Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the computional time of different algorithms

From: Automatic calibration of crack and flaking diseases in ancient temple murals

Mural

Size

Times/s

Cao and Li [12]

Jaidilert and Farooque [13]

Zhang and Xu [16]

Ours

The third row of Fig.10a

648 \(\times\) 723

431.388

9.877

79.451

7.410

The fourth row of Fig.11a

648 \(\times\) 723

430.957

28.737

77.674

18.989

The second row of Fig.12a

838 \(\times\) 828

156.412

4.198

141.060

4.051

The first row of Fig.13b

350 \(\times\) 350

6.561

1.840

27.358

1.631

The first row of Fig.15a

648 \(\times\) 723

183.981

12.590

63.401

9.837

The fourth row of Fig.15a

793 \(\times\) 799

156.940

11.003

141.034

10.310

  1. The bold value in the table represents the optimal values.