Skip to main content
Heritage Science
Download PDF
Download ePub

Comparison and simulation-based analysis of the sound field of Dong drum tower buildings

Heritage Science volume 11, Article number: 213 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Drum towers are the most prominent cultural markers and the major site for cultural ceremonies in Dong villages. The visibility and audibility of drum towers are important factors influencing the location and construction of buildings in Dong villages. In this paper, the authors map and classify 21 drum tower buildings according to three characteristics: shape of the plan, elevation of the enclosure, and aspect ratio of the longitudinal section. Having used the sound field simulation software Odeon to filter two of the three characteristics that were identical, the authors simulated drum towers with different values of the third characteristic to study the factors influencing their sound field. The correlation between the construction of the drum tower and its characteristics of sound was established, and the characteristics of the sound field as well as their adaptability were assessed by comparing different forms of drum towers. This can provide technical support for the protection and repair of drum towers, their renovation and upgrade, and the construction of new drum towers in the Dong region.

Introduction

The Dong people are an ethnic group with a long history and an ancient culture in China. They are descendants of the ancient Yue people, and belong to the Gan Yue and Luo Yue branches [1] that are mainly distributed in parts of Guizhou, Hunan, and Guangxi provinces [2]. A Dong village consists of dwellings, a theater, a fish pond, a Satan (traditional Dong ritual architecture), and drum towers [3]. The drum tower is the tallest, largest, and most beautifully decorated building in the Dong village [4], and is so called because a wooden drum is located on the top floor of the tower. The earliest known drum tower is more than 500 years old, and 439 drum towers have been preserved in the Guizhou area of Nan Dong [1, 5, 6]. They can be divided into two types: temple pavilion type and drum tower buildings [7]. Temple pavilion-type drum towers mainly originate from the Dong branch of the Jiao Dong branch, located in the Yangtze River system, and from the Dan Dong branch of the Xun River basin in the Pearl River system. Drum tower buildings are widely found in all Dong areas [8]. The internal space of the drum tower is divided into a “fire space” and a surrounding space for activity by two columns on the inside and outside [9] that represent access to the spiritual world [10]. The planes of the tower are mostly even. Most of them have one central column (Leigong column) symbolizing the year, four main columns symbolizing the four seasons and the four geographical directions, and 12 side pillars symbolizing the 12 earthly branches and the 12 months of the year [11]. The structure of the drum tower is based on the principle of mechanical leverage, with a chiseled mortise and tenon joints, large and small pillars, squared pillar crossings and straight sets, and hinged support systems combined with a pierced layer-by-layer structure [12].The layers are odd in number as this is considered auspicious by the Dong people [13]. The outer eaves panel of the drum tower is usually decorated with two totems of dragons and auspicious clouds as the main motifs. They symbolize the supreme authority of the drum tower in the Dong village. The pigments used in the totems are made of clay unique to the Dong region, and have an anticorrosive effect [14].

The Dong drum tower has political, military, and cultural functions in the Dong village. Politically, the drum tower is a symbol of the rights and domains of the ethnic group, and acts as the political center of the village. It is the site of deliberations and trials, where the matters are dealt with according to the internal conventions of the clan [11, 15]. Its military function is mainly defensive, as a lookout in which wooden drums can be used to send out warning signals. In case of a call for usual deliberations, the beat of the drums is “dong dong dong,” which represents the soundscape when the atmosphere is calm [16].When encountering soldiers and bandits engaged in rioting and looting, the drums are struck with an initial heavy blow followed by continuous strikes. In case of fire hazards, the drums are beaten intensively and at intervals, during which the drummer shouts and point to the location of the fire [17]. When important personages arrive or assemble at the tower, the sounds of the drums are long and the beats slow. The cultural nature of the drum tower is expressed in the cultural identity that it establishes for villages, ethnic groups, and families. The Dong people are closely connected with the drum tower throughout their lives. Every important stage of life, such as birth, marriage, and funeral, is celebrated in the drum tower. All 13- to 17-year-old Dong male youths (note that their ages are odd numbers) are assigned names associated with the drum towers of their villages in a grand naming ceremony, and a naming banquet is held to mark their adulthood [18]. That is, they are associated with the drum tower and thus establish a cultural bond with it. This is also a reflection of the cultural function of the drum tower. Therefore, seeing the drum tower and hearing the drums are important considerations for the Dong people in choosing the site of the building. Each drum tower is thus inseparable from the pulse of the Dong village.

