Skip to main content

Current progress on murals: distribution, conservation and utilization

Abstract

As non-renewable cultural heritages, murals have important implications in historical customs, religions, and philosophy as well as their aesthetic values. Recently, many murals are threatened by natural factors and human activities. During the past decades, there are increasing interest in the investigation of murals. Here we review the current status of murals and provide an up-to-date summary of achievements related to murals. The murals that draw the most attention are distributed in Mexico, Ireland, China, and Spain. The aesthetics, history, cultural, educational, and economic values of murals are comprehensively analyzed. The main research technologies used to detect the chemical compositions and physical structures of murals are also summarized. The restoration of murals includes several procedures such as stabilization, repair, surface cleaning, and pigment reconversion. Emerging technologies such as computer science benefit the research and conservation of murals. We also propose that tourism management and climate change should be incorporated into the conservation of murals in the future.

Introduction

A Mural is a painting on a wall, ceiling, bridge, or other permanent substrates, it is usually connected with architecture. The murals are widely distributed around the world. The earliest murals can date to about 52,000–40,000 BP as cave paintings in Borneo [1], and about 32,000 BP in Chauvet cave in France [2]. In ancient Egyptian tombs which were built around 3150 BP, many ancient murals have been found. These pre-historic murals were used to convey messages or stories of former lifestyles or habits. It has been suggested that communication through paintings on walls eventually formed a writing system [3].

As a visual cultural heritage of historical recording information, murals, especially ancient murals, are precious heritages because they reflect the life and cultural advances of human history as well as enormous value to humanity [4]. They represent a masterpiece of human creative genius, and exhibit an important interchange of human values [5]. Therefore, murals have significant historical, aesthetic, ethnological, anthropological, and scientific values.

There is increasing attention in the research and conservation of murals during the past decades. To provide context on the relative activity concerned with murals, we performed the search at the end of 2022 using the “All Fields” categorical function, and the baseline period is the last 22 years. Based on the Web of Science (Clarivate Analysis) databases including both Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), the yearly publication counts since 2000 were extracted. It is clear that the results from the words of murals, wall paintings, and cave paintings showed similar increasing trends (Fig. 1). However, due to the natural degradation of the materials of the murals, effects of changing environmental conditions, heightened human activities, increasing pollution, as well as natural hazards including earthquake, rainstorms, floods, and rockfall, many ancient murals were damaged to varying degrees [4]. The damages and deteriorations of murals strongly affect their values and impose great risks to the conservation of this type of cultural heritage [6].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Number of publications in the web of science through time for various search terms associated with murals, wall paintings, and cave paintings. The search was based on the data from the ISI Web of Science databases including Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), and the search was conducted on December 2, 2022

The traditional restoration of murals mainly depends on the manual implementation, these methods are time-consuming and expensive, while the efficiency is usually low. These methods are irreversible and risky, and thereby restrict the development of mural protection [7]. During the past decades, there are emerging new methods for the detection of mural materials composition and multiple-layer structures [8, 9]. Based on the physical, chemical, and biological analysis, the processes and mechanisms of the deterioration have been extensively discussed [10,11,12]. Meanwhile, new materials and methods have been also developed for the conservation of murals [13,14,15]. In addition to on-site study and conservation measures, machine learning [6, 16], deep learning [17, 18], and virtual reality methods [19,20,21] are widely used for the detection and conservation of murals with the rapid development of computer science and technology. These progresses greatly improve our ability to study and conserve murals although the modern restoration of murals is still time-consuming and complicated work.

Many murals are also important resources for tourism and education. Once damaged, the murals are not recoverable and thus the heritages should be protected for sustainable development. The fundamental solution is to protect the intact murals against deterioration under natural and anthropogenic influences. During the past decades, although many achievements have been made to protect the murals [22], many areas face challenges to conserve murals, and it is also challenging to balance modernization and heritage protection [23]. In this review, the progress in the distribution, values, chemical composition, physical structure, deterioration, and its driving mechanisms, restoration, and protection of murals are synthesized. The future directions of mural protection are also described. The objective of this study is to provide an important scientific frame for the future conservation and utilization of murals by synthesizing the findings on murals.

Major distribution areas of murals

Although there is no strict rule to define the modern and ancient mural arts, murals that were painted since the nineteenth century are usually regarded as modern murals, which are distributed in many cities such as Madrid, New York, London, Paris, Mexico, and some of them become famous tourist destinations [3]. For the ancient murals, the magnitude, conservation status, and values varied greatly. Some ancient murals with high values alone themselves or together with other cultural or natural components have been added to the world heritage sites (https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/), which are designated by United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Many ancient murals are distributed in imperial palaces, mausoleums, caves, temples, ancient cities, and archaeological remains that are listed in world heritage sites.

There are some regional mural data have been established. The Web Gallery of Art (https://www.wga.hu/index1.html) is a virtual museum and a searchable database that contains some murals in Europe from the 3rd to nineteenth centuries. It serves multiple purposes including a source of artistic enjoyment, a convenient alternative to visit a distant museum, a tool for education, etc. The Rock Art Database (https://rockartdatabase.com/) focuses on the arts that are painted on the rock. This database is a non-profit online project at Griffith University in Australia, and it seeks to improve theory and practice in the digital curation of rock data. The Mural and Street Art Databases (https://guides.canadacollege.edu/murals/databases) provide several links for different books and mural data in different areas. The datasets mainly belong to street art, and most of the murals contained in the databases are modern graffiti. There are no global datasets for murals due to the wide distribution and the enormous number of murals. The publication number in different areas were analyzed. Although the publication number is not identical to the number and importance of the murals since publication on international journals is affected by other factors such as the language, and development of science and technology in these countries, it is definitely a useful indicator of the public’s level of concern for murals. Based on the Web of Science (Clarivate Analysis) databases including both Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), the search on December 2 in 2022 using the “topic” categorical function with the inputting words of “murals” and the name of each country we re-conducted. All the publication counts to show the spatial distribution of publications numbers were collected (Fig. 2). The highest numbers were recorded in Mexico (157), Ireland (135), China (128), and Spain (111), followed by the United States (84), France (63), Japan (52), and Egypt (51). Here the typical murals in Europe, America, and Asia were briefly introduced.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The number of all the publications in the web of science till 2022. The search was based on the data from the ISI Web of Science databases including Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), and the search was conducted on December 2, 2022. The figure was created using ENVI 5.3 (Exelis Inc., Boulder, CO)

Europe has the highest number of publications in murals. The earlier murals were found in ancient cities or tombs. For example, the ancient city of Ostia (Italy), which can date back to the second century had many murals on buildings [24], and the Etruscan tombs that were decorated with murals in Italy were developed during a period from the 7th to the third century BCE [25]. However, the murals largely were destroyed and only can be studied by the fragments in the ancient city [24], and the murals in tombs had suffered from physic-chemical and biological weathering due to the temperature and humid regimes [25]. Currently, the murals that received extensive attention are usually associated with the building in churches, and most of these murals were painted in the Medieval period. The church of Sotterra in the province of Cosenza, Italy, is probably the Byzantine origin. The frescoes in this church, which date back to the 9th to tenth century, present a direct derivation from the Byzantine stylistic features [26]. In the rupestrian church Grotta del Crocifisso (Lentini, Italy), the earliest mural paintings date back to the twelfth century, and these wall paintings constitute the greatest wealth of this church [27]. Located in Castellammare del Golfo (Trapani, Italy), Santa Margherita’s cave is a natural cave, containing the remains of paintings, which can date back to thetwelfth century. This cave is a karstic cave, located on a coastal cliff. Due to the humid conditions and sea aerosols which influenced the salt composition and microbial community, the murals are now in a poor state of conservation [28]. The Museo Nacional del Prado in Spain is composed of several buildings, and some of them were built in the seventeenth century have famous murals [29]. In southern Sweden, all the Romanesque murals are dated to around the thirteenth century [30]. In Russia, the St. George Cathedral was built in the first half of the twelfth century. The wall paintings covered all the walls, some stairs towers, and the cupola that crowns the tower. However, due to the fire damage, most of the decoration of the interior was replaced in the first half of the nineteenth century, and the original the twelfth century murals were preserved only in the stairs tower. During 2013–2017, a large number of pieces of knocked-down the twelfth century murals were discovered below the floor level. Some of the large fragments are preserved in high-quality paintings and can be used for mural restoration [31]. In central Europe (Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia), many churches were established around 1400 because central Europe was an important crossroad of political, economic, social, cultural, and artistic currents at that time. Many parts of these churches were painted with murals. The murals from the fourteenth century show strong Italian Trecento influences, while those from the fifteenth century have more local impacts [32]. Northern Ireland has around 2000 murals, which mainly belong to modern morals. These murals can be traced back to 1908 when the Protestants began painting murals to celebrate the victory in the Battle of the Boyne in 1690 [33]. The largest concentration of murals was found in Belfast, which has at least 700 murals. Many of these murals clearly showed political conflicts [34, 35].

