Table 6 Comparison between the theoretical dating of the constructions, and that obtained after analysis by the AHC classification technique
Samples | Groups obtained after AHC analysis (Fig. 6)a | Groups controlled by petrographic study and new proposal dating | |
---|---|---|---|
HFO1 | 1st c | 1st c | |
HFO2 | 1st c | 1st c | |
HFO3 | 1st c | 1st c | |
HB1 | 4–5th c | 4–5th c | |
HB2 | 4–5th c | 4–5th c | |
HB3 | 4–5th c | 4–5th c | |
HFG1 | End 2th c | 1st c | |
HG1 | (?) | 1st c | |
HG2 | (?) | 1st c | |
HG3 | (?) | 1st c | |
HT1 | 3rd c | 4–5th c | |
HT2 | 3rd c | 4–5th c | |
HT3 | 3rd c | 4–5th c | |
HT4 | 3rd c | 4–5th c | |
HM1 | 2nd c | 2nd c | |
HM2 | 2nd c | 2nd c | |
HM3 | 2nd c | 2nd c | |
HTR1 | 2nd c | 2nd c | |
HTR2 | 2nd c | 2nd c | |
HTR3 | 2nd c | 2nd c |