The Dong people did not develop writing during their long historical evolution, because of which the drum tower served as the main site for education. Activities such as the transmission of history and culture, the spreading of a national spirit, and the management of daily affairs are carried out in the drum tower through oral transmission [19]. Such verses as “spring with a huge wood buried in the ground for the building, several feet high, singers at night will edge to stay on it [sic]…” [20] and “[sic] trigger men singing, drinking sound, night edge to stay on it, so proud” [21] describe such scenes involving sounds. The social activities recorded in songs of the drum tower have also enriched the field of its sound [22]. Examples include the “the Grand Song of the Dong,” “Moon also old,” and “Moon also Zuo Lou” [23, 24]. Thus, the sound of the drum tower is indispensable to the culture and life of the Dong people, and many studies have examined its construction and influence on their culture [8, 25,26,27,28,29,30] as well as its function and meaning [18, 31, 32]. However, no study to date has regarded the drum tower as a building for spectators and examined the characteristics of its sound field, in the context of its role as a cultural building that integrates the assembly, lives, and education of the Dong people, and in light of the cultural attributes of its sounds. Therefore, the authors of this study analyze and compare the characteristics of the sound fields of different kinds of drum towers by classifying typical drum towers in Dong villages into different types and simulating them. This provides a basis for the protection, repair, and construction of such towers.

Materals and methods

Selection of features for the classification of typical drum towers

There are many drum towers in Dong settlements. Because the palm ink masters who built the drum towers had no design drawings, all the structures and dimensions were based on memory, and no particular norms and standards were followed [12]. This resulted in different forms of drum towers. The on-site mapping of 21 typical drum towers with good integrity and the longest history has shown that they are mainly quadrilateral in plan, with a few towers with hexagonal and octagonal plans. The overall height, number of layers of heavy eaves, form of the roof, and form of the plan of these towers were measured as modeling points, and the results are shown in Fig. 1 [11].Its internal structure is shown in Fig. 2. From the perspective of architectural acoustics, the spatial morphology of a building influences the spatial characteristics of its sound field, and the relationships between them is shown in Fig. 3. The planar shape in the figure represents the shape of the viewing space, and reflects the path of reflection of sound in the horizontal space. The aspect ratio of the longitudinal section of the viewing space, i.e., the ratio of the height of the longitudinal section to the length of the bottom edge of the tower, represents the shape of the building cavity and reflects the path of reflection of the sound in the three-dimensional cavity. The enclosure of the façade reflects the degree of sound transmission from the interior of the building to the environment, i.e., the amount of sound spillover. The authors used these three characteristic quantities for the classification of the types of drum tower. The results are shown in Table 1. Different types of drum towers were simulated and compared by setting two of the above three characteristics as constant and varying the third.

Fig.1
figure 1

Mapped values of the characteristics of drum towers and their morphologies

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Internal structure of Dong Drum tower

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Spatial characteristics and spatial relationships of the sound field of drum towers

Full size image
Table 1 Classification of characteristics of drum towers in Gulou
Full size table

Simulations and parameter settings

ODEON16.00 software was used to simulate the sound field. It considers specular and diffuse reflections as well as diffraction, and thus is regarded as among the most accurate softwares for modeling building acoustics based on geometric acoustic algorithms [33]. Its applicability to sound fields in small spaces, urban public open spaces, and semi-open and semi-enclosed spaces has been demonstrated [34,35,36]. Owing to the diverse architectural forms of the drum tower and the large number of decorative components on the surface of the building, the process of modeling was faceted, and was linearly simplified [37]. The fully enclosed drum tower was treated in the same way as an indoor sound field [38, 39], and the semi-enclosed drum tower was process by using the manual user settings of ODEON [40].The number of sound lines was set on a case-by-case basis [41], and the duration of the impulse response was set to two-thirds of the maximum duration of reverberation to enhance the accuracy of the calculations [42]. The coefficient of material absorption was modified with reference to past research [43], and by consulting the relevant tools [41, 44, 45] of the software [46]. The selected coefficients of absorption are shown in Table 2. The settings of humidity and temperature for each building were consistent, and the local annual average was calculated with reference to [47], where the humidity had been set to 80% and the temperature to 18.5 °C. The distance between each measurement point of the drum building and the source point of sound was consistent, and all parameters were calculated according to the ISO 3382–1:2009 standard.

