Skip to main content
Heritage Science
Download PDF
Download ePub

The dissemination of Chinese potash-rich faience: investigation of faience beads from the Wupu cemetery, Xinjiang

Heritage Science volume 11, Article number: 69 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

The Wupu cemetery, located in the Yizhou District, Hami City, Xinjiang Province, and in the eastern part of the southern foothills of the Tianshan Mountains, is remains from the late Bronze Age. In this study, four faience beads excavated from the Wupu cemetery were examined by stereomicroscopy, synchrotron radiation micro-CT, and electron microprobe analysis. The appearance and compositions of these faience beads are presented and discussed. The results show that these tubular faience beads, glazed by the application glazing method, are all potash-rich faience, consistent with the faience produced locally in China. The faience products from the Central Plains were disseminated to the Hami region of Xinjiang Province during the Western Zhou dynasty (1046 BC–771 BC), reflecting the spread of such faience to the west with the Zhou people mastering the technique of making potash-rich faience.

Introduction

The production and distribution of faience

Faience is an early decorative object made from quartz grains as the body, which was covered with glaze and fired at temperatures approaching 1000 °C [1]. The types of faience objects range from small tube beads to large tiles. The production of faience was first developed in Mesopotamia and Egypt [2,3,4], and from which it spread westwards and northwards to Europe and northern grasslands, and from these sites eastwards to the east and south of Asia. Faience in the Indus Valley first appeared at the beginning of the 3rd millennium BC but began to decline in the 2nd millennium BC [5].

The earliest faience beads in China were dated from 1661 to 1546BC, and found in the Adunqiaolu site in Wenquan County, northwestern Xinjiang [6, 7]. Thereafter, faience in the Central plains lasted mainly from the Western Zhou (1046–771BC) to the Warring States period (475–221BC). It emerged in the Western Zhou, flourished during the Spring and Autumn period (770–476BC), declined from the Warring States to the Qin dynasty, and nearly disappeared in the Han dynasty (206BC–220AD) [8].

Composition characteristics of faience beads produced in different places

The flux composition of faience products is an important characteristic to distinguish the provenance. According to previous studies, the early production of faience in West Asia and Egypt used lime, natural soaking soda ash, and soda-rich plant ash as fluxes, resulting in Na2O/K2O ratios much greater than 1 for the majority of the finished faience [9]. Later, on the way to the north and west, Europeans mastered the technique of faience production and substituted the raw materials used with locally accessible materials [10]. In Western Europe, mineral evaporite and plant ash have been used as faience fluxes [11], producing faience characterized by high sodium and mixed alkali [12].

In China, the first-appeared faience had high sodium and mixed alkalies, such as the Adunqiaolu site (nineteenth–fifteenth centuries BC) [7, 13], the Tianshanbeilu in Hami (1500–1400BC) [14], and the Ya'er cemetery (1050–910BC) [15]. Scholars tend to believe this technique began in Eurasian steppes and then may have spread from Xinjiang to the Yellow River basin through the Hexi Corridor [16]. Potash-rich faience began to appear in China in the 1st millennium BC, such as at the Dahekou site in Shanxi, the Peng State site in Shanxi, and the Yuguo cemetery in Shaanxi, all of which are in the Yellow River basin. Potash-rich faience is often thought to be of indigenous Chinese production because of their compositional characteristics different from those provenances which already known. However, the route and mode of the technique dissemination are still unknown (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map showing the location of key sites mentioned in this study (1. Adunqiaolu site, Xinjiang 6, 7; 2. Ya'er cemetery, Xinjiang 15; 3. Tianshanbeilu site, Xinjiang 14; 4. Wupu cemetery, Xinjiang; 5. Shangsunjiazhai site, Qinghai 14; 6. Dapuzishan cemetery, Gansu 49; 7.Yujiawan site, Gansu 52; 8. Yuguo cemetery, Shaanxi 18; 9. Liangdaigou site, Shannxi 23; 10. Peng State site, Shanxi; 11. Tianma-Qucun site, Shanxi 23; 12 Yangshe cemetery, Shanxi 23; 13. Dahekou site, Shanxi 48; 14. Guo State site, Henan 17; 15. Western Zhou cemetery at Zhongzhou Road, Henan 18)

Full size image

Research aim

This study presents a synthetic analysis of four faience beads excavated from the Wupu cemetery and compared them with the faience beads excavated from other Chinese sites of the same period. We focus on exploring the dissemination routes and modes of Chinese indigenous faience beads during the Western Zhou period and providing insights into the study of this particular faience production during the middle and late Western Zhou.

