Skip to main content

3D modelling of an Asbad (Persian windmill): a link between vernacular architecture and mechanical system with a focus on Nehbandan windmill

Abstract

Asbads (Persian windmills) present a multifaceted view of using heritage science. These mills are no longer in use due to advances in technology and the advent of new grinding systems. Windmills show perfect harmony between vernacular architecture and mechanical system. This paper aims to review and analyze the mechanism of one of these windmills in Iran and illustrate how these historical buildings can bridge the gaps between these two science branches for better understanding of cultural heritage. To that purpose, a precise 3D modelling of mechanical components and architectural elements is provided based on architectural survey, photographs and sketches. This study addresses how vernacular architecture, with the specific flexibility, can be considered as one of the most useful tools for human beings. Thus, one of the Iranian windmills in Nehbandan was selected through field studies to be modelled. In this construction, local materials such as wood, adobe and stone are used. Findings reveal that windmills and their architectural flexibility are consistent with mechanical components and address environmental needs.

Introduction

Human beings have immemorially benefited from wind energy for different purposes, like moving sailing boats, cooling houses through circulation of outside air and operating machinery in agriculture [1]. For centuries, residents in certain areas of the world, where there are strong winds and water shortages, have been encouraged to find alternative sources of energy. They developed windmills, which constituted another technical innovation, by using vernacular building techniques and relying on the science of mechanics [2]. Moreover, there has been a new interest in reviving these systems due to their simple design and low cost, as well as a high rate of energy generation at low wind velocities [3]. Windmills in Iran were designed to convert wind energy into mechanical energy through moving a wind wheel, which in turn activated a system of vertical rotation (axis) through a system of gears that in turn rotating the millstones to grind cereals and raise water from wells. The first windmills are thought to have been used for irrigation and milling in Sistan (Persia). They are believed to have an important function and gained rapid popularity throughout Europe and the Arab countries as illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1 History of windmills from 200 BC to the present

Nehbandan Windmills show how the residents responded to the environmental opportunities and constraints and mastered a traditional technology. This study is based on a characteristic environmental feature—the wind—as the driving force of windmills associated with local materials like adobe and subsequently a developing technology. Studying windmills can shed more light on how harnessing natural energy and using local materials in architectural heritage helped residents create environmentally friendly structures in the past. In this paper, different mechanical components of windmill, their architectural features, and the relationship between these two parts will be discussed. The paper also sought to answer the following questions by studying Nehbandan windmills:

1. How can mechanical components affect the architectural features?

2. How can architectural design determine the complexity of a mechanical system?

The literature review demonstrates that earlier studies mainly focused on several categories. Some researchers have discussed the historical and technological aspects of the windmills in Iran. These studies show the old history of harnessing wind energy for various purposes [14, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Sketching numerous windmills to provide information about this ancient structure and significant changes over centuries, other researchers have emphasized the historical aspects of windmills in East Asia and Europe [7,8,9, 15, 18, 19, 22, 36]. Some studies have focused on energy efficiency issues. These studies have mainly focused on obtaining the maximum amount of energy and the minimum structural changes in early windmills [4, 11, 23,24,25, 37,38,39,40]. Also, some studies have been carried out, showing digital and graphical representation of windmills in terms of the technology used and the functions intended. These studies aimed at determining the technical parameters of these windmills. For example, they show different types of windmills depending on the shape of their blades to grind cereals or collect water from wells [2, 3, 41]. Finally; travel writers have described the operation of windmills. During their travels across eastern provinces of Iran, they sketched windmills or took pictures of them to illustrate their description of windmills [42,43,44,45]. This study has identified the precise details of the architectural elements and mechanical components of one of the windmills in Iran and the correlation of these two branches of science with 3D-modelling representation. This could be a way for future research to use novel technologies such as virtual reality or augmented reality to help better understanding of architectural heritage.

