Skip to main content

A high detail UAS-based 3D model of the Torre Benzalá in Jaén, Spain

Abstract

The constant development of geomatics tools has driven the opening of their applications to multiple disciplines, including archaeology. The possibility of performing a 3D reconstruction of archaeological remains as well as a semantic classification of the 3D surface facilitates not only a better knowledge of the historical heritage but also an essential aid to the planning and development of restoration and preservation projects of this legacy. Different data exploitation strategies are needed to take advantage of the geospatial data provided by geomatics tools. In this paper, we have studied the current state of conservation of a medieval tower, Torre Benzalá in Jaén, southern Spain. The interesting thing about this study is that very high resolution RGB images, taken by a drone, have been used in order to show the current degree of deterioration of the tower, providing accurate and precise documentation of the current state. Thus, a highly detailed 3D reconstruction of the tower has been carried out. A dense point cloud was generated to obtain a digital elevation model (DEM) to identify and quantify the most critically deteriorated areas. The results are useful for the development of an architectural maintenance and restoration project to preserve this archaeological legacy.

Introduction

The object of our study is a tower of a fortification located in the south of Spain. Both Carthaginians and Phoenicians settled in the Iberian Peninsula between 575 and 206 BC, establishing relations with the indigenous peoples known as Iberians. After the Punic Wars, the Romans ruled this territory from 206 BC, establishing provinces such as Hispania Ulterior, which later became a senatorial province called Baetica in 117 AD. The North African Muslims, known as the Moors, conquered much of Hispania between 711 and 715 AD. The fortification of Torre Benzalá is believed to have been built during the period AD 1242–1246 [1].

During the period between 1242 and 1246, once the truces between the Christian King Ferdinand III and Ibn al-Ahmar, Sultan of Arjona, and Ibn Hud, Emir of the Taifa of Murcia, were over, the area of the Jaén countryside was conquered, more specifically the urban centres of Arjona and Jaén, which were in Muslim hands, Fig. 1. It was at this time that the Muslims built various fortifications in the areas of influence of these main population centres, hence the castles of El Berrueco, Torredelcampo, Fuentetetar, El Término, Torre Benzalá, etc. were built [2].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the main towns in the countryside in the ninth-tenth centuries

The conquest of many of these fortifications by the Christians meant that they passed into the hands of encomiendasFootnote 1 such as those of Calatrava or Santiago, which reused some of the pre-existing constructions.

Ximena Jurado (1639) documents and describes the situation of the fortification of Torre Benzalá at that time by means of text and freehand drawing [2], from which it can be deduced that the place was uninhabited, although a large part of the fortification was still standing, describing a triangular plan with a crenellated walled enclosure and towers at the corners, a circular one (the one at the right in the Fig. 2) that sheltered the entrance and another square one (which is still preserved). All of them had openings and arrow slits. A circular keep could also be seen inside the fortification, which would normally have been used as a garrison residence [3]. In short, there were three towers. The largest in the drawing would be in the centre of the fortification as drawn by Ximena Jurado. (In the back corner, which is not visible in the drawing, there would be no tower, as it is an area with greater height, due to the orography and easy defence from the walls). The third circular tower, on the right side of the drawing, does not exist today, but there are some remains of its foundations under a nearby olive tree.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Source: Ximena Jurado, M. (1639), [2]. National Library of Spain. The tower highlighted in red is the one studied

Manuscript id: 1180, page 142.

At present, Torre Benzalá is in a precarious state of conservation, as it has signs of ruin and possible collapse due to the effects of the weather and, above all, to the anthropic action that has been taking its toll on its battered structure over the centuries. The Benzalá tower, as part of a fortification, has suffered over the years the actions typical of defensive architecture, as stated in the international congress Defensive Architecture of the Mediterranean (FORMED2020) [4].

In this sense, Digital technologies can be used to bring destructed cultural heritage sites back to life [5] and, specially, 3D technologies allow to access to the culture heritage elements that are difficult to reach in a real world. The use of digital techniques such as orthophotos, planimetries and digital terrain models help us to make an almost perfect copy of the real object at a given time, so it is no longer surprising that archaeological science uses these means to document, protect, reconstruct, restore, conserve [6], disseminate and spread the fragile archaeological record, therefore, obtaining a three-dimensional model of the heritage is considered ideal and necessary for a better archaeological scientific knowledge of our heritage, allowing a more in-depth a posteriori analysis such as those carried out in [7,8,9].