Materials and research methods

The Wupu cemetery in Hami, Xinjiang (Fig. 2) was discovered in 1978 and has undergone several excavations ever since. This site was excavated with a wide variety of materials for decorations, with beadwork such as agate beads, turquoise tube beads, glass beads and faience beads currently detected. Four faience beads from the Wupu cemetery were investigated in this study. Dating of other textile items such as plant and woolen clothing excavated from the tombs indicates that most of these remains were from the mid to late Western Zhou period, with a few from the early Western Zhou. The four faience beads in this study were all excavated from the Wupu cemetery, two (HW-F-3 and HW-F-4) of which were from burial 78HWM1, and no remains were suitable for dating at this time. A single-eared pottery pot (Fig. 3) was also excavated from the same tomb where the studied faience beads were unearthed in the Wupu Cemetery, and it is similar to the single-eared pottery pots dated to 800–500BC from the Ya’er cemetery in Hami. A similar object was also excavated from M75 in the Yanbulake cemetery. Based on the similar forms of these pottery and other burial relics dating results from the Wupu site, the studied faience beads were probably produced from the mid-to-late Western Zhou dynasty to the Spring and Autumn Period, no earlier than 1000BC.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Map showing the location of Wupu cemetery

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

The Wupu cemetery 78HWM1:1 single-eared pottery pots①

Full size image

Of the four faience beads from the Wupu cemetery (Fig. 4), HW-F-4 is an ovoid bead, while the other three are all tubular beads, and they all have varying degrees of fragmentation and weathering. In cross-section, all four beads have a white body covered with a blue-green glaze. Details are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Faience beads excavated from the Wupu cemetery

Full size image
Table 1 Overview of some of the faience beads excavated from the Wupu cemetery
Full size table

Examination conditions:

  1. 1.

    Stereomicroscope: The stereomicroscope model is KF-7700 produced by Japan HIROX. The working conditions included a Halogen cold light source, MX-5040RZF lens, and 2.01 million dynamic pixels. Beads were observed at 50×–100× magnification.

  2. 2.

    Synchrotron radiation micro-CT (SR-μCT): Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) beamline station BL13W. The distance between the sample and the detector was 10 cm. The maximal photon flux density was observed to appear at the X-ray energy of 27 keV. The charge-coupled device detector had a spatial resolution of 9 μm.

  3. 3.

    Electron microprobe analysis (EPMA): JXA-8230, JEOL. The beam spot of 3 μm in diameter and operating voltage of 20 keV were used. The glassy material inside the faience body was analyzed in a vacuum and the measurements were averaged to represent the compositions.

Results

Results of stereomicroscope observations

Stereomicroscope observations show that all four faience beads have white dense bodies with blue-green glaze, which have many small bubble pits on the surface. Sample HW-F-2 has a groove around its surface, which may have resulted from the incomplete truncation of the faience tube during manufacture (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Results of stereomicroscopic observation (a HW-F-1, b HW-F-2, c HW-F-3, d HW-F-4)

Full size image

Results of synchrotron radiation micro-CT analysis

Synchrotron radiation micro-CT for the observational examination of remains is feasible because heavy elements in the remains have a higher absorption of X-rays and appear brighter in CT sections. The obtained images can be used to identify the density and chemical composition of faience and their variations from the body to glaze, which could help reveal the possible glazing methods.

In the three CT images, HW-F-1 and HW-F-2 are the cross-sections of the sample, and HW-F-3 is the longitudinal section of the sample. As shown in the microscopic CT images (Fig. 6), each faience bead has a dense body with small granules of unfused quartz and rounded bubbles inside, a clear demarcation between body and glaze, and a thick and uniform glaze layer. The glazing method is likely to be the application glazing method. The inner wall of the body is straight and regular, suggesting it should have been molded by the core-forming method.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Morphology of the sample bead sections under micro-CT (a HW-F-1, b HW-F-2, c HW-F-3)

Full size image

Results of the electron microprobe analysis

As a traditional minimal-damage method, only limited samples from the remains could be analyzed. As samples HW-F-1, 2 and 3 were taken from sections where the edges were about to fall off and sample HW-F-4 was smoother and more intact, to protect the remains to the maximum, samples HW-F-1, HW-F-2, and HW-F-3 were selected for EPMA analysis, and the internal parts of the bodies were analyzed to minimize the effects of weathering. The composition of the Corning glass specimens was examined and validated prior to sample testing using the electron microprobe to ensure that the test data are quantitatively accurate and reliable.

