Geological background
Yungang Grottoes (113°20‵E, 40°04‵N) is located at Datong city of Shanxi Province, China, as displayed in Fig. 1. The grottoes are known as one of the largest grotto groups in China and the world-famous stone carving art, including 45 major caves, 252 shrines and approximately 51,000 sculptures. There is an average of 423 mm rain per year with rainfall distribution mostly in July, August and September. The annual average evaporation is 1748 mm, with the maximum of 801 mm in June.
The whole grottoes are divided into three parts: the east (1st–4th Cave), the middle (5th–20th Cave) and the west (21th–53th Cave). The 4th Cave with typical features of seepage hazards (Fig. 2a–f) was chosen as example of seepage channel survey where the blue box shows the actual observed water seepage and the bottom of the grottoes is 10 m higher than the groundwater level, completely in the aeration zone. Precipitation is the only source of replenishment for groundwater, which continues seeping via fractures until arriving in groundwater. Tensile joints were the most developed joints in the east of Yungang Grottoes, appearing in groups, with dip direction nearly erect and extension direction nearly east–west, roughly parallel to the faults. A total of 97 joints inside the 4th Cave were measured and the stereographic diagram for the joint patterns analysis was displayed in Fig. 2g, using upper hemisphere projection, as evidence from the rose diagram for the joint patterns analysis in Fig. 2h. The pole of each facet was shown by a triangle and the average plane was drawn with a circle line. Two groups of the joints in the 4th Cave were obvious: one group was 208°∠68° with direction of S62°E and the other is 265°∠75°with direction of N5°W。
Measurement of chemical composition
The grotto rock powders were prepared and measured using a X-ray diffraction detector (XRD, D8 Advance) with a scanning range from 3 to 70°. The XRD patterns of the grotto rock powders were analyzed in Fig. 3a for identifying the chemical composition existed in the grotto rocks. It is characteristic of obvious peaks at 20°, 26°, 36°, 39°, 50° and 60°, which could indexed to the standard lattice parameters of quartz. The typical diffraction peaks of feldspar were displayed at 28°, 35° and 42°. The peaks at 8°, 12°, 19° and 24° indicated the existence of biotite and kaolinite. It is mainly composed of 54.39% quartz and 31.20% feldspar according to semi-quantitative calculation as illustrated in Fig. 3b and as a result, feldspar-quartz slab was generated for the current computational studies.
Computational methods and models
Finite element computational details
Various studies have shown that the critical Reynolds number (Re) for a flow between a Darcy and a non-Darcy flow is 10 and the flow satisfies Darcy`s law when Re ≤ 10 [29]. Re is defined as (Eq. 1) [30]
$$ {\text{Re}} = \frac{\rho Q}{{\mu b}} $$
(1)
where ρ is the density of water, Q is the flow rate, μ is the viscosity of water, b is the aperture of the fracture. In this paper, ρ is 1.0 × 103 kg m−3, μ is 1.005 mPa s [30], Q is 1.0 × 10–5–2.0 × 10−6 m3/s [31] and b is 0.001 m. So, the Re equals to 1.99–9.95 and it was governed by Darcy`s law.
The macro-scale FE model was conducted using commercial available ANSYS software as depicted in Fig. 4. The mesh was generated for all the volume entities with 10-node tetrahedral element to better mesh quality and the converging rate. As a consequence, the FE model was discretized using approximately 8078 tetrahedral elements and 17,139 nodes. The rainfall infiltration was considered in the boundary conditions and the rainfall intensity on the top surface was set as 100 mm d−1. The bottom surface was impermeable boundary. The rainfall infiltrated from the top surface to the underground and it was governed by Darcy’s law (Eq. 2) [32,33,34]:
$$ v = - k\frac{\partial h}{{\partial l}} $$
(2)
where v is the seepage rate, k is the permeability h is the total head,l is the length of seepage path.
The flow rate Q can be calculated according to Eq. 3 [32,33,34]:
$$ Q = kw\frac{{h_{1} - h_{2} }}{l} $$
(3)
where w is the cross-section area.
The general governing differential equation for three-dimensional seepage can be expressed mathematically as following (Eq. 4) [35]:
$$ \frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left( {k_{x} \frac{\partial h}{{\partial x}}} \right) + \frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left( {k_{x} \frac{\partial h}{{\partial y}}} \right) + \frac{\partial }{\partial z}\left( {k_{x} \frac{\partial h}{{\partial z}}} \right) = \gamma_{w} m_{w} \frac{\partial h}{{\partial t}} $$
(4)
where kx, ky and kz are the permeability in the X-, Y- and Z- direction, γw is the specific weight of water and mw is storage curve slope.
MD computational details
The external pressure was applied to drive the fluid flow. All MD simulations are performed by Accerlery Materials Studio software. Figure 5 depicts the initial configuration of parallel feldspar-quartz slabs mimicking skeleton nanochannel with the inter-space (d) of 2.0 nm. A simple point charge-extended (SPC/E) model was applied for H2O molecules because of its excellent description for bulky water. 737 H2O molecules with density equal to = 1.0 g/cm−3 was randomly filled into the left reservoir with dimension of 2.00 × 2.51 × 4.40 nm3. The model consists of a 3 × 2 supercell of quartz slab and a 8 × 5 supercell of feldspar slab, for which position constraints were employed. One-layer Graphene sheet with size of 2.46 × 5.04 nm2 is assigned to motion group and acts as moveable wall (piston) for creating the driven force toward H2O molecules in the left reservoir and the right reservoir (2.00 × 2.51 × 4.40 nm3) was kept empty. Geometry optimization of 5,000 iterations was achieved for energy minimization. Following this, a MD simulation via the isothermal-isometric(NVT) ensemble with the Nose thermostat is performed using Drieding force field at 298 K with a timestep of 1 fs. The intermolecular potential energy includes the LJ 6–12 type potential (EvdW) and the Coulomb potential (Eele) to describe van der Waals and electrostatic interactions, respectively. Their mathematical expressions are displayed in Eq. 5 [36].
$$ U(r) = E_{vdW} + E_{ele} = 4\varepsilon \left[ {\left( {\frac{\sigma }{{r_{ij} }}} \right)^{12} - \left( {\frac{\sigma }{{r_{ij} }}} \right)^{6} } \right] + \frac{{e^{2} }}{{4\pi \varepsilon_{0} }}\sum\limits_{i \ne j} {\frac{{q_{i} q_{j} }}{{r_{ij} }}} $$
(5)
The LJ parameters for the O atoms are σ = 0.354 nm and ε = 0.152 kcal/mol[36].