America has a rich mural heritage, and this is especially true of Mexico, Canada, and the United States. These murals show many features of their history, culture, politics, and even their education or advertising [36]. In Mexico, the murals in Teotihuacan, which is considered a major cultural and political center of ancient Mesoamerica, were painted embedded since the early stages (1–200 CE) and until the collapse of the great city (650 CE) [37, 38], and these beautiful and complex murals are considered the important source of understanding Teotihuacan culture and society [39]. Despite the ancient murals in Mexico can be traced back to Mayan Empire [40, 41], the most famous murals in Mexico were created in the modern era. The major creation of murals in Mexico began in the 1920s when the Mexican government attempted to reunify the country under the government post-Mexican revolution [42]. From the 1920s to the 1970s, many murals with nationalistic, social, and political messages were pained in many public settings, most of them located in historical buildings and museums [43].

In Asia, there are many ancient tombs and buildings that have murals. These murals are painted in different periods that span a wide time period. Some of these murals are famous. For example, the Goa-ri Tomb in the Republic of Korea, has murals that were painted in the sixth century. Many of the wall murals were missing at the time of their discovery, and the remaining murals have immense value as cultural heritage [44]. Although many other murals in tombs or ancient buildings in Asia may be small and not famous, they are still valuable resources for history researchers [45]. The most important murals found in Asia were discovered in the areas along the Silk Roads, and several famous murals sites are distributed from central Asian countries to China. The Mogao Grottoes in northwest China, represent the greatest achievement from the 4th to the fourteenth century. They were first constructed in 366 CE [46]. These grottoes preserve the largest underground galleries in the world, and there are currently more than 2000 painted sculptures in the 487 caves. A total of 45,000 m2 of murals in these grottoes show various aspects of historical politics, economics, culture, arts, ethnic relations, and daily dress [47]. The murals in these grottoes accounted for most of the studies in China. Among the 128 publications on the international journal in China (Fig. 2), 102 of them focused on Mogao Grottoes. In Northwest China, there is another grotto site that has been inscribed on the World Heritage List, namely, the Kizil Grottoes. These grottoes are regarded as the earliest major Buddhist cave complex in northwest China. These grottoes were excavated in the third century and ended in the ninth century [48]. There are 236 cave temples in Kizil that stretch at a length of 2 km. Although many caves have been damaged and looted, there are about 5000 m2 murals remaining, mostly depicting Jakat stories, avadanas, and legends of the Buddha [49]. In addition to the Buddha culture, Jesus Christ also appears in Asian murals. For example, the St. Mary’s Orthodox Syrian Church in southern India, which was built in the sixteenth century, is a treasure trove of mural art. The murals depict the major events in the life of Jesus Christ, the Lord’s mother, the trial of Christ, the crucifixion, and Christ being brought down from the cross [50].

Values of murals

The murals may display an incredibly high level of skill in complex portrayals of various scenes from life. In addition to the aesthetic values, murals have a great history, cultural, religious, educational, tourism, and commercial values and thus are of interest to archaeologists and scientists for research work.

Murals show many historical community events and thus have important historical values. Many murals are termed “peace walls”, “walls that speak”, “walls of expression”, “walls of heritage", “walls of pride”, “walls of empowerment”, etc. [51]. These murals clearly demonstrate information about the culture, lifestyle, production, living conditions, and nature at that time [52]. The music and dance were also clearly shown in the murals [53].

Murals have cultural and religious values because they represent one of the most important facets that embody the identity, traditions, and practices of a country, and they usually reflect the spirit and aspirations of the specific community [54]. For example, the murals can show the alcohol trade, drinking customs, and banquet culture, as well as the types, materials, and decorative patterns of drinking vessels, liquor stores, commerce, and alcoholic beverages [55]. Murals have religious values since there are visual symbols that may reveal underlying meanings and values. In Northern Thailand, some murals illustrate the rebirth of Buddha, and Buddha in heaven being beseeched, Buddha touching the earth, and these murals represent an assertion of certain core values expressed in ancient Buddhist symbols [56]. In ancient Greek, where the religion is polytheistic, a large number of murals represent the divine and secular world, i.e., their worship of animals and nature, integration between humans and animals, divinity, and humanity [57].

In addition to the aesthetics, design, and color of murals that can be used as teaching materials. The design of a mural can be used to trigger inspiration, and the color of murals can be used to teach students how to distinguish similar colors [58]. The murals can also play an important role in inclusive education. The murals can only be completed with an emphasis on ideas development and collaborative execution including ideas development, mural design, wall preparation, layout plotting, painting execution, varnishing protection, documentation, appreciation, and reflection [54]. The murals are also representative of the significance and the essence of arts, i.e., passion, imagination, creativity, enthusiasm, endurance, and perseverance [54]. Therefore, incorporating murals into lessons can provide a good opportunity to implement inclusive education.

Mural tourism can stimulate the economy because many murals are among the most visited destinations due to their cultural and natural features. Tourism can be a major contributor to the local economy [59]. Nowadays, the mural landscapes have been regarded as new tourist attractions directly or indirectly both in cities (e.g., Lisbon in Portugal, London in the UK, Madrid in Spain) and rural areas (e.g., Chemainus in Canada, Fanzara in Spain, San Gregorio de Polanco in Uruguay) [60]. Accordingly, the cultural values of murals become an important indicator in increasing an intercultural dialogue based on cultural diversity [61]. It is important to remember that there is an increasing trend in cultural tourism. The murals are highly valuable resources, and it should be borne in mind that sustainable management should be performed to preserve murals [62].

Murals may have great commercial value. Buildings with modern murals often become local landmarks, and they tend to draw more visitors or foot traffic. The property’s market value may be higher with murals [63]. Both the modern and ancient murals can inspire others with a stronger sense of creative flair. There are many traditional elements in the murals, and the design concept, choice of colors, and display part have implications for the current commercial use [64]. Murals and sculptures are the most predominant elements that have been used in advertising [65]. The integration of elements of famous murals into current commercial designs can arouse aesthetic and emotional resonance, expand the audience, and achieve wider dissemination and attention [66]. For example, many elements of the murals in the Mogao Grottoes have been widely adopted for commercial use such as advertising and brand design [64, 67].

Materials composition and research techniques

The commercial pigments for modern murals are largely well-known, while the murals and frescos that were created in the early time were prepared with various mineral powders mixed with lime or water [68]. Currently, most studies pertaining to the materials composition and research techniques for murals are mainly distributed in Europe and Asia which have many traditional murals.

Many types of organic matters were used as binders for the mineral colors such as egg yolk, casein, gelatin, starch, oils from seeds (poppy, flax, and hemp), resins including skin gel from laccifer lacca, fish or donkey [69, 70]. The plaster used in the Goa-ri Tomb murals in the Republic of Korea was made of oyster shells [71]. The gold powder was also used as pigment for murals in Buddhist caves [72].