Three to five spot analyses were performed on each sample and the data were averaged (Table 2). Before normalization, the analyzed total contents of 97–100 wt% agree well with the expected analytical total contents from 98 to 102 wt %, suggesting little or minor weathering on samples andreliable analyticalresults of this test. The data obtained show small differences in fluxes between the three samples, which have SiO2 content between 72.75 and 76.35%, Na2O content of 1.39–2.39% and K2O content of 11.92–12.32%, with Na2O/K2O ratios of 0.12–0.19. These chemical characteristics indicate the samples are potash-rich faience.

Table 2 Electron microprobe composition data results (wt %)
Full size table

Discussion

Production process

Typologically, the ovoid-shaped form of Sample HW-F-4 has been excavated in many other regions of China. For example, the Peng State cemetery, the Dahekou site, and the Tianma-Qucun site in Shanxi all have ovoid faience beads similar to Sample HW-F-4 from the Wupu site. Tubular faience beads are found in tombs from around the Western Zhou period, including the Sanmenxia Guo State site in Henan and the Yuguo cemetery in Shaanxi [17, 18]. Shortland suggests that tubular faience was first produced in the Northern Caucasus [19]. Prior to this study, tubular faience beads from 1700BC–1500/1400BC were excavated in the Tianshanbeilu and the Saensayi Cemetery in Xinjiang Province, while those from the Central Plains did not occur until 1040BC–950/910BC in the Shanxi-Shaanxi region [14]. Among them, both contemporaneous tubular beads and oval beads are present in Shanxi Peng State Cemetery (Fig. 7), Shanxi Dahekou site, Shanxi Tianma-Qucun site (Fig. 8), Qinghai Shangsunjiazhai site (Fig. 9) and other sites, similar to the combination of beaded ornaments of Wupu Cemetery. The similarity in faience form and the combination of beads indicate the connection between the Central Plains and Xinjiang.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Ovoid and tubular faience bead from the Peng State cemetery, Shanxi [22]

Full size image
Fig.8
figure 8

Ovoid and tubular faience bead from the Tianma-Qucun cemetery, Shanxi [23]

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure 9

Ovoid and tubular faience beads from the Shangsunjiazhai cemetery, Qinghai [14]

Full size image

In terms of the molding process, the SR-μCT results show that HW-F-3 has a vertical uniform inner wall, indicating that the faience beads should have been molded by the core-forming method. The grooves surrounding the tubular bead on the surface of HW-F-2 may have been made by artificial pressure with a tool after the glaze was fired. It is possible that a long, thin tube of faience was made and cut into short sections after or during firing. HW-F-2’s grooves may be the result of an incomplete cut.

In terms of the glazing process, the internal morphology of the three small faience bead ornaments (HW-F-1, HW-F-2, and HW-F-3) excavated from the Wupu site revealed by SR-μCT shows a dense body with a thick and uniform glaze layer and a clear boundary between the body and glaze. For the efflorescence glazing method and cementation glazing method, the boundary between the carcass and the glaze layer is not clear due to the infiltration between the glaze layer and the body [20]. Therefore, the glazing method for the studied beads with clear body-glaze boundary was likely to be the application glazing method [21]. The irregular bubble pits in the glaze of the samples are unevenly distributed, which may be a reduction glaze phenomenon, and they also represent the traces of direct application glazing.

Composition characteristics and raw material

The excavated Chinese faience was mainly from the Western Zhou to the Spring and Autumn period and was mainly composed of SiO2. The Na2O contents are very low, and most Na2O/K2O ratios are much lower than 1, showing an obvious high potassium characteristic [9]. In contrast, faience from Western Europe has Na2O/K2O ratios around 1 or just below 1, and the sodium contents are usually much higher than those of the potash-rich faience excavated in China. The Chinese faience has distinct compositional characteristics from the Egyptian and Mesopotamian Plain's faience. Lin studied the different compositional characteristics of faience and concluded that a minimum total alkali content above 4% was required to minimize element loss due to weathering, 6–7% would be preferred for accuracy. Therefore, faience with a Na2O/K2O ratio above 1.5 can be considered soda-rich, while faience with Na2O/K2O ratio between 0.5 and 1.5 or slightly higher can be classified as mixed-alkali faience. Potash-rich faience is defined by a total alkali content above 7% and a Na2O/K2O ratio below 0.4 [14]. The EPMA data in this study show that faience beads are potash-rich with K2O contents above 10% and Na2O contents below 3%.