Table 2 Coefficients of sound absorption of materials of the enclosure of the drum tower
Full size table

Selection of characteristic quantities for evaluating the sound field

The drum tower is not a fully enclosed space, and the early decay time (EDT) can be used as an indicator of the quality of sound of the space to characterize changes in the sound energy with changes in its spatial morphology [48]. As a classical index for assessing indoor acoustics, the reverberation time (T30) can also be applied to evaluate the acoustic environment of open spaces [23]. The intensity index (G) was used as a logarithmic ratio to characterize the impulse response in the free field during the propagation of sound [49]. The variation in its magnitude can be used to accurately measure the characteristics of the sound field and assess its homogeneity [50]. Changes in the speech transmission index (STI) [51] can reflect the listener’s perception of the clarity of the speech. Linguistic clarity (C50) is also an important index based on the impulse response used to measure the quality of sound in the sound field, and can reflect the level of energy of the reflected sound in relation to time and space [52] to represent its clarity. A weighted level of sound pressure (LAeq) can be used to characterize changes in sound pressure inside the sound field of the drum tower to reflect the changes in sound at different locations in this space.

To ensure the objectivity of the simulations, their results were compared with empirical measurements of the sound field with reference to the requirements of the just noticeable difference (JND) international standard. On-site sound measurement was performed by using the Lehua (AWA6291) sound level meter with a calibration error of ± 0.5 dB.A SONY professional recorder was used to record the on-site source of sound, and the sound of balloon burst was used as the source of the sound of the impulse response.The entire measurement process followed the ISO3382-1 standard. The height of the handheld sound source was 1.5 m, and six receiving points at an equal distance from the center of the drum tower were arranged in each tower. The distance between the source point to the receiving point was at least 1 m, and the height is 1.2 m as specified in the standard.The measured and simulated arrangement of measurement points for the sound field is shown in Fig. 4. The pressure of the source of sound in each octave in the sound field of the drum tower needed to be higher than the background noise of 45 dB for repeated tests of the background noise. The results show that background noise are below 20 dB, while the sound pressure level of the sound source are above 75 dB, the difference between the two meet the requirements of international standards. Live sound recording files after audio editing software Cool edit editing after using the reverberation room calibrated Dirac software for acoustic index analysis, the field measurement data of Huanggang Gaoluo drums building and simulation results error analysis is shown in Fig. 5, it can be seen that according to Table 3 (JND) standard comparison of the two types of results, the simulation results obtained values are within the allowable error, so the accuracy of the results of this simulation experiment can be guaranteed.

Fig.4
figure 4

Measured and simulated positions

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Error between empirical measurements and the simulated calculations

Full size image
Table 3 JND of the objective parameters
Full size table

.

Results

Comparison of sound fields of drum towers with different planar shapes

The enclosure of the elevation and the aspect ratio of the longitudinal section were approximated as the screening conditions. The authors then compared the planar forms and the distributions of the simulated measurements points of the Huanggang Gaoluo Drum Tower (octagonal) and the Zhaoxing Rentuan Drum Tower (quadrilateral), as shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Huanggang Gaoluo (a) Zhaoxing Rentuan (b)

Full size image

The results of simulations of the Huanggang Gaoluo and the Zhaoxing Rentuan Drum Towers are shown in Fig. 7. The patterns of variations in the EDT, T30, and C50 with the frequency were the same at each measurement point in the two drum towers. The EDT of the Gaoluo Drum Tower had the largest value at 125 Hz and the smallest at 500 Hz. The difference in values between the measurement points was small. The value of EDT of the Zhaoxing Rentuan Drum Tower was the largest at 125 Hz, and then decreased gradually with an increase in the frequency of sound. After a short rise at 2 kHz, its value decreased with the increase in frequency. The values of T30 of the Gaoluo Drum Tower were 0.27–0.59 s, and smaller values were recorded at each measurement point at 500 Hz and 4 kHz.The maximum value was obtained at 125 Hz. The value of T30 of the Zhaoxing Rentuan Drum Tower was 0.34–0.66 s, slightly higher than that of the Gaoluo Drum Tower. Its value at each measurement point was the lowest at 1 kHz and 4 kHz, and was the largest at 125 Hz. However, the difference in values between the measurement points was larger than that of the Gaoluo Drum Tower, and was the most significant at 250 Hz and 500 Hz. Its value of C50 at 500 Hz was the largest, and was the smallest at 125 Hz, where the value at measurement point R2 was the lowest in each frequency band. The value of C50 at 500 Hz was the largest, and was the smallest at 125 Hz. The difference between the measurement points in the high-frequency band was small.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Objective indicators of the simulated sound fields of Huanggang Gaoluo (a) and Zhaoxing Rentuan (b)

