Skip to main content

Table 1 Relationship between extraction protocols used and painting techniques hypothesized

From: What do we know of Roman wall painting technique? Potential confounding factors in ancient paint media analysis

Research groupa

Type of work

Provenance

Date

No. of samples

Extractor yield (%) (dried extract/ scraped paint)

Painting technique

References

1

Wall painting

Pompeii

First century AD

2

0.04–0.02 (estimate)

Wheatpaste-based paint

[11]

Wall painting

Liternum, Campania

First century AD

1

0.04–0.02

Wheatpaste-based paint

[12]

Wall painting

Pompeii

Four Pompeian styles third to second century BC to first century AD

4

0.07–0.01

Wheatpaste-based paint

[13, 14]

2

Wall painting

Ampurias, Cartagena, Baelo Claudia

First century BC to second century AD

8

25.58–14.34

Beeswax emulsion

[15]

Wall painting

Mérida

Second century AD

6

No data

Beeswax emulsion

[16]

Complutum

Third century AD

2

Marsala

Third century AD

4

3

Wall painting

Herculaneum

Before 79 AD

4

No data

Egg tempera: 2 samples

Undetermined: 2 samples

[17]

Painted wooden ceiling

Herculaneum

Before 79 AD

17

No data

Egg tempera

[18]

Wall painting

Pylos, Mycenas

Before 1180 BC

23

No data

Egg tempera: 11 samples

Egg + glue tempera: 4 samples

Egg + gum + starch/honey? Tempera: 4 samples

Egg + gum tempera: 1 sample

Animal glue tempera: 1 sample

Undetermined: 2 samples

[19]

Painted alabaster sarcophagus

Tarquinia, Etruria

Fourth century BC

1

No data

Egg tempera

[20]

Wall painting

Sarteano, Etruria

Fourth century BC

9

0.06–0.01

Egg tempera

[21]

4

Wall painting

Herculaneum

No data

11

No data

Fresco

[3]

Wall painting

Pompeii

First century AD

4

No data

Fresco

[23]

  1. aResearch teams sharing members