealgar (β-AsS), and orpiment (As2S3). Realgar, a widely used orange/red pigment, occurs in low-temperature hydrothermal deposits [3–5]. Pararealgar is the light-induced degradation yellow form of realgar and alacranite [6, 7]. Mixtures of pararealgar and/or realgar have been systematically observed in many studies [8–10]. Orpiment was widely used as a yellow colorant besides yellow ochre since ancient times [11]. Another arsenic sulfide, alacranite (As8S9) [12] is a rather uncommon red mineral showing a complicated crystallographic structure where clusters of As4S4 (realgar-type) and As4S5 coexist in an ordered cagelike structure [3]. Although rare in nature, alacranite has been documented in works of art as a possible artificial product deriving from the arsenolite smelting [13–15]. The production of artificial orpiment in Western Europe was first mentioned by Johannes Alcherius in his recipe collection (1380–1420) [16], but the very first description of this synthetic pigment was made by Cennino Cennini in his treatise [17]. According to these and later sources artificial orpiment was initially obtained by sublimation, using the dry-process method [15]. The wet-process method, which produces a yellow precipitate, was introduced at the end of the nineteenth century [2 and references therein, 18].

Characterizing arsenic sulfide pigments and accurately distinguishing between natural and synthetic origin is a challenging chemical and crystallographic problem which requires a multi-analytical approach. Techniques such as polarized light microscopy (PLM), micro-Raman spectroscopy (RM), X-Ray Fluorescence spectrometry, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive microanalysis (SEM-EDS) [15] are best suited to this task: some of them allow non-invasive analysis while others require microsampling. An in-depth study carried out on natural and artificial orpiment, the latter obtained through both wet- and dry-process, pointed out how only the results from the combination of several techniques allowed to identify the actual nature of the pigment [2, 14]. In particular, the presence of spherules of arsenic sulfide glass or alacranite solid solution series (As8S8)–(As8S9) was shown to be conclusive evidence for an artificial origin for orpiment [14].

In this work we investigated green and yellow pigments in Japanese woodblock prints dating to the late Edo (1615–1868) and early Meiji period (1868–1912). A collection of 30 dated prints ranging from 1864 to 1887 (Table 1) was assembled by one of the authors with the purpose of examining the chronology of the introduction of synthetic organic dyes in Japan (a paper on this topic is forthcoming). In the course of this study we initially surveyed the prints in all colored areas with X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy. The discovery of arsenic in the yellow and green areas, usually interpreted as a sign of the use of the pigment orpiment (As2S3) was rather interesting. Yellow pigments traditionally used in Japan for painting include orpiment, yellow earth, gamboge, and berberin [19, 20]. A recent study by Yamato [21] on Japanese prints dating to 1811–29 and 1836–91 similarly noted a widespread use of arsenic containing pigments for yellow and green areas, with turmeric often present in the yellow area.

Table 1 List of the prints analyzed in this research, complete of dates, authors, and titles
Full size table

For woodblock prints, a commercial form of art, the use of cheaper pigments is generally expected, making the use of natural orpiment, usually an expensive pigment, quite unlikely. In her study, Yamato used the appearance of the pigment under optical microscopy observation to distinguish between synthetic and natural arsenic sulfides. In this study, we offer a fully multianalytical classification based on optical microscopy, Raman microscopy, and Scanning Electron microscopy with Energy Dispersive Spectrometry.

Methods

Samples

30 Japanese prints dated from 1864 to 1887 were selected for the analyses. A complete list of the prints alongside with their titles and authors is reported in Table 1.

A multi-technique approach, which includes micro-X-ray fluorescence, micro-Raman spectroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy equipped with Energy Dispersive Spectrometry, was followed in this study. The use of X-ray Diffraction was ruled out because of the small dimensions of the pigment particles and the low pigment coverage, which would have resulted in unacceptably large samples.

Micro-XRF

Micro X-ray fluorescence (micro-XRF) measurements were acquired with a Bruker ARTAX 400 instrument using unfiltered Rh radiation at 50 kV, 700 μA. Spectra were acquired with a 1 mm collimator for 120 s live-time accumulations.

Micro-Raman spectroscopy

Micro-Raman spectra were acquired with using a Bruker Senterra™ dispersive Raman microscope system, operating at 785 nm. Raman spectra were acquired directly from the prints using an Olympus LMPlanFL 50× long working distance objective, at a spectral resolution of 3–5 cm−1 and 30 s integration time. To avoid degradation or heat induced physical changes, the power at the laser injection port was limited to 1 mW. Integration times of 30 s were employed and three accumulations were averaged for each spectrum to obtain an adequate signal-to-noise ratio. Spectra were acquired and processed using the Opus 7.0 Raman software.