Full size image

The values of STI of the two drum towers are shown in Table 4. Both were above 0.75, and the differences in values between their measurement points were small. The STI at each measurement point of the Gaoluo Drum Tower was lower than that of the Rentuan Drum Tower. The values of LAeq of the Gaoluo Drum Tower and the Rentuan Drum Tower exhibited the same pattern of variation with the frequency of sound, i.e., The maximum values at middle and high frequencies were higher than that at a low frequency. The difference in values between measurement points was significant at 500 Hz, and the results are shown in Fig. 8. The LAeq of the Gaoluo Drum Tower gradually decreased along its outer edge after a sudden drop at its inner column. The LAeq of Rentuan Gulou exhibited a significant reduction near the diagonal of the plane, and decreased uniformly from inside to outside at the other locations. The value of G of each measurement point for the two drum towers is shown in Fig. 7.The values of G between the measurement points of the Gaoluo Drum Tower were large, among which the value of G at R5 was smaller than those at the other measurement points. The difference in the values of G between measurement points R1 and R4, and the remaining measurement points was large as well. However, the difference in G at the same measurement point at different frequencies was small.

Table 4 STI values of the drum towers
Full size table
Fig. 8
figure 8

Distribution of LAeq values for the Huanggang Gaoluo (a) and the Zhaoxing Rentuan Drum Towers (b)

Full size image

Comparison of sound fields of drum towers with different façade enclosures

The Huanggang Dangliao Drum Tower and Tang’an Drum Tower, which had similar planar forms and aspect ratios in the longitudinal section but different enclosures of the façade, were selected for comparison. They also satisfied the screening conditions. Figure 9 shows the distributions of their simulated measurement points.

Fig. 9.
figure 9

Huanggang Dangliao (a) Tangan (b)

Full size image

The results of the simulations are shown in Fig. 10. When the pattern of variations in the EDT with the frequency of sound tended to be the same for each measurement point in the drum tower, the difference in values between the measurement points was small. The EDT was the smallest at 500 Hz, and the difference in its values between measurement points was large. The EDT at each measurement point of the Tangan Drum Tower was inconsistent with changes in the frequency of sound, i.e., it gradually decreased after 250 Hz, but the decline at each measurement point was different. The minimum values at R3 and R6 were obtained after having remained stable in the low range of frequency. When the R4 measurement point in the drum building at 125 Hz-500 Hz, R1 measurement point at 125 Hz T30 value is the highest and higher than the average, the rest of the measurement point in each frequency band under the value of lower and different points between the difference is small.The pattern of variation in the values of T30 at different frequency bands tended to be the same at each measurement point of the Tangan Drum Tower, with the smallest values at 1 kHz and 4 kHz, and minor differences between the measurement points.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Objective indicators of the simulated sound fields of Huanggang Dangliao (a) and Tangan (b)

Full size image

The value of C50 at 500 Hz was the largest, and was the smallest at 125 Hz, where the value at measurement point R2 was the lowest in each frequency band. The value of C50 at 500 Hz was the largest, and was the smallest at 125 Hz. The difference between the measurement points in the high-frequency band was small. The values of STI of the two drum towers are shown in Table 5, and all of them were above 0.75. The difference in its values between the measurement points was small. The difference in STI between the measurement points of the Tangan Drum Tower was large. The smallest value at measurement point R2, located at the entrance, was 0.76, and the largest value at R3, located at the west entrance, was 0.90. Except for measurement point R2, the values of the STI at all other measurement points were higher than those of the Tangan Drum Tower.

Table 5 STI values of the drum towers
Full size table

The patterns of distribution of the values of LAeq at different frequencies of sound of the Dangliao Drum Tower and Tangan Drum Tower were the same, i.e., the middle frequency yielded the largest value, and larger values were obtained at high frequencies than at low frequencies. The difference between the measurement points was more significant at 500 Hz, and the results are shown in Fig. 11. The value of G at each measurement point of the Tangan Drum Tower varied consistently with the frequency of sound, as shown in Fig. 10, with the smallest values at 500 Hz and 4 kHz, and the largest value at 125 Hz.The difference in values between the measurement points was small. The values of G of the Tangan Drum Tower were not significantly large, except at measurement point R2, at which it was significantly smaller than in the entire frequency band. The difference in its values between the other measurement points was small.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Distributions of LAeq values of Huanggang Dangliao (a) and Tangan (b)

Full size image

Comparison of sound fields of drum towers with different aspect ratios of longitudinal section

We compared the Shangzhai Gaomu Drum Tower and the Xiazhai Pomu Drum Tower, with similar planar forms and elevation enclosures but different aspect ratios in the longitudinal section, as shown in Fig. 12.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Shangzhai Gaomu (a) Xiazhai Pomu (b)

