Skip to main content

Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of the Ming Great Wall

Abstract

The Great Wall during the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644) was the most prominent engineering volume and the most perfect military defense structure in the history of China. By combining traditional historical textual research, site surveys, and GIS database analysis, this paper reveals the Ming Great Wall’s spatial and temporal distribution characteristics and the immediate causes of their formation are discussed in the nine military districts of the frontier. The results show that: (1) The general rule of the Ming Great Wall was to set up military forts, passes, piers, and other related defensive facilities before constructing the continuous wall. (2) The Great Wall spatial and temporal distribution of the phases is relatively apparent, divided into five construction phases in the Ming Dynasty (1368–1620): Hongwu to Xuande (1368–1435), unbuilt the wall; Zhengtong to Tianshun (1436–1464), the consecutive wall appeared; Chenghua to Zhengde (1465–1521), the first construction climax of the Great Wall; Jiajing period (1522–1566), the second construction climax of the Great Wall; Longqing to Wanli (1567–1620), the completion of the whole line of the Great Wall.(3)The warfare and defense posture was the immediate factor that prompted the construction of the Great Wall between the Ming Dynasty and Mongolia. This study has some reference significance for restoring the integrity and authenticity of the Ming Great Wall, and contribute to the preservation of the cultural heritage of.

Introduction

The Great Wall of China is an ancient military defense project with the longest cumulative construction time in the world [1].In the history of China, more than 20 vassal states and dynasties built the “Great Wall” along their frontiers to safeguard their territories. The Great Wall built during the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644) is China's most representative World Heritage Site.

The Great Wall was widely distributed along the northern borderland of ancient China in Ming Dynasty. The government of the Ming Empire (1368–1644) constructed successively and managed a substantial defensive work on its north borderland called “Nine Military Districts of the Frontier” (九边重镇 JiuBian Zhongzhen) from the eastern Liaodong Town to the western Gansu Town.In the Ming Dynasty, the Great Wall was often called the “frontier wall,” closely related to China’s severe northern military defense situation. For the government, the frontier defense was essential. The “frontier wall” undertakes the organization of small-scale invasion, the transmission of warning information, and daily observation.

O Lattimore comprehensively discusses the origin [2], formation, and role of the Great Wall of China's frontier from the perspective of the social sciences, and proposes the term “Great Wall frontier”(the Chinese version was first published in 2008) [3]. Through field research, the scholars detailed the location of the Great Wall along the route, the general direction, and the relevant remains in Ming Dynasty (1988) [4]. AN Waldron have pointed out that the existing Great Wall of China is basically the Great Wall of Ming Dynasty, and the direct historical reason for its construction is considered to be the Ming Dynasty’s political and military policy turn in the sixteenth century(1992) [5]. The application of remote sensing technology [6,7,8,9], UAV photogrammetry [10,11,12], and 3D point cloud [13,14,15,16] in architectural heritage has provided a certain degree of technical reflerence for the measuremente and visualization of the Great Wall heritage [17,18,19]. Lovell told the story of the Great Wall as she shows how China was shaped over the course of 2000 years by interactions with Central Asia and the peoples of the steppe (2007) [20]. The structure of the Great Wall at Yansui Town in 1474 is referred to as the “frontier wall age”, which reveals that the Ming dynasty’s system of frontier defense shifted from the construction of forts to the Great Wall (2009) [21]. Scholar A Jing generalized the historical process of the construction of the Great Wall of China through the ages (2015) [22]. The School of Architecture of Tianjin University utilizes the GIS spatial digital humanities method. The research group has spent twenty years on the integral research on the Ming Great Wall from 2003 to 2023 [23, 24].

Studies have also been conducted on some critical sections of the Ming Great Wall. Five typical study cases illustrate the spatial and temporal evolution of the wall section of Liaodong Town (1989) [25], Yansui Town, Ningxia Town, Guyuan Town, and Gansu Town (2017) [26]. Scholars Y Du et al. analyzed the architectural form (2021) [27], distribution characteristics (2017) [28] and surrounding environment (2019) [29] of the Ming Great Wall site in Qinghai Province. Scholars Y Cao et al expand a new vision of the relationship between the Ming Great Wall and military defense settlements through the fractal structur e (2018) [30]. Some researches focus on a typical section of the Ming Great Wall, studying the layout [31], spatial distribution and integration [32], and so on.