Although sample collection allows a precise analysis of materials, non-destructive observation is desired for fragile artworks. There are various methodologies for the on-site characterization of murals. Non-invasive techniques provide chemical information about the materials, and diagnostic methods can reveal structural information and provide multi-layered structures [73]. X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF) [74, 75], macro X-ray fluorescence (MA-XRF) [76, 77], laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) [12, 78, 79], ultraviolet fluorescence [80, 81], infrared [74, 82], microwave imaging [83,84,85], Laser Raman Analyzer [13, 50, 86], and Terahertz (THz) spectroscope and imaging techniques [84, 87, 88] were widely used to study the materials of the paintings. For example, the Raman analysis can identify the materials of different pigments. Using this method, the composition of the pigments in the fifteenth century Thubchen Lakhang monastery was presented, and it was found that the blue pigments were azurite (C2H2Cu3O8) and sometimes with lazurite ((Na, Ca)8[(S, Cl, SO4, OH)2|(Al6Si6O24)]), the red and orange paint layers were orpiment (As2S3) and vermilion (HgS), the brown and green color decorations are composed by red ochre (Fe2SO3) and malachite (Cu2CO3(OH)2) [89, 90]. For the murals in the rupestrian church Grotta del Crocifisso at Lentini in Italy, X-ray fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy can easily identify the red, yellow, brown, and green pigments [27]. Using multiple techniques including binocular microscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy, X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray fluorescence, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thin-film X-ray diffraction, micro-Raman spectroscopy, and Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, the materials composition in the sixteenth century Orthodox Syrian Church in south India were determined. The results showed that the cinnabar (HgS) and malachite (Cu2CO3(OH)2) were mainly used for the red and green pigments, along with minor proportions of lead oxide (PbO), calcite (CaCO3), and clay. Plant oils and proteins were used as organic binders [50]. The pyrolysis–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) with tetramethylammonium hydroxide in double-shot mode can distinguish the various types of binders, detect the marker compounds of organic pigments, and define the nature of alkyd paints [91].

The non-invasive methods also have limitations as diagnostic tools in realistic cases since the materials of murals are numerous and heterogeneous [73]. The Raman, Ultraviolet fluorescence, and infrared can only be used to study the surface layers of the murals because none of them can penetrate thick layers of plaster. X-rays and microwave methods are also limited by dislocations, water damage, and other defects although they can penetrate thick layers. In addition, X-rays and microwaves are suffered from no depth resolution and poor lateral spatial resolution [84]. Optical Coherence Tomography, digital holography, and Terahertz imaging can reveal the structure information and 3D mapping of the multi-layers of murals [73]. The ground penetrating radar can also be used to reveal the different layers of frescos and thus providing valuable information for 3D heritage/historic building information models [92, 93]. Among these techniques, the Terahertz waves can penetrate opaque materials and thus have great potential for the analysis of mural paintings in a non-invasive manner [88]. The Terahertz can obtain fingerprint spectra which are determined by the intermolecular behavior. For example, mercury sulphide (HgS) was widely used as a red pigment and this substance can be recognized by the specific spectra [94].

Although various methods for the determination of the chemical composition and the in-depth delineation of the physical structure of murals have been studied under laboratory experiments, there is a need for incorporating multiple technologies for on-site studies. Due to the similar spectroscopic characteristic and matrix effects of some materials, the accurate identification of chemical compositions of murals is challenging using non-invasive techniques. Recently, the machine learning methods combined with different datasets (e.g., laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy-based dataset, namely, the online RRUFF database which contains an integrated database of Raman spectra, X-ray diffraction, and chemistry data for minerals, https://rruff.info) have been proposed as a useful method to accurately identify the pigments with similar chemical compositions of murals [78, 95]. It is worth noting that there are multiple machine learning methods, e.g., support vector machine, back propagation artificial neural network, K-nearest neighbor algorithm, random forest, and there are also other datasets such as laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) that could be used for the machine learning methods to identify the pigment compositions [78]. The detailed knowledge of chemical composition and physical structure may deepen our understanding of the history of the murals and thus can be helpful to evaluate their authenticities, as well as provide insights into the restoration and conservation of the murals [73]. Further studies including the spectra of pigments, plasters, and other artistic media are required to improve the applicability of this method for mural painting studies.

Mechanisms of mural contaminants formation and deterioration

As many murals are very old, some of the murals became distorted due to natural conditions such as earthquakes, storms, and rains. Murals often exhibit degradation, shedding, cracking, flaking, and detachment, and there are usually many contaminants on the surface layers of the murals including soot, and microbial colonies. In order to perform effective conservative measures, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms of mural deterioration and the formation of contaminants. Most reports of mural deterioration are conducted in Europe and Asia since these areas occupy a large number of valuable traditional murals.

There are commonly two degradation pathways of mural flaking and detachment, i.e., (1) formation of sulfates depleting and weakening the carbonate layer; (2) solubilization and recrystallization of sulfate salts during the humidity cycles [96]. During this process, moisture is considered one of the most important factors influencing the murals because moisture transformation can lead to salts migration and accumulation, which can further cause efflorescence, flaking, and detachment of the murals [47].

Murals and Frescoes can be susceptible to microbial colonization [97]. Using molecular methods, it has been demonstrated that fungi colonization is the main reason for the dark-spot biodeterioration of the frescos in Kyiv, which were created in the eleventh century [98]. The environmental factors including temperature, humidity, exposure to light and Ultraviolet radiation, and the materials used for the arts determine the microbial growth on murals and frescoes [11, 99]. Although the murals and frescoes lacking organic matter are more resistant to microbial biodeterioration fungi and bacteria can affect both organic and inorganic components [98]. The mechanisms underlying the biodeterioration are calcium carbonate glucose agar, casein nutrient agar, pigment secretion, acid and alkali production, and enzymes [100].

Compared with the murals in western churches, murals in China are usually distributed in temples, caves, and tombs. These murals are subjected to long-time contamination by soot due to the combustion of joss sticks, oil lamps, and candles [101]. These processes gradually added organic compounds to the murals, which can support the colonization of bacteria. But later on, abundant fungi can grow on the murals along with the accumulation of organic deposits. Fungi colonizers produce physical and chemical deterioration phenomena [102, 103].

Climate conditions can lead to mural damage. The Mogao Caves area is deep in Eurasia inland, far from the sea, and belongs to the arid regions. Currently, the annual precipitation is less than 50 mm, while the evapotranspiration is about 2500 mm [104]. Due to the arid climate, murals and sculptures are largely well preserved, while about 50% of the murals have suffered from deteriorating diseases for several reasons. Many black spots were observed on the murals and cause serious damage to the paintings. These black spots are mainly caused by the fungi communities, and the fungi growth is affected by temperature and relative humidity as well as the history and drawing techniques [11]. The arid climate is also responsible for the frequent sandstorms in this area, and the grottoes are seriously threatened by wind erosion. The higher the height is, the greater wind erosion to the grottoes is [105, 106]. It is worth mentioning that there are some specific risks to the murals according to the location of the murals. For example, rockfall hazards represent a significant risk to the grottoes that are located on cliffs [107].

In addition to the natural conditions, human activities including tourism and inappropriate restoration interventions can also be deteriorative factors for murals. Tourism can disturb the indoor environment although tourism encourages economic growth. High numbers of visitors will contribute to higher humidity and carbon dioxide concentration, which can disrupt the indoor environment and further constitute a risk to the conservation of the murals [108,109,110,111]. The airflow in crowed archeological sites contains a high amount of fungal spores including the Aspergillus genus, Malassezia [109, 112], and these genera are often the dominant genera on the surface of the murals and can lead to biodeterioration of the murals [109, 113]. Without adequate protection measures, airborne fungi are an important source of contamination on the murals, and some murals can be seriously contaminated and even damaged after a large number of visitors come [114]. Inappropriate restoration interventions can directly remove the materials from the murals and may result in secondary damage to the murals [115, 116]. For example, the proteinaceous materials had been incorrectly used for the restoration of a fresco in Pisa, and these materials caused serious alterations to the fresco [117].

Overall, there are many factors that can affect the deterioration of murals via physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms. The main driving factors and mechanisms of murals were summarized (Fig. 3). These factors and mechanisms should be considered in the conservation of murals.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A schematic frame showing the influencing factors and mechanisms of deterioration of murals. The green downward arrow shows the absorption of carbon dioxide, and the pink upward arrow and dark downward arrows show the vertical movement of calcium and magnesium in a mural [118]

Measures for mural restoration and protection

The mural is a complex and multilayer system and can be corroded by natural weathering, human activities, and biological effects. Murals face severe damage along with archeological discoveries or deterioration under natural conditions, and the restoration of murals has attracted much attention. The mural restoration includes multiple steps including reinforcement or stabilization by procedures of consolidation of both plaster and pictorial film, repair of the rims of the exposed mortars, surface cleaning, reconversion of the pigment, etc. [119].