SEM-EDS

Pigment coated paper fiber samples for SEM-EDS analysis were mounted on aluminum stubs using a carbon adhesive tab and coated with a 10 nm carbon layer. SEM analyses (backscattered electron images and point analyses) were performed with a FE-SEM Zeiss Σigma HD, equipped with an Oxford Instrument X-MaxN 80 SDD detector. EDS microanalyses were run at 20 kV acceleration voltage and a working distance of 8.5 mm. Data were acquired and processed using the AZtec software system, v. 2.2 SP2 (Oxford Instruments).

Results and discussion

The majority of data was initially acquired by using non-destructive techniques, and for all the prints the same analytical approach was followed: XRF was systematically run on all the colored portions of each print, then, according to the elemental composition Raman measurements were acquired on selected areas. Finally, selective sampling was carried out to proceed with SEM-EDS analyses.

XRF

XRF data for green and yellow areas show the presence of arsenic and sulfur with other minor elements, notably iron, due to the paper matrix. The iron concentration seems higher in the green areas, possibly reflecting the use of Prussian blue mixed with the yellow to obtain the green shade.

Micro-Raman spectroscopy

Raman measurements were collected on both green (Fig. 1) and yellow (Fig. 2) areas from all the prints. Spectra resulting from the arsenic containing green- and yellow-colored areas display the same characteristic features across the range of prints examined: a broad band at 329–340 cm−1, with a shoulder at 365 cm−1 (Figs. 1, 2) as well as small bands at 230 and 471 cm−1. Only spectra collected from green areas exhibit an additional band at 2154 cm−1 (Fig. 1), which is the diagnostic band of Prussian blue. The band at 471 cm−1 was detected in all the prints, with variable intensity: this band and the associated bands at 150 and 217 cm−1 are characteristic of sulfur. The broad peak at 329–340 cm−1 and that at 230 cm−1 find a good match with alacranite [22]. No matches with natural orpiment were found [23, 24].

Fig. 1
figure1

Raman Spectra of selected green colored areas. A Print 5, B Print 11, C Print 27

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure2

Raman Spectra obtained from selected yellow colored areas. A Print 3, B Print 4, C Print 19, D Print 7

Full size image

The strong characteristic peaks at 329 and 340 cm−1 may be attributed to the monomer units in the alacranite structure, forming the shoulder at 360 cm−1. The insert in Fig. 1 shows also the characteristic peaks at about 349 and 355 cm−1, which may be assigned to the deformation and cage breath of the monomer As4S4 [22].

SEM-EDS

Backscattered electron images of some fibers taken from the yellow colored areas, display variously shaped and sized particles, scattered on single fibers (Fig. 3). Some particles show an irregular, elongated shape with sharp edges and sizes up to 13 μm (Fig. 3a). Rare particles are very small spheres (Fig. 3b), up to 8 μm in size, perfectly round and smooth. Semi-quantitative EDS microanalyses have been performed on both these particle typologies, and all showed similar compositions, with an average sulfur content of 53.8 ± 3.9 wt% and arsenic of 45.2 ± 3.8 wt%. This composition is consistent with that of arsenic sulfide pigments, with sulfur unusually exceeding the arsenic concentration. Similar compositions have been detected also in the arsenic sulfide pigments used to decorate the Japanese tower in Laeken, Belgium [13]. These results are not consistent with the use of a natural arsenic sulfide (e.g., orpiment), as none of the observed particles did exhibit the foliated structure of natural orpiment and the chemical compositions are non-stoichiometric. It is worth to note that every arsenic sulfide particle is characterized by the presence of copper as minor component. No As2O3 particles have been observed on the selected fibers.

Fig. 3
figure3

Back-scattered Electron image of a yellow colored fiber from Print 2, Kunichika, The actor Kawarazaki Gonjûrô, from the series Shindô Suikoden. a prismatic particle of arsenic sulfide; b spherical arsenic sulfides

Full size image

Discussion

In all the prints from late Edo to Meiji period analyzed in this study, the systematic presence of arsenic and sulfur for the yellow and green colors indicates the use of arsenic sulfide-based pigments. This is consistent with results obtained by Yamato [21].