Based on this feature, it is speculated that in the mid-1st millennium BC, China had already used local raw materials to make faience that was characterized by the use of high-potassium fluxes. Some scholars have suggested that this high-potassium flux may have derived from the ashes of the Chenopodiaceae family of halophytic plants, such as Salsola [24]. However, the low Ca and Mg contents of the faience samples in this study and the complex compositions of the plant ashes with their high impurity contents indicate that purer minerals were more likely to be the flux [24], given that it was uncertain whether clarifiers were used in the treatment of plant ashes. Of these, soil nitrate and saltpeter (KNO3 being the main component) are more likely to have been used as fluxes for potash-rich faience. Saltpeter ores are widely distributed in Xinjiang, Shanxi, Shandong, and Sichuan in China. In addition to mineral resources, Brill suggests that precipitated salts from toilets could also be sources of saltpeter [25]. Saline alkaline land and northern rural walls in China commonly have white precipitates, where soil nitrate is more easily accessible and the processing and purification are simply boiling and precipitation.

The glaze of these faience beads is green. Copper is often considered to be the coloring agent for blue-green faience. The presence of CuO in our analytical results suggests that the coloring agent used must contain copper because Cu2+ would have appeared blue-green during the firing at high temperatures [26, 27]. The use of this coloring agent could have been related to the development of copper smelting [28] and also to the fact that it was originally used as a substitute for precious natural stones such as turquoise for decoration, which was consistent with the indigenous Chinese aesthetics.

Modes of dissemination of potash-rich faience

Cultural exchanges between Xinjiang and the Central Plains have existed since ancient times. Since twenty-first century BC [29], the agricultural civilization represented by painted pottery has spread westwards many times, from the Shaanxi-Gansu region to Xinjiang through the Hexi Corridor. For instance, the amphora diamond grid painted pottery jars in the remains of the Tianshanbeilu in Hami, Xinjiang, are examples of the painted pottery forms of the Machang civilization in the Gansu-Qinghai region [30, 31]. In addition, the costume remains from the Wupu site show similarities to the costume combinations of the Shang and Zhou people, with a strong influence from the Central Plains [32]. The hooked thunder pattern and hooked pattern (a kind of decorative pattern) on the fabric of the Yanghai cemetery in Xinjiang are similar to the clouded thunder pattern and hooked thunder pattern that were prevalent during the Shang and Western Zhou dynasties in Central Plains [33, 34], indicating the influence of the Central Plains civilization on the Xinjiang region during the Shang and Zhou periods. At the same time, culture spread from west to east, with weapons, horse tools, decoration and other bronze and even iron tools from the Eurasian steppe through Xinjiang and influencing the Shaanxi-Gansu region [31, 35, 36]. Cultural exchanges in the Xinjiang region have been characterized by great diversity and complexity. Eastern cultures, represented by painted pottery, entered Xinjiang, interacted with cultures from the west, and continued advancing westwards. These cultural exchanges presented the rich cultural heritage in Xinjiang and laid the foundation for the Silk Road in later times [37,38,39].

The faience in this study dates from roughly 800BC to 500BC, between the late Western Zhou and Spring and Autumn periods. During the same period, Central Asia was in the early stage of the Persian Empire, when the nomadic people of the Eurasian steppe had already migrated eastwards. The frequent migration of nomads across the vast steppes also played a significant role in ancient ethnic exchanges. The cultural exchange between the people of Central Asia and the native Chinese people became more frequent and diverse [40]. The development of the faience-making technique in Xinjiang was influenced by a combination of factors, with Egypt, West Asia, and Europe all playing a role in its development, whereas the role of the central Chinese region (Central Plains) cannot be ignored.