Both inorganic and organic materials have been used for mural reinforcement. Inorganic materials such as lime water can bring the aqueous solution into the mural and result in the crystallization of soluble salts [120]. Organic materials, such as acrylic polymers, e.g., Paraloid B-72 (Ethyl methacrylate–methyl acrylate copolymer) and Primal AC33, have been applied to the reinforcement of the murals. Although organic materials have good permeation, adhesion, and transparency, they are suffering from aging problems after thermal oxidation and optical irradiation. The polymer may also block surface pores, which generates mechanical stresses in the mural layer [121]. In recent years, nanomaterials have been used for mural protection [122], and the nanocomposite PAAG@Ca(OH)2 displayed a promising application for the reinforcement of murals due to the high porosity, strong adsorption, appropriate hydrophilicity, good permeability, and strong adhesion to mural pigments [15].

Many processes lead to abundant contaminants appearing on the mural surfaces. The contaminants affect the aesthetic values of murals and accelerate the deterioration of the murals. In order to reveal hidden details or information and prolong the life of murals, cleaning of surface contaminants is critical for murals conservation, while removal of surface deteriorated overlayers from murals is a delicate and complicated work due to the multitude of materials within the murals and the high sensitivity of materials to environmental factors such as heat and light. Traditional methods such as chemical solvent and mechanical cleaning can remove contaminants. However, these methods can also damage the mural surface [123]. Some nanomaterials are capable of holding large amounts of liquid, but have a low liquid penetration rate into the substrate. Both model and in situ tests showed that using some nanomaterials can significantly reduce the ingrained dirt on murals when compared with traditional methods [124]. Recently, lasers have been widely used to clean cultural heritage and protect features and this method can effectively remove dust and soot on mural surfaces. However, laser cleaning can lead to damage to the pigment layer due to heat mechanisms. In addition, more damage is likely to occur under ultraviolet laser irradiation than near-infrared laser irradiation because the former has a higher photon energy of electrons [125, 126]. Ultraviolet laser irradiation is effective to remove contaminants on stone substrates [123, 127, 128]. Obviously, although laser cleaning is a promising approach to process unwanted surface layers on murals, the physiochemical properties of the material, laser fluences, and the number of pulses should be carefully assessed before the implementation of contamination removal. In addition, in situ monitoring of the cleaning process is also necessary to safeguard the original painting [123, 125].

Microorganisms are causative agents of biodeterioration in murals, while they can be positively used for the cleaning of murals. The bio-cleaning method, which uses the exoenzymes produced by selected microbial strains, can remove a widely utilized consolidant, adhesives, nitrate, and sulfate salt, and oil from the painted surfaces [129]. The bio-cleaning methods are non-toxic, non-aggressive, non-invasive, and highly specific for removing surface contaminants, and thus represent a promising result in the field of bio-cleaning of murals [130]. It should be borne in mind that some of the exoenzymes could not be completely removed during the restorations and these compounds may cause aesthetic damage to the murals over time [131]. Currently, the exoenzymes that could be potentially used for mural cleaning are not produced at an industrial, and they are not commercially available. Consequently, the production cost of enzymes represents a major drawback for the widespread use of bio-cleaning. Meanwhile, more studies are required to systematically assess the efficiency of these methods as well as the potential effects of remaining exoenzymes of the murals [129]. In addition to the bio-cleaning methods to remove the surface contaminants, the X-rays can be potentially used to cure biodegradation by inhibiting the growth of pathogens on murals in a green way [132].

The lead-based pigments, particularly red lead (Pb3O4) and lead white (2PbCO3·Pb(OH)2) were among the most used materials for pigments in murals. These materials tend to be blacked with time due to the oxidation to plattnerite (PbO2). The proposal of scraping away the darkened part and repainting is not acceptable because it would destruct many original materials [133]. Chemical reagents can be used for the reconversion of these pigments, but these methods may put pictorial layers at risk [134]. Continuous wave laser heating can be used for the reconversion of minium (Pb3O4) and massicot (PbO) in murals, while the formation of massicot as an intermediate product is a promising reconversion of lead white [13]. The distortions can lead to mistakes in mural identification and classification, while traditional restoration of damaged artworks requires talented artisans, which are difficult to find these days. Therefore, virtual restoration of the murals may have great potential for mural conservation and research [17, 135]. Using computer technology, digitally repaired damaged murals can be helpful for the virtual display of the murals, and it has been shown that cloud edge computing could be a useful tool to automatically identify and repair the cracks of murals [136]. Deep learning and visual reality technology can build a digital recognition model which can accurately identify the colors and drawing materials of each specific color and thus be of great significance for the preservation simulation of murals [137, 138]. However, deep learning methods usually require a large amount of data and computational resources. Therefore, the establishment of some feasible methods for conservation and the digital documentation process is still needed to support heritage institutions [139].

It should be stressed that a good understanding of the material compositions, structures of the murals, formation of contaminants, and other deterioration mechanisms are needed before the restoration process [26,27,28]. Understanding the deterioration mechanisms can provide a scientific basis for mural conservation and remedial treatments. For example, when microbial communities are detected, measures such as frequent cleaning, adequate ventilation, and indoor climate management can be carried out to prevent mural deterioration [100]. On the contrary, the restoration of murals with an insufficient understanding of the materials and mechanisms of the deterioration can lead to considerable damage. In the 1980s, China restored many murals by applying epoxy adhesives, and these materials showed shrinkage and gradual deformation caused by fluctuating environmental conditions. Nowadays, it is difficult to dismantle these structures and safely remove the support layer made of glass fiber bonded with epoxy adhesives [140].

Emerging opportunities and challenges for mural conservation

Since the first industrial revolution, our science and technology developed rapidly, which further propelled the economy forward at the global scale [141]. Meanwhile, the increasing human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels and changing land use types, lead to rapid climate change such as increasing temperature, precipitation, and extreme events [142]. These changes bring both opportunities and challenges for mural conservation.

New technologies provide more useful tools to study the murals’ chemical composition, physical structures, and deterioration mechanisms. The traditional single-view scene cannot show all deterioration forms of murals because changes may happen in materials and plaster layers. The depth, hyper-spectral, and multi-view cameras can be used to capture the 3D structure of deterioration [143]. It has been proposed that a multi-path convolutional neural network, which takes multiple lighted image patches as inputs and outputs the corresponding label of the center pixel, can rapidly detect mural deterioration [144]. Recently, machine learning methods have been widely for murals study, which can improve the accuracy of composition detection [16, 17]. In addition, based on pigments and physical strata of the murals from multi-band imaging techniques, it is possible to virtually reconstruct the original color and appearance of the faded murals. These technologies have been successfully used in some murals in the Mogao Grottoes in China [145]. The application of molecular and microbial technology provides deep insights into the processes and mechanisms of microbial deterioration of murals [146, 147].

Murals are tourist resources, and tourism development can boost the local economy. Tourism can also raise public awareness of the values of murals and benefit the education of aesthetics, history, culture, etc. [60, 148]. Tourism is expected to increase in the future despite the shrinkage of the tourist market in recent years due to COVID-19 [149, 150]. However, visitor walking can increase the bioaerosols particles. Although the installation of glass barriers near the wall can decrease the deposition number of bioaerosols particles and thus can protect murals from the deposition of bioaerosols particles, visitors can still change the moisture and air flow, thus leading to further deterioration of murals [114]. It has been well recognized that it is important to preserve the cultural landscape of mural destinations, and strict measures should be performed. In many areas, there is a lack of cooperation between the key stakeholders in policy formulation and implementation, which could pose a threat to the balance of mural protection and sustainable development of tourism [108].

Climate change threatens mural conservation. Many murals were built before the industrial revolution, a period in which the climate was very different from what it is today. Currently, there are increasing trends in air temperature and air pollution. The precipitation also shows an increasing trend with great annual fluctuations. These changes likely induce chemical and biological deterioration of murals. Consequently, studies revealing the deterioration of murals with climate change are needed, and it is necessary to predict what would happen in the murals, and what methods can be applied for the conservation of the murals under a changing climate [151].