Full size image

The results of simulations of the Shangzhai Gaomu Drum Tower and the Xiazhai Pomu Drum Tower are shown in Fig. 13. The regularity of variations in the EDT with the frequency of sound was the same for both drum towers. Their EDTs were the shortest at 500 Hz and the longest at 125 Hz. The difference in the EDTs between the measurement points decreased gradually with the increase in the frequency of sound, and was the most significant at 250 Hz. The overall EDT of the Pomu Drum Tower was slightly longer than that of the Gaomu Drum Tower, except at R1, which tends to be the same with frequency, i.e., the maximum at 500 Hz and the minimum at 125 Hz. But the difference between the values gradually increased with the frequency.The variation in the value of T30 with frequency was not significant at any measurement point of the Gaomu Drum Tower, and the difference in values between measurement points was small. The overall value of T30 of the Pomu Drum Tower was slightly higher than that of the Gaomu Drum Tower, and its values varied significantly between measurement points with the frequency of sound. The pattern of variation tended to be consistent, i.e., the minimum value was obtained at 500 Hz and the maximum at 125 Hz. The difference between the values at the measurement points was small.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Simulated values of the Shangzhai Gaomu (a) and Xiazhai Pomu (b) drum towers

Full size image

The overall value of C50 was higher than that of the Pomu Drum Tower, but both have similar patterns of variation with frequency, i.e., both are maximum at 500 Hz and 4 kHz. The values of STI of both drum towers were above 0.75, as shown in Table 6, while the difference in STI values between the measurement points of the Gaomu Drum Tower was small. The difference in STI between the measurement points of the Pomu Drum Tower was larger, while its average STI was lower than that of the Gaomu Drum Tower.

Table 6 STI values of the drum towers
Full size table

The pattern of distribution of values of LAeq in different frequency bands was the same for the Gaomu Drum tower and the Pomu Drum Tower, i.e., the largest values were obtained a medium frequency, and values at high frequencies were larger than those at low frequencies. The difference between the measurement points was the most significant at 500 Hz, and the results gradually decayed from inside to outside along the center, as shown in Fig. 14. The LAeq of the Gaomu Drum tower was large, as was the distance between the location of attenuation and the center, than that of the Pomu Drum Tower. The patterns of distribution of the values of G of the two drum towers were similar, and the small difference in values between their measurement points is shown in Fig. 13.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Distributions of LAeq values of Shangzhai Gaomu and (a) Xiazhai Pomu (b)

Full size image

Discussion

The planar shape of a structure has a limiting effect on the propagation of sound in it in the horizontal direction. The above comparisons of drum towers of different shapes showed that listeners in the quadrilateral drum tower experienced clearer sound, and the small difference in sound pressure at different locations of the tower indicated that the sound field was more uniform. The sound energy decayed more uniformly in the octagonal drum tower over time, and the reverberations in it were closer to those in an acoustically well-designed hall [42]. The overall quality of the sound field in the quadrilateral drum tower was slightly better than that in the octagonal drum tower.This explains one of the reasons why there are far more quadrilateral drum towers than octagonal ones in Dong villages.To overcome the shortcomings of the sound fields of the two planar forms, the authors suggest increasing the number of reflective surfaces in the viewing space of the quadrilateral drum tower to improve the effect of reverberations. As the octagonal planar form satisfies the aesthetics of the Dong people in terms of construction and decoration, its sound field should be improved by changing the aspect ratio of the enclosure of the facade.

The surface enclosure has a limiting effect on the ratio of reflection to transmission of sound in the sound field. A comparison of the two enclosures of the facade of the drum tower showed that the tower with a larger facade underwent a more stable change in sound energy, and had a more uniform sound field and clearer sound at different locations within the drum tower. The drum tower with a smaller façade enclosure had a good reverberation effect, and the differences in the magnitudes of sounds experienced at different locations were smaller. Therefore, the dimensions of the enclosure of the façade should can be changed according to the specifics of the drum tower by using easily removable materials to enhance the reverberation effect and make the sound field more uniform.

The aspect ratio of the longitudinal profile has a limiting effect on the direction of propagation of sound in space. The comparison of drum towers with different aspect ratios showed that sound in the tower with a larger aspect ratio varied less with time, and the reverberation times at different locations in the space varied greatly,but were all short. Therefore, the drum tower can provide a relatively stable reverberation effect, and the volume of the sound at different locations decreases from its center to its edges. The sound field was also more uniform. The drum tower with a smaller aspect ratio provided clearer sounds, and the difference in sounds between locations was not significant. The overall quality of the sound field of the drum tower with a large aspect ratio was slightly better. Engineers should thus appropriately increase the aspect ratio of new drum towers that are constructed, and the height of the platform of the wooden drum placed inside existing drum towers should be altered to change its aspect ratio and thus improve the reverberation effect, uniformity of the sound field, and clarity of the sound.

