Table 1 Evaluation indicators and weights of the integrity protection of heritage site
Dimension | Specific indicators | Explanation of the indicators | Computing method | Index type | Weight and order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Landscape integrity | X1:Landscape dominance | The ecological service value, aesthetic value, ecological price of different landscape types | Remote sensing interpretation | + | 0.2863/1 |
X2:Landscape fragmentation | The complexity of the spatial structure of the landscape reflects the degree of human interference with the landscape | Remote sensing interpretation | − | 0.0867/7 | |
X3:Landscape separation | The separation of individual distribution of different patches in a landscape type | Remote sensing interpretation | − | 0.0977/6 | |
X4:Degradation of the landscape | The ratio of area of each landscape type and time difference of two remote sensing data | Remote sensing interpretation | − | 0.1035/5 | |
X5:Landscape cohesiveness | Measure the complexity of the landscape spatial pattern | Remote sensing interpretation | + | 0.1048/4 | |
Heritage value embodied integrity | X6:Uniqueness of landscape beauty | Reflect the integrity of the aesthetic and geomorphological value of the heritage site | Five-point scale method | + | 0.1663/2 |
X7:Richness of landscape beauty | Reflect the integrity of the aesthetic and geomorphological value of the heritage site | Five-point scale method | + | 0.1554/3 |