The above research results are similar to the object of this paper, and the perspective of their presentation is an essential source of guidance for the study. However, most focus on qualitative research, which is not conducive to accurately presenting objective facts and needs a more scientific nature of quantitative analysis [33]. The spatial and temporal layout characteristics of the Ming Great Wall still need to be improved.

Research aims

The formation and development of the Ming Great Wall did not happen overnight; it was a dynamic, giant project. The study uses ArcGIS Pro digital humanities spatial visualization, combined with relevant documents to quantify the construction length of the Great Wall at different stages in the Ming Dynasty and tries to explore the Great Wall's spatial and temporal distribution characteristics. Through this perspective and method, we can reduce the subjectivity of perception of the Great Wall and provide a reference for promoting the integrity and protection of the Great Wall's large-scale heritage.

Materials and methods

Study area

The Ming Great Wall is distributed in the northern regions of China, stretching along 156 counties in ten provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) from east to west, including Liaoning, Hebei, Tianjin, Beijing, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Ningxia, Gansu, and Qinghai. There are the Yellow River, Haihe River, Luanhe River, Huaihe River, Liao River, and other vital rivers distributed among them.

According to the results of China's Great Wall Resources Survey in 2007, The total length of the Ming Great Wall is 8,851.8 km, of which the length of artificial walls is 6,259.6 km, the length of trenches is 359.7 km, and the size of natural hazards is 2, 232.5 km [34]. The Ming Great Wall starts from Hushan Mountain in Liaoning Province, and the Hushan Great Wall is the starting point of the eastern, with the coordinates 124°30′50″E, 40°13′19″N. From Gansu Jiayuguan in the west, the Yidun Great Wall is the western endpoint with the coordinates of 98°11′57″E, 39°44′36″N. It should be indicated that the study area excludes Zhenbao Town, Chang Town, and the Wall of Qinghai, where the total length of the study is 7,894.17km (Fig. 1).

Fig.1
figure 1

Study area

The so-called “JiuBian Zhongzhen” (九边重镇) were nine major frontier defense regions at the core of the Ming Dynasty in northern China. The resident military troops in each defense zone defined their jurisdictions based on the principle of territorial defense. The nine towns along the Great Wall were initially established as Liaodong Town, Xuanfu Town, Datong Town, and Yansui Town, followed by Ningxia Town, Gansu Town, and Jizhou Towns. Then, Shanxi Town and Shaanxi Town were added. From east to west are Liaodong Town, Jizhou Town, Xuanfu Town, Datong Town, Shanxi Town, Yansui Town, Ningxia Town, Guyuan Town and Gansu Town. Later, to strengthen the defense of the capital and the imperial tombs, the addition of Zhenbao Town and Chang Town formed eleven military towns of military defense pattern [35].

Data sources

According to the research needs, the essential databases established include: (1)The construction period of the Great Wall in the Ming Dynasty is mainly derived from official books, anthologies, local chronicles, and related maps. Modern books come from the “Ming Dynasty Great Wall Resource Survey Report”issued by provinces along the Great Wall of China and related publications. (2) The spatial data of the Ming Great Wall obtained by the Key Laboratory of the Department of Culture and Tourism of Information Technology of Architectural Heritage Inheritance at Tianjin University, based on field research and a literature search. (3) A DEM (Digital Elevation Model) was obtained by a spatial data cloud platform built by the Science Data Center of the Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Method

Fieldwork and data practice

Compared with a single architectural heritage, the Ming Great Wall is huge in scale, meandering and complex in terrain. It is very difficult to achieve the measurement and digitization of the whole line of the Ming Great Wall. Therefore, for over two years, since 2019, we have conducted external aerial surveys of the Ming Great Wall.

More than 2 million photographs were taken using a drone for three flight paths and multi-angle views, with the overlap rate of adjacent pictures up to 70% and the average resolution at the centimeter level (Fig. 2) [23].The image data alone is nearly 800,000 photos, allowing artificial intelligence to identify, retrieve, and compare images with a storage capacity of almost 8T. The group completed a close photographic survey of 5500 km of the artificial walls and obtained much first-hand data. For the first time, the whole line of the Great Wall was realized without blind spots and high-definition 3D digitization, establishing “the imagery and 3D database of the entire line of the Ming Great Wall” [36].

Fig.2
figure 2

Schematic diagram of three drone routes for UAV photographing the Ming Great Wall

By combing the relevant materials on the basic construction of the Ming Great Wall, this paper uses ArcGIS Pro software digital humanities visualization technology to organize the construction information of the wall segments into the database [37].“Field”in ArcGIS Pro includes the construction section, construction start and end points, construction time, construction personnel, and construction length. Thus, it can realize the free access to the historical information and geographic data of the Ming Great Wall.