Based on the above descriptions, the main strategies and specific measures for the conversation of murals were summarized (Fig. 4). In short, preservation, restoration, and utilization of murals should be considered in a broad context.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Some strategies for restoration and protection of murals. The upper two photos were shot by the authors. The Egyptian mural is credited to “Ancient Egyptian Murals at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York (3)" by mharrsch, and the image is licensed under CC BY 2.0. The bottom picture is credited to “Mogao, by txikita69”, and this image is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Conclusions and remarks

Murals are distributed widely around the world. The most studied murals are distributed in Mexico, Ireland, Spain, China, Italy, and the USA. The murals in Mexico and Ireland are mainly modern murals. In Europe, many murals are associated with buildings such as churches that were built in the medieval period. The most famous murals in China are associated with grottoes and have a long history that can date back to the third century. The murals have multiple values including aesthetics, history, cultural, educational, tourist, and commercial values. Many methods including chemical analysis, non-invasive spectroscopic methods, Terahertz, and ground penetrating radar have been used to detect the chemical composition and physical structures of the murals. The most common phenomena are degradation, shedding, cracking, flaking, and detachment. Mural deterioration can be induced by both natural of anthropogenic factors. The application of microbial and molecular methods has deepened our understanding of the mechanisms of microbial deterioration in murals. Stabilization, repair, surface cleaning, and pigment reconversion are the common measures of mural restoration. The rapid development of computer science provides new tools including machine learning algorithms to study and conserve murals. The major achievements of mural study and protection during the past decades include the materials composition using new techniques, mechanisms of mural deterioration, computer science and technology used for mural restoration and protection.

Although many progresses have been achieved in the study and conservation of murals in the past decades, our knowledge is far from sufficient to understand the deterioration of murals including color-changed pigments and fading of the image lines, and these knowledge gaps hinder our ability to reconstruct the murals in detailed information. Therefore, more studies are required to understand the composition, structure, and deterioration mechanism of the murals. New technologies such as bio-cleaning, and nanomaterials are potentially useful for the conservation of murals. The major challenges for mural study and conservation are the rapid climate change and the balance of mural protection and sustainable development of tourism. Therefore, in order to achieve sustainable development of murals, tourism management, and climate change should be also considered in the study and the conservation of murals in the future.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Aubert M, Setiawan P, Oktaviana AA, Brumm A, Sulistyarto PH, Saptomo EW, et al. Palaeolithic cave art in Borneo. Nature. 2018;564(7735):254–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadier B, Delannoy J-J, Benedetti L, Bourlès DL, Jaillet S, Geneste J-M, et al. Further constraints on the Chauvet cave artwork elaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(21):8002–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Norfarain AR, Ismail AR, Rahim RA. Revolutions of mural painting. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2020;10(10):1195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tao N, Lei Y, Qu L, Wang G, He Y, Li X, et al. Square-heating thermography for quantitative 3D evaluation of large ancient murals. J Nondestr Eval. 2020;39(1):21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gullino P, Larcher F. Integrity in UNESCO world heritage sites. A comparative study for rural landscapes. J Cult Herit. 2013;14(5):389–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao J, Li Y, Cui H, Zhang Q. Improved region growing algorithm for the calibration of flaking deterioration in ancient temple murals. Herit Sci. 2018;6(1):67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li X, Lu D, Pan Y, editors. Virtual Dunhuang Mural restoration system in collaborative network environment. Computer Graphics Forum; 2000: Wiley Online Library.

  8. Dal Fovo A, Mazzinghi A, Omarini S, Pampaloni E, Ruberto C, Striova J, et al. Non-invasive mapping methods for pigments analysis of Roman mural paintings. J Cult Herit. 2020;43:311–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Wang J, Liu H, Wang X, Zhang S. Integrated analysis of pigments on murals and sculptures in Mogao Grottoes. Anal Lett. 2015;48(15):2400–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jurado V, Sanchez-Moral S, Saiz-Jimenez C. Entomogenous fungi and the conservation of the cultural heritage: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2008;62(4):325–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma W, Wu F, Tian T, He D, Zhang Q, Gu J-D, et al. Fungal diversity and its contribution to the biodeterioration of mural paintings in two 1700-year-old tombs of China. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2020;152:104972.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yin Y, Sun D, Su M, Yu Z, Su B, Shui B, et al. Investigation of ancient wall paintings in Mogao Grottoes at Dunhuang using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Opt Laser Technol. 2019;120:105689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. de Seauve T, Detalle V, Semerok A, Aze S, Grauby O, Bosonnet S, et al. Continuous wave laser thermal restoration of oxidized lead-based pigments in mural paintings. Appl Phys B. 2021;127(12):162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu J, Li X, Zhang Y, Wang J, Wei B. Graphene-enhanced nanomaterials for wall painting protection. Adv Func Mater. 2018;28(44):1803872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gu W, Wei Y, Liu B, Hu L, Zhong L, Chen G. Polyacrylic acid-functionalized graphene@Ca(OH)2 nanocomposites for mural protection. ACS Omega. 2022;7(14):12424–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou S, Xie Y. Intelligent restoration technology of mural digital image based on machine learning algorithm. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2022;2022:4446999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pawar P, Ainapure B, Rashid M, Ahmad N, Alotaibi A, Alshamrani SS. Deep learning approach for the detection of noise type in ancient images. Sustainability. 2022;14(18):11786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu L, Zhang L, Shi J, Zhang Y, Wan J. Damage detection of grotto murals based on lightweight neural network. Comput Electr Eng. 2022;102: 108237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Soto-Martin O, Fuentes-Porto A, Martin-Gutierrez J. A digital reconstruction of a historical building and virtual reintegration of mural paintings to create an interactive and immersive experience in virtual reality. Appl Sci. 2020;10(2):597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lucet G, editor Virtual reality: a knowledge tool for cultural heritage. Computer Vision and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications: International Conference, VISIGRAPP 2008, Funchal-Madeira, Portugal, January 22–25, 2008 Revised Selected Papers; 2009: Springer.

  21. Paladini A, Dhanda A, Reina Ortiz M, Weigert A, Nofal E, Min A, et al. Impact of virtual reality experience on accessibility of cultural heritage. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2019;42(W11):929–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Borg B, Dunn M, Ang A, Villis C. The application of state-of-the-art technologies to support artwork conservation: literature review. J Cult Herit. 2020;44:239–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu F, Kang J, Wu Y, Yang D, Meng Q. What do we visually focus on in a World Heritage Site? A case study in the Historic Centre of Prague. Human Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bracci S, Cantisani E, Conti C, Magrini D, Vettori S, Tomassini P, et al. Enriching the knowledge of Ostia Antica painted fragments: a multi-methodological approach. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2022;265:120260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Caneva G, Isola D, Lee HJ, Chung YJ. Biological risk for hypogea: shared data from Etruscan tombs in Italy and ancient tombs of the Baekje dynasty in Republic of Korea. Appl Sci. 2020;10(17):6104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ricca M, Alberghina MF, Houreh ND, Koca AS, Schiavone S, La Russa MF, et al. Preliminary study of the mural paintings of Sotterra Church in Paola (Cosenza, Italy). Materials. 2022;15(9):3411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Montana G, Giarrusso R, D’Amico R, Di Natale B, Vizzini MA, Ilardi V, et al. Multi-analytical study of the medieval wall paintings from the rupestrian church Grotta del Crocifisso at Lentini (eastern Sicily): new evidence of the use of woad (Isatis tinctoria). Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2022;14(9):183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Armetta F, Cardenas J, Caponetti E, Alduina R, Presentato A, Vecchioni L, et al. Conservation state of two paintings in the Santa Margherita cliff cave: role of the environment and of the microbial community. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(20):29510–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Jurado V, Gonzalez-Pimentel JL, Hermosin B, Saiz-Jimenez C. Biodeterioration of Salón de Reinos, Museo Nacional del Prado, Madrid, Spain. Appl Sci. 2021;11(19):8858.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nord AG, Tronner K. Analysis of pigments from Romanesque murals in three churches in the province of Vastergotland, southern Sweden. Fornvan J Swedish Antiq Res. 2021;116(3):220–7.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Philippova OS, Dmitriev AY, Tsarevskaya TJ, Dmitrieva SO. Comprehensive study of 12th century wall painting fragments from the St. George Cathedral of the Yuryev Monastery in Veliky Novgorod (Russia) using complementary physico-chemical methods. Heritage Science. 2022;10(1):49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kriznar A, Želinská J. Materials and techniques of selected mural paintings on the “Gothic Road” around 1400 (Slovakia). Heritage. 2021;4(4):4105–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hill A, White A. Painting peace? Murals and the Northern Ireland peace process. Irish Polit Stud. 2012;27(1):71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rolston B. Changing the political landscape: murals and transition in Northern Ireland. Ir Stud Rev. 2003;11(1):3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rolston B. Re-imaging: mural painting and the state in Northern Ireland. Int J Cult Stud. 2012;15(5):447–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. De-Miguel-Molina M, Santamarina-Campos V, Martínez-Carazo E-M, De-Miguel-Molina B. Murals in North America. In: Santamarina-Campos V, Martínez-Carazo E-M, de Miguel MM, editors. Cultural and creative mural spaces: community, culture and tourism of Uruguayan contemporary muralism and other international mural spaces. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 157–67.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Argote DL, Torres G, Hernández-Padrón G, Ortega V, López-García PA, Castaño VM. Cinnabar, hematite and gypsum presence in mural paintings in Teotihuacan, Mexico. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2020;32:102375.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Miriello D, Pingarrón LB, Pingarrón AB, Barca D, Bloise A, González Parra JR, et al. Hydraulicity of lime plasters from Teotihuacan, Mexico: a microchemical and microphysical approach. J Archaeol Sci. 2021;133:105453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Browder JK. Place of the High Painted Walls: The Tepantitla murals and the Teotihuacan writing system: University of California, Riverside; 2005.

