Skip to main content

Table 5 Normalized evaluation criteria of each index

From: Safety risk assessment of heritage buildings in metro construction based on SPA theory: a case study in Zhengzhou, China

Evaluation factor

Attribute category

I

II

III

IV

V

\(c_{1}\)

−

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{2}\)

−

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{3}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{4}\)

−

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{5}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{6}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{7}\)

−

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{8}\)

−

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{9}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.3333

0.3333–0.5000

0.5000–0.6667

0.6667–0.8333

0.8333–1.0000

\(c_{10}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{11}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{12}\)

−

0.0000–0.1667

0.1667–0.3333

0.3333–0.5000

0.5000–0.6667

0.6667–1.0000

\(c_{13}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{14}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{15}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000

\(c_{16}\)

+ 

0.0000–0.2000

0.2000–0.4000

0.4000–0.6000

0.6000–0.8000

0.8000–1.0000