Skip to main content

Table 2 Parameters of thermal denaturation of collagen in new vegetable tanned leathers and new parchment

From: Micro differential scanning calorimetry and micro hot table method for quantifying deterioration of historical leather

Collagenous material

Tonset/°C

Tmax/°C

H/J g−1

T1/2/°C

\(C_{{p , {\text{max}}}}^{ex}\)/J K−1 g−1

Calf leather

 Chestnut tannina

63.1 (2.1)

66.3 (0.9)

27.7 (2.2)

3.2 (0.1)

6.7 (0.2)

 Mimosa tannina

70.8 (1.0)

75.1 (1.1)

29.5 (2.4)

4.4 (0.2)

5.1 (0.2)

Sheep leather

 Chestnut tannina

66.5 (1.1)

69.1 (1.3)

26.8 (2.2)

2.4 (0.2)

8.6 (0.4)

 Mimosa tannina

70.5 (1.0)

73.6 (1.1)

29.6 (2.4)

3.4 (0.3)

7.3 (0.2)

Goat leather

 Chestnut tannin

66.8 (0.5)

71.7 (1.1)

26.5 (2.5)

2.8 (0.2)

6.9 (0.2)

 Mimosa tannin

76.6 (0.3)

79.6 (1.4)

28.2 (1.5)

2.9 (0.3)

7.2 (0.2)

 Vegetable leather

88.0b

90.0b

21.8b

76.3c

80.1c

11.5c

Parchment

 Calf

53.1 (1.3)

55.8 (1.8)

53.4 (5.0)

5.4 (1.2)

5.8 (1.0)

 Sheep

55.5 (0.6)

57.4 (1.0)

46.4 (2.4)

4.6 (0.4)

5.8 (0.5)

 Goat

55.1 (0.7)

57.6 (1.1)

47.5 (3.1)

3.6 (0.3)

5.6 (0.4)

  1. Literature data for new vegetable leathers are also reported
  2. Calf, sheep and goat leather and parchment were manufactured at INCDTP-ICPI, Bucharest. Uncertainty is the standard deviation. At least three measurements with fresh samples were performed for each leather/parchment type
  3. Literature data [15, 16] were obtained by performing DSC measurements at the rate of 10 °C min−1
  4. aRef. [29]; bRef. [15]; cRef. [16]