Table 1 Comparison of passive samplers of various configurations in regards to the geometry, sampling reagent, sampling rate and LOD (for the recommended sampling period)
From: Validation of passive samplers for monitoring of acetic and formic acid in museum environments
Name | Geometry | Reagent | Sampling rate (ml/min) | LOD (\({\upmu }\hbox {g/m}^3\)) | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Palmes diffusion tube | Tube, \(l={7.1}\,\hbox {cm}\), \(d={1.1}\,\hbox {cm}\) | 1 M KOH, 10% v/v glycerine | AcOH: 44, HCOOH: 13 | [11] | |
SPME | AcOH: 5.3, HCOOH: 28.9 | [35] | |||
SKC diffusive sampler | Coconut charcoal | AcOH: 19.6 | AcOH: 10 | [9] | |
Diffusive sampler | Badge, \(h={7}\,\hbox {mm}\), \(d={55}\,\hbox {mm}\) | 10% TEA, 5% glycerine | AcOH: 3.7, HCOOH: 3.2 | [36] | |
Radiello | radial diff. sampler, \(h={6}\,\hbox {cm}\), \(d={5.8}\,\hbox {mm}\) | Wet TEA | AcOH: 97±3, HCOOH: 91±4 – 112±3 | AcOH: 0.4, HCOOH: 0.2 | [10] |
NILU passive sampler | Badge | Alkaline solution impregnated filter | Both 0.5 | [12] | |
IVL passive sampler | Badge, \(h={13}\,\hbox {mm}\), \(d={25}\,\hbox {mm}\) | Impregnated membrane | AcOH: 4, HCOOH: 1.5 |