Positioning geographic coordinate of the Ming Great Wall

According to the relevant information collation, we divided the positioning of the starting and ending point data of the wall of the Ming Great Wall into the following four conditions:

  1. 1.

    Mainly from the GPS location data of the fieldwork, we determined the geographic coordinates of the starting and ending points of the Great Wall section built simultaneously and in the same military town.

  2. 2.

    Since most of the starting and ending points described are military ports (or beacon towers) along the Great Wall in the historical documents. We can combine the distance and direction between the military settlement and the Great Wall and deduce the coordinates of the starting and ending points of the Great Wall section to mark them in ArcGIS Pro. For example, the Great Wall of Shanxi Town was built from Yajiaodun to Laoniuwan in 1466 the coordinates of Yajiaodun are 111.208°E, 39.230°N, and the coordinates of Laoniuwan are 111.873°E, 39.607°N [40]. By analogy, the starting and ending points of the construction sections of the Ming Great Wall can be completely determined. We try to find different clues and historical sources to verify each other for the same Great Wall section.

  3. 3.

    In the relevant works (monographs, journals and conferences, dissertations, etc.) of modern scholars, some of them have examined and researched the Great Wall sections built by some military towns [25, 26].

  4. 4.

    If it is impossible to determine the Great Wall's exact starting and ending points, it will not be counted in the marking scope.

Spatial and temporal visualization of the Ming Great Wall

Based on the above conditions, the ArcGIS Pro calibrates the sections recorded in the historical names with modern geographical locations. The starting and ending spots of wall sections in the same period and the same military town are marked with spatial information to determine the coordinates accurately. Then, according to these coordinates, multiple distributed walls were selected and merged, thus forming a complete wall section.

It should be emphasized that the units of wall construction length recorded in historical documents need to be standardized. It is often used for “miles”, “feet”, “steps”, and so on, and most of them are approximate (“about”, “remainder”, and so on).To more accurately calculate the length of the walls, the paper will be divided into the following three situations for conversion:

  1. 1.

    The wall segments described by the miles need to be calculated according to the number of miles in the Ming Dynasty, that is, 1 mile = 572.4 m.

  2. 2.

    The wall segments described by the feet need to be calculated according to the unit of measure in the Ming Dynasty, that is, 1 step = 5 feet, 1 foot = 0.319 m [38].

  3. 3.

    For wall segments that do not have a documented length but only a start and end point, calculate the wall length using the “Calculate Geometry” command in the property sheet of the ArcGIS Pro software. The unit is “m”.(The results are shown in Table 2 to Table 4.)

By quantifying the construction length of each wall section through the above method, the specific segments constructed were inferred at successive periods during the Ming Dynasty. The error is minimized as much as possible to improve the visualization and digitization practice of the whole line of the Ming Great Wall. (Fig. 3).

Fig.3
figure 3

The logical framework

Results

Based on the historical documents, the research results of the previous researchers, and “the imagery and 3D database of the entire line of the Ming Great Wall”, the construction of the Great Wall was statistically determined (Table 1). The construction of the Great Wall can be divided into five phases: Hongwu to Xuande period (1368–1435), the period of no extended wall, mainly to build passes and set up fire beacon towers; Zhengtong to Tianshun (1436–1464): the presence of the Great Wall; Chenghua to Zhengde (1465–1521): the first large-scale construction; Jiajing (1522–1566): the climax of the construction; Longqing to Wanli (1567–1620): the completion of the construction of the whole line.

Table 1 The Ming Great Wall construction statistics (chronological)

Hong-wu to Xuan-De in the Ming Dynasty (1368–1435)

During the period from Hong-wu to Xuan-de (1368–1435), the defensive boundary was not the continuous wall between the Ming Dynasty and the Mongolian tribes. Instead, military forts and significant passes were used to defend against the Mongolian troops, which formed a preliminary Ming Great Wall defense system from east to west along the Chinese northern frontier. A series of 453 military forts (including passes) were constructed in nine frontier military districts, constituting the general military defense path.Footnote 1 Also, the Ming Dynasty government constructed the beacon tower [39] to defend against the Mongolian army during this period. According to official historical records, more than 130 smoke piers were constructed along the Ming Great Wall. However, now there are no survivors (Fig. 4, Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Distribution of military forts in the nine military districts of the frontier in 1368–1435

