- Research article
- Open Access
Technological study of the gilded haft-rang tiles of the Imamzadih Ismail mausoleum in Qazvin, Iran
© Mishmastnehi and Holakooei; licensee Springer. 2015
- Received: 23 June 2014
- Accepted: 27 March 2015
- Published: 16 April 2015
Gilding decorations on Islamic tiles have been previously studied either historically or technologically. The major emphasis in these studies has always been focused on the use of gold leaf on glazed tiles. The current research has been conducted by electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA), portable micro X-ray fluorescence (μ-XRF), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), optical microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to shed light on a less-known technique of gilding applied on the nineteenth century haft rang glazed tiles of the Imamzadih Ismail mausoleum in Qazvin, Iran.
Our observations showed that the gilding decorations are performed on a blue alkali glaze. Plant ash was suggested to be the source of alkali and cobalt was identified as the colouring agent of the glaze. Moreover, trace amounts of arsenic in the composition of the blue glaze was interpreted to be associated with the colouring agent of the glaze; i.e., cobalt. Furthermore, the gilding decorations were suggested to be achieved by firing gold powder on the pre-fired blue substrate glaze. AFM, SEM and optical microscopy proved that the gold flakes partially penetrated the pre-fired blue substrate glaze.
This paper established a local provenance for the colouring agent of the blue glaze used as a substrate of gilding decorations. In addition, our studies showed that the gilding decorations were achieved by firing gold powder on the pre-fired blue glaze of a nineteenth century Persian haft rang tile.
- Atomic Force Microscopy
- Polarise Light Microscope
- Gold Powder
- Gold Leaf
- Vitreous Material
The use of gold leaf on silica-based substrates may be dated back to the Roman period . In the Islamic era, however, gilding on glassy substrates appears first on tableware in 12th century Persia  and shortly after on glassware under the Ayyubids and the Mamluks in Syria and Egypt during the 13th and 14th centuries .
Although the use of gold powder for gilding vitreous materials has been reported previously [3,4], technical literature about Islamic gilded tiles does not support this idea. In other words, the published data about gilding on the Islamic glazes are only limited to the use of gold leaf on glazes [2,5,6]. In addition, there is no general consensus about the technique of applying either gold leaf or powder on archaeological glazes. While the use of an organic adhesive as mordant of gold leaf has already been reported [5,6], a firing process has also been suggested to be the reason of adhering gold leaf on a pre-fired glaze . In support of the former idea, there is the Abu’l Qasim’s treatise in which he describes how to fire gold leafs on a pre-fired glassy surface [7,8].
Chemical composition of the substrate glaze
The quantitative EPMA results on the blue and white glazes
Actual total (wt%)
As far as the chemical composition of the blue glaze is concerned, it was an alkali glaze in which cobalt had yielded a dark blue colour (Table 1). On the other hand, 4.29 wt% and 0.37 wt% of potassium and magnesium respectively showed that the source of alkali in the blue glaze was most probably plant ash. Plant ash has been reported to be the most common fluxing agent used in Persian archaeological vitreous materials [12,13]. More interestingly, the chemical composition of the blue glaze was interestingly associated with arsenic (Table 1). As it is generally well-known, the cobalt ores of Qamsar, near Kashsn in central Iran, have always been noted to be the source of supplying cobalt for achieving deep blue colours in glassy materials. These ores have been reported to be cobaltite (CoAsS) and erythrite (Co3(AsO4)2·8H2O), which are As-bearing cobalt ores [7,14]. Thus, the detected arsenic in the composition of the blue glaze can be derived from these sources showing a Persian provenance for the blue colouring agent of the glaze. On the other hand, the absence of bismuth in the composition of the blue glaze can be considered as another evidence of the local provenance as bismuth is reported to be associated with the blue Co-bearing pigments found in Europe and India .
