Table 8 The degree to which compatible values can fulfill the model metadata profile for each whole metadata profile (source: own work)
From: Evaluation of metadata describing topographic maps in a National Library
Item (k) | Metadata element | Weight (wk) | mck | Eak |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Type of content | 1.0 | 35,090 (100%) | 1.00 |
2. | Date range | 1.0 | 35,090 (100%) | 1.00 |
3. | Subject/keywords | 1.0 | 18,285 (52%) | 0.52 |
4. | Rights | 1.0 | 35,090 (100%) | 1.00 |
5. | Language | 1.0 | 35,069 (100%) | 1.00 |
6. | Date | 1.0 | 35,071 (100%) | 1.00 |
7. | Distribution format | 0.0 | 0 (0%) | 0.00 |
8. | Geographic location | 0.8 | 28,891 (82%) | 0.66 |
9. | Scale of map | 0.8 | 34,690 (99%) | 0.79 |
10. | Reference system | 0.5 | 32,271 (92%) | 0.46 |
11. | Mapping methods | 0.5 | 33,209 (95%) | 0.47 |
12. | Map format | 0.5 | 34,375 (98%) | 0.49 |
13. | Source materials used to develop the map | 0.5 | 7512 (21%) | 0.11 |
Ea = | 8.50 | |||