Conclusion

The quality of the sound field of a quadrilateral drum tower is slightly better when the enclosure of its facade is consistent with the aspect ratio of its longitudinal section. Among the variables reflecting sound quality, the STI and C50 at different locations within the quadrilateral tower had smaller differences but larger values, changes in the values of G were not prominent. However, differences in the EDT and T30 between the measurement points of the tower were large, and this led to a poor reverberation effect. The changes in T30 and EDT at different locations in an octagonal drum tower tended to be consistent, but differences in the values of G and LAeq at different measurement points were large. The value of C50 was small, because of which the sound field was not uniform and the resulting sounds were unclear.

When the aspect ratio of the longitudinal section of the drum tower was consistent with its planar shape, the EDT values at different locations of the tower with a larger enclosure of the facade were large, and had the same trend of change. Differences in the values of STI, C50, but those in T30 were large, and values of LAeq decayed significantly from the center of the tower to the outside. The reverberation effect was thus poor, and there were significant differences in the magnitude of sound at different locations. The difference in T30 at different positions in the drum tower with a small enclosure of the facade was not significant, and the decay in the value of LAeq from the center to the outside was not prominent. However, the differences in the values of C50, LAeq, and G at different positions were significant, because of which the clarity of sound and the uniformity of the sound field in the drum tower were poor.

When the enclosure of the facade was consistent with the planar shape, the quality of the sound field of the drum tower with a large aspect ratio in the longitudinal section was good. The values of C50 and the STI at different locations in the drum tower with a small aspect ratio were large. However, the values of the EDT and T30 were small, and those of G at different locations were different such that the reverberation effect and the uniformity of the sound field were poor. The values of EDT and T30 at different locations in the drum tower with a large aspect ratio in the longitudinal section were high. However, the value of C50 was small and LAeq gradually decayed from inside the tower such that the clarity of sound was poor. Moreover, there were significant differences in the intensity of sound experienced by listeners at different locations.

The results of the simulations showed that the value of STI of the drum towers under different constraints was above 0.75, which reflects excellent intelligibility of sound. Moreover, few drum towers in the Dong region have hexagonal and octagonal planar forms. Therefore, in this study, when screening the three variables, the two groups of “façade enclosure” and “aspect ratio of longitudinal section” for quantitative purposes are missing hexagonal and octagonal plan forms. In future work, the authors plan to collect more data on drum towers with polygonal floor plans to further generalize the results of this study.This study focuses on the sound field simulation of ancient Chinese buildings, because of the small research on the sound absorption of ancient building materials, coupled with the inability to disassemble for laboratory mapping, some of the errors in the experiments are considered reasonable, and the study aims to characterize the sound scene, and does not follow the evaluation criteria of the sound quality of modern halls to evaluate the merits of their sound field.

The study can provide a sound field research perspective for the future construction and protection of drum towers in the Dong ethnic area, which can be protected in three dimensions: plan form, façade enclosure and different aspect ratios of longitudinal section. And extend the protection from purely external surface protection to the "interior", enriching the comprehensive protection strategy of the Dong ethnic drum towers.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Deng Z, Dong K, Bai D, Tong K, Liu A. A case study on soundscape analysis for the historical and ethnic village of Dong Nationality in Zhaoxing County. Acoustics. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics3020016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jin M, Faridah I. The effect of social media on dong people ethnic culture in Guangxi Province. J Human Arts Soc Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2022.09.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mao L, Zhang X, Ma J, Jia Y. A comparative study on the audio-visual evaluation of the grand Song of the Dong soundscape. Herit Sci. 2023;11(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00876-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ting W. Analysis of Gaeml architectural culture characteristics based on Drum Tower. 2019.