  40. Carrasco Vargas R, López VAV, Martin S. Daily life of the ancient Maya recorded on murals at Calakmul, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106(46):19245–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Santini LM, Weber SL, Marston JM, Runggaldier A. First archaeological identification of nixtamalized maize, from two pit latrines at the ancient Maya site of San Bartolo, Guatemala. J Archaeol Sci. 2022;143:105581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Soto LG. Building the nation of the future, one waiting room at a time: hospital murals in the making of modern Mexico. Hist Technol. 2015;31(3):275–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Coffey MK. How a revolutionary art became official culture: Murals, museums, and the Mexican state. Durham: Duke University Press; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee KM, Lee HS, Han KS. The research of condition for mural tomb in Goa-ri, Goryeong in Gaya period. MUNHWAJAE Korean J Cult Herit Stud. 2015;48(4):44–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Guo R, Feng J, Liu R, Xia Y, Fu Q, Xi N, et al. Rare colour in medieval China: Case study of yellow pigments on tomb mural paintings at Xi’an, the capital of the Chinese Tang dynasty. Archaeometry. 2022;64(3):759–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jinshi F. Master plan for the conservation and management of the Mogao Grottoes: preparation and achievements. Conservation of ancient sites on the Silk Road. 2010:3–7.

  47. Sun M, Zhang J, Zhang L, Wang X, Guo Q, Pei Q, et al. Multi-electrode resistivity survey for the moisture distribution characteristics of the cliff of Mogao Grottoes. Bull Eng Geol Env. 2022;81(11):489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou Z, Shen L, Li C, Wang N, Chen X, Yang J, et al. Investigation of gilding materials and techniques in wall paintings of Kizil Grottoes. Microchem J. 2020;154:104548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou Z, Shen L, Zhang H, et al. The Wall Painting Techniques and Materials of Kizil Grottoes. In: Aoki S, Taniguchi Y, Rickerby S, Mori M, Kijima T, Bomin S, et al., editors. Conservation and painting techniques of wall paintings on the ancient silk road. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 235–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Sharma A, Singh MR, Jangid R. Scientific study of the pigments and binders used in mural painting from the 16th-century ce St Mary's Church of Cheriapally, Kottyam, Kerala, and its relevance to conservation. Archaeometry; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12836.

  51. de-Miguel-Molina M. Visiting dark murals: an ethnographic approach to the sustainability of heritage. Sustainability. 2020;12(2):677.

  52. Saunders A. Recovering the street: relocalising urban geography. J Geogr High Educ. 2013;37(4):536–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu S. The artistic features of the rebounding Pipa flying in the Dunhuang Cave 112 Murals. Front Art Res. 2021;3(3):1.

  54. Ho K. Mural painting as inclusive art learning experience. Teach Artist J. 2010;8(2):67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang S. An archaeological perspective of alcoholic beverages in the song dynasty (960–1279). Archaeologies. 2022;18(2):436–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ferguson JP, Johannsen CB. modern Buddhist murals in northern Thailand: a study of religious symbols and meaning 1. Am Ethnol. 1976;3(4):645–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tao S, Peng A, Chen X. “being so caught up”: exploring religious projection and ethical appeal in Leda and the Swan. Religions. 2021;12(2):107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Di X. The Significance of the Dunhuang Mogao Frescoes for Universal Education Today. The Dunhuang Grottoes and Global Education: Philosophical, Spiritual, Scientific, and Aesthetic Insights. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 161–86.

  59. Khanom S, Moyle B, Scott N, Kennelly M. Host–guest authentication of intangible cultural heritage: a literature review and conceptual model. J Herit Tour. 2019;14(5–6):396–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Martínez-Carazo E-M, Santamarina-Campos V, de-Miguel-Molina M. Creative mural landscapes, building communities and resilience in Uruguayan tourism. Sustainability. 2021;13(11):5953.

  61. Silva HE, Henriques FMA. The impact of tourism on the conservation and IAQ of cultural heritage: the case of the Monastery of Jerónimos (Portugal). Build Environ. 2021;190:107536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Koster RLP. Mural-based tourism as a strategy for rural community economic development. In: Woodside AG, editor. Advances in Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research. Advances in Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research. 2: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2008. p. 153–292.

  63. Stephen T. Street murals as a unique tangible cultural heritage: a case study of artifact value preservation’. Int J Cult Creat Ind. 2016;4(1):48–61.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Liu H, editor The Artistic innovation of" deer Pattern" in Dunhuang murals—Taking the" Nine-color Deer" illustration design as an example. The 5th International Conference on Art Studies: Research, Experience, Education (ICASSEE 2021); 2021: Amsterdam University Press.

  65. Hetsroni A, Tukachinsky RH. The use of fine art in advertising: a survey of creatives and content analysis of advertisements. J Curr Issues Res Adv. 2005;27(1):93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Borghini S, Visconti LM, Anderson L, Sherry J, John F. Symbiotic postures of commercial advertising and street art. J Advert. 2010;39(3):113–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang R. Research on the elements of costumes in Dunhuang Feitian Art. 2018 International Conference on Culture, Literature, Arts & Humanities; Changchun, China. London, UK: Francis Academic Press; 2018. p. 87–90.

  68. Faustini M, Nicole L, Ruiz-Hitzky E, Sanchez C. History of organic–inorganic hybrid materials: prehistory, art, science, and advanced applications. Adv Func Mater. 2018;28(27):1704158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sterflinger K. Fungi: their role in deterioration of cultural heritage. Fungal Biol Rev. 2010;24(1):47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Ciferri O. Microbial degradation of paintings. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(3):879–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Lee HS, Yu YG, Lee HH, Han KS. Wall materials and manufacturing techniques for Korean Ancient Mural Paintings (Great Gaya, 6th Century)-discovery of shells used in wall plaster and identification of their processing status. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 2022;12(8):1051.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Yang J, Zhou ZB, Lu TJ, Shen L. Investigation of gold gilding materials and techniques applied in the murals of Kizil Grottoes, Xinjiang, China. Appl Sci Basel. 2022;12(21):1.