Study area

Nehbandan is the largest city located in the southern part of South Khorasan Province in eastern Iran (Fig. 1). It is located between 31 degrees and 32 min of north latitude and 60 degrees and 2 min of east longitude [26]. Nehbandan borders on Afghanistan in the east, Sarbisheh City in the north, Birjand City in the west, Kerman Province in the southwest and Sistan and Baluchestan Province in the southeast.

Fig. 1
figure1

Location of Nehbandan: Google Map

The prevailing wind in this area is called 120-day wind that blows for 120 days from the heights of northeastern Iran to the southeastern lands. In Nehbandan, this wind lasts for 111 days from May 17th to September 5th [46]. The direction of the prevailing wind is north-northeast.

Windmills in Nehbandan

Nehbandan windmills have a north-northeast orientation with regard to the direction of the prevailing wind (120-day wind) in this region [15]. These windmills have a major drawback: as they have vertical axis, they are only responsive to prevailing wind direction and if the wind direction is different, they cannot be adjusted to it [38].

These windmills were not usually built as free-standing constructions; in other words, every four to five mills were attached to one another with the same architectural features and mechanical components and formed a chain of connected units [43] as shown in Fig. 2. Adjacency of the windmills also could neutralize probable propulsive forces and resisted strong winds such as the 120-day wind.

Fig. 2
figure2

The chain of windmills. a 3D modelling. b The current state

Iranian architecture is based on the use of eco-friendly and local materials. The Nehbandan windmill is not an exception and the local materials in the Khorasan province such as stone, adobe and wood have been used to build these windmills [47].

Nehbandan windmill is a monument of historical and cultural interest. The historical importance of this windmill lies in the fact that it is one of the first windmills in the world. Nehbandan was part of Sistan province in the past, so as Table 1 shows, the history of these windmills goes back to 200BC although the exact year is not clear. In the past, there were 30 windmills in Nehbandan most of which have been destroyed or abandoned. The name of Nehbandan windmill comes from the region it is built in. Field observations show that some restorations implemented have been limited to applying a layer of straw on the roof and surrounding walls in 2004. There is no conservation plan for these windmills nowadays.

On the other hand, the cultural importance of these windmills is that these historical buildings have been part of ordinary people's lives. The economic situation of residents relied on the operation of these windmills. People used these structures over hundreds of years as efficient machinery to meet their basic needs such as grinding wheat.

Methods

This study is based on documentary and field research. The findings are the results of the authors' years of research on various windmills in Iran. Since many of these windmills have been destroyed due to climate change, the most challenging part of the study was accessing precise mechanical and architectural details.

To that aim, one windmill in Nehbandan, which is still standing and can be distinguished in terms of architectural features and mechanical elements, was chosen. This windmill has undergone minimal changes in the mechanical components. A vast amount of fieldwork, including photographs, sketches, architectural surveys and interviews with former millers were conducted to collect reliable information on the operation of the windmill and to acquire 3D data. Caliper, Micrometer and Feeler gauge were used to document the various mechanical components of the windmill. In addition, tape measure, digital level, compass, plummet and camera were used for architectural survey. Then a model based on computer-aided design (CAD) techniques was developed. Also, data obtained from previous research contributed to developing an accurate understanding of the ways these windmills operated.

3D modelling

First, a schematic representation of the objects, elements and properties of the windmill was produced to develop a three-dimensionalmodel. Modelling was carried out before and after visits to the windmill. Due to the absence of plans for the windmill under investigation, or any reliable historical information in previous research, the field work was undertaken rigorously using empirical techniques for direct measurement and architectural surveys, through which the dimensions of all of the elements were determined. Following the first visits, the model was updated using new information obtained from subsequent visits. Thus, the3D modelling was performed using Google SketchUp 2015 to create models of both the machinery and the mill.

Results and discussion

Each windmill is a two-story building. The lower story is named Askhaneh, and the upper story is named Parkhaneh, as depicted in Fig. 3. The three-dimensional modelling of the windmill reveals how mechanical components affect the architectural design and how architectural design determines the complexity of the mechanical system. Thus, architectural features and the mechanical components of each story will be discussed in this study.