  5. Conjiang County Journal. Conjiang County People's Government. (In Chinese)

  6. Libing County Journal. Libing County People's Government. (In Chinese)

  7. Yang C. Introduction to Dong culture. Guizhou People Publication Press. 1999. (In Chinese)

  8. Wang S. Tradition and transmutation: a comparison study of Dong minority villages and Drum towers between the Pingtan river basin and Jiudong area. J Asian Archit Build Eng. 2023;22(4):1865–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2122831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu X, Wei Y, Hu X, Fang J. A research on the architectural design and its implementing of dong nationality in northern guangxi. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 525, No. 1,). IOP Publishing. 2020; p. 012078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/525/1/012078

  10. Kong D. The Dong Oral Architecture: Carpenter, architecture and phenomena among the Dong people in southwest of China (Doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield). 2016

  11. Mao L, Zhang Y. A comparative study of 22 Drum Towers in Southern Dong. Contemp Archit. 2020;11:84–8 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith KS, Smith AC, Li X. A human measure: structure, meaning and operation of the ‘Lu Ban’foot-rule (鲁班尺) of the Dong carpenters. Arch Res Q. 2013;17(3–4):227–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135514000050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Luo B. A preliminary exploration of the art of drum tower architecture of the Dong gibbous clan. J Sci Educ. 2010;24:247–8. https://doi.org/10.16400/j.cnki.kjdkz.2010.12.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang T. Discussion on the art of Dong drum tower architecture in Qiandongnan. Popu Lit Art. 2020;10:59–60 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yu D. An analysis of the dimensions of Dong “Drum Tower Culture.” Guizhou Ethnic Stud. 1989;03:44–8 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. http://www.gzhighway.gov.cn/cxfw/jtly/mzfq/dongzu.jsp.

  17. http://www.418500.net/article-863-1.html.

  18. Cui R, Noivangklung P. Drum tower of dong village in guizhou province: cultural and negotiating identities of an ethnic group in the minority development process of China (Doctoral dissertation, Mahasarakham University). 2022. http://202.28.34.124/dspace/handle123456789/1572

  19. Mao L, Zhang X, Ma J, Jia Y. Cultural relationship between rural soundscape and space in Hmong villages in Guizhou. Heliyon. 2022;8(11):e11641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli-yon.2022.e11641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jinx, Guangxi, Tongzhi. https://www.zhonghuadiancang.com.

  21. Kuang L. Commer. Press. 1936. (In Chinese)

  22. Song Y, Yuan M. Tourism and its impact on Dong traditional music and life in Xiaohuang. J Tour Cult Chang. 2021;19(2):200215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766825.2019.1707839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Liu A, Wu L, Tang H, Deng Z. The intention to protect the grand song of the dong ethnic group based on the planned behavior theory model. In: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings (Vol. 261, No. 3). Institute of Noise Control Engineering; 2020; pp. 3407–3420.

  24. Ning K. Translation-workshop of Dong Folk songs. Translating China (2.0).

  25. Luo K, Wu H. Cultural adaptation and consciousness: a case study of Dong People in Huanggang Village. Anthropologist. 2015;22(3):576–86.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wen F, Xiaohua Z. How to continue the beauty of traditional architecture of Dong Village—the exploration of cultural protection. Phys Procedia. 2012;24:2314–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu Q, Wang J. Recognition of values of traditional villages in southwest China for sustainable development: a case study of Liufang Village. Sustainability. 2021;13(14):7569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Han Y, Chun Q, Hua Y. Wind-induced vibration of traditional Chinese Citygate buildings in the Ming-Qing dynasties–a case study of the Nanjing drum tower. Int J Archit Herit. 2023;17(4):615–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2021.1953191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Deng Y, Guo SH, Cai L. Application of mathematical metamodeling for an automated simulation of the Dong nationality drum tower architectural heritage. Comput Concr. 2021;28(6):605–19. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2021.28.6.505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou Z, Jia Z, Wang N, Fang M. Sustainable mountain village construction adapted to livelihood, topography, and hydrology: A case of Dong villages in southeast Guizhou, China. Sustainability. 2018;10(12):4619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fan Y. Interpreting the symbolic meaning of Dong drum tower architectural form—taking Sanjiang ma fat drum tower as an example. Open Access Lib J. 2022;9(5):1–13. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cai L, Deng Y, Jiang X. Construction technology of Centro-column drum towers of Dong nationality. Adv Mater Res. 2012;450:870–6. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.450-451.870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim MJ, Yang HS, Kang J. A case study on controlling sound fields in a courtyard by landscape designs. Landsc Urban Plan. 2014;123:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu, P., Tao, W., Lu, X., Mo, F., Guo, F., Zhang, H. Optimisation design and verification of the acoustic environment for multimedia classrooms in universities based on simulation. In Building Simulation. Tsinghua University Press. 2022; pp.1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0875-7

