Case study: the small-rock mountain retreat
The Small-Rock Mountain Retreat (SRMR) is located in Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China. It is part of Heyuan, a national protected historic garden built between the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. It is believed that this rockery was originally designed by Shi Tao, the great artist of the Qing dynasty (1636–1912) [26]. The garden was gradually abandoned in the middle and late Jiaqing reign (1796–1820), and the owners of the rockery and the surrounding gardens have changed several times over the next 100 years. Although the garden has undergone many changes, the main part of the rockery has survived and was discovered and recognized as a cultural heritage in 1962.
SRMR, facing south in front of the posterior wall of the garden, is a rectangular wall-hugging rockwork (Fig. 2). The rockery is made of stacked Taihu Lake stones, covers an area of about 238 square meters. The main peak rises from its western end to impose its steep presence upon the pond at its foot, and the highest point is about 875 m. Below the peak stands the so-called “mountain retreat”, a two-bay square stone chamber hidden in the rockery body, which is a metaphor for the intention of the designer to live in seclusion in nature [1].
The surface of SRMR has two main characteristics, one is the well-proportioned density and space (Fig. 3). The designer and crafters of the rockery had taken great pains in selecting rocks and put them together according to their sizes, textures, and veins, following the principle of a painter’s texturing brush strokes derived from natural peaks [27]. In the era when waterways were the only means of bulk transportations, Yangzhou, as a city without quarriable mountains, could only rely on small pieces of Taihu Lake stone transported from Suzhou and other places as the material for making artificial mountains. This was a challenge for artificial mountain crafters and called for higher stone-pilling expertise. Therefore, the texture of the SRMR is very detailed and the density is very well controlled to ensure that the whole mountain looks seamless. The proper contrast between solid and void is another important characteristic of SRMR (Fig. 3). Shi Tao is a great master of Chinese traditional arts, especially in controlling the contrast and balance between tangibles and intangibles in his landscape paintings. This theory and techniques were well applied in the design and construction of the rockery, the shape of the rock is well handled, and rich light and shadow contrast effects are obtained through the changes of convexity and concave [28].
When SRMR was discovered by CHEN Congzhou in 1962, the western main peak and the eastern cave remained, but the other part of the rockery had collapsed (Fig. 4). The restoration project was organized by local management department in 1989, which has fully protected the historical remains, and connected them by applying local Taihu Lake stone stacking techniques to form a completed artificial mountain. Shi Tao’s paintings and the oral history from the garden owners’ family were used as evidence during the restoration. However, the evaluation of the results of the rockery restoration was mixed, in which the point of contention is that whether the restored parts continue the characteristics of the historical remains. Therefore, SRMR provides an appropriate case for us to explore the digital characterization approach.
Data acquisition and processing
In this study, we used laser scanning tools to collect spatial information of SRMR. A Leica BLK360 rack-mounted laser scanner and a GeoSLAM ZEB-REVO handheld laser scanner were combined to ensure the accuracy and the integrity of data in confined rockery spaces [30]. The data acquisition process demonstrated that the handheld laser scanner has higher flexibility to cover the extremely complex surfaces of the rockery. The point cloud data was then imported into the CloudCompare 2.12.2 program after registration, combination and clean up in Leica and GeoSLAM preprocessing programs. Outliers were then removed and noise reduction was conducted by point cloud filtering, and the points of plants in the model were separated using the CANUPO plug-in in CloudCompare. Further data processing was conducted to manually refine the classification results. Based on the processed point cloud model, a mesh model was then created using Artec 3D Geomagic Wrap 2017 software for further analysis (Fig. 5).
Data analysis and visualization
Based on data integrity, restoration process, and the characteristics, we selected two sample surfaces on the digital models for quantitative analysis and comparison. Sample A is a key part of the historic relic peak that is believed to have been built in the eighteenth-nineteenth century and reflects the characteristic of the "small stone mosaic, the well-proportioned density and space" of SRMR. Sample B is the key part of the restoration completed in 1989. The analysis and comparison of the two samples were performed using both the point cloud data and mesh model data. From the perspective of the overall structure of the rockery, sample A is the main part, and sample B is the subordinate part. While there are obvious differences in their shapes, what we want to examine is whether their surface textures are similar, that is, whether the recently restored part inherits the historical characteristics of ancient remains, and whether the characteristic can be expressed by quantitative means.