  73. Filippidis G, Tserevelakis GJ, Mari M, Zacharakis G, Fotakis C. Emerging photonic technologies for cultural heritage studies: the examples of non-linear optical microscopy and photoacoustic imaging. Appl Phys A. 2022;128(11):982.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Vornicu N, Bibire C, Murariu E, Ivanov D. Analysis of mural paintings using in situ non-invasive XRF, FTIR spectroscopy and optical microscopy. X-ray Spectrom. 2013;42(5):380–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Sawczak M, Kamińska A, Rabczuk G, Ferretti M, Jendrzejewski R, Śliwiński G. Complementary use of the Raman and XRF techniques for non-destructive analysis of historical paint layers. Appl Surf Sci. 2009;255(10):5542–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Alfeld M, Pedroso JV, van Eikema HM, Van der Snickt G, Tauber G, Blaas J, et al. A mobile instrument for in situ scanning macro-XRF investigation of historical paintings. J Anal At Spectrom. 2013;28(5):760–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Romano FP, Caliri C, Nicotra P, Di Martino S, Pappalardo L, Rizzo F, et al. Real-time elemental imaging of large dimension paintings with a novel mobile macro X-ray fluorescence (MA-XRF) scanning technique. J Anal At Spectrom. 2017;32(4):773–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Sun D, Zhang Y, Yin Y, Zhang Z, Qian H, Wang Y, et al. A comparative study of the method to rapid identification of the mural pigments by combining LIBS-based dataset and machine learning methods. Chemosensors. 2022;10(10):389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Yin Y, Sun D, Yu Z, Su M, Shan Z, Su B, et al. Influence of particle size distribution of pigments on depth profiling of murals using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. J Cult Herit. 2021;47:109–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Romani A, Clementi C, Miliani C, Favaro G. Fluorescence spectroscopy: a powerful technique for the noninvasive characterization of artwork. Acc Chem Res. 2010;43(6):837–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Thoury M, Elias M, Frigerio JM, Barthou C. Nondestructive varnish identification by ultraviolet fluorescence spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc. 2007;61(12):1275–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Tortora M, Sfarra S, Chiarini M, Daniele V, Taglieri G, Cerichelli G. Non-destructive and micro-invasive testing techniques for characterizing materials, structures and restoration problems in mural paintings. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;387:971–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Dandolo CLK, Jepsen PU. Wall painting investigation by means of non-invasive terahertz time-domain imaging (THz-TDI): inspection of subsurface structures buried in historical plasters. J Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves. 2016;37:198–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Jackson JB, Mourou M, Whitaker JF, Duling IN, Williamson SL, Menu M, et al. Terahertz imaging for non-destructive evaluation of mural paintings. Opt Commun. 2008;281(4):527–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Cucci C, Picollo M, Chiarantini L, Uda G, Fiori L, De Nigris B, et al. Remote-sensing hyperspectral imaging for applications in archaeological areas: non-invasive investigations on wall paintings and on mural inscriptions in the Pompeii site. Microchem J. 2020;158:105082.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Rousaki A, Vandenabeele P, Berzioli M, Saccani I, Fornasini L, Bersani D. An in-and-out-the-lab Raman spectroscopy study on street art murals from Reggio Emilia in Italy. Eur Phys J Plus. 2022;137(2):252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Inuzuka M, Kouzuma Y, Sugioka N, Fukunaga K, Tateishi T. Investigation of layer structure of the takamatsuzuka mural paintings by terahertz imaging technique. J Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves. 2017;38:380–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Krügener K, Ornik J, Schneider LM, Jäckel A, Koch-Dandolo CL, Castro-Camus E, et al. Terahertz inspection of buildings and architectural art. Appl Sci. 2020;10(15):5166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Mazzeo R, Baraldi P, Lujàn R, Fagnano C. Characterization of mural painting pigments from the Thubchen Lakhang temple in Lo Manthang, Nepal. J Raman Spectrosc. 2004;35(8–9):678–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Shui B, Yu Z, Cui Q, Wang Z, Yin Z, Sun M, et al. Blue pigments in Cave 256, Mogao Grottoes: a systematic analysis of murals and statues in Five dynasties, Song Dynasty and Qing Dynasty. Herit Sci. 2022;10(1):89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Pellis G, Bertasa M, Ricci C, Scarcella A, Croveri P, Poli T, et al. A multi-analytical approach for precise identification of alkyd spray paints and for a better understanding of their ageing behaviour in graffiti and urban artworks. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2022;165:105576.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Coli M, Ciuffreda AL, Marchetti E, Morandi D, Luceretti G, Lippi Z. 3D HBIM model and full contactless GPR tomography: an experimental application on the historic walls that support Giotto’s Mural Paintings, Santa Croce Basilica, Florence, Italy. Heritage. 2022;5(3):2534–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Ortega-Ramírez J, Bano M, Villa Alvarado LA. High frequency GPR in the diagnosis of the state of alteration of a mural by Diego Rivera previous restoration. J Cult Herit. 2022;55:228–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Fukunaga K, Ogawa Y, Hayashi SI, Hosako I. Application of terahertz spectroscopy for character recognition in a medieval manuscript. IEICE Electron Exp. 2008;5(7):223–8.

  95. Sang X, Zhou R-G, Li Y, Xiong S. One-dimensional deep convolutional neural network for mineral classification from raman spectroscopy. Neural Process Lett. 2022;54(1):677–90.

  96. Baglioni P, Chelazzi D, Giorgi R, Poggi G. Colloid and materials science for the conservation of cultural heritage: cleaning, consolidation, and deacidification. Langmuir. 2013;29(17):5110–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Pepe O, Sannino L, Palomba S, Anastasio M, Blaiotta G, Villani F, et al. Heterotrophic microorganisms in deteriorated medieval wall paintings in southern Italian churches. Microbiol Res. 2010;165(1):21–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Fomina M, Cuadros J, Pinzari F, Hryshchenko N, Najorka J, Gavrilenko M, et al. Fungal transformation of mineral substrata of biodeteriorated medieval murals in Saint Sophia’s cathedral, Kyiv, Ukraine. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2022;175:105486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Melo D, Sequeira SO, Lopes JA, Macedo MF. Stains versus colourants produced by fungi colonising paper cultural heritage: a review. J Cult Herit. 2019;35:161–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Unković N, Dimkić I, Stupar M, Stanković S, Vukojević J, Ljaljević GM. Biodegradative potential of fungal isolates from sacral ambient: In vitro study as risk assessment implication for the conservation of wall paintings. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Li Y, Liu H, Ye Y, Yuan X, Miao X, Yao C, et al. Microscopic investigation for the evaluation of atmospheric pressure non-equilibrium plasma technique used to remove contaminants from ancient Chinese murals. J Cult Herit. 2022;57:205–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Zucconi L, Canini F, Isola D, Caneva G. Fungi affecting wall paintings of historical value: a worldwide meta-analysis of their detected diversity. Appl Sci. 2022;12(6):2988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Voyron S, Tonon C, Guglielmone L, Celi L, Comina C, Ikeda H, et al. Diversity and structure of soil fungal communities unveil the building history of a burial mound of ancient Japan (Tobiotsuka Kofun, Okayama Prefecture). J Archaeol Sci. 2022;146:105656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Wu B, Zhu W, Yan N, Xing Q, Xu J, Ma Z, et al. Regional actual evapotranspiration estimation with land and meteorological variables derived from multi-source satellite data. Remote Sensing. 2020;12(2):332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Liang L, Zhang W, Tan L, Chen S. Dust emission from gobi under different dust content conditions: a wind tunnel study atop the Mogao Grottoes. Atmosphere. 2021;12(11):1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Gomoiu I, Cojoc R, Ruginescu R, Neagu S, Enache M, Dumbrăvician M, et al. The susceptibility to biodegradation of some consolidants used in the restoration of mural paintings. Appl Sci. 2022;12(14):7229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Zhang L, Wang Y, Zhang J, Zhang S, Guo Q. Rockfall hazard assessment of the slope of Mogao Grottoes, China based on AHP, F-AHP and AHP-TOPSIS. Environ Earth Sci. 2022;81(14):377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Maxim C, Chasovschi CE. Cultural landscape changes in the built environment at World Heritage Sites: Lessons from Bukovina, Romania. J Destin Mark Manag. 2021;20:100583.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Suphaphimol N, Suwannarach N, Purahong W, Jaikang C, Pengpat K, Semakul N, et al. Identification of microorganisms dwelling on the 19th Century Lanna Mural Paintings from Northern Thailand using culture-dependent and—independent approaches. Biology. 2022;11(2):228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Graves K, Corda K. Conserving a boundary: the conservation and management of a Berlin Wall mural. Stud Conserv. 2016;61(S2):61–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Li H, Wang W, Zhan H, Qiu F, Guo Q, Sun S, et al. The effects of atmospheric moisture on the mural paintings of the Mogao Grottoes. Stud Conserv. 2017;62(4):229–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Kavkler K, Humar M, Kržišnik D, Turk M, Tavzes Č, Gostinčar C, et al. A multidisciplinary study of biodeteriorated Celje Ceiling, a tempera painting on canvas. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2022;170:105389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Rojas TI, Aira MJ, Batista A, Cruz IL, González S. Fungal biodeterioration in historic buildings of Havana (Cuba). Grana. 2012;51(1):44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Liu Z, Wu M, Cao H, Liu H, Wang H, Lv J, et al. Impact of the visitor walking speed and glass barriers on airflow and Bioaerosol particles distribution in the typical open tomb. Build Environ. 2022;225:109649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Jo YH, Hong S. Application of three-dimensional scanning, haptic modeling, and printing technologies for restoring damaged artifacts. J Conserv Sci. 2019;35(1):71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Cardinale N, Ruggiero F. A case study on the environmental measures techniques for the conservation in the vernacular settlements in Southern Italy. Build Environ. 2002;37(4):405–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Martino M, Balloi A, Palla F. Biocleaning. In: Palla F, Barresi G, editors. Biotechnology and conservation of cultural heritage. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 71–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  118. Oriols N, Salvadó N, Pradell T, Jiménez N, Cotte M, Gonzalez V, et al. Carbonation of fresco mural paintings with a dolomitic mortar. Cem Concr Res. 2022;157:106828.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Grassi S, Carretti E, Pecorelli P, Iacopini F, Baglioni P, Dei L. The conservation of the Vecchietta’s wall paintings in the Old Sacristy of Santa Maria della Scala in Siena: The use of nanotechnological cleaning agents. J Cult Herit. 2007;8(2):119–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Zhuo W, Bo-min S, Zong-ren Y, Bi-wen S, Jin-li Z, Qiang C, et al. In-situ non-invasive FTIR analysis of conservation materials on the surface of mural paintings in prince Shi’s Palace of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom. Spectrosc Spect Anal. 2020;40(2):356–61.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Carretti E, Dei L. Physicochemical characterization of acrylic polymeric resins coating porous materials of artistic interest. Prog Org Coat. 2004;49(3):282–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Chelazzi D, Poggi G, Jaidar Y, Toccafondi N, Giorgi R, Baglioni P. Hydroxide nanoparticles for cultural heritage: consolidation and protection of wall paintings and carbonate materials. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2013;392:42–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Pouli P, Selimis A, Georgiou S, Fotakis C. Recent studies of laser science in paintings conservation and research. Acc Chem Res. 2010;43(6):771–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Segel K, Brajer I, Taube M, Martin de Fonjaudran C, Baglioni M, Chelazzi D, et al. Removing ingrained soiling from medieval lime-based wall paintings using nanorestore gel® peggy 6 in combination with aqueous cleaning liquids. Stud Conserv. 2020;65(Sup1):P284–P91.