  35. Wu H, Jian K, Jin H. Effects of urban street spatial parameters on sound propagation. Environ Plann B Urban Anal City Sci. 2019;46(2):341–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317714799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee PJ, Kang J. Effect of height-to-width ratio on the sound propagation in urban streets. Acta Acust United Acust. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu J, Wang S, Qiu X, Shaid A, Wang L. Contributions of various transmission paths to speech privacy of open ceiling meeting rooms in open-plan offices. Appl Acoust. 2016;112:5969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ricciutelli A, Lori V, Lops C, Serpilli F, Montelpare S. Churches acoustics as intangible cultural heritage: experimental and numerical characterization of the temple of San Biagio. Int J Archit Herit. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2023.2214510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang D, Lai R, Zhang M, et al. Effects of spatial elements and sound sources on sound field in Main Hall of Chinese Buddhist temple. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020;147(3):1516–30. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang D, Kong C, Zhang M, et al. Courtyard sound field characteristics by bell sounds in Han Chinese Buddhist temples. Appl Sci. 2020;10(1279):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Christensen CL. Odeon room acoustics program. Version 12.2, User manual, industrial, auditorium and combined editions. Kgs. Lyngby: ODEON A/S, 2012.

  42. Ciaburro G, Iannace G, Lombardi I, et al. Acoustic design of ancient buildings: The odea of Pompeii and Posillipo. Build. 2020;10(12):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10120224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ma J, Mao L, Zhang X. Simulation study on the sound field of Tongguping in Long Horn Miao Village. Contemp Archit. 2022;35(11):121–4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang DX, Liu DP, Kang J. Influence of spatial elements and sound source pointing on the sound field in the Mahamudra Temple of the Han Dynasty Buddhist Temple. Build Sci. 2015;31(06):63–9 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wu S. Principles of architectural acoustics design. China Constr Ind Press. 2000. (In Chinese)

  46. Labia L, Shtrepi L, Astolfi A. Improved room acoustics quality in meeting rooms: Investigation on the optimal configurations of sound-absorptive and sound-diffusive panels. Acoust. 2020;2(3):451–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu J, Qiu W, Zheng Y, et al. Survey of mosquitoes in some counties and cities in the southeast of Qianhai region. Southwest Def Med. 2013;23(12):2 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Barteld N, Postma J, Brian F, Katz G. Creation and calibration method of acoustical models for historic virtual reality auralizations. Virtual Real. 2015;19(3–4):161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-015-0275-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bo E, Astolfi A, Pellegrino A, et al. The modern use of ancient theatres related to acoustic and lighting requirements: Stage design guidelines for the Greek theatre of Syracuse. Energy Build. 2015;95(May):106–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Suárez R, Alonso A, Sendra JJ. Intangible cultural heritage: the sound of the Romanesque cathedral of Santiago de Compostela. J Cult Herit. 2015;16(2):239–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2014.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Soeta Y, Shimokura R, Kim YH, et al. Measurement of acoustic characteristics of Japanese Buddhist temples in relation to sound source location and direction. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;133(5):2699–710. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4796116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pilch A. Optimization-based method for the calibration of geometrical acoustic models. Appl Acoust. 2020;170:107495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Youth Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51808356), the Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education (22YJA760058), and the Hebei Province University Humanities and Social Sciences Research Youth Top Talents Project (BJS2022008).

Funding

The work was supported by the Youth Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51808356), the Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of the Ministry of Education (22YJA760058), and the Hebei Province University Humanities and Social Sciences Research Youth Top Talents Project (BJS2022008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture and Art, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, No. 17, East North Second Ring Road, Shijiazhuang, China

    Linqing Mao, Jianjun Ma, Xin Zhang & Jianzhuang Niu

  2. Zhongtu Dadi International Architectural Design Co., Ltd., Shifeng Road, Sports North Street, Chang′an District, Shijiazhuang, China

    Bin Liu

Authors
  1. Linqing Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianjun Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianzhuang Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LM: conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data, wrote the paper. JM: performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data, wrote the paper. XZ: performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data. BL: conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data. JN: performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linqing Mao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our research paper "Comparison and Simulation-based Analysis of the Sound Field of Dong Drum Tower Buildings", written by Linqing Mao, Jianjun Ma,Xin Zhang, Bin Liu and Jianzhuang Niu, contributes to your journal. All the authors of this article guarantee that: (1) The study complies with the relevant ethical codes; (2) Oral informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study; (3) Truthfulness of thesis content.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, L., Ma, J., Zhang, X. et al. Comparison and simulation-based analysis of the sound field of Dong drum tower buildings. Herit Sci 11, 213 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01057-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01057-5

Keywords