Influenced by Mesopotamia and Egypt or Caucasus faience products, a local Chinese faience system began to sprout, and it began to spread in turn to the west after the localization of the production techniques. According to previous research, most of the potash-rich faience from the Western Zhou period was found in Gansu, Shaanxi, and Shanxi provinces, i.e. mainly in the Central Plains. During the reign of King Cheng of Zhou (1043BC–1021BC), the establishment of the Eastern Capital of Luoyi in Luoyang (Henan) as a new political center led to economic and cultural development. Henan became the center of development in the Central Plains, where superb production techniques flourished. The production and use of faience are one of the manifestations of this prosperity. Faience beads were excavated from the Western Zhou cemetery at No. 816 Zhongzhou Road, Luoyang, which date from the time of King Mu (977BC–922BC) [18]. Faience beads from the cemetery site of Guo State in Sanmenxia, northwest of Luoyang, date mainly from the ninth to the seventh century BC, which was an important vassal state of the Western Zhou period. However, due to sample breakage and element loss, faience from both sites was impossible to identify its original composition.

Furthermore, during the Western Zhou period, the Zhou dynasty expanded its territory through many wars [41]. King Zhao of Zhou waged several wars against the state of Chu to the south [42], and the losses in the wars also led to a decline in the state’s power [43]. According to available excavations, no potash-rich faience has been unearthed in the south of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, which might have resulted from a weaker control of this region due to the loss of expansion to the south during the Western Zhou. In contrast, interactions between the Zhou and the many tribes of the northwest were more frequent. The tombs of the Central Plains during the Western Zhou period show the characteristics of the various tribes of the northwest tribes. The bronze ritual vessels excavated at Liangdai village in Shaanxi incorporate features from other surrounding tribes [44]. Bronze mirrors were excavated from the tombs of the State of Guo in Henan and are thought to have been first introduced to the Shang dynasty from west of Central Asia through the Hexi Corridor [45]. The exchange of civilizations was a two-way street, with the Zhou incorporating features learned from the surrounding tribes of the northwest into their own civilization, as well as bringing the technology and products of the Central Plains to the northwestern tribes.

Historical records show that, during the Zhaomu period (966BC–922BC), the growing power of Quanrong hindered the interaction between the Zhou people and other countries in the northwest. As a result, King Mu of Zhou made three expeditions to the west to restore interaction with other countries in the northwest. It is recorded in many historical books, such as Guoyu Zhouyu (The State Language of the Zhou), and is considered to be a historical fact. Among these, the Biography of Mu Tianzi is part of the Zhushujinian (Bamboo Book of Chronicles), written by historians of the state of Jin during the Spring and Autumn period and historians of the state of Wei during the Warring States period, and was discovered in a tomb in Ji County, Henan, during the Western Jin period. In recent times, Hu Yinglin's Sibuzhenge (The Four Correct Errors), and Liang Qichao's the Authenticity of Ancient Books and Their Dating have all concluded that the Biography of Mu Tianzi is real [46]. The route of the third expedition is detailed in the Biography of Mu Tianzi. King Mu of Zhou stayed in Yuguo (Shanxi Province) and crossed parts of Gansu, Qinghai, and Xinjiang [47]. According to previous archaeological excavations and scientific research, potash-rich faience has been excavated from several locations along the route, mostly dating from the mid-late Western Zhou period to the early Spring and Autumn Period, which is consistent with the period influenced by the Western Zhou. In addition to the Luoyang sites mentioned above, faience beads were unearthed along this route till the Peng State. The faience beads excavated from the Peng State also have high potassium contents. This may indicate a distinct local faience system in the Peng State [23], which is also supported by the high-potassium faience beads found in the Dahekou site not far to the northeast of the Peng State [48]. Potash-rich faience has also been excavated from Dapuzishan cemetery in Gansu [49]. On his return journey, King Mu of Zhou passed through the Hami region of Xinjiang [50], which may have likely influenced the Wupu region.

In conclusion, exchanges between the Western Zhou and the tribes in the northwest were either peaceful and civilized or violent and confrontational, resulting in a political, economic, and cultural clash. The dissemination of potash-rich faience was also a result of this mutual exchange. Through warfare and trade, the techniques and finished products of potash-rich faience spread as far as the Western Zhou forces could reach.

The combination of oval faience and tubular high-potash faience, and ages of the excavated beads discussed earlier, including those from the Shanxi Peng State site, the Shanxi Dahekou site, the Shanxi Tianma-Qucun site, the Shanxi Yangshe Marquis of Jin site, and the Qinghai Shangsunjiazhai site, are similar to those of the faience of the Wupu Cemetery. Except for the Shangsunjiazhai site with controversial ages [51], the remaining sites all belong to the Zhou Dynasty period (Fig. 10). The shapes, combinations, compositions, and eras of the faience unearthed at these sites are highly similar, suggesting that the faience beads were likely related in some ways and were made by the same technique.

