Skip to main content

Correction to: Reviving WHAAM! a comparative evaluation of cleaning systems for the conservation treatment of Roy Lichtenstein’s iconic painting

The Original Article was published on 31 January 2020

Correction to: Herit Sci (2020) 8:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-0350-2

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors realized they had omitted copyright information for some figures. The missing copyright information is as follows:


Main article


Figure 2: Photo © Tate


Figure 3: Photo © Tate


Figure 4: Image © Tate


Figure 5: Image © Tate


Figure 6: Image © Tate


Figure 7: Image © Tate


Figure 8: Photo © Tate


Figure 9: Image © Tate


Figure 10: Image © Tate


Figure 11: Photo © Tate


Figure 12: Image © Tate and CGSI


Figure 13: Image © Tate and CGSI


Figure 14: Image © Tate and CGSI


Figure 15: Image © Tate and CGSI


Figure 16: Image © Tate and CGSI


Figure 17: Image © Tate


Figure 18: Photo © Tate


Figure 19: Photo © Tate


Supplementary information


Figure S1: Image © Tate


Figure S2: Image © Tate


Figure S3: Image © Tate


Figure S4: Image © Tate

All figures were reproduced with permission.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Bartoletti A, Barker R, Chelazzi D, Bonelli N, Baglioni P, Lee J, Angelova LV, Ormsby B. Reviving WHAAM! a comparative evaluation of cleaning systems for the conservation treatment of Roy Lichtenstein’s iconic painting. Herit Sci. 2020;8:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-0350-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bronwyn Ormsby.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bartoletti, A., Barker, R., Chelazzi, D. et al. Correction to: Reviving WHAAM! a comparative evaluation of cleaning systems for the conservation treatment of Roy Lichtenstein’s iconic painting. Herit Sci 8, 41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00384-1

Download citation