Table 6 Linguistic assessment of the intensity of mutual influence between criteria and alternatives, as well as the influence of alternatives on the criteria, according to Expert no. 1
Expert 1 | \({C}_{1}\) | \({C}_{2}\) | \({C}_{3}\) | \({C}_{4}\) | \({C}_{5}\) | \({V}_{1}\) | \({V}_{2}\) | \({V}_{3}\) | \({V}_{4}\) | \({V}_{5}\) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\({C}_{1}\) | – | LN | HN | LN | LP | MP | LN | HP | LP | MP |
\({C}_{2}\) | LN | – | MP | HP | NI | MP | HP | NI | NI | HP |
\({C}_{3}\) | MN | HP | – | MP | MN | LN | NI | MN | NI | MP |
\({C}_{4}\) | MP | HP | MP | – | LN | HN | MP | HN | NI | LP |
\({C}_{5}\) | MP | NI | MP | LN | – | MP | LN | MP | LP | LP |
\({V}_{1}\) | HP | LN | MN | LN | NI | – | LP | HP | MN | LP |
\({V}_{2}\) | LP | MP | MP | HP | MP | MP | – | MP | NI | LN |
\({V}_{3}\) | HP | LN | LN | LN | MN | MP | LP | – | LP | LP |
\({V}_{4}\) | MN | LP | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI | NI | – | MN |
\({V}_{5}\) | MP | LN | HN | LN | LN | LP | MN | HP | HN | – |