Fig. 3
figure3

Parkhane and Askhaneh in a windmill. a 3D modelling. b The current state

A: Parkhaneh

In this section each mechanical components and architectural features of Parkhaneh will be discussed:

Mechanical components

•The Kharpol is a horizontal cylindrical wooden beam with a 6 m length and 0.14 m diameter (Fig. 4 Detail A; Fig. 5). It rests on the surrounding walls on both sides. Kharpol prevents any lateral movements of Tirpol. It is made of pine wood.

  • The Tirpol is the central vertical axis of the windmill with a 5 m length (Fig. 5). Tirpol consists of two parts. The upper part is connected to Kharpol and the lower part passes through a hole on the roof of the Askhaneh and is placed in the middle of the runner stone.

  • The Koloosi is a hole in the middle of Kharpol where Kharpol connects with Tirpol as shown in Fig. 5.

  • The Ghalandarak is a piece of spindle wood with square section on one side and cylindrical shape on the other to facilitate Tirpol rotation in Koloosi (Fig. 5). It acts like ball bearing and made of pine or walnut wood.

  • The Pareh (Fig. 5) is a vertical blade with a 3 m length and 0.15 m width, connected to the Tirpol via Bahoos (a horizontal connector between Tirpol and Pareh). Pareh is made of pine or walnut wood.

  • The Charkhbad (Fig. 4 Detail B; Fig. 5) is the collection of Tirpol and Parehs (6–8 Parehs) which rotates clockwise. It is made of pine or sycamore wood.

  • The Peyvand (Fig. 8) is the lower part of Tirpol used to maintain the consistency of two stories of the windmill. It is easily damaged because it has to support maximum torque and tension.

Fig. 4
figure4

Cross-section of windmill

Fig. 5
figure5

Detail A, B. The components of Charkhbad and Kharpol

Architectural features

Surrounding walls

Parkhaneh contains three surrounding walls with the height of 4 m (Fig. 6). Two stepped walls were built with the thickness of 0.8 m to provide more stability for the windmill and facilitate access to the elements of the windmill structure for possible repairs. The third wall was built facing the wind with a 1–1.2 m opening which is named Darvazeh. The wind blows through Darvazeh and rotates the Charkhbad effectively by providing the required torque and creating a draft. Darvazeh is connected to the surrounding walls with wooden beams.

Fig. 6
figure6

Architectural features

Accessories and related tools

  • The Doshakh is a long-handled tool with two prongs used to stop the rotation of Tirpol by placing its crotch inside the Pareh and leaning its end against the surrounding wall which is presented in Fig. 4 Detail C and Fig. 7. It is made of pine wood.

Fig. 7
figure7

Detail C. Schematic view of Doshakh

B: Askhaneh

In this section, each of the mechanical components and architectural features of Askhaneh will be discussed:

Mechanical components

The mechanical components of Askhaneh which is presented in Fig. 4 Detail E, include the runner stone, bed stone, Tavareh, Mosht, Takht and Varkesh. Each component will be described here:

  • The Runner stone is an upper concave millstone with a diameter of 1.4 m, spinning on the bottom stone, with a hole in the center, where grains enter (Figs. 8, 10). It is made of hard rock without veins.

  • The bed stone is the bottom convex millstone with a diameter of 1.4 m, placed under Tavareh without any movement (Fig. 8). It is made of hard rock without veins.

  • The Tavareh is a swallow-tailed or bow-tie component between two millstones. It facilitates the spinning of two stones on each other (Fig. 8). The length of Tavareh is 0.5 m and the width of it in the narrowest part is 0.06 m and 0.1 m in the widest part. It is made of metal.

  • The Mosht is a 0.4 m long vertical cylinder placed between Takht and Tavareh which is made of cedar or ash wood (Fig. 8). It transmits the compressive force created by miller's feet and applied to Varkesh to the Tavareh.

  • The Takht (Fig. 8) is a support with 1 m length and 0.1 m width, located under bed stone and rests on Varkesh. It transmits the force of Varkesh to Mosht.

