Skip to main content

Integrating typological and stylistic characteristics with scientific results on the provenance study of of proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan Cemetery dating to the early western Zhou Dynasty


There has been widespread concern about the provenance of proto-porcelain in previous studies, which is fundamental in determining the origin of porcelain. However, there are still different opinions on the provenance of proto-porcelain. To discuss this question, this study analyzed 21 proto-porcelain shards, excavated from the Yejiashan Cemetery, on the basis of typology, petrography, and LA-ICP-AES methodologies. Three shards from the Panlongcheng site were also collected for comparative analysis. The typological analysis showed that the majority of proto-porcelain samples from the Yejiashan Cemetery were similar to those from Northern China in type, shape, decoration,and glaze color, while 2 shards showed typical Southern characteristics. The petrographic analysis indicated that there were two different patterns of distribution for quartz particles in the collected samples, which suggested the potential existence of at least two different origins. The LA-ICP-AES analysis results also supported two different origins for Yejiashan proto-porcelain and suggested that one may originate from Zhejiang Province in Southern China. In summary, our study has demonstrated the existence of at least two distinct provenance areas for the proto-porcelain sourced from the Yejiashan cemetery. This distinction is founded upon disparities in typological characteristics, distribution patterns of quartz particles, and chemical compositions. This conclusion contributes to a better understanding of cultural exchange between the Zeng state and neighboring regions and can shed light on the manufacturing industry of the early Western Zhou Dynasty (1046–771 BC).


As a great breakthrough in porcelain technology, proto-porcelain first emerged in the Erlitou period in Northern China and the Maqiao period in Southern China [1, 2]. Proto-porcelain was not only a symbol of technological achievement in ancient China, but also an important cultural relic which persisted throughout the Shang and Zhou dynasties with a wide distribution across different regions, capable, to some extent, of reflecting activities of ancient people and socioeconomic development. Therefore, research on proto-porcelain has always been a pivotal concern in both science history and archaeology [3, 4]. Most recent research indicates that so-called “proto-porcelain” is porcelain since it evidently aligns with the physicochemical characteristics of porcelain [3, 5]. Some scholars believe that proto-porcelain was made in several places like Jiangxi and Zhejiang in Southern China and traded massively to regions in Northern China [4, 6]. However, some studies assert a higher likelihood that proto-porcelain originated and developed independently in both Northern and Southern China based on significant differences in chemical compositions and microstructures between samples from Northern and Southern China [1, 8,9,10,11].

To investigate the origin of proto-porcelain, previous research has merely focused on proto-porcelain in the Shang Dynasty and/or earlier stages, while having some degree of unawareness of the Western Zhou Dynasty [1, 12,13,14,15,16]. Moreover, the provenance of proto-porcelain from adjacent areas of Nothern and Southern China has not yet been fully discussed. By combining methodologies of typology and scientific analysis, we can systematically and chronologically study proto-porcelain unearthed in a certain region, which will provide concrete evidence to support an understanding of the provenance and development of the porcelain industry in this region. The Yejiashan Cemetery is located in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in Hubei Province, where a large quantity of proto-porcelain has been unearthed which provides valuable evidence for exploring the origins of porcelain during the Western Zhou Dynasty.

In this paper, 24 shards of proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan Cemetery and the Panlongcheng site were collected. Typology, thin-section petrography, and chemical elements were analyzed to determine the provenance of proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan Cemetery. The result will reflect, to a certain extent, the economy and technological standards of Hubei during the Western Zhou Dynasty, and reflect the monarchy control of the central plains area during the Zhou Dynasty.

Archaeological background of the Yejiashan cemetery

Hubei Province is located at the boundary between Northern and Southern China, where ancestors worked and lived continuously, leaving numerous significant sites and remains. In the Shang Dynasty, the Panlongcheng site was built to control mineral resources in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River [17]. The Panlongcheng site, built approximately 3500–3200 years ago, is located in the Huangpi District of Wuhan City in Hubei Province. After its discovery in 1954, the Panlongcheng site yielded large-scale structures such as city walls and palaces, as well as multiple high-level aristocratic tombs. Hundreds of artifacts, including bronze, pottery, jade, stone, and bone objects, were excavated. This site reflects the expansion of the Central Plains culture to the south during the Shang Dynasty (Sixteenth to thirteenth century BCE) and the development of a central urban center in the Yangtze River basin.