The potash-rich faience beads excavated in the Wupu sites have also shed light on the mode of faience bead dissemination. The Wupu site is the only site in Xinjiang where potash-rich faience has been excavated, and the faience forms overlap with those excavated in the Central Plains. This indicates that the finished products rather than the technique of potash-rich faience were imported to the Wupu site because a technique import would have a wider distribution of potash-rich faience. Secondly, the Biography of Mu Tianzi mentions that King Mu of Zhou offered rewards along his western expedition and that King Xiao of Zhou (892BC–886BC) rewarded faience beads to Quanrong when Quanrong was defeated and tributed horses for peace. Therefore, it is likely that faience bead ornaments spread to nomads and other northwest tribes as one of the various diplomatic rewards. Meanwhile, the Western Zhou period was economically prosperous with trade markets in larger cities. The faience beads in this study were probably traded by exchange, plundered in war, or rewarded by the Zhou, whereas the technique of potash-rich faience remained in the Zhou reign and did not spread to the nomads and other tribes in the northwest.

Conclusion

Four faience beads excavated from the Wupu site in Hami were studied through microscopic typological observations and compositional analysis. The microscopic morphological observations have revealed these faience beads were small pieces made in bulk using the application glazing method, while the tubular bead was probably cut from a long tube. The molding process would be the core-forming method. The compositional analysis shows that the tubular faience beads are all potash-rich, with a possible flux of saltpeter or soil nitrate, and were locally produced in China, as opposed to the Western mixed-alkali faience and soda-rich faience using mixed alkali plant ash and natural soaking soda as fluxes.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Map showing the location of key sites mentioned in this part (1. Wupu cemetery, Xinjiang; 2. Shangsunjiazhai site, Qinghai 14; 3. Dapuzishan cemetery, Gansu 49; 4. Yuguo cemetery, Shaanxi 18; 5. Peng State site, Shanxi 23; 6. Tianma-Qucun site, Shanxi 23; 7. Dahekou site, Shanxi 48; 8. Guo State site, Henan 17; 9. Western Zhou cemetery at Zhongzhou Road, Henan 18)

Full size image

Based on the morphological and compositional characteristics, the faience beads excavated from the Wupu cemetery in Hami are potash-rich faience. This potash-rich faience may have been introduced during the exchange between the Zhou and northwestern tribe peoples during the Western Zhou period when the faience production techniques of the Central Plains were disseminated to various parts of China. The faience beads unearthed in this study were considered imported finished products based on their small quantity, which is consistent with the lack of potash-rich faience-making techniques in the Hami region of Xinjiang as revealed in this study. The potash-faience-making technique was mastered by the Zhou and appeared within the geographical areas that the Zhou could influence through war and trade.

The Hami region was located on the road from Europe and Central Asia to the Central Plains of China, and the results of several archaeological excavations in Hami show a high consistency with other archaeological remains from the surrounding areas. This suggests that, by the middle of the 1st millennium AD, the Central Plains and Xinjiang were already in relatively frequent contact and exchange, influencing each other in terms of production and trade. During the late Western Zhou and Spring and Autumn periods, the manufacturing industries of the Central Plains were well developed, with the rapid development of copper smelting, textiles, and other handicrafts. These exchanges have enriched the living of the local people in Xinjiang.

Availability of data and materials

Will be made available on reasonable request.