Fig. 5
figure 5

The related military defensive facilities along the Ming Great Wall. Three-dimensional point cloud model of Jiayuguan Pass (嘉峪关). Three-dimensional point cloud model of the current condition and restoration of the beacon tower. Physical photograph of typical military forts along the Ming Great Wall

Zhengtong to Tianshun period in Ming Dynasty (1436–1464)

Liaodong Town was the first to construct the wall, marking the beginning of the Great Wall in the Ming dynasty from 1437 to 1442 [40]. The length of construction is 869.45km, accounting for 71.34% of the whole wall in Liaodong Town. The project is divided into two sections. The first section from Haizhouwei (海洲卫) to Shenyang Zhongwei (沈阳中卫) was constructed in 1437. This section is the earliest Great Wall project in the Ming Dynasty, with a length of 157.640km. The second section starts from ShanhaiGuan Pass to Kaiyuan in 1442, with a length of 711.811km, connected to the wall built in 1437 (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Construction of the Great Wall from 1436 to 1464 in the Ming Dynasty

During the period from Jingtai to Tianshun period (1450–1464), due to the shorter time, coupled with the influence of the “Tumu Fort Change” (土木堡之变),Footnote 2 the Ming dynasty regime alternation was frequent. Therefore, there is no time to consider the wall's construction.

Chenghua to Zhengde period in Ming Dynasty (1465–1521)

The period from Chenghua to Zhengde (1465–1521) was the first climax of the Great Wall construction in the Ming Dynasty. Large-scale wall construction was thoroughly carried out in the nine military districts of the frontier, which extended to a length of 5,415.87 km The construction began in 1466 and ended in 1517 in Shanxi town. Among them, the walls of Liaodong Town, Jizhou Town, and Yansui Town were finished. Datong Town and Xuanfu Town had a higher degree of completion, more significant than 80% (Figs. 78).

Fig. 7
figure 7

The Construction of the Great Wall from 1465 to 1521 in the Ming Dynasty

Fig. 8
figure 8

The chronological distribution of the walls constructed from 1465 to 1521 in the Ming Dynasty

The wall of Yansui Town created in 1474, is the symbol of the first large-scale construction of the Great Wall in the Ming Dynasty, which is also the most extended extant wall section in this period. In addition, the existing length of the wall constructed by Gansu Town in 1503 is shorter than that of Yansui Town. However, from the historical records, this wall section should be the most extended wall project built from 1466 to 1521(Table 2).

Table 2 Construction time of the Great Wall in 1465–1521 (chronological)

Jiajing period in Ming Dynasty (1522–1566)

The Jiajing period (1522–1565) was the second climax of the Ming Dynasty’s construction of the Great Wall. The wall operation in this period should be discussed in two situations.

Firstly, the newly constructed wall mainly concentrated in Xuanfu Town, Datong Town, Shanxi Town, Ningxia Town, Guyuan Town, and Gansu Town. The total length of the construction was 1,338.94 km. It was started by Ningxia Town in 1529 and ended by Guyuan Town in 1517. Among them, the walls of Xuanfu Town, Datong Town, Shanxi Town, and Ningxia Town were finished. As a result, the Great Wall formed the most prominent and longest-spanning military defense works in the history of China throughout the dynasties (Fig. 9, Table 3).

Fig. 9
figure 9

The Construction of the Great Wall from 1522 to 1566 in the Ming Dynasty

Table 3 Construction time of the Great Wall in 1522–1566 (chronological)

Secondly, the renovation of existing walls is complicated. All the nine frontier military districts are involved, with a length of 3,782.95 km. It was started by Liaodong Town in 1522 and ended by Datong Town in 1558. The length of renovation was greater than 50% of the total length of the walls in Jizhou Town, Yansui Town, Shanxi Town, Datong Town, and Xuanfu Town. In particular, Jizhou Town is the largest, with its whole line renovated in 1551 (Fig. 10, Table 4).