In the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, the kingdoms of Chu, Zeng, Yong, and Lu were all established in Hubei Province [18]. The abundant relics excavated from Zeng Marquis(曾侯)Yi 's Tomb showed the extreme prosperity of the kingdom of Zeng. For a long time, academics lacked a clear understanding of the kingdom of Zeng’s early history due to a lack of historical documents and unearthed materials. The excavation of the Yejiashan Cemetery provides an opportunity to explore this important issue. Therefore, the Yejiashan Cemetery was voted among the "top ten archaeological discoveries of China in 2011". The Yejiashan Cemetery in Suizhou is a high-level aristocratic burial site, belonging to the Zeng State, dating back to the early Western Zhou period. This cemetery is located in the Jiangjia Village of Xiche Town in Suizhou City, more than 20 km away from the Zeng Marquis Yi’s Tomb of Suizhou. The first phase of excavation of this cemetery was conducted by the Hubei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology from January to June 2011. A total of 65 tombs and one chariot-and-horse pit were discovered. Excavations yielded 739 artifacts of various materials, including pottery, bronze, porcelain, jade, lacquered wood, and other artifacts. Experts revealed new information from different perspectives and published phased results, promoting in-depth research on Zeng country [19, 20]. Numerous precious cultural relics were excavated from the Yejiashan Cemetery, where there are more than 30 pieces of proto-porcelain of various shapes and types, including Zun-vessel, Dou-vessel, Weng-vessel, Hu-vessel, and Guan-vessel, [21]. The proto-porcelain shards attract extensive attention from archaeologists and historians. There is an existing debate on whether the shards were made locally or imported from other places, as well as their exact provenance [19, 22, 23].

Proto-porcelain samples

Twenty-one shards of proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan Cemetery and 3 shards of proto-porcelain from the Panlongcheng site were carefully selected for analysis and comparative studies.

Detailed information on the 24 pieces of proto-porcelain samples is presented in Table 1, where “YJS” represents the Yejiashan Cemetery and “HB” represents the Panlongcheng site in Hubei Province.

Table 1 Detailed information of experimental proto-porcelain samples

Figure 1 presents the geographical location information of all excavated proto-porcelain sites or tombs mentioned in the article.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location of sites/cemeteries involves in this paper. (1. Liulihe Cemetery in Beijing, Western Zhou dynasty; 2. Qianzhangda Cemetery in Shandong,Shang dynasty; 3. Beiyao Cemetery in Luoyang, Western Zhou dynasty; 4. Yingguo Cemetery, Western Zhou dynasty; 5. Changzikou Tomb, Western Zhou dynasty; 6. Guoguo Cemetery, Western Zhou dynasty; 7. Yejiashan Cemetery, Western Zhou dynasty; 8. Panlongcheng site, Shang dynasty; 9. kiln site in Deqing country, Western Zhou dynasty; 10. Ducangshan, Western Zhou dynasty; 11. Wucheng site, Shang dynasty.)


Typology analysis

Archaeological typology is one of the basic tenets of archaeological research and is mainly used to study the morphological changes of relics and to find out their pattern of evolution. Typology combines stratigraphic judgment and contributes to determining the cultural nature of remains and to analyzing aspects such as, living conditions, social relations, and spiritual activities. It is widely used for the study of pottery, porcelain, and other artifacts that underwent significant change during the short periods over which they were used [24,25,26]. In our study, the proto-porcelain unearthed from the Yejiashan Cemetery was compared with those from Northern and Southern China during the same period before further scientific analysis.

Thin-section petrography analysis

After being cut and polished, samples were made into euphotic thin-section with a thickness of 0.03 mm and viewed under a polarizing microscope (ECLIPSE LV100 POL, Nikon, Japan), with magnifications of × 50 and × 100. Due to restrictions based on the size of samples, 12 representative shards were analyzed.