Micro-Raman spectroscopy showed the presence of alacranite and sulfur in the yellows, with additional Prussian blue added to obtain the green shades. The mixture of arsenic sulfide and Prussian blue explain the higher iron concentration detected by XRF in the green pigments. The broadening of the alacranite bands in the range between 329 and 340 cm−1, indicative of the presence of amorphous arsenic sulfide glass is consistent with the use of synthetic arsenic sulfides as shown by Vermeulen et al. [13]. Likewise, the presence of free sulfur has been interpreted by Vermeulen et al. [13] as due to the dry-process method used to synthesize the pigment. SEM-EDS analyses further strengthen this hypothesis, since the presence of alacranite spherules (Fig. 3b), with non-stoichiometric ratio between arsenic and sulfur, is indicated in literature as the evidence for synthetic arsenic sulfides produced by dry-process rather than a wet-process method [2, 14, 15]. Interestingly, the analyses of the Aizu synthetic arsenic sulfide pigment carried out by Takamatsu in 1878 also show excess free sulfur [25].

The production of arsenic sulfides by sublimation from burning arsenolite and sulfur, dates back to the fourteenth century in Western Europe, but no sources have been found about their production in East Asia. The only reference known, that of Takamatsu in 1878 [25], refers to a possible production of artificial orpiment in Japan in about 1846, by burning arsenical stones with sulfur, in Aizu (in the present Fukushima prefecture). The very low concentration of copper may be explained by the exploitation of arsenic ores related to copper mining, largely attested in Japan [26–28].

Conclusions

The evidence presented in this study demonstrates that synthetic arsenic sulfide pigments were most likely manufactured in Japan in the late Edo period and in the early Meiji period. We show conclusively that this pigment was commonly used in woodblock printing, probably due to its low cost and easy availability. Takamatsu [25] reports “large scale” manufacture of orpiment in the Aizu region in northern Japan, and mentions the use of the pigment for tinting varnishes and painting book covers. No mention is made however of its use for woodblock prints. Takamatsu reports also that manufacture of synthetic orpiment would have started after 1846: while it is tempting to correlate this report with the finding of realgar (likely available and mined in the prefecture of Gunma) in several Edo period prints in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art (results unpublished), a full study of arsenic pigments in Edo period woodblock prints will need to be carried before giving excessive weight to this date.

Finally, Takamatsu’s article also allows us to compare the price of artificial orpiment with that of gamboge, an imported and expensive yellow pigment also traditionally used on woodblock prints. The price of synthetic orpiment is quoted as 42 sen per 1 kin, while that of gamboge is 1.35 yen per 1 kin. At 100 sen to the yen, synthetic orpiment is less than one third the price of gamboge, making it a very attractive pigment for the woodblock printing trade.

References

  1. 1.

    FitzHugh EW. Orpiment and realgar. In: FitzHugh EW, editor. Artists’ pigments: a handbook of their history and characteristics, vol. 3. Washington D.C: National Gallery of Art; 1997. p. 47–79.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Grundmann G, Rötter C. Artificial orpiment: microscopic, diffractometric and chemical characteristics of synthesis products. In: Schuller M, Emmerling E, Nerdinger W, editors. Auripigment-Studien zu dem Mineral und den künstlichen produkten/Orpiment-Studies on the mineral and the artificial products. Materialen aus dem Institut für Baugeschichte, Kunstgeschichte und Restaurierung mit Architekturmuseum der technischen Universität München, Anton Siegl, Fachbuchhandlung GmbH. Munich; 2007. p. 103–66.

  3. 3.

    Bonazzi P, Bindi L, Olmi F, Menchetti S. How many alacranites do exist? A structural study of non-stoichiometric As8S9-x crystals. Eur J Miner. 2003;15(2):283–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bryndzya LT, Kleppa OJ. Standard molar enthalpies of formation of realgar (As4S4) and orpiment (As2S3) by high-temperature direct-synthesis calorimetry. J Chem Thermodyn. 1988;20:755–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Roberts AC, Ansell HG, Bonardi M. Pararealgar, a new polymorph of AsS, from British Columbia. Can Miner. 1980;18:525–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Trentelman K, Stodulski L, Pavlosky M. Characterization of pararealgar and other light-induced transformation products from realgar by Raman microspectroscopy. Anal Chem. 1996;68(10):1755–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bonazzi P, Menchetti S, Pratesi G. The crystal structure of pararealgar, As4S4. Am Miner. 1995;80:400–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rosalie DA, Edwards HGM, Farwell DW, De Faria DLA. Raman spectroscopic analysis of ancient Egyptian pigments. Archaeometry. 2001;43(4):461–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    El Bakkali A, Lamhasni T, Haddad M, Ait Lyazidi S, Sanchez-Cortes S, Puerto Nevado ED. Non-invasive micro Raman, SERS and visible reflectance analyses of coloring materials in ancient Moroccan Islamic manuscripts. J Raman Spectrosc. 2013;44(1):114–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Burgio L, Clark RJ, Muralha VS, Stanley T. Pigment analysis by Raman microscopy of the non-figurative illumination in 16th–18th century Islamic manuscripts. J Raman Spectrosc. 2008;39(10):1482–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Emelina AL, Alikhanian AS, Steblevskii AV, Kolosov EN. Phase diagram of the As-S system. Inorg Mater. 2007;43(2):95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Popova VI, Popov VA, Clark A, Polyakov VO, Borisovski SE. Alacranite As8S9: a new mineral. In: Proceedings of the Russian mineralogical society (ZVMO); 1986. p. 360–68.