Fig. 10
figure 10

The Repair of the Great Wall from 1522 to 1566 in the Ming Dynasty

Table 4 Repair time of the Great Wall in 1522–1566 (chronological)

Longqing to Wanli period in the Ming Dynasty (1567–1620)

The most striking feature of the Longqing period (1567–1572) was the emergence of hollow watch towers in Jizhou Town [41]. One thousand one hundred ninety-four hollow watch towers were built in Jizhou Town between 1569 and 1571(Fig. 11). However, these were only the construction of additional defenses on existing walls, not new ones.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Three-dimensional model of the current condition and restoration of the hollow watch tower

The whole line of the Ming Great Wall was completed mainly during the Jiajing period. Therefore, from 1567 to 1620, only Guyuan Town and Gansu Town constructed the new walls, which were finished. The length of construction was 269.91 km. Guyuan Town created the Peijiachuan Great Wall about 230 “li” in 1571; the existing was 118.093km. The Ming Dynasty repaired the Songshan Great Wall under the joint management of Guyuan Town and Gansu Town, with more than 400 “Li” in total in 1599. The existing length is 151.816km.

During this period, the renovation of the existing walls was mainly concentrated in Liaodong Town, Datong Town, Yansui Town, and Gansu Town, which had a length of 2,566.80 km. The most considerable work was done in Liaodong Town, which repaired 1,050 km in 1608, accounting for 86.15% of the town’s total length. Until 1644, there was no more large-scale construction of the Great Wall in the Ming Dynasty (Fig. 12, Fig. 13).

Fig. 12
figure 12

The Construction of the Great Wall from 1567 to 1620 in the Ming Dynasty

Fig. 13
figure 13

The Repair of the Great Wall from 1567 to 1620 in the Ming Dynasty

Discussion

The construction of the Great Wall during the Ming Dynasty was in a different and complex order in the “Nine Military Districts of the Frontier.” There was no continuous Great Wall in the Ming Dynasty before the Zhengtong period. The Great Wall appeared in Liaodong Town in 1437, with a length of 869.45 km. Large-scale construction of the Great Wall began in 1466, and by 1521, the length of the Ming Great Wall had reached 7,242.95 km. Until 1566, the Ming Great Wall was 8,581.89 km at its peak. In 1644, the Ming Great Wall formed a complete military defense project of 8,851.8 km.

Using quantitative analysis, we can conduct an in-depth study of the overall process and spatio-temporal characteristics of the Ming Great Wall, as far as possible to summarize the standard methodology for the integrity study of the Great Wall heritage instead of just staying in the qualitative analysis of historical materials [27]. Although, the data of the Great Wall in different periods of the Ming Dynasty is analyzed as a whole, there are still some points to be discussed.

Immediate cause for the construction of Great Wall in the Ming Dynasty

According to the official records and the relevant local chronicles along the Great Wall, the number of significant campaigns in nine frontier military districts was counted during the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644), which can roughly reflect the significant defense situation between the Ming Dynasty and Mongolia. The factor of military warfare was the immediate reason that urged the Ming Dynasty to construct the Great Wall (Fig. 14) [42].

Fig. 14
figure 14

War defense situation line chart between Ming and Mongolia

The military was influential during the Hongwu period (1328–1398) when Zhu Yuanzhang (the first emperor of the Ming Dynasty) took the initiative to conquer. The Mongolian tribes had just withdrawn beyond the Great Wall and had no strength to fight against the newly founded Ming Dynasty. During the Yongle period (1403–1424), the Mongolian tribes had broken up into the Eastern Mongol (present-day south of Lake Baikal and most of Mongolia), the Western Mongol (present-day western Mongolia, and the area around the Junggar Basin), and the Wu Liangha tribe (present-day Inner Mongolia and the Liao River valley region). Five northern expeditions by Zhu Di (the third emperor of the Ming Dynasty) prompted the more powerful Eastern and Western Mongols to evade the north desert and could not respond. As a result, the number of wars during the Hongwu and Yongle periods was relatively less. Hongxi period and Xuande period rested and recuperated. There were no severe conflicts on the northern frontier,

During the Zhengtong period (1436–1449), Liaodong Town was more frequently invaded by the Wu Liang Ha tribe. Therefore, Liaodong Town was the first to have a continuous Great Wall to resist the intrusion. After the “Tumu Fort Change,” the Ming Dynasty's military frontier policy changed from active aggression to passive defense. The relationship between the Ming court and the Mongolian tribe deteriorated.

Eastern Mongolia became increasingly powerful and frequently invaded the Hetao district between Chenghua and Zhengde (1465–1521). They threatened the frontier security of Datong Town, Shanxi Town, Ningxia Town, Yansui Town, and Gansu Town. There was a frequent conflict between the Ming and the Mongolia, especially during the Hongzhi period (1488–1505), which peaked at an average of more than ten fights yearly [43]. Therefore, this period formed the first climax of constructing the Great Wall to prevent the eastern Mongolian tribes in the Ming Dynasty.

