Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of accuracies under different algorithms

From: Ancient mural classification methods based on a multichannel separable network

 

Reference [12]

Reference [13]

Reference [14]

GoogLeNet

VGG

MCSN

Animals

65.63%/75.89%/65.13%

64.16%/73.56%/66.22%

66.61%/75.61%/60.61%

67.34%/67.34%/67.34%

70.63%/67.34%/67.34%

75.16%/82.16%/75.16%

Buildings

61.13%/72.54%/64.28%

63.51%/79.98%/73.24%

64.55%/77.45%/68.35%

65.98%/74.26%/68.33%

66.31%/68.43%/64.25%

69.45%/75.35%/70.24%

Clouds

68.24%/85.69%/76.22%

70.24%/84.67%/72.67%

70.36%/88.69%/74.65%

72.35%/84.34%/73.25%

74.64%/84.01%/72.59%

77.38%/90.36%/79.31%

Disciples

63.35%/88.54%/70.13%

69.41%/84.68%/74.61%

66.63%/87.19%/74.04%

62.31%/78.83%/76.21%

65.56%/77.21%/71.06%

70.33%/81.03%/78.61%

fo

61.34%/79.24%/76.13%

64.98%/82.44%/72.14%

67.15%/89.36%/77.24%

69.21%/86.54%/74.48%

64.58%/78.87%/71.69%

73.25%/87.36%/76.39%

People

62.33%/75.33%/66.16%

67.27%/81.49%/72.46%

67.20%/84.31%/71.89%

70.16%/81.59%/72.31%

69.24%/79.21%/71.59%

69.07%/78.82%/75.56%

Plants

67.19%/83.16%/69.35%

65.18%/75.84%/67.94%

68.85%/82.16%/69.71%

68.21%/82.41%/69.61%

61.55%/72.46%/69.21%

70.22%/86.66%/73.21%

pusa

69.99%/87.25%/76.41%

66.64%/89.66%/71.97%

71.45%/79.97%/74.69%

66.29%/83.46%/71.24%

67.15%/70.05%/67.16%

68.11%/91.00%/73.21%