Another interesting point in the quantitative EPMA data is that the actual total of the quantified elements of the blue glaze does not sum up to 100 wt% and is significantly low (86.26 wt%) (Table 1). This could be related to the manufacturing process of the blue glaze. According to the descriptions provided by Rochechouart , Ali Mohamed , Olmer  and Schindler , 19th century Persian glaze-makers used to make a concentrated Co-bearing pigment from the cobalt ores of Qamsar by mixing and smelting the cobalt ores and borax. A tiny amount of this concentrated pigment was then added to an alkali frit to achieve a deep blue colour. Moreover, the analytical data provided on the raw materials used by Ali Mohamed (preserved at the Edinburg Museum of Science) confirm the presence of borax in the composition of Persian blue glazes in the 19th century . However, as boron cannot be measured with EPMA due to its low atomic weight, this can provide an explanation for the loss of total amount of composing elements of the blue glaze. However, this hypothesis needs to be proved with more relevant analytical approaches. Due to the fact that the blue glaze was diffused in the white glaze and its thickness was very small (Figure 2b), it was not practically possible to remove any sample from the blue glaze without contaminating the sample with the white substrate glaze. Thus, the most appropriate technique, which could quantitatively measure boron from one hand and, on the other hand, did not require removing the blue glaze, was laser ablation-induced coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), which we did not have access to.
Although previous studies on the Persian gilded vitreous materials had showed the use of gold leaf pasted on the glassy surface by an adhesive, the current study revealed, for the first time, the application of gold flakes on a 19th century Persian haft rang tile adhered by firing gold flakes on a blue glaze. Moreover, the blue substrate glaze was revealed to be an alkali glaze coloured by cobalt. Further, the colouring agent of the blue glaze was probably supplied from the Qamsar cobalt ores. These cobalt ores, which were either cobaltite or erythrite, are probably fused with borax to be used in the composition of the blue glaze. Moreover, the white glaze showed to be a lead-alkali glaze opacified with tin oxide with a relatively high ratio of Pb/Sn which is unusual in the context of Persian glaze technology.
AFM and μ-XRF were performed on a small sample which was delicately removed with scalpel from a well-preserved haft rang tile placed in the south-eastern portico of the mausoleum. SEM observations were performed on the gold coated sample in order to prevent charging effect. For observing the cross section of the sample under PLM, another tiny sample was mounted in a 1:1 mixture of Araldite AW 8545–1:Hardener HW 8545–1 and was cut and polished to be observed under the PLM. The same sample was then coated with carbon to be analysed by EPMA.
The optical microscopy was performed with an Alltion BK-POLT (China) polarised light microscope (PLM). A Canon EOS Kiss x4 digital camera was used to capture the photos under the plane light.
The portable XRF was an ARTAX™ 200 (Bruker AXS Microanalysis, Germany). Its X-ray tube was Mo placed at 6° involving a 100 μm beryllium window and a maximum voltage and current of 50 kV and 1000 μA respectively. The X-ray beam on the surface of the sample had 1 mm diameter and measurements were carried out in air for about 120 s.
Scanning electron microscopy images were obtained with a Philips XL30 electron microscope in secondary and backscattered modes under about 10 mm of working distance and 17 kV as an accelerating voltage.
Electron microprobe analysis was performed with a JXA-8230 field emission electron probe microanalyser in the wavelength-dispersive mode (WDS). The acceleration voltage, beam current and beam diameter were 15 kV, 5 nA and 10 μm respectively. On-peak counting times were 10 s and counting times on the background on both sides of the peak were 5 s. As standard for Si, Na and Al, we used well-characterised natural albite, galena for Pb, olivine for Fe and Mg, wollastonite for Ca and sanidine for K, plus pure metals of Co, Sn and Cu.
The topography of the gilded zone was studied by a Bruker-Nanos atomic force microscope (Germany). AFM images were obtained by measurement of the interaction forces between the tip and the sample surface. The experiments were performed in air at room temperature and AFM images were processed with Image Plus 2.9 software.
The supports of Carmela Vaccaro and Ralf Milke are cordially appreciated. Sajjad Mahmoudpour and Abdu’l Hamid Rezaei thanked for AFM and SEM observations respectively.