Mongolian invaders seriously plagued the Ming Dynasty in the Jiajing period (1522–1566). The Eastern Mongolian tribes constantly infested the areas of Shanxi Town, Xuanfu Town, Datong Town, and Jizhou Town, and there were frequent battles. In addition, the Ming dynasty was excessively reliant on walls at this time. During the Jiajing period, they witnessed the second climax of wall construction.

After the Longqing peace, the Ming Dynasty government ended nearly two hundred years of Mongolian hostilities. The northern frontier was peaceful and stable. However, by the middle to late Wanli period, Mongolian tribes gradually occupied the Songshan Grassland area of China, which connected the Hetao, Songshan, and Qinghai regions. It is why the "Songsan Xinbian" mentioned above was constructed.Then, It should be emphasized that the rapidly rising Jurchen tribes (女真部族) plunged the Liaodong Town into crisis. Therefore, Liaodong Town renovated its 1,050 km Great Wall in 1608. Then, the Qing Dynasty invaded the ShanhaiGuan Pass (山海关) [44]. The Ming Dynasty was overthrown.

On quantifying the spatial and temporal distribution of the Ming Great Wall

Based on the ArcGIS Pro digital humanities technology, combined with the database and historical documents, the starting and ending points of the Ming Great Wall construction sections are one-to-one correspondence with the existing data to obtain accurate coordinates. More detailed quantitative data were accessed through screening, calculation, and integration. It clarifies the essential characteristics of the spatial and temporal distribution of the Ming Great Wall, which makes up for the previous shortages of qualitative analysis. The study further demonstrates the authenticity of the Ming Great Wall heritage, providing a reference for expanding its integrity research and contributing to the development of the Great Wall National Cultural Park in China.

It should be emphasized that the document could have been more extensive and sketchy in the Ming Dynasty due to the wall's long and complex construction process. There are errors in labeling the coordinates of the start and end positions of wall segments, which can only be minimized as much as possible. Due to the large degree of destruction of the Ming Great Wall, it was impossible to quantify the precise length of the surviving wall segments. They must be converted according to historical documents using the Ming Dynasty construction units. In addition, the paper did not analyze the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of the wall section of Zhenbao Town, Changzhen Town, and Xining Wei (西宁卫) during the Ming Dynasty. The author will add it in the future research.

With the continuous construction of military defense facilities in northern areas, the military defense system of the Great Wall was gradually improved in the Ming Dynasty. The frontier defense also relied more and more on the defensive effect of the Great Wall. The Ming imperial government's excessive reliance on the Great Wall military defense system contributed to a great contradiction between the economy, population, and resources. Meanwhile, it also laid the groundwork for the social turmoil at the end of the Ming Dynasty, which profoundly affected the destiny.

The establishment and visualization of "the imagery and 3D database of the entire line of the Ming Great Wall" has overcome the constraints of the vast spatial scale and considerable geographical segmentation of the remains, improved the efficiency of heritage information processing and the accuracy of site observation, and accelerated heritage exploration and the formulation of scientific protection strategies.

Conclusions

In this study, based on the GIS spatial digital humanities analysis method, the immediate causes of the Ming Great Wall construction are systematically analyzed, and the essential rules of the wall construction about the Ming Dynasty are clarified. The starting and ending locations of each construction section corresponded one by one with the existing wall, which helps to strengthen the understanding of the chronological phasing of constructing the Great Wall and demonstrate the authenticity of the Great Wall's heritage.

The military war dynamic between the Ming imperial government and Mongolia was the direct reason for the construction of the Great Wall for the Ming dynasty. As a result, The formation and development of the Great Wall was a dynamic giant project, which generally experienced the entire process of setting up military settlements and related facilities → construction of the wall → refurbishment of the wall.

Explicitly speaking, The temporal and spatial distribution of the Great Wall in the Ming Dynasty has apparent characteristics, which can be divided into five construction phases: Hongwu to Xuande (1368–1435), the period without wall when military settlements, passes, and fire beacon towers were used for defense; Zhengtong to Tianshun (1436–1464): the emergence of walls from Liaodong Town; Chenghua to Zhengde (1465–1521): the first construction climax, started by Shanxi Town in 1466. The completion of the wall in Yansui Town marked the entry of the Ming dynasty into large-scale wall construction in 1474. The rest of the towns were newly established; in the Jiajing period (1522–1566), the second construction climax, the wall was primarily connected to the line. In addition to new construction, the wall was also refurbished on a large scale and operated in nine military districts of the frontier; Longqing to Wanli (1567–1620): The entire Ming Great Wall was completed, forming 8,851.8 km of integral the wall defenses.