References

  1. Tite MS, Bimson M. Faience: an investigation of the microstructures associated with the different methods of glazing. Archaeometry. 1986;28(1):69–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1986.tb00375.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tite MS, Shortland AJ. Introduction. In: Tite MS, Shortland AJ, editors. Production technology of faience and related early vitreous materials. Oxford: Oxford University School of Archaeology; 2008. p. 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaczmarczyk A, Vandiver PB. Faience production in Egypt. In: Tite MS, Shortland AJ, editors. Production technology of faience and related early vitreous materials. Oxford: Oxford School of Archaeology; 2008. p. 57–90.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bouquillon A, Kaczmarczyk A, Vandiver PB. Faience production in the Near East and the Indus Valley. In: Tite MS, Shortland AJ, editors. Production technology of faience and related early vitreous materials. Oxford: Oxford School of Archaeology; 2008. p. 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stone JFS, Thomas LC. The use and distribution of faience in the ancient east and prehistoric Europe. Proc Prehist Soc. 1956;22:37–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan Y, Wang Y, Cong D, Jia PW. Analysis of faience from the adunqiaolu cemetery. Xinjiang. 2020;5:123–7 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Thilo R, Tan Y, et al. New evidence for the transcontinental spread of early faience. J Archaeol Sci. 2020;116:105093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gan F. Technology development of Chinese ancient glass. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Publishing House; 2005. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fu X, Gan F. Chinese faience and frit. J Chin Ceram Soc. 2006;4:427–31 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Angelini I. Faience production in Northern and Western Europe. In: Tite MS, Shortland AJ, editors. Production technology of faience and related early vitreous materials. Oxford: Oxford School of Archaeology; 2008. p. 129–35.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson J. Electron probe microanalysis of mixed-alkali glasses. Archaeometry. 1988;1:77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tite MS, Shortland A. The composition of the soda-rich and mixed alkali plant ashes used in the production of glass. J Archaeol Sci. 2006;33:1284–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jia P, Betts A, Cong D, et al. Adunqiaolu: new evidence for the Andronovo in Xinjiang, China. Antiquity. 2017;91(357):621–39. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2017.67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin Y, Rehren T, Wang H, et al. The beginning of faience in China: a review and new evidence. J Archaeol Sci. 2019;105:97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2019.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu N, Yanga Y, Wang Y, et al. Nondestructive characterization of ancient faience beads unearthed from Ya’er cemetery in Xinjiang, Early Iron Age China. Ceram Int. 2017;43:10460–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gan F. The glass and Jade road—the cultural and technical exchange of silicate based artifacts outside China before Qin Dynasty. J Guangxi Univ Natl (Nat Sci Ed). 2009;41:6–17 (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Y, Chen K, Ma Q, et al. The analysis of faience beads from Marquis Guo State Cemetery in Sanmen Gorge of Henan Province. Sci Conserv Archaeol. 2017;29(2):45–54. https://doi.org/10.16334/j.cnki.cn31-1652/k.2017.02.008. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang B. Preliminary study on Western Zhou glass. Palace Museum J. 1980;2:14–24 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shortland A, Shishlina N, Egorkov A. Origin and production of faience beads in the north Caucasus and the northwest Caspian Sea region in the Bronze Age. In: Lyonnet B, editor. Les Cultures du Caucase. Paris: CNRS Editions; 2007. p. 269–83.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matin M, Matin M. Egyptian faience glazing by the cementation method part 2: cattle dung ash as a possible source of alkali flux. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2016;8:125–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-014-0218-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gu Z, Kenoyer JM, Yang Y. Investigation of ancient Harappan faience through LA-ICP-AES and SR-μ CT. J Instrum. 2016;11(4):1–9. C04001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/11/04/C04001.