- Darque-Ceretti E, Hélary D, Aucouturier M. An investigation of gold/ceramic and gold/glass interfaces. Gold Bull. 2002;35:118–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pacheco C, Chapoulie R, Dooryhee E, Goudeau P. Gold leaf decoration on medieval Islamic glazed ceramics – in search of technological features with XRD. Z Kristallogr Suppl. 2007;26:317–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gueit E, Darque-Ceretti E, Aucouturier M. Glass gilding process in medieval Syria and Egypt (13th–14th Century). J Archaeol Sci. 2010;37:1742–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carboni S, Henderson J. Mamluk enamelled and gilded glass in the Museum of Islamic Art, Qatar. London: Islamic Art Society; 2003.Google Scholar
- Mish Mast Nehi M, Chaman HR, Mortazavi M. Scanning electron microscopy and optical microscopic study of gilded tiles from Darb-i Imam Tomb in Isfahan, Iran. In: Meek A, Meeks N, Mongiatti A, Cartwright C, editors. Historical Technology, Materials and Conservation: SEM and Microanalysis. London: Archetype Publications; 2012. p. 179.Google Scholar
- Osete-Cortina L, Doménech-Carbó MT, Doménech A, Yusá-Marco DJ, Ahmadi H. Multimethod analysis of Iranian Ilkhanate ceramics from the Takht-e Soleyman palace. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;397:319–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allan JW. Abu’l Qasim’s treatise on ceramics. Iran. 1973;11:111–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ritter H, Ruska J, Winderlich R. Orientalische steinbücher und persische fayencetechnik. Abteilung Istanbul Des Archäologischen Institutes Des Deutschen Reiches. 1935;3:16–56.Google Scholar
- Holakooei P, Tisato F, Vaccaro C, Petrucci FC. Haft rang or cuerda seca? Spectroscopic approaches to the study of overglaze polychrome tiles from seventeenth century Persia. J Archaeol Sci. 2014;41:447–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vendrell M, Molera J, Tite MS. Optical properties of tin-opacified glazes. Archaeometry. 2000;42:325–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ali Mohamed. On the manufacture of modern kāshi earthenware tiles and vases in imitation of the ancient. In Leadless Decorative Tiles, Faience, and Mosaic. History, Materials, Manufacture and Use of Ornamental Flooring Tiles, Ceramic Mosaic, and Decorative Tiles and Faience. Recipes for Tile-bodies, and for Leadless Glaze and Art-tile Enamels, Edited by Furnival WJ. Furnival WJ, Stone, Staffordshire; 1888:215.Google Scholar
- Tite MS, Shortland A, Maniatis Y, Kavoussanaki D, Harris SA. The composition of the soda-rich and mixed alkali plant ashes used in the production of glass. J Archaeol Sci. 2006;33:1284–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rehren T. A review of factors affecting the composition of early Egyptian glasses and faience: alkali and alkali earth oxides. J Archaeol Sci. 2008;35:1345–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stöllner T. Notes on mining archaeological structures at the cobalt mine of Qamsar. In: Stöllner T, Slotta R, Vatandoust A, editors. Persiens Antike Pracht. Buchum: DBM; 2004. p. 515.Google Scholar
- Darrah JA. Connections and coincidences: three pigments. In: Arie W, Erma H, Marja P, editors. Historical Painting Techniques, Materials and Studio Practice. Marina del Rey: The Getty Conservation Institute; 1996. p. 70.Google Scholar
- Rochechouart J. Souvenirs d’un voyage en Perse. Paris: Challamel Ainé; 1867.Google Scholar
- Olmer ML-J. Rapport sur une Mission Scientifique en Perse, vol. XVI. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale; 1908.Google Scholar
- Floor W. Traditional Crafts in Qajar Iran (1800–1925). California: Mazda Publishers; 2003.Google Scholar
- Nutting J, Nuttall JL. The malleability of gold: an explanation of its unique mode of deformation. Gold Bull. 1977;10:2–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.