From historical information extraction, model construction, and data correction to a conclusion, this method can provide the basis for quantitative analyses of other linear cultural heritages. Future research will provide more detailed digital practice and reproduction of the Ming Great Wall to promote the holistic conservation and sustainable development of large-scale cultural heritage.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. According to the "Ming Great Wall defense system space−time database" built by the research group statistics.

  2. “The Tumu Fort Change” refers to the events that took place on September 1, 1449 in Ming Dynasty, when the Ming army lost to the Mongol tribes at Tumu Fortress (10 km east of present-day Huailai County, Hebei Province).

References

  1. Pan J, Xu N, Tang Y, et al. Quantitative evaluation of plants on top surface of the Great Wall in Dazhuangke using the analytical hierarchy process. Herit Sci. 2023;11(1):191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lattimore O. Origins of the Great Wall of China: a frontier concept in theory and practice. Geogr Rev. 1937;27(4):529–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lattimore O. Inner Asian frontiers of China. New York: Capital Publishing Co.,Inc.Irvincton-On-Hudson,and American Geographical Society; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dong Y, et al. Textual research on Ming Great Wall. Beijing: China Archives Publishing House; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Waldron AN. The Great Wall of China: from history to myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bachagha N, Wang X, Luo L, et al. Remote sensing and GIS techniques for reconstructing the military fort system on the Roman boundary (Tunisian section) and identifying archaeological sites. Remote Sens Environ. 2020;236: 111418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang S, Luo L, Li Q, et al. Auto-identification of linear archaeological traces of the Great Wall in northwest China using improved DeepLabv3+ from very high-resolution aerial imagery. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2022;113: 102995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luo L, Bachagha N, Yao Y, et al. Identifying linear traces of the Han Dynasty Great Wall in Dunhuang using Gaofen-1 satellite remote sensing imagery and the Hough transform. Remote Sens. 2019;11(22):2711.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo L, Wang X, Liu C, et al. Integrated RS, GIS and GPS approaches to archaeological prospecting in the Hexi corridor, NW China: a case study of the royal road to ancient Dunhuan. J Archaeol Sci. 2014;50:178–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng F, Zhu X, Li X, et al. 3D digitisation of large-scale unstructured Great Wall heritage sites by a small unmanned helicopter. Remote Sens. 2017;9(5):423.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bakirman T, Bayram B, Akpinar B, et al. Implementation of ultra-light UAV systems for cultural heritage documentation. J Cult Herit. 2020;44:174–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Altuntas C. Triangulation and time-of-flight based 3D digitisation techniques of cultural heritage structures. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2021;43:825–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Petrovic V, Vanoni DJ, Richter AM, et al. Visualizing high resolution three-dimensional and two-dimensional data of cultural heritage sites. Mediter Archaeol Archaeom. 2014;14(4):93–100.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aveta C, Salvatori M, Vitelli GP. The complex point cloud for the knowledge of the architectural heritage. some experiences. Int Arch Photogramm, Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2017;42:235–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moyano J, Nieto-Julián JE, Lenin LM, et al. Operability of point cloud data in an architectural heritage information model. Int J Arch Herit. 2022;16(10):1588–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aicardi I, Chiabrando F, Lingua AM, et al. Recent trends in cultural heritage 3D survey: the photogrammetric computer vision approach. J Cult Herit. 2018;32:257–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu H, Chen F, Zhou W. A comparative case study of MTInSAR approaches for deformation monitoring of the cultural landscape of the Shanhaiguan section of the Great Wall. Herit Sci. 2021;9(1):1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang H, Chun Q, Zhang C, et al. Quantitative evaluation method of structural safety for the Great Wall hollow defensive forts under gravity loads. Int J Arch Herit. 2023;17(10):1736–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yanzhen W, Xiaofen W, Lihua H. Research on Great Wall section protection and user VR experience innovation based on GIS data visualization. Soft Comput. 2023;27(13):9041–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lovell J. The Great Wall: China against the world, 1000 BC–AD 2000. New York: Open Road+ Grove/Atlantic; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Y Du. From Tun-Bao To Great Wall:The Study of North Defense in Ming China. master's thesis,Taiwan: National Cheng Kung University. 2009. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/23d9rx