  • The Varkesh is a pedal, on which Takht rests, and acts as a lever by placing a stick under it (Fig. 8). Varkesh is made of wood or metal.

Fig. 8
figure8

Detail E. Mechanical components of Askhaneh

Architectural features

Askhaneh is a rectangular space with a length of about 9.5 m, a width of 4.5 m and a height of 4 m, as shown in Fig. 6. Askhaneh is entirely made of adobe and mud.

Accessories and related tools

  • The Navdani is a 0.5 m length gutter used to carry wheat from wheat storage to the hole in the center of runner stone (Fig. 4 Detail D; Figs. 9, 10). It is made of metal or wood.

  • The Lok-Lokeh is an oblique cylinder with a 0.4 m length on the runner stone and tangent to the Navdani (Figs. 9, 10). This cylinder is connected to wheat storage to control the amount of grain entering the Navdani with vibration. By increasing the rotation speed of Tirpol and the movement of the Lok-Lokeh, more wheat enters the mill. Lok-Lokeh is made of wood.

  • The Danehkesh is a collection of wooden cubes which is shown in Fig. 9. Sometimes because of high vibration of the Lok-Lokeh, a huge amount of wheat enters the Navdani and the runner stone, which results in the overflowing of the wheats. Danehkesh is used to limit the amount of wheat entering the hole in the center of the runner stone. The number of Danehkesh in the Navdani depends on the wind intensity and the rotation speed of Pareh.

Fig. 9
figure9

Detail D. Danehkesh

Fig. 10
figure10

The interior of Askhaneh

The operation of windmill

The windmill starts working by removing the Doshakh. The wind passes through the Darvazeh and makes the Charkhbad rotate. As the Charkhbad rotates, the upper part of Tirpol rotates in the Koloosi and the lower part (Peyvand) rotates in the runner stone and rotates the Tavareh. When the Tavareh rotates, the Lok-Lokeh starts vibrating. This vibration is transmitted to the Navdani and makes the wheat flow from the wheat storage to the Navdani and pours it into the runner stone, and then converts it into flour.

To stop the windmill, the miller places the Doshakh inside the blade and leans the end of Doshakh against the outer wall of the mill to stop the rotation of blades. Alternatively, the miller presses Varkesh, by which Varkesh is pressed upwards, and presses the Mosht to Tavareh which stops the rotation of Tirpol.

The relationship between architectural features and mechanical components

The effects of mechanical components on the architectural features can be described as follows:

  • Kharpol transmits forces generated by windmill operation and the wind forces to the surrounding walls. In order to prevent any damages and maintain the stability of the windmill, the surrounding walls are built with a width of 0.8 m.

  • In order to protect the mechanical components from erosion caused by the wind, two surrounding walls are built in stepped form.

  • In order to convert kinetic wind energy applied to Tirpol in upper story to mechanical energy of the runner stone in the lower story, there is an opening on the roof of the Askhaneh where Tirpol passes through.

The effects of architectural design on the complexity of a mechanical system can be the following:

  • The accurate placement of three walls in Parkhaneh intensifies and directs the wind energy. This is how the required force to move the mechanical components is provided.

  • In order to provide the required torque and create a draft for the rotation of Charkhbad, an opening (Darvazeh) has been created in the third wall.

Conclusion

This paper investigated a windmill in Nehbandan which is an example of architectural heritage. Harnessing natural energy and using local materials such as stone, wood and adobe, the residents were able to create environmentally friendly structures. In this paper, one of these windmills that is still standing in Nehbandan was selected from a chain of windmills. Then, based on architectural survey, interviewing with millers and sketching, the dimensions of architectural elements and mechanical components were obtained and the windmill was modelled.

