Table 3 Analysis of designer responses
Category/ Entries | Summary of question answers | Consistent perspective | Individual perspective |
|---|---|---|---|
Common Questions | Q1: B1- Yes, but only a limited amount B2- Yes, but it is more of a suggestion for the management of the event, with very little reference to the design B3- Ibid Q2: B1- Types of cultural information that will impressive B2- Impressed and repulsed scenes B3- Scenes considered to be inadequately performed Q3: B1- Expected: Comments that PJM has restored a historical scene or character he had in mind Concerns: There are errors of historical rigor in the details B2- Ibid B3- Expected: Deepening visitors’ impressions and knowledge of the heritage sites Concerns: Visitors do not have enough patience to see the whole content Q4: B1- Great, is enough to change the stereotype of a visitor to a specific cultural heritage B2- Ibid B3- Ibid Q5: B1- Advantages: Distinguishes itself from traditional sightseeing and is more innovative and attractive Disadvantages: Needs constant updating of PJM content, but design ideas can easily be repeated B2- Ibid B3- Ibid Q6: B1- I refer it to my family, but only involved in the PJM rehearsal process B2- I recommended it to my family and friends, but only experienced the part I designed B3- Ibid | Q1: Yes, but returns are limited in amount and rarely design referenced Q2: Impressive scenes and cultural elements for visitors Q3: Expected: Restored historical scenes or tasks that visitors have in mind Concerns: Errors in historical detail Q4: Great, changing stereotypical image of tourism in heritage sites Q5: Novel approach to sightseeing that is different from the traditional ways, but the innovative ideas are repeated often Q6: Had referred to family and friends but only engaged in part of the experience personally | Q1: None Q2: Scenes of visitor dissatisfaction Q3: Worried that visitors will not have the patience to see the whole content Q4: None Q5: None Q6: None |
Designer-only questions | Q9: B1- Teams frequently omit presenting cultural content and instead show special effects in order to avoid presenting the incorrect intellectual information B2- PJM content updates lack reference to visitor feedback and innovation is limited B3- Ibid Q10: B1- Lack of understanding of the content, suggestions for the style of demonstration, the most impressive scenes B2- Ibid B3- Reasons not to recommend to others, the most impressive scenes | Q9: Lack of reference to visitor feedback and limited innovation Q10: Negative comments on the content and form of the demonstration, and the most impressive scenes | Q9: Reduced cultural content demonstration to avoid historical misinformation Q10: Reasons for not referring to others |