  22. Jing A. A history of the Great Wall of China. Singapore: World Scientific; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Z, Tuo X, Zhang M. Types and historical roles of secret gates: a new understanding of the Ming Great Wall based on a digital heritage survey. J As Archit Build Eng. 2023;22(2):842–60.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin F, Zhang X, Ma Z, et al. Spatial structure and corridor construction of intangible cultural heritage: a case study of the Ming Great Wall. Land. 2022;11(9):1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Q. A study on the Great Wall and defense of Liaodong town in the Ming dynasty. Beijing: Cultural Relics Publishing House; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ai C. The Great Wall of four military regions in Shaanxi province of Ming dynasty. Nanjing: Published by Jiangsu Phoenix Science and Technology Press; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Du Y, Chen W, Cui K, et al. An exploration of the military defense system of the Ming Great Wall in Qinghai province from the perspective of castle-based military settlements. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01283-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen W, Du Y, Cui K, Fu X, et al. Architectural forms and distribution characteristics of beacon towers of the Ming Great Wall in Qinghai Province. J As Archit Build Eng. 2017;16(3):503–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cui K, Du Y, Zhang Y, Wu G, et al. An evaluation system for the development of scaling off at earthen sites in arid areas in NW China. Herit Sci. 2019;7(14):1–21.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cao Y, Zhang Y. The fractal structure of the Ming Great Wall military defense system: a revised horizon over the relationship between the Great Wall and the military defense settlements. J Cult Herit. 2018;33:159–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shen Y, Su Q, Jia T, Zhou X. Characteristics of the site selection and the layout of the Great Wall of the Ming dynasty from a military perspective: xiaohekou section as an example. Front Arch Res. 2020;9:541–55.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shen Y, Su Q, Jia T, et al. Distribution and integration of military settlements’ cultural heritage in the large pass city of the great wall in the Ming dynasty: a case study of Juyong pass defense area. Sustainability. 2021;13:7166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang Y, Tan L, Zhang Y, et al. A quantitative evaluation model of ancient military defense efficiency based on spatial strength—take Zhejiang of the Ming dynasty as an example. Herit Sci. 2023;11(1):246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. National cultural heritage administration: The total length of the Ming Great Wall is 8,851.8 kilometers.(http://www.ncha.gov.cn/art/2009/4/18/art_722_112099.html).

  35. Zhang Y. Chronicles of the Great Wall of China: the wall as strategic border strongholds. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li Y, Zhang Y, Li Z. A holistic study and digital practice of the Great Wall. Chin Acad J Electr Publ H. 2022;08:16–21. https://doi.org/10.16414/j.wa.2022.08.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cabeza García PM, Razo Cajas EF, Cajas RF, Carrión. Characterization of smes in the metropolitan district of Quito using the ArcGIS pro georeferencing system. Rev Univ Y Soc. 2022;14(2):280–90.

    Google Scholar 

  38. He J. GIS-based cultural route heritage authenticity analysis and conservation support in cost-surface and visibility study approaches. Chin Univ Hong Kong. 2008;70:09.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tan L, Wu B, Zhang Y, et al. GIS-based precise predictive model of mountain beacon sites in Wenzhou, China. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):10773.

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Xiang Y, Peng Y. Chronicles of the Great Wall of China: the wall in literature book 2. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li Z, Chen Z, Tuo X, et al. A textual research on the pass beacon mark of the hollow enemy tower of the Great Wall under Qi Jiguang’s rule. Archit J. 2023;27:68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Liu Q. Chronicles of the Great Wall of China: military affairs. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zang Y, Fan X, Li Y. Wars and the Construction Great Wall in of the Military Settlements along the Ming’s Northern Border. J Tianjin Univ. 2016;03:135–9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Peterson WJ. The Cambridge history of China: volume 9, The Ch’ing Dynasty to 1800, part 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (21AZD055).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, YZ; methodology, YZ, and YY; software, YY; validation, YY; formal analysis, YY; investigation, YZ, YY, and YL; resources, YZ, and YL; data curation, YY; writing—original draft preparation, YY; writing—review and editing, YY; visualization, YY; supervision, YZ, and YL; project administration, YZ, and YL.; funding acquisition, YL. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yukun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Institutional review board statement

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Y., Zhang, Y. & Li, Y. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of the Ming Great Wall. Herit Sci 12, 81 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01198-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01198-1

Keywords