The results reveal that there is a close relation between architectural features and mechanical components. The orientation of this windmill toward prevailing wind, the correct placement of walls in three faces and creating a hole named Darvazeh in the third wall to direct the wind into the Parkhaneh are architectural features which provide the kinetic energy of the wind to move the mechanical components. The stepped form of the surrounding walls prevents erosion of mechanical components and as a result increases the durability of the windmill. Creating a hole in the roof of Askhaneh for the passage of Tirpol has connected the mechanism of two stories by this mechanical component. This shows how architecture is affected by mechanics. Also, mechanical components like Kharpol lead to the stability of the whole set by transferring the forces generated by the operation of the windmill and the wind force to the surrounding walls.

It is suggested that conserving these architectural heritages, creating a 3D model of them and leveraging novel technologies such as augmented reality or virtual reality can assist in better understanding of cultural heritages.

Availability of data and materials

All data obtained during this study are included in this published article, and the 3D models (in.skp) are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Allaei D, Andreopoulos Y. INVELOX: description of a new concept in wind power and its performance evaluation. Energy. 2014;69:336–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pérez-Martín E, Herrero-Tejedor TR, Gómez-Elvira MÁ, Rojas-Sola JI, Conejo-Martin MÁ. Graphic study and geovisualization of the old windmills of La Mancha (Spain). Appl Geogr. 2011;31:941–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rojas-Sola JI, Bouza-Rodríguez JB, Menéndez-Díaz A. Technical and functional analysis of Spanish windmills: 3D modeling, computational-fluid-dynamics simulation and finite-element analysis. Energy Convers Manag. 2016;123:130–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.06.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Alamdari P, Nematollahi O, Mirhosseini M. Assessment of wind energy in Iran: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:836–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Farrokh K. Shadows in the desert: ancient Persia at war. United Kingdom: Osprey Publishing; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Himri Y, Merzouk M, Merzouk NK, Himri S. Potential and economic feasibility of wind energy in south West region of Algeria. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Igliński B, Iglińska A, Koziński G, Skrzatek M, Buczkowski R. Wind energy in Poland–history, current state, surveys, renewable energy sources Act, SWOT analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;64:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jefferson M. There’s nothing much new under the Sun: the challenges of exploiting and using energy and other resources through history. Energy Policy. 2015;86:804–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kaldellis JK, Zafirakis D. The wind energy (r) evolution: a short review of a long history. Renew Energy. 2011;36:1887–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Manwell JF, Mcgowan JG, Rogers AL. Wind energy explained: theory, design and application. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Wiley; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jha SK, Bilalovic J, Jha A, Patel N, Zhang H. Renewable energy: present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;77:297–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Tummala A, Velamati RK, Sinha DK, Indraja V, Krishna VH. A review on small scale wind turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;56:1351–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Xu J, Li L, Zheng B. Wind energy generation technological paradigm diffusion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;59:436–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Saeidian A, Gholi M, Zamani E. Windmills (Asbads): remarkable example of Iranian sustainable architecture. ACEE. 2012;5:19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zayats I. The historical aspect of windmills architectural forms transformation. Procedia Eng. 2015;117:685–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Allamehzadeh H. Wind energy history, technology and control. Phoenix: 2016 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech); 2016. p. 119–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/SusTech.2016.7897153.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bjornlund V, Bjornlund H. Understanding agricultural water management in a historical context using a socioeconomic and biophysical framework. Agric Water Manag. 2019;213:454–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.10.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Möllerström E, Gipe P, Beurskens J, Ottermo F. A historical review of vertical axis wind turbines rated 100 kW and above. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;105:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shepherd DG. Historical development of the windmill. New York: Cornell Univ; 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Maslov BS. Drainage of farmlands. United Kingdom: Eolss Publishers Co., Ltd., Oxford; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Von der Lohrmann D. östlichen zur westlichen Windmühle. Archiv Kult Geschichte. 1995. https://doi.org/10.7788/akg.1995.77.