  13. 13.

    Vermeulen M, Sanyova J, Janssens K. Identification of artificial orpiment in the interior decorations of the Japanese tower in Laeken, Brussels, Belgium. Herit Sci. 2015;15:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Grundmann G, Richter M. Current research on artificial arsenic sulphide pigments in artworks: a short review. CHIMIA Int J Chem. 2008;62(11):903–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Grundmann G, Ivleva N, Richter M, Stege H, Haisch C. The rediscovery of sublimed arsenic sulphide pigments in painting and polychromy: applications of Raman microspectroscopy. In: Studying old master paintings: technology and practice. The National Gallery Technical Bulletin 30th Anniversary Conference Postprints; 2011. p. 269–76.

  16. 16.

    Merrifield MP. In: Original treatises dating from the XIIth to XVIIIth centuries on the arts of paintings, in oil, miniature, mosaic and on glass. Originally published John Murray, London, 1849. New York: Dover Publications; 1999. p. 78–9.

  17. 17.

    Cennino C. Il libro dell’arte della pittura: il manoscritto della Bibliotheca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze, con integrazioni dal codice riccardiano. Torresi AP, Liberty House, Ferrara; 2004.

  18. 18.

    Wallert A. Orpiment and realgar. Maltechnik-Restauro. 1984;90(4):45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    FitzHugh EW. Pigments in later Japanese paintings. In: Freer Gallery of Art Occasional papers, new Series, Vol 1. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution; 2003. p. 1–56.

  20. 20.

    Winter J. East Asian Paintings Materials. London: Archetype Press; 2008. p. 13–44.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Yamato A. Kôki ukiyo-e hanga ni shiyô sareta shikizai no hensen ni kansuru kenkyû (Studies on changes in the colorants used in later ukiyo-e prints). Japan: MA thesis, Tohoku University of Art and Design; 2013.

  22. 22.

    Pagliai M, Bonazzi P, Bindi L, Muniz-Miranda M, Cardini G. Structural and vibrational properties of arsenic sulfides: Alacranite (As8S9). J Phys Chem A. 2011;115(17):4558–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bell IM, Clark RJ, Gibbs PJ. Raman spectroscopic library of natural and synthetic pigments (pre- ≈1850 AD). Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 1997;53(12):2159–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Burgio L, Clark RJ. Library of FT-Raman spectra of pigments, minerals, pigment media and varnishes, and supplement to existing library of Raman spectra of pigments with visible excitation. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2001;57(7):1491–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Takamatsu T. On Japanese pigments. Tokyo: Department of Science; 1878.

  26. 26.

    Geerts AJC. Useful minerals and metallurgy of the Japanese. Trans Asiat Soc Jpn. 1883;3:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Plunkett FR. Report on the mines of Japan. Jpn Mail. 1876;7(1):74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Matsubara S, Miyawaki R. Pararealgar and alacranite from the Nishinomaki Mine, Gunma Prefecture, Japan. Bull Natn Sci Mus Tokyo. 2005;31:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

The prints selected for analyses were assembled and dated by HDS, II. XRF and Raman data was collected by YL. SEM–EDS analyses were carried out by EB. The manuscript was prepared by YL, EB, and ML. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

YL gratefully acknowledges the support of the Advanced Interdisciplinary Innovation Research Project of Sichuan University (skqy201216).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of History and Culture, Center for Archaeological Science, Sichuan University, 29 Wangjiang Road, Chengdu, 610064, China

    Yanbing Luo

  2. Department of Scientific Research, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1000 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10028, USA

    Elena Basso & Marco Leona

  3. Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, Columbia University, 420 West 118th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA

    Henry D. Smith II

Authors
  1. Yanbing Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elena Basso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Henry D. Smith II
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marco Leona
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Leona.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, Y., Basso, E., Smith, H.D. et al. Synthetic arsenic sulfides in Japanese prints of the Meiji period. Herit Sci 4, 17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-016-0087-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Japanese woodblock prints
  • Synthetic arsenic sulfides
  • Alacranite
  • Micro-Raman spectroscopy
  • Micro-XRF
  • SEM-EDS