Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison results of virtual imaging restoration and other methods

From: In situ virtual restoration of artifacts by imaging technology

Restoration methods

Visiting experience

Authenticity

Reversibility

Discernibility

Economy

Scope of application

Physical restoration

+

6

+

8

+

8

+

8

+

7

+

4

–

3

–

2

–

3

–

2

–

3

–

4

â—‹

3

â—‹

2

â—‹

1

â—‹

2

â—‹

2

â—‹

4

Digital restoration

+

9

+

4

+

7

+

7

+

6

+

5

–

0

–

2

–

0

–

0

–

5

–

4

â—‹

3

â—‹

6

â—‹

5

â—‹

5

â—‹

1

â—‹

3

Digital projection restoration

+

7

+

4

+

6

+

6

+

5

+

5

–

0

–

4

–

0

–

0

–

2

–

3

â—‹

5

â—‹

4

â—‹

6

â—‹

6

â—‹

5

â—‹

4

Patterns restoration

+

11

+

7

+

9

+

9

+

6

+

4

–

0

–

2

–

0

–

0

–

4

–

2

â—‹

1

â—‹

3

â—‹

3

â—‹

3

â—‹

2

â—‹

6

AR restoration

+

5

+

3

+

4

+

6

+

7

+

3

–

3

–

1

–

1

–

1

–

2

–

5

â—‹

4

â—‹

8

â—‹

7

â—‹

5

â—‹

3

â—‹

4

  1. The numbers represent the number of people
  2. + virtual imaging restoration is better than the compared method
  3. – virtual imaging restoration is worse than the compared method
  4. â—‹ the two methods are equivalent or incomparable