Heritage Science

Table 6 Showing the percentage success of the databases and algorithms with the default wavelength range used separated out into the different manuscripts’ results

From: Comparing the effectiveness of hyperspectral imaging and Raman spectroscopy: a case study on Armenian manuscripts

Percentage success	Default settings
Database	1			2			3			4			5			Sample size
Algorithm	SFF	SAM	BE	SFF	SAM	BE	SFF	SAM	BE	SFF	SAM	BE	SFF	SAM	BE	Sample size
Total	20	9	13	71	49	37	60	23	22	27	14	18	43	44	44	91 (73 for databases 2 and 3)
MS Arm e34	38	25	13	N/a	N/a	N/a	N/a	N/a	N/a	38	13	0	38	38	25	8
MS Arm d13	10	7	9	68	45	34	55	13	13	32	20	27	49	47	44	59 (56 for databases 2 and 3)
MS Arm d3	100	20	20	100	60	80	100	60	80	0	0	0	0	80	80	5
MS Arm g4	0	0	0	N/a	N/a	N/a	N/a	N/a	N/a	0	0	0	43	29	14	7
MS Arm d22	50	0	50	50	50	0	50	50	25	0	0	0	25	25	50	4
MS Arm c3	29	14	43	100	86	57	86	71	57	43	0	0	43	29	71	7

The difference in sample sizes is due to databases 2 and 3 not being used on some folios from MS Arm D13, MS Arm e34, and MS Arm g4, this is discussed in the text

Back to article page