Safety risk assessment of heritage buildings in metro construction based on SPA theory: a case study in Zhengzhou, China

Heritage Science

Table 6 Values of 16 evaluation indexes

Index	\({\varvec{c}}_{1}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{2}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{3}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{4}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{5}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{6}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{7}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{8}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{9}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{10}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{11}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{12}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{13}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{14}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{15}\)	\({\varvec{c}}_{16}\)
− 25 m	83	75	78	23	20.9	25	6.2	–	19	4.6	0.33	1.06	81	92	63	51
− 20 m	83	75	78	23	20.82	20	6.2	–	18	5.5	0.29	1.06	81	92	63	51
− 15 m	83	75	78	23	20.77	15	6.2	–	19	5.3	0.33	1.05	81	92	63	51
− 10 m	83	75	78	23	20.68	10	6.2	–	18	5.9	0.28	1.05	81	92	63	51
− 6 m	83	75	78	23	20.57	6	6.2	–	18	6.3	0.28	1.27	81	92	63	51
3 m	83	75	78	23	20.5	3	6.2	–	19	5.1	0.26	1.31	81	92	63	51
6 m	83	75	78	23	20.42	6	6.2	–	18	6.1	0.28	1.28	81	92	63	51
10 m	83	75	78	23	20.3	10	6.2	–	18	5.9	0.30	1.18	81	92	63	51
15 m	83	75	78	23	20.23	15	6.2	–	18	4.2	0.32	1.12	81	92	63	51
20 m	83	75	78	23	20.18	20	6.2	–	18	5.5	0.29	1.11	81	92	63	51
25 m	83	75	78	23	20.1	25	6.2	–	19	4.5	0.34	1.05	81	92	63	51