Trace elements analysis by LA-ICP-AES

The chemical compositions of glazes and the bodies of samples were quantitatively analyzed by laser ablation-inductive coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (LA-ICP-AES). A LEEMAN-Prodigy ICP-AES with a NEW-WAVE laser ablation system was used. The operating parameters were as follows: (1) RF generator: 40.82 MHz; (2) RF Power: 1.1 kw; (3) Argon flow rate: Plasma: 20 L/min; (4) Auxiliary pressure: 0 psig; Nebuliser pressure: 30 psig; (5) Laser: Nd-YAG; (6) Laser mode: Q-switched; (7) Laser Wavelength: 266 nm; (8) Output energy: 15.1 mJ; (9) Facular aperture: 610 mm; (10) Helium flow rate: 0.6 L/min.

Si was used as an internal standard, while Corning B, GSS, GSS2, GSS5, GSS6, and GSR1 standards were used as standard reference materials. Overall, 14 elements were determined, including Al, Fe, Mg, Ca, Na, K, Ti, Mn, Ba, Sr, Cu, Zn, Zr, and Sc. The SiO2 data were calculated by subtracting the sum of all other elements in weight percent of oxides from 100%. According to the analytical results for the major and minor elements, most relative standard deviations are less than 1% for major elements, and less than 5% for trace elements.

Results and discussion

Results of the typology analysis

There are various types of proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan Cemetery, many of which were not yet observed in Hubei Province. Therefore, it is widely believed that these ceramics were imported from other places through trade or cultural exchange [19]. However, it remains unknown where these proto-porcelain were produced. Some experts infer they came from Zhejiang Province according to the S-shaped decoration and dark green glaze on some vessels, while others find that the body, glaze, decoration patterns, and shape of most proto-porcelain relics from the Yejiashan Cemetery are similar to those excavated from Northern China at that time, suggesting they came from Northern China [22]. The archaeological literature shows that, to date, 36 proto-porcelain objects have been excavated from the Yejiashan Cemetery, including Dou-vessel, Bu-vessel, Lei-vessel, Zun-vessel, Weng-vessel, Gui-vessel, and Cap (Table 2) [27].

Table 2 Number and type of proto-porcelain in Yejiashan cemetery

After carefully comparing the types of proto-porcelain objects unearthed both in Northern and Southern China dating to the early Western Zhou Dynasty, it was found that the Lei-vessel and Bu-vessel types were common in Northern China, but hardly seen in Southern China [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. It was also found that there were significant differences in the shapes of two kinds of Zun-vessel and Gui-vessel in Northern and Southern China. The Zun-vessel and Gui-vessel with a double ear design excavated from the Yejiashan Cemetery were similar to the Zun-vessel from the Yingguo Cemetry (M232:062) and Gui-vessel (M54:3) in Beiyao, Luoyang, respectively. Generally speaking, the proto-porcelain objects unearthed in the Yejiashan Cemetery have, more or less, the same type and shape as those from Northern China (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Line drawing of proto-porcelains from Yejiashan Cemetery, Northern and Southern China in the same period

It is worth noting that the phenomenon of intentional pre-burial damage to certain objects like the Dou-vessel in the Yejiashan Cemetery was similar to that of the Changzikou tomb at Taiqing Palace, the Beiyao Cemetery in Luoyang and the Yingguo tomb in Pingdingshan, which are all located in Henan Province, Northern China [27, 28, 30]. The same specific burial custom in the four cemeteries indicated that the Yejiashan Cemetery was strongly influenced by Northern cultural factors.

The types and combinations of most vessels from Yejiashan, represented by the Zun-vessel, Lei-vessel, Bu-vessel, and Gui-vessel, were very similar to those unearthed in parts of Northern China, such as in Henan and Shaanxi. Meanwhile, some vessels found both in Northern and Southern China had similar shapes, such as the Weng-vessel and Dou-vessel. It is difficult to figure out where these vessels came from just by analyzing their type and shape. In this case, the glaze and decorative pattern must be discussed carefully together. As the excavation report shows, YJS17 and YJS18 are similar in shape, both having a trumpet-shaped mouth with an out-turned rim, convex grooves between the neck and shoulder, and a box pattern on the shoulder and body [21]. Notably, the glazes of these two Weng-vessels were brownish green and dark green, which was more similar to those in the southern region, whereas products in Northern China often show light green and pea green. Another Weng-vessel from tomb 65(M65:19) had the same shape as YJS17 and YJS18, with a decorative pattern and glaze showing typical southern characteristics, including three cloudscape girdles on the shoulder, a chevron pattern on the body, and a brownish-green glaze [21]. This decorative pattern and glaze have been rarely discovered in Northern China, however, both were found on the Weng-vessel from Ducangshan and Quzhou in Zhejiang Province (Fig. 3). By all appearances, the Weng vessels are abundant in southern characteristics which supports the distinct possibility that they originate from Zhejiang Province.