  125. Li Y, Ye Y, Liu H, Shen R, Yuan X, Miao X, et al. Time-resolved imaging for investigating laser-material interactions during laser irradiation cleaning on murals. Opt Laser Technol. 2023;157:108679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Teule R, Scholten H, Van den Brink OF, Heeren RM, Zafiropulos V, Hesterman R, et al. Controlled UV laser cleaning of painted artworks: a systematic effect study on egg tempera paint samples. J Cult Herit. 2003;4:209–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Pouli P, Oujja M, Castillejo M. Practical issues in laser cleaning of stone and painted artefacts: optimisation procedures and side effects. Appl Phys A. 2012;106(2):447–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Cappitelli F, Cattò C, Villa F. The control of cultural heritage microbial deterioration. Microorganisms. 2020;8(10):1542.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Ruginescu R, Enache M, Popescu O, Gomoiu I, Cojoc R, Batrinescu-Moteau C, et al. Characterization of some salt-tolerant bacterial hydrolases with potential utility in cultural heritage bio-cleaning. Microorganisms. 2022;10(3):644.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Roig PB, Regidor Ros JL, Estellés RM. Biocleaning of nitrate alterations on wall paintings by Pseudomonas stutzeri. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2013;84:266–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Ranalli G, Alfano G, Belli C, Lustrato G, Colombini MP, Bonaduce I, et al. Biotechnology applied to cultural heritage: biorestoration of frescoes using viable bacterial cells and enzymes. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98(1):73–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Vadrucci M. A machine for ionizing radiation treatment of bio-deteriogens infesting artistic objects. Quantum Beam Sci. 2022;6(4):33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Koller M, Leitner H, Paschinger H. Reconversion of altered lead pigments in alpine mural paintings. Stud Conserv. 1990;35(1):15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Costantini I, Lottici PP, Bersani D, Pontiroli D, Casoli A, Castro K, et al. Darkening of lead- and iron-based pigments on late Gothic Italian wall paintings: energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence, μ-Raman, and powder X-ray diffraction analyses for diagnosis: Presence of β-PbO2 (plattnerite) and α-PbO2 (scrutinyite). J Raman Spectrosc. 2020;51(4):680–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Mol VR, Maheswari PU. The digital reconstruction of degraded ancient temple murals using dynamic mask generation and an extended exemplar-based region-filling algorithm. Herit Sci. 2021;9(1):137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Gao Y, Zhou Z. Automatic recognition and repair system of mural image cracks based on cloud edge computing and digitization. Mob Inf Syst. 2022;2022:1534596.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Xie H. Digitized visual transformation of grotto art using deep learning and virtual reality technology. Sci Program. 2022;2022:5106036.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Lv C, Li Z, Shen Y, Li J, Zheng J. SeparaFill: two generators connected mural image restoration based on generative adversarial network with skip connect. Herit Sci. 2022;10(1):135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Nasri A, Huang X. Images enhancement of ancient mural painting of Bey’s palace constantine, Algeria and Lacuna extraction using mahalanobis distance classification approach. Sensors. 2022;22(17):6643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Liu C, Suemori K, Li Q, He Y, Wang F, Kang H. Deterioration caused by a new support layer bonded with epoxy adhesive to the mural paintings at Fengguo Temple in Yixian, Liaoning, China. Stud Conserv. 2020;65(Sup 1):P187–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Baten J. A history of the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  142. IPCC. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA; 2019.

  143. Riveiro B, Solla M. Non-destructive techniques for the evaluation of structures and infrastructure. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  144. Huang R, Feng W, Fan M, Guo Q, Sun J. Learning multi-path CNN for mural deterioration detection. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2020;11(8):3101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Bolong C, Zongren Y, Manli S, Zhongwei S, Jinli Z, Biwen S, et al. Virtual reconstruction of the painting process and original colors of a color-changed Northern Wei Dynasty mural in Cave 254 of the Mogao Grottoes. Herit Sci. 2022;10(1):164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Joseph E. Microorganisms in the Deterioration and Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2021.

  147. Unković N, Ljaljević Grbić M, Stupar M, Vukojević J, Subakov-Simić G, Jelikić A, et al. ATP bioluminescence method: tool for rapid screening of organic and microbial contaminants on deteriorated mural paintings. Nat Prod Res. 2019;33(7):1061–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Zheng Y, Liu X. Discussion on two intangible cultural heritage inheritance patterns: a case study of dunhuang painted sculpture. J Human Soc Sci Stud. 2022;4(3):254–9.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Jeon C-Y, Yang H-W. The structural changes of a local tourism network: comparison of before and after COVID-19. Curr Issue Tour. 2021;24(23):3324–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. León-Gómez A, Ruiz-Palomo D, Fernández-Gámez MA, García-Revilla MR. Sustainable tourism development and economic growth: bibliometric review and analysis. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Marrocchino E, Telloli C, Grazia Paletta M, Leis M, Vaccaro C. The mural paintings of the cloister in the Certosa di Calci, Pisa. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2022;43:103461.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Innovation Foundation of the Department of Education of Gansu Province (2021B-326).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yihui Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Wu, X. Current progress on murals: distribution, conservation and utilization. Herit Sci 11, 61 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00904-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00904-9

Keywords