Skip to main content

Table 2 Traditional methods used by cultural heritage institutions for identification of photographic plastic film bases

From: Rapid identification of cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate film in historic photograph collections

 

Cellulose nitrate

Cellulose acetate

Polyester

Evaluation of technique

Contextual information

 

Non-invasive

No WHS Concerns

Not always available

 Date [6]

?

?

?

Requires verification: periods of use overlap.

Visual examination

 

Non-invasive

No WHS Concerns

Physical characteristics not always present

 Edge printing [6]

Nitrate’

Safety’

‘Estar’

‘Cronar’

Requires verification: film duplication (for example from nitrate to polyester) can include previous edge printing

 Notches [47]

x

Usually ‘V’

x

Usually ‘U’

?

Requires verification: different manufacturers used notches to mean different things

 Deterioration [48]

?

?

x

Requires verification: some deterioration is common to both

 Polarisation test [48]

x

x

Shows interference colours

Only identifies polyester

Requires verification: does not distinguish between cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate

Chemical testing

 

Invasive & destructive (requires sample)

WHS concerns (solvents or by products)

 Float test [48]

Requires verification: results can be difficult to interpret, since there are many different types of cellulose nitrate and acetate manufactured, and deteriorated film behaves diversely

 Diphenylamine spot test [49]

x

x

Requires verification: cellulose acetate and polyester sometimes have a subbing layer of cellulose nitrate —can create a false positive.

 Burn test [48]

x

x

Requires safety measures: must be performed outdoors, requires bucket of water, and is generally no longer conducted