The attributes of surface complexity and the contour curvature were examined to analyze the characteristic of the well-proportioned density and space. The rockery texture density is formed by its small stones as materials and traditional stone stacking techniques, and has distinct historical and local features. The complexity of surface is an attribute demonstrating the basic units and the pattern of the rockery texture. Therefore, we analyzed the complexity of the rockery surface by calculating the ratio between the area of the sample surfaces and the volume they occupied. The larger the ratio, the larger the surface area per unit volume and the more complex the corresponding surface texture. On the premise of non-overlapping and complete data, four representative cubic units were selected from the two sample areas, based on the side length of 2 m (Fig. 6).
The areas and volumes of the point cloud model in the cell space were captured by CloudCompare. In terms of the technical parameters, the volume was calculated by dividing the bottom surface of the point cloud into discrete grids with side length of 0.02 m. The volume of each grid was then calculated and summed up. The calculation formula of surface complexity, k, is as follows:
$$k = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\frac{{s_{i} }}{{v_{i} }}} ,n = 4$$
Based on the identification of surface complexity, we hope to use the contour curvature to analyze the pattern and similarity of the surface texture, and then evaluate the characteristic of well-proportion. The contours of the digital model were extracted and the box-counting dimension method from Fractal Theory was used to analyze the self-similarity of the contours, so as to capture the unity and consistent of density and space [31, 32]. The contour lines were extracted in CloudCompare. In terms of the technical parameters, some ten 0.01 m-thick point cloud segments were intercepted at 0.2 m spacing in sample A and B (Fig. 7). The maximum edge length of 0.25 m was used as it can retain most of the transitions.
As the result, ten longitudinal contour lines were extracted respectively with the redundant segments were manually removed (Fig. 7). For the fractal dimension calculation of contour lines, we used box dimension calculation method, taking different box side lengths, \(\varepsilon\), approaching 0, and count the number of boxes required for covering the figure, \({N}_{i}(\varepsilon )\). The logarithmic ratio of that to the number of boxes in the unit length, 1/\(\varepsilon\), is called box dimension. The contour curvature, d, is defined as a quantitative index to show the overall irregularity and complexity of the contours. The average value of the box dimensions of multiple contour lines extracted from the samples was taken as the overall contour curvature, d. The calculation formula is as follows:
$$d = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {\mathop {\lim }\limits_{\varepsilon \to 0} } \frac{{\log N_{i} \left( \varepsilon \right)}}{{\log \left( {{\raise0.5ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle 1$} \kern-0.1em/\kern-0.15em \lower0.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle \varepsilon $}}} \right)}}$$
The Fractalyse 3.0 software was used to calculate the box dimension, and the minimum box side length was set as 0.1 m and the maximum length was 1.6 m, to fit the characteristic of the sample areas. The highest and lowest values were removed during the process to reduce the impact of extreme data. The average value of the box dimension of the contour lines was used as the indicator of curvature.
The attributes of shape variation and the interweaving of lightness and darkness were examined to analyze the characteristic of the proper contrast between solid and void. Rockery is an art in which solid and void are integrated in the same space. We first analyzed the composition of solid and void elements on the rockery surface by identifying the degree of undulation and variation of the surface shape. The verticality of points in the digital model was calculated in CloudComplare with a radius of 1 m. The distribution trend of the verticality v of the point cloud model was used to quantify the richness of shape variation. By importing the point cloud verticality data into the MathWorks Matlab R2021a software to calculate the normalized standard deviation of point z values with verticality above 0.75, the shape variation richness index, r, was calculated by using the following formula:
$$r = \frac{1}{{z_{max} - z_{min} }}\sqrt {\frac{{\mathop \sum \nolimits_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {\left( {z_{i} - \overline{z}} \right)^{2} } \right)}}{n}} , v_{i} > 0.75$$
The change of lightness and darkness is an attribute that can intuitively reflect the solid and void changes on the surface of the rockery and its scene. We simulated the lighting environment by Rhino 6.0 software, conducted lighting experiments and image analysis for the mesh model, and then quantitatively compared the characteristics of the two sample areas. The common 60 degrees solar altitude angle was applied, and some 9 angles were selected in 9 equal parts within the 180° range in front of the viewing surface of the rockery. The images of lightness and darkness of sample A and B were then created. The dark areas in the images were extracted for further analyses (Fig. 8). The average value of the rotational inertia of each black area, I, in the lightness-darkness diagram against the overall center of mass was calculated by MathWorks Matlab, and the interweaving degree of the lightness and darkness under this light condition was measured by the following equation:
$$I = \frac{1}{n}\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{n} \left( {\left( {x_{i} - \overline{x}} \right)^{2} + \left( {y_{i} - \overline{y}} \right)^{2} } \right)$$