There is work where the Digital Elevation Model (DEM) has been used to analyse the volumetric change of an area of interest, e.g. the Cauvery Delta [10]. For this purpose, freely available SRTM, PALSAR and Sentinel 1A DEMs of moderate spatial resolution were used, yielding a root mean square error (RMSE) of 3.33, 3.11 and 3.04 m respectively. However, in this work we aim to obtain values of a higher level of detail and geometric accuracy.

Aerial photogrammetric measurement by means of UAS (Unmanned Aircraft System) is no stranger to archaeological science, as its use has been developing over the last decade. One of the advantages of the use of UAS is to be able to raise the point of view of the photograph in places that are difficult to access, such as rooftops and high areas, allowing a focus on a plane parallel to the horizontal and at the same time high, at a low cost, not being necessary to hire other means such as light aircraft or helicopters. In addition, the results obtained are usually better than those obtained with other systems such as the use of poles, scaffolding, ladders, etc. Photographic sensors installed in UAS are enabling the detection of archaeological sites, so that when sensors capable of capturing invisible light spectra such as infrared or ultraviolet are installed, the detection of underground structures belonging to settlements of past times is facilitated, as can be analysed in [11, 12].

On the other hand, UAS have demonstrated their versatility in the creation of orthoimages and DEMs (Digital Elevation Models) that are allowing the reading and interpretation of the faces of the constructions carried out in the past, such as the one carried out in [13, 14]. The use of control points allows the georeferencing of the same allowing the precise study based on the three-dimensional models obtained [15]

Archaeological science has been one of the disciplines that has applied the photogrammetric technique for the study and conservation of heritage, as it allows the reliable digitisation of structures or objects in an automated way with a reasonable economic cost compared to other digitisation systems [16]. This technique will obtain a three-dimensional model by taking overlapping photographs from various viewpoints surrounding the captured object [17]. In this study, the Structure from Motion (SfM) method was applied to obtain the 3D model of Torre Benzalá.

The SfM photogrammetric method is an automated process that, makes it possible to reconstruct an object from a set of unoriented images (i.e. without data about spatial orientation or georeferencing) taken with uncalibrated cameras, without data about the location of the main point, radial distortion, focal length or distance to the object to be studied. SfM algorithms allow reconstructing the positions and orientations of the cameras simultaneously, as well as the 3D structure of the scene, from a set of feature correspondences obtained from the superposition of images. That is, it detects common or homologous points allowing the software to find their relative positions, placing them in a three-axis coordinate system, allowing, in this study case, the characterization of the medieval archaeological remains obtained to be studied.

The aim of this study is to obtain a highly detailed and geometrically accurate 3D model of the ruins of the Torre Benzalá fortification. In this way a 3D visualisation and referencing is obtained which is useful for the identification of the materials used in the construction, reuse of previous materials,, as well as obtaining elements of analysis to be able to confirm or not the hypothesis of Ximena Jurado about the plan of the fortification, as well as the existence of the constructive elements described by him in the seventeenth century.

This article is structured as follows: “Materials and methods” Section describes the flight planning, trajectories, camera parameters and processing workflow. Besides, it shows the proposed methods for data acquisition, 3D reconstruction, point cloud characterisation, orthophoto and DEM generation. In “Results” Section, the results are presented, including the interpretation of the results and the discussion of the main issues in “Discussion” Section. Finally, “Conclusions” Section presents the main conclusions.

Materials and methods

Study area

The archaeological site of Torre Benzalá is located in the municipality of Torredonjimeno, at a distance of 9 km from the town centre (Fig. 3). Generally protected by the decree of 22 April 1949, the Spanish Historical Heritage Law 16/1985 of 25 June 1985 declared it an Asset of Cultural Interest (BIC). Despite its declaration as BIC, it has never been the object of an archaeoarchitectural study, archaeological intervention or consolidation works. In short, the Benzala Tower is a monument protected by the state authorities, but is located on a private estate.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Research area. a Location of the Study area in Spain. b Precise localization of Torre BenZalá. The coordinates (m) are UTM, zone 30 North, referred to ETRS89

The site is located on the top of the Ben-Zala hill, 544 m above sea level, to the north of Cortijo del Marqués. This promontory is located in the area of Aldea Las Casas, surrounded by olive groves. The mound area may contains the remains of a mound and vestiges of an earthen fortification, of which we have limited historical information about its construction. At present only a trapezoidal masonry tower remains (Fig. 7). Given its precarious state of conservation, it is listed on the red heritage list promoted by the Hispania Nostra Association https://bit.ly/2ONecjm.

Torre Benzalá is located in the extreme south-western part of the province of Jaén, in the depression of the River Guadalquivir, known as La Campiña Sur. The landscape surrounding the enclave is made up of hilly and/or moderately undulating slopes, forming a geomorphology of successions of hillocks, ridges and hills. This geomorphology accentuates its strategic importance from the point of view of territorial control, being one of the highest points in the southern countryside of Jaén (544 m above sea level), allowing visual communication with other fortifications located on hills of similar characteristics (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Panoramic view from Torre Benzalá. West orientation. Visual link with the town of Porcuna (Bulkuna). Facing North. Visual link with the town of Arjona (Aryuna) Source: own creation -background image: Google Earth

UAS-based and field data

An Unmanned aircraft system (UAS) is, according to the definition given by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), an aircraft and its associated elements operated with no pilot on board [18]. Popularly known as drones, RPAs (remotely-piloted aircraft systems) or UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), the ICAO guidelines [18] reserve the use of UAVs just for the aircraft, while the term UAS will refer to the whole: aircraft and its associated elements.

In recent years, the use of UAS in archaeology has become more widespread, since the possibility of obtaining data remotely is combined with the ability to capture it from a high vantage point. Having an elevated viewpoint provides archaeologists with an overview of the site under study, facilitating its understanding, and at a much larger scale than conventional aerial photogrammetry or artificial satellites. It is therefore a technology that is here to stay in the field of documentation and the detection of archaeological features. In addition to its versatility, efficiency and low cost [19], UAS can carry a wide variety of sensors (thermal, RGB or LIDAR, among others), allowing for high quality 2D and 3D products that meet the different needs of archaeological research Table 1.

Table 1 Cartographic locator of andalusian cultural heritage. ETRS89 reference system

In this research, the aerial survey was conducted with a DJI Mavic PRO FC220, equipped with a camera with a nominal focal length of 4.74 mm, and a 1/2.3′′ 12.3-megapixel CMOS sensor with a nominal pixel size of 1.55 × 1.55 μm. The DJI Mavic PRO FC220 camera creates an image of 4000 × 3000 pixels corresponding to 6.16 × 4.55 mm. The characteristics of the camera are described in Table 2.

Table 2 Main characteristics of the camera sensor. Drone DJI Mavic FC220

To get the coordinates of the Ground Control Points (GCPs), we used a total station LEICA TS-06 solidly aimed (σEDM = 2 mm ± 2 ppm). To obtain the coordinates, the vertices of the National Geodetic Network were used, taking Torrevencela as the starting point. The topographic observation method used was the radiation method, taking Torrevenzalá as the station point of reference and orienting towards another geodetic vertex, Arjona. From there the control points were radiated. The accuracy of the coordinates obtained is less than one centimetre, which is considered acceptable, since the range of the uncertainty of the acquisition and measurement of the objects (e.g., vegetation, stones, loose soil) with the photogrammetric survey is greater than a centimeter [20].

Methods

Mission planning.

Before capturing data in the field, it is necessary to visit the site in order to take notes and obtain a sketch showing the dimensions of the element to be surveyed by photogrammetric means, as well as the identification of elements that may hinder the photographic shots and/or the flight path of the drone, which is usually planned and programmed in advance. Regarding the trajectory of the drone, a circular trajectory was defined to capture the tower walls. In order to obtain maximum overlap in the images and maximum orthogonality in the camera shots, several vertical trajectories were also taken, running up and down each face of the tower and vice versa (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

(Source: own creation -background image: PNOA orthophotograph, IGN). c Orthogonal camera position to the faces of the tower

Location of photographs. a General shots. b Detail shots.

The following conclusions are drawn from the field visit:

  • The object is an almost rectangular shaped tower, located in an olive farm.

  • The proximity of olive trees to the tower may prevent the drone from having a clean flight path.

  • The presence of a geodetic vertex close to the site, taking advantage of the strategic characteristics of the location, facilitates the georeferencing of the enclave with support points.

The next step is to determine what the resolution of the survey should be, specifying a Ground Sampled Distance (GSD) appropriate to the characteristics of the object and the final product to be obtained (3D model and orthophotographs).

Three of the four faces of the tower are seriously deteriorated on the lower part, due to the extraction of the exterior ashlars for use in the construction of the surrounding farmhouses. Therefore, it is necessary to take this into account in order to establish the GSD. Exploration in situ advises the use of two GSDs: one for the more regular part, where the original ashlars remain, and another for the more deteriorated part. Also the angle of the camera was always orthogonal to the faces of the tower.

For photogrammetry at the typical architectural scales, [20] recommend the following values of ground sample distance (GSD): for 1:50 output scale, 3 mm maximum; and for 1:10 output scale, 1 mm maximum. Taking into account these recommendations and the characteristics of the object, it was decided to plan the shots with a general GSD of 5 mm and a GSD of 1 mm for the most deteriorated areas.

Once the GSD has been defined and the characteristics of the camera to be used are known (Table 2), the shots are planned (Tables 3 and 4), following the recommendations of [20] for SfM photogrammetry (80% longitudinal overlap and 40% transversal overlap).

Table 3 General shot planning
Table 4 Planning of detail shots

Georeferencing. coordinates of support points.

The photogrammetric model is georeferenced using 11 coded targets. Two-colour targets with a well-defined geometry have been used to mark them (Fig. 6). They have been placed, distributed on the four faces, two targets per each one and three of them in the most deteriorated part of the tower, as shown in Fig. 7. The size of the artificial support point (Table 5) is calculated according to the GSD established in the planning phase [20] of the general shots.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Coding of the targets. a Agisoft Metashape window with the parameters [21]. Diameter of the central point of 8 pixels. b Coded target for support point number 1

Fig. 7
figure 7

Targets on the object

Table 5 Size of artificial support points

The support points are provided with coordinates based on the creation of a closed polygonal with 4 sections, taking the trigonometric point/triangulation pillar “Torrevencela” as the initial and final point. This configuration makes it possible to give the support points three-dimensional coordinates in the ETRS89-UTM zone 30 N projection system (Tables

Table 6 Number of projections, UTM Coordinates (m), heigth above sea level (m) and associated errors (δ E, δ N, δ Alt.) of the GCPs. Errors are measured in centimeters (adapted from [4])

6 and 7).

Table 7 RMS errors (cm) in each component associated with the GPCs

In addition to georeferencing the model, the support points are necessary for the scaling of the photogrammetric model obtained in the initial phase. In the case of the SfM algorithm, the transformation from model coordinates to terrain coordinates is performed after the orientation process of the photographs, the result of which is a sparse point cloud. In this way, the generation of the dense point cloud is performed directly in georeferenced terrain coordinates.

Point cloud generation.

As a preliminary step to the generation of photogrammetric products, it is necessary to generate a dense point cloud. The result is a discrete representation of the real object, as the surface is not continuous.

The image processing has been performed with the Agisoft Metashape Pro software (v.1.7.1 build 11797) [21]. The workflow (Fig. 8) facilitates the generation of a 3D point cloud automatically, using SfM algorithms. The shot configuration can be stereoscopic, convergent or a combination of both, depending on the type of object and its complexity. The only requirement is that a point must appear in at least three images to facilitate the reconstruction of the orientation of the cameras.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The general photogrammetric workflow with Agisoft Metashape

The images obtained must be grouped in a subdirectory belonging to the project subdirectory, considered as root and where the software will store the results obtained during the processing.

The generation of the dense point cloud and the application of the external orientation includes the following steps [21]:

  • 1. Loading images into Metashape.

  • 2. Estimating the metric quality of the images. To reduce the error in the detection of support points (markers), it is advisable to discard those whose quality is lower than 0.5.

  • 3. Orient the photographs. In this phase, the internal orientation parameters of the camera and the relative orientation between them are calculated in order to produce the intersection of the homologous rays. The result is a sparse point cloud, formed by the points that have been used in the calculations.

  • 4. Detect the markers, as coded targets are used.

  • 5. Check the markers and relocate them, if necessary.

  • 6. Import the coordinates of the markers.

  • 7. Check the error in the estimated coordinates of the markers.

  • 8. Optimise the cameras to perform the absolute orientation of the photogrammetric model.

  • 9. Dimension the working area, depending on the size of the object and the area of interest. This reduces the processing time in the following phases.

  • 10. Generate the dense point cloud.

  • 11. Remove the noise from the dense point cloud.

Product generation: 3D model and Orthophoto

The desired products are twofold: a textured 3D model of the object and orthophotographs of the four faces of the tower. Both products will allow archaeologists to study the object remotely.

The creation of the 3D model can be done from the sparse point cloud, obtained by aligning the images, or from the dense point cloud. In the first case the result is of low quality while in the second case a high quality 3D model is obtained, but never higher than the GSD used to take the images. The processing time to obtain both products is low for the first case and quite high for the second, this depends on the size of the GSD defined in the mission planning section.

Orthophotograph, given its metric nature, can be used to carry out architectural archaeological studies, delimit areas of special interest, etc.

Existing image may be resampled to produce a new image that conforms to specific geometric properties. This may be a one-to-one process, where a single source image is modified into another resampled one, as is commonly the case when producing an orthophoto, or a many-to-one process, whereby a new image contains parts from multiple images as in the case in mosaicking [20] (p.963). As a complex object it is necessary to take more than one image, the orthorectified product being a composition of partial images. In Agisoft Metashape it is called an orthomosaic. The result is a resampled image where the effects of perspective and displacement due to relief have been eliminated, thus obtaining an orthoimage that has a uniform scale, as in a map. Agisoft Metashape expresses this scale in mm/pixel (Fig. 6), which is easily convertible into its normalised form (1:x).

Both products are of particular interest from a conservation and restoration point of view.

Results

The processing of images to obtain the products of this work requires a fairly significant computational load, so it is necessary to have high-performance computer equipment to keep the processing time reasonable. Of all the phases of the process (Fig. 8), the most time-consuming is the generation of the dense point cloud, as it requires the creation of the depth maps for each image as a preliminary step. Table 8 shows a summary of the different phases of the work: mission planning, flying, data processing parameters and the time needed for each process. In some phases, due to the computational demands, it is advisable to perform a low quality processing to check that the results to be obtained are as expected. For example, in the generation of the dense point cloud Fig. 9.

Table 8 Profiling of each stage
Fig. 9
figure 9

Southeast view, dense point cloud, of the tower (Agisoft Metashape)

From the dense point cloud, 5 DEMs have been obtained for the four faces of the tower (Fig. 11) and the top view (Fig. 10a). The values of the DEMs are values in depth, not values of heights with respect to the ground, i.e. distances in the direction perpendicular to the faces of the tower. The DEMs reflect the strong anthropic deterioration suffered, due to the extraction of well-made ashlars. These ashlars are mainly found in the lower part and in the corners of the tower, and correspond to the areas highlighted in white in the pictures in Fig. 11.

Fig. 10
figure 10

a DEM (1.6 mm/pixel) of the top view of the tower. b Orthophotograph (1 mm/pixel) of the top view of the tower

Fig. 11
figure 11

DEM of the four faces of the tower (1.6 mm/pixel). The eroded area is in red

The metric analysis of the tower establishes that the volume, in its current state, should be 48.2 m3. The loss of materials in the lower part, due to selective extraction (anthropic erosion) and meteorological erosion, amounts to a total of 5.1 m3, 10.5% of its current volume.

The orthophotographs obtained have a high image quality and a resolution in accordance with the plan (1 mm/pixel). Both allow vector products to be obtained with a CAD software, and can be printed on paper at scales typical for architectural surveys [20] and no larger than 1:10. Regarding the metric quality of the products generated, measurements were taken on the different faces of the tower, with a flexometer, and these were contrasted with the measurements taken on the orthophoto. The results showed differences of no more than 1 cm.

Discussion

In this work a correct methodology and of possible application has been used to carry out an analysis and hypothesis proposal on the fortification of Torre Benzalá that allows a better interpretation of this medieval construction, determining the relationship between the written source and the preserved tower, with the aim of its future conservation and enhancement.

The oldest and most decisive written source on the Benzalá tower is to be found in the text and drawing made by Ximena Jurado in 1639. It shows a walled fortification with a triangular ground plan and towers at two of its corners, one rectangular and the other circular, which contained openings and arrow slits. A circular keep can also be seen inside the enclosure with the same construction elements used to shelter the garrison. The entrance to the interior of the protected space would have been located in the wall between the towers. On the other hand, this drawing shows the completion of the merlons with a pyramid-shaped top, characteristic of the Mudéjar style known as albardilla. At the present time, one might wonder whether this triangular fortification was actually built, or whether there are fictitious elements that have no basis in the written source.

The results obtained from the orthoimages generated corroborate the interpretation of a more complex construction than that of a simple medieval tower. This tower has a trapezoidal construction (Fig. 10.a). Irregular sandstone masonry is used for its construction, with the smoothest of its faces showing on the outside, with lime and sand mortar and reinforced at the corners with sandstone rocks with a rope-and-pound mortar. On the other hand, it can be seen that the empty spaces between these masonry blocks are filled with rubble or small stones, thus ensuring that the horizontality of the courses is not considerably altered. This type of Castilian construction is characteristic and comparable to that of other castles and fortifications that share a similar chronology and even greater geographical proximity, as can be seen in [12]. The use of masonry in the construction is the most reasonable technique, since the fortification is located in a frontier area and it is necessary to be as efficient as possible in its construction. Therefore, it could be determined that the construction would have taken place between 1242 and 1251, a period in which there is written evidence of the construction of the Castillo del Berrueco by the Order of Calatrava, which owned this commandery and that of Torre Benzalá [[21].

The analysis of the resulting data shows a different hypothesis that contradicts the one put forward in her drawing by Ximena Jurado. According to the orthoimages, the tower was built in a solid form, lacking interior spaces or chambers where the saeteras drawn could be incorporated. However, we can confirm the hypothesis of the starting point of two walls from this tower that would defend the flanks in that part of the fortification, with parapets that would give access to the upper part of the tower. The dismantling and plundering carried out for the construction of nearby farmhouses at the end of the nineteenth century left their mark mainly on the north face of the tower itself, with a loss of material at its east end measuring 2.45 m high by 3.20 m wide and at its west end measuring 3.65 m high by 1.20 m wide (Fig. 11b). This difference in height and width indicates that the thicker east-facing section of the wall was the weakest defensive point. On the other hand, it would be defended by the flanking of the two towers (circular and square). The existence of different heights in the two walls that converge at this tower explains the difference in height between the wall facing north-east and the wall built facing north-west Figs. 12 and 13.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Orthophotographs of the four faces of the tower (1 mm/pixel). The eroded area is in white

Fig. 13
figure 13

Photogrammetric survey a East face and b South face of Torre Benzalá (orthophotos and outlines of the preserved elements)

The removal of material from the tower part reveals the interior appearance of the tower, which tells us about the construction process used in the tower. Firstly, the four sides of the wall were built with masonry, leaving the interior empty up to a certain height. Secondly, this core was filled with a mixture of mortar and masonry that was more irregular and smaller than that used on the outside. We cannot categorically dissociate Christian construction from possible Muslim construction in terms of materials and building techniques because they often influence each other. It is possible that the Christians occasionally employed Muslim builders and equipment and vice versa, in fact the completion of the merlons with pyramidal termination is more typical in the Mozarabic period, although it would continue to be used in later Castilian castles as can be seen in the castle of El Berrueco, of the same chronology and geographical proximity.

The DEM and orthophoto of the upper surface of the tower (Fig. 10) do not reflect the real strength and height of the tower, which would have had a parapet to access its terrace flanked by a crenellated parapet with merlons that could have been perforated with arrow slits. This is supported by the existence of the need to defend this flank of the fortification and the arrangement of stones protruding from the tower in the upper northwest corner.

The limited economy in the construction of the tower is confirmed by the reuse of stone material that had been carved earlier, such as a carved stone with a cylindrical perforation resembling a stone hinge (Fig. 14a) and another in the form of a portion of a stepped shaft (Fig. 14b), which confirms the hypothesis of economic savings, effort and time spent both in carving and in transporting the material. The absence of stonemason’s marks and the more than possible use of structures from the nearby Roman settlement “Ordo Batores” further confirm this hypothesis.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Detail of the carving with cylindrical perforation on the east face a and detail of a portion of the stepped shaft on the south face (b) of Torre Benzalá

This study could be completed with other subsequent studies using LIDAR and TLS techniques, as in [22,23,24,25], which could define the dimensions of the plan of the fortification, as well as the positioning of the wall sections that made up the fortification. Unfortunately, the structural loss of almost the entire fortification makes virtual reconstruction based on historical documentation and following the principles of the London Charter and Seville principles the basis for virtual archaeology unfeasible.

Therefore, in our opinion, it is urgent to carry out the appropriate archaeological interventions, developing a documentation project to obtain relevant information, aimed at carrying out certain conservation and restoration works to prevent the deterioration of the monument. In this way, Torre Benzalá could be integrated into the circuit of cultural visits of the route of the Castles and Battles, thus contributing to the development and improvement of tourist competitiveness, within the framework of quality tourism, promoting the conservation and enhancement of the heritage and history of this territory, as well as the economic development of the area [26].

Conclusions

Torre Benzalá, as well as its non-existent fortification, played a leading role in the border lines established between Arabs and Castilians between the years 1224–1246. The photogrammetric and descriptive documentation in this study shows that it was built in the Castilian period, reusing building materials from the Roman period.

The state of conservation of the tower is quite worrying. Apart from the usual historical looting, which can be seen in the disappearance of the walls, and the numerous stone remains that can be found around the tower, we would like to emphasise the possibility of the tower collapsing due to the continuous climatic action.

In the field of archaeology, the data collection process must be meticulous and formally recorded. The great advantage of geomatic techniques is that an enormous amount of information about an archaeological site can be obtained in a single day. In a single day of data acquisition a large amount of details are recorded, all of them important however insignificant they may seem, any piece of data or piece of pottery, can shed light on the research carried out and, therefore, must be recorded, otherwise they will be lost forever. Thus it is necessary that the historical heritage be properly studied and preserved so that, generation after generation, it is transmitted without its essence being blurred. It requires the work and ability of the archaeologist to produce a measured, drawn and written record; properly preserved and archived finds; and a final report that is fully synthesized and presented to the appropriate authorities.

The working methodology and data acquisition techniques used in this work have made it possible to obtain a 3D model of the current state of the Benzalá Tower with a high level of detail and geometric accuracy. The maximum RMSE obtained in the model is 4.6 cm. This corroborates that the technology used guarantees obtaining a useful product for visual and analytical analysis. As for the volumetric analysis, reliable results can also be concluded due to the high precision of the model both in planimetry and altimetry.

Finally, the worldwide availability of the Internet opens up new innovative avenues for dissemination and cooperation. Data stored in the cloud allows results to be shared and made available to researchers and students around the world. Moreover, if the results are 3D metric quality data, as is the case presented, they can be used as a basis for Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality applications in Cultural Heritage.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. The encomienda is a was part of the spanish medieval feudal system, which structured society and relationships, holding land/encomienda in exchange of services. In this case the Order of Calatrava or Santiago, was granted a group of people to work for them in exchange providing them protection.

References

  1. Castillo Armenteros, J.C.; Alcázar Hernández, E.M. 2006 La Campiña Del Alto Guadalquivir En La Baja Edad Media. La Dinámica de Un Espacio Fronterizo. Studia Historica Historia Medieval. 24.

  2. Ximena Jurado, M. Antigüedades Del Reino de Jaén. 1639 Antiquities of the Kingdom of Jaén. Biblioteca Nacional de España. MSS/1180.

  3. Cerezo Moreno, F.; Eslava Galán, J. 1989 Castillos y Atalayas Del Reino de Jaén. Riquelme y Vargas: España. ISBN 84-86216-18-4.

  4. fortmed2020 Fortmed2020: https://fortmed2020.wordpress.com/ (Accessed 16 October 2022).

  5. Stylianidis E, Evangelidis K, Vital R, Dafiotis P, Sylaiou S. 3D Documentation and visualization of cultural heritage buildings through the application of geospatial technologies. Heritage. 2022;5:2818–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5040146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conservation of cultural heritage: http://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/conservation-cultural-heritage (Accessed 16 Oct 2022).

  7. Enríquez C, Jurado JM, Bailey A, Callén D, Collado MJ, Espina G, Marroquín P, Oliva E, Osla E, Ramos MI, et al. The UAS-based 3D image characterization of mozarabic church ruins in bobastro (malaga) Spain. Remote Sensing. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12152377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Orihuela A, Molina-Fajardo MA. UAV photogrammetry surveying for sustainable conservation: the case of mondújar castle (Granada, Spain). Sustainability. 2021;13:24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bercigli M. Dissemination strategies for cultural heritage: the case of the tomb of zechariah in Jerusalem. Israel Heritage. 2019;2:306–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage2010020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández Díaz, M.; Fernández Díaz, M. La Profesión de Piloto de Drones en el ámbito del Patrimonio Cultural y la Arqueología: ciencia y divulgación desde el aire.. The Drone Pilot Profession in the field of Cultural Heritage and Archaeology: science and divulgation from the air. https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/69056/ (Accessed 12 November 2022).

  11. Themistocleous K. The Use of UAVs for Cultural Heritage and Archaeology. In: Hadjimitsis DG, Themistocleous K, Cuca B, Agapiou A, Lysandrou V, Lasaponara R, Masini N, Schreier G, editors. Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Landscapes. Berlin: Springer; 2020. p. 241–69.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. García-Pulido, L.J., Palazón J.N., Camacho F.O. 2020 Análisis de las estructuras emergentes del castillo de La Peña, cabeza de la encomienda calatrava de Martos (Jaén). Arqueología de la Arquitectura. e092-e092 https://doi.org/10.3989/arq.arqt.2020.001.

  13. Vilbig JM, Sagan V, Bodine C. Archaeological surveying with airborne LiDAR and UAV photogrammetry: a comparative analysis at cahokia mounds. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sammartano, G.; Spano, A. 2016 DEM Generation based on UAV photogrammetry data in critical areas. pp. 92–98.

  15. Agüera-Vega F, Carvajal-Ramírez F, Martínez-Carricondo P. Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation ground control points number using unmanned aerial vehicle. Measurement. 2017;98:221–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rajakumari S, Mahesh R, Sarunjith KJ, Ramesh R. Volumetric change analysis of the cauvery delta topography using radar remote sensing. Egyptian J Remote Sensing Space Sci. 2022;25:687–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moya, J.A.; Muñoz Ojeda, F.J. 2017 Fotogrametría de restos arqueológicos subacuáticos. El modelo del pecio Bou Ferrer. Ayuntamiento de l’Alfàs del Pi. ISBN 978-84-697-7374-1.

  18. ICAO. 2011 Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS). Cir 328 AN/190; International Civil Aviation Organization: 999 University Street, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 5H7

  19. Pecci, A.; Masini, N. 2016 Archaeology, Historical Site Risk Assessment and Monitoring by UAV: Approaches and Case Studies. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EPSC2016-17424.

  20. Andrews D, Bedford J, Bryan P. Metric Survey Specifications for Cultural Heritage. In: Andrews D, editor. Liverpool University Press. Historic England; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Agisoft, L. 2020 Agisoft Metashape User Manual. Professional Edition, Version 1.6; Agisoft LLC

  22. Mullen, R.A., Bethel, J., Mikhail, E.M., and McGlone, J.C.; 2006. Manual of Photogrammetry, 5th Edition. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72:312.

  23. Guía Digital Del Patrimonio Cultural de Andalucía - Junta de Andalucía (In Spanish). Digital Guide to the Cultural Heritage of Andalusia - Junta de Andalucía: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/iaph/areas/documentacion-patrimonio/guia-digital.html Accessed 13 Nov 2022.

  24. Uribe P, Angás J, Romero F, Pérez-Cabello F, Santamaría D. Mapping ancient battlefields in a multi-scalar approach combining drone imagery and geophysical surveys: the roman siege of the oppidum of cabezo de Alcalá (Azaila, Spain). J Cult Herit. 2021;48:11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. García-Molina DF, González-Merino R, Rodero-Pérez J, Carrasco-Hurtado B. Documentación 3D para la conservación del patrimonio histórico: el castillo de Priego de Córdoba. Virtual Archaeol Rev. 2021;12:115–30. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2021.13671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vizcaíno AS, Pérez MN, Torres IM, Cuenca VS, Hernández EMA, Armenteros C. El Patrimonio Medieval de Jaén En Europeana. El Proyecto Europeana Archaeology. Arqueología y territorio medieval. 2019;26:275–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This result has been partially funded through the research project 1381202-GEU, PYC20-RE-005-UJA, which are co-financed with the Junta de Andalucía and the European Union FEDER funds.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FL-C contributed to the archaeological investigations, conceptualisation of the study area, the interpretation and analysis of results and conclusions. AR-M contributed to the planning of the fieldwork. The design of the flight parameters and the obtaining of the photogrammetric products and the generation of the resulting cartographic products. CE contributed to the planning and execution of the drone flights and to the supervision of the analysis of the products resulting from the processing of the images. MIR has contributed to the general supervision of the paper, to the writing of the manuscript and layout of the manuscript as well as to the mailing and exchange of mailings with the journal. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. I. Ramos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lerma-Cobo, F., Romero-Manchado, A., Enríquez, C. et al. A high detail UAS-based 3D model of the Torre Benzalá in Jaén, Spain. Herit Sci 10, 203 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00835-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00835-x

Keywords

  • Archaeology
  • 3D reconstruction
  • UAS
  • Geomatics