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hand B, Cashman A. A review on the historical development of the lift-type vertical axis wind turbine: From onshore to offshore floating application. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2020;38:100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Baloch MH, Chaudhary ST, Ishak D, Kaloi GS, Nadeem MH, Wattoo WA, et al. Hybrid energy sources status of Pakistan: an optimal technical proposal to solve the power crises issues. Energy Strategy Rev. 2019;24:132–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sajadi A, Rosłaniec L, Kłos M, Biczel P, Loparo KA. An emulator for fixed pitch wind turbine studies. Renew Energy. 2016;87:391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Barutha P, Nahvi A, Cai B, Jeong HD, Sritharan S. Evaluating commercial feasibility of a new tall wind tower design concept using a stochastic levelized cost of energy model. J Clean Prod. 2019;240:118001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Saeidi D, Mirhosseini M, Sedaghat A, Mostafaeipour A. Feasibility study of wind energy potential in two provinces of Iran: North and South Khorasan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15:3558–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.05.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Saeidian A. Windmills in Iran. Histor Preserv. 2012;42:6507–15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Saeidian A, Bemanian MR, Zamani E, Pourjafar MR, Gholi M. A survey in sustainable design of Iranian windmill technology in desert areas. Sustain Archit. 2012;48:9295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Estakhri AII. Masālik w’al-Mamālik. Tehran: Tehran Scientific and Cultural Publication Company; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Forbes RJ. Studies in ancient technology. Netherlands: Brill Publisher; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gasch R, Twele J. Wind power plants: fundamentals, design, construction and operation. 2nd ed. Germany: Springer Science and Business Media; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hawqal MI. Kitab Surat Al-Ard. Germany: Brill; 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Needham J. Science and civilization in China, Part. 2: mechanical engineering, vol. 4. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Notebaart JC. Windmühlen: der Stand der Forschung über das Vorkommen und den Ursprung. Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co., KG; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sistani IA. Manifest Sistan. Tehran: Tehran Morghaein; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Khammas FA, Suffer KH, Usubamatov R, Mustaffa MT. Overview of vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) is one of the wind energy application. Appl Mech Mater. 2015;793:388–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ahmed AS. Wind resource assessment and economics of electric generation at four locations in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. J Clean Prod. 2018;183:1170–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Müller G, Chavushoglu M, Kerri M, Tsuzaki T. A resistance type vertical axis wind turbine for building integration. Renew Energy. 2017;111:803–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Saeed IM, Ramli AT, Saleh MA. Assessment of sustainability in energy of Iraq, and achievable opportunities in the long run. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;58:1207–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Shu ZR, Li QS, Chan PW. Investigation of offshore wind energy potential in Hong Kong based on Weibull distribution function. Appl Energy. 2015;156:362–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rojas-Sola JI, Lez M-EG, Martín EP. Computer-aided design and engineering: a study of windmills in la Mancha (Spain). Renewable Energy. 2006;31:1471–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Gabriel A, Gabriel-Kummer A. Durch Persiens Wüsten: neue Wanderungen in den Trockenräumen Innerirans. Germany: Strecker und Schröder; 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hedin S. Zu Land nach Indien durch Persien, Seistan, Belutschistan. Wetter: Germany Brockhaus; 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sykes PM. Ten thousand miles in Persia or eight years in Iran. London: Murray; 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Yate CE. Khurasan and Sistan. London: W. Blackwood; 1900.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hoseinzadeh S. One hundred and twenty days winds of Sistan. Geogr Res. 1997;12:103–27.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Molanaei S, Soleimani S. Insight into the valuable elements of Sistan local architecture in relation to climatic factors of sustainable architecture. Bagh e Nazar. 2014;13:63–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have participated equally in 3D modelling, writing—original draft preparation, visualization, investigation, writing—reviewing and editing, methodology, architectural survey, supervision, validation, verification. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nima Valibeig.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarrabi, M., Valibeig, N. 3D modelling of an Asbad (Persian windmill): a link between vernacular architecture and mechanical system with a focus on Nehbandan windmill. Herit Sci 9, 108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00587-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Asbad (Persian windmill)
  • 3D modelling
  • Mechanical system
  • Vernacular architecture
  • Nehbandan windmill
  • Heritage science