Fig. 3
figure 3

the line drawing of weng-vessels from three sites

Typological analysis showed that most of the proto-porcelain objects unearthed in the Yejiashan Cemetery were close to the northern counterparts in terms of combination, shape, ornamentation, and glaze, but there were still a few vessels with typical southern features. The following characteristics were combined with petrographic and trace element analyses and other scientific and technological methods to further explore provenance.

Results of the thin-section petrographic analysis

Thin-section petrographic analysis plays a crucial role in the study of pottery provenance, which reveals vast information like mineral composition, structural performance, and techniques in ceramic creation [36,37,38,39,40]. As is shown in Figs. 4 and 5, quartz particles from representative samples came in different sizes, with the majority ranging between 0 and 250 μm and some exceeding 500 μm. Quartz particles from most samples (except YJS17 and YJS18) were mostly white, faint yellow, or blue. Their body texture showed a floccus structure with a quantity of pores and air bubbles. On the contrary, the micrographs of YJS17 and YJS18 showed significantly different structures and grain distribution patterns. Quartz particles in these two samples were quite small, ranging from 0 to 25 μm, where the largest was not greater than 50 μm. The bodies were fine and vitrified matrices with few pores or bubbles. In addition, granular quartz in metamorphic clasts was found in the body of YJS1, indicating that the parent rock of the raw material of YJS1 may have been metamorphic [41].

Fig. 4
figure 4

the translucent microphotograph of samples from Yejiashan Cemetery (scale bar = 1000 μm)

Fig. 5
figure 5

the reflective microphotograph of samples from Yejiashan Cemetery (scale bar = 1000 μm)

To determine the size and distribution pattern of quartz grains in the bodies of samples, the scientific image processing software, Image Pro, was used to quantitatively analyze quartz particles in the body. Accumulative curves (Fig. 6) and probability cumulative curves (Fig. 7) were plotted as follows.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Accumulative curve of quartz particles of analysed samples

Fig. 7
figure 7

Probability area accumulative curve of quartz particles of YJS8 and YJS17

As is shown in Fig. 6, the abscissa axis indicates the particle diameter and the ordinate axis represents the accumulative area of particles. The accumulative area of particles refers to the sum of the areas of all particles in a specific range. Curves of YJS17 and YJS18 increased from 0 to 25 μm (diameter) and flattened after 25 μm, while curves of other samples showed a different trend where they increased in all the diameter ranges without peaking. Therefore, it was evident that there were at least two different distribution patterns of quartz particles in the samples from the Yejiashan Cemetery.

Compared with the accumulative curve, the probability cumulative curve more intuitively reflects the change in sizes of quartz particles. In the probability cumulative curve, the abscissa axis is the equivalent circle diameter of the particles, and the ordinate is the percentage of the total area of all the quartz particles in a specific range. If there are many grains of a certain size, there will be a corresponding peak in the curve. YJS8 and YJS17 were used as representatives of two different distribution patterns for comparison with their probability cumulative curves (Fig. 7). As shown in Fig. 7, YJS17 has an obvious peak at about 20 μm with the accumulative probability up to 55%, suggesting the sizes of most grains are about 20 μm; YJS8 shows several peaks from 0 to 250 μm, indicating the grain sizes of quartz particles were more dispersed.

The size and distribution of quartz particles in the bodies of the proto-porcelain samples were mainly affected by manufacturing processes of purification and selection, which were not directly related to the place of production. According to evidence of ancient ceramic production, vessels of the same type often share similar manufacturing techniques and production processes since they are uniform in size, shape, and function. YJS17 and YJS8 have the same Weng-vessel type, however, they differ in size and distribution pattern of quartz particles. Based on the theory of “similar type-similar manufacturing technology and productