Skip to main content

Table 7 Rotated Component Matrix and Component Loadings for Rotated loadings of Factors (N = 198)

From: Practices and challenges of cultural heritage conservation in historical and religious heritage sites: evidence from North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia

Items

Component loadings

Commonality

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

X1. There is no regular monitoring and evaluation of cultural heritage status by the concerned body (mean = 3.58)

0.671

      

0.570

X2. The growth of vegetation over the heritage is the challenge of heritage (mean = 3.36)

0.668

      

0.553

X3. Funding agencies lack the willingness to provide aid and loans to cultural heritage (mean = 4.33)

0.664

      

0.570

X4. The heritage is challenged by biological factors such as rats & other biological organisms (mean = 3.60)

0.626

    

0.418

 

0.587

X5. The media failed to expose the problems of heritage to the community in time (mean = 3.60)

0.571

 

0.423

    

0.564

X6. The heritage hosts more than its carrying capacity during different events (mean = 2.88)

0.571

      

0.598

X7. Travel agents and tour operators are negligent to the sustainability of heritage (mean = 2.86)

0.485

      

0.494

X8. Population growth & settlement programs have impacts on the cultural heritage of the area (mean = 4.53)

 

0.742

     

0.621

X9. There is a conflict of interest among stakeholders to safeguard the cultural heritage (mean = 4.42)

 

0.710

     

0.611

X10. There is a practices of heritage conservation without the involvement of professional (mean = 4.72)

 

0.576

     

0.609

X11. Little concern of government and local authorities about the heritage in your area (mean = 3.46)

  

0.811

    

0.735

X12. Professionals lack enough commitment to engage in conservation practices (mean = 3.30)

  

0.773

    

0.704

X13. The community aren’t concerned about the cultural heritage (mean = 2.38)

   

0.724

   

0.623

X14. The cultural heritage of the area are not promoted for sustainable tourism development (mean = 3.12)

   

0.660

   

0.593

X15. There is the practice of illicit trafficking of cultural objects (mean = 2.93)

   

0.518

   

0.0619

X16. Lack of buffer zone around heritage sites (mean = 3.04)

    

0.682

  

0.623

X17. Inappropriate conservation practices of cultural heritage (mean = 3.26)

    

− 0.613

  

0.454

X18. Practice of farming around the heritage (mean = 3.40)

     

0.750

 

0.744

X19. Natural catastrophes and climate variations (flooding, frost, temperature) deteriorate cultural heritage (mean = 3.68)

     

0.573

 

0.574

X20. The community have no positive attitude towards cultural heritage (mean = 2.71)

      

0.832

0.784

Eigenvalues

4.742

2.028

1.597

1.389

1.239

1.095

1.003

% of Variance

14.726

9.412

8.808

7.503

7.222

6.509

5.325

  1. Values greater than 0.45 were considered while extracting the factors and written in bold along with their corresponding factor in the same column. Source: Filed Survey, 2021