Index | Content | Grading (select one box per row) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\({c}_{1}\) | Importance degree (100) | \({x}_{11}\) | Cultural relics level (25) | Ungraded (0–5) | County (6–10) | Municipal (11–15) | Provincial (16–20) | National (21–25) |
\({x}_{12}\) | Historic value (25) | Very low (0–5) | Low (6–10) | Average (11–15) | High (16–20) | Very high (21–25) | ||
\(x_{13}\) | Artistic value (25) | Very low (0–5) | Low (6–10) | Average (11–15) | High (16–20) | Very high (21–25) | ||
\(x_{14}\) | Scientific value (25) | Very low (0–5) | Low (6–10) | Average (11–15) | High (16–20) | Very high (21–25) | ||
\(c_{2}\) | Geometric character (100) | \(x_{21}\) | Height (25) |  < 5 m (0–5) | 5–10 m (6–10) | 10–15 m (11–15) | 15–25 m (16–20) |  > 25 m (21–25) |
\(x_{22}\) | Length–width ratio (25) | 1.0–1.5 (0–5) | 1.5–2.5 (6–10) | 2.5–3.5 (11–15) | 3.5–4.5 (16–20) |  > 4.5 (21–25) | ||
\(x_{23}\) | Length–height ratio (25) |  > 5.0 (0–5) | 3.0–5.0 (6–10) | 1.0–3.0 (11–15) | 0.5–1.0 (16–20) |  < 0.5 (21–25) | ||
\(x_{24}\) | height–width ratio (25) |  < 0.5 (0–5) | 0.5–1.0 (6–10) | 1.0–1.5 (11–15) | 1.5–2.0 (16–20) | 2.0–2.5 (21–25) | ||
\(c_{3}\) | Structure type (100) | \(x_{31}\) | Upper structure (50) | Wooden structure (0–10) | Brick/stone mix structure (11–20) | Concrete structure (21–30) | Frame/bent structure (31–40) | Reinforced concrete structure (41–50) |
\(x_{32}\) | Foundation (50) | No foundation or unknown (0–10) | Brick / rubble foundation (11–20) | Plain concrete foundation (21–30) | Reinforced concrete foundation (31–40) | Pile foundation (41–50) | ||
\(c_{4}\) | Deterioration degree (100) | \(x_{41}\) | Deterioration (25) | No obvious degradation (0–5) | Slight local degradation (6–10) | Significant local degradation (11–15) | Serious local degradation (16–20) | Serious degradation (21–25) |
\(x_{42}\) | Weathering (25) |  ≤ 5% (0–5) | 5%–10% (6–10) | 10%–15% (11–15) | 15%–20% (16–20) |  ≥ 20% (21–25) | ||
\(x_{43}\) | Damage (25) |  ≤ 1% (0–5) |  ≤ 10% (6–10) | 10%–30% (11–15) | 30%–50% (16–20) |  ≥ 50% (21–25) | ||
\(x_{44}\) | Crack width (25) | 0 (0–5) |  ≤ 0.1 mm (6–10) | 0.1–0.3 mm (11–15) | 0.3–0.5 mm (16–20) |  ≥ 0.5 mm (21–25) | ||
\(c_{13}\) | Monitoring measurements (100) | \(x_{131}\) | Monitoring frequency (30) | 1 time/ 3–5 days or no monitoring (0–6) | 1–2 times / 1 day (7–12) | 3–5 times / 1 day (13–18) | 1 time / 2–5 h (19–24) | 1–5 times / 1 h (25–30) |
\(x_{132}\) | Monitoring precision (30) | Manual monitoring, very low (0–6) | Manual monitoring, low (7–12) | Manual monitoring, average (13–18) | Automated monitoring high (19–24) | Automated monitoring, very high (25–30) | ||
\(x_{133}\) | Measuring point (40) | Very lack (0–8) | Lack (9–16) | Average (17–24) | Dense (25–32) | Very dense (33–40) | ||
\(c_{14}\) | Management system (100) | \(x_{141}\) | Management system (25) | Worst (0–5) | Poor (6–10) | Average (11–15) | Good (16–20) | Perfect (21–25) |
\(x_{142}\) | Management personnel (25) | Worst (0–5) | Poor (6–10) | Average (11–15) | Good (16–20) | Perfect (21–25) | ||
\(x_{143}\) | Responsibility division (25) | Worst (0–5) | Poor (6–10) | Average (11–15) | Good (16–20) | Perfect (21–25) | ||
\(x_{144}\) | Management level (25) | Very low (0–5) | LOW (6–10) | Average (11–15) | High (16–20) | Very high (21–25) | ||
\(c_{15}\) | Contingency plan (100) | \(x_{151}\) | Emergency plan (50) | Worst (0–10) | Poor (11–20) | Average (21–30) | Good (31–40) | Ideal (41–50) |
\(x_{152}\) | Early warning response (50) | Very slow (0–10) | Slow (11–20) | Average (21–30) | Fast (31–40) | Very fast (41–50) | ||
\(c_{16}\) | Monitoring engineer (100) | \(x_{161}\) | Professional level (50) | Very low (0–10) | Low (11–20) | Average (21–30) | High (31–40) | Very high (41–50) |
\(x_{162}\) | Practical experience (50) | very low (0–10) | low (11–20) | average (21–30) | high (31–40) | very high (41–50) |