  22. Gu Z, Zhu J, Xie Y, Xiao T, Yang Y, Wang C. Nondestructive analysis of faience beads from the Western Zhou Dynasty, excavated from Peng State Cemetery, Shanxi Province, China. J Anal At Spectrom. 2014;29(8):1438–44. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4JA00031E.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lei Y, Xia Y. Study on production techniques and provenance of faience beads excavated in China. J Archaeol Sci. 2015;53:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.09.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brill RH. The chemical composition of a faience bead from China. J Glass Stud. 1989;31:11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brill RH. Chemical analyses of some glasses from Frattesina. J Glass Stud. 1992;34:11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pollard AM, Moorey PRS. Some analyses of middle Assyrian faience and related materials from Tell al-Rimah in Iraq. Archaeometry. 1982;24(1):45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shortland AJ. The use and origin of antimonate colorants in early Egyptian glass. Archaeometry. 2002;44(4):517–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4754.t01-1-00083.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gan F. Development history of ancient chinese glass. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technological Press; 2016. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tong J, Ma J, Li W, Chang X, et al. Chronology of the tianshanbeilu cemetery in Xinjiang, Northwestern China. Radiocarbon. 2020;63:343–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Han S. Bronze age and early iron age cultures of Xinjiang. Beijing: Culture Relics Press; 2007. p. 99 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Han J. The polychrome ceramic roads and early sino-western cultural communications. Archaeol Cult Relics. 2013;195(01):28–37 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li W, Kang X. Study of costumes in Xinjiang ‘s Bronze age. Art Des Res. 2014;63(01):69–78 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jia Y. Studies on the woolen textiles in ancient Xinjiang. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House; 2015. p. 255 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu X, Hou M. The spread of central-plain cultural elements to the tianshan area in prehistoric China. J Xinjiang Normal Univ (Ed Philos Soc Sci). 2021;42(06):60–8. https://doi.org/10.14100/j.cnki.65-1039/g4.20201225.001. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mei J, Wang P, Chen K, Wang L, Wang Y, Liu Y. Archaeometallurgical studies in China: some recent developments and challenging issues. J Archaeol Sci. 2015;56:221–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.02.026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Han J. Early iron and early iron age in Xinjiang. Soc Sci Front. 2018;277(07):130–7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jing Z, Wang L. Xia, Shang and Zhou archaeology. 2nd ed. Beijing: Science Press; 2020. p. 495–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang L. Analysis of the development of production and operation in the turpan area during the early iron age. J Western. 2022;158(05):13–6. https://doi.org/10.16721/j.cnki.cn61-1487/c.2022.05.002. (in Chinese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rawson J. China and the steppe: reception and resistance. Antiquity. 2017;91(356):375–88. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2016.276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gan F, Cheng H, Li Q. The origins of ancient Chinese glass—a study of the earliest ancient glass in China. Sci China (Ser E: Technol Sci). 2007;3:382–91 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang H. The study on the relationship between the royal finances depleted in middle and late era and the Decline of West Zhou Dynasty. Shanghai: East Chain Normal University; 2015. p. 78–83 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Liu L. Discussion on issues related to King Zhao of Zhou southern expedition to the Jianghan region. Jianghan Archaeol. 2000;3:66–71 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dai S. The doubtful deeds of King Zhao of Zhou and King Mu of Zhou as found in the book of “Chuci Tianwan.” Haidai J. 2019;01:99–107 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rawson J. Ordering the exotic: ritual practices in the Late Western and Early Eastern Zhou. Zurich: The Museum Rietberg Zurich; 2013. p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rawson J. Ordering the exotic: ritual practices in the late western and early eastern Zhou. Zurich: The Museum Rietberg Zurich; 2013. p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ling F. The chapter named King Mu of Zhou in Liezi was later publicated than the biography of Mu Tianzi. J Jiangxi Norm Univ (Philos Soc Sci Ed). 2021;54(06):49–57 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Li Y, Geng B. A study of the Xinwangmu in Pre-Qin documents and the Animal Tail in Western Asia and Northern Africa: also on the Westward march of Zhoumuwang and the cultural exchange between China and Foreign countries in the Pre-Qin Period. J Dunhuang Stud. 2020;2:150–66 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Scientific analysis of Faience Beads from M6043 at the Dahekou Cemetery. Archaeol Cult Relics. 2019;2:114–9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang Y. Technological research of faience in Western-Zhou and Eastern-Zhou Periods. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing; 2019. p. 68–72 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gu S. Lectures on the western expedition of the biography of Mu Tianzi. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Literature Press; 2015. p. 28 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yang Y. Archaeometry should be based on archaeology, A comment on Lin et al. J Archaeol Sci. 2020;119:105149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang Z, Ma Q. Faience Beads of the Western ZhouDynasty Excavated in Gansu Province, China: A Technical Study. In: Gan F, Robert HB, Tian S, editors. Ancient Glass Research along the Silk Road. Singapore: World Scientific; 2009. p. 275–89. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812833570_0013.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 22BKG023). Samples were kindly made available for analysis by Xinjiang’s Institute of Cultural Relic and Archaeology. We are grateful to the Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics in Xian and the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility.

Funding

The financial support is from the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 22BKG023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China-Central Asia “the Belt and Road” Joint Laboratory on Human and Environment Research, Key Laboratory of Cultural Heritage Research and Conservation, School of Culture Heritage, Northwest University, Xi’an, 710127, China

    Rui Wen, Xueqing Hu & Shiyuan Cao

  2. Xinjiang’s Institute of Cultural Relic and Archaeology, Ürümqi, 830011, China

    Yongqiang Wang

Authors
  1. Rui Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xueqing Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shiyuan Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yongqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WR carried out the research design, HX was a major contributor in writing the manuscript, CS tested the relics samples to obtain data, and WY collected the relics samples. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Wen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

The consent for the publication of details and images in the manuscript are obtained from all participants.

Competing interests

No conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, R., Hu, X., Cao, S. et al. The dissemination of Chinese potash-rich faience: investigation of faience beads from the Wupu cemetery, Xinjiang. Herit Sci 11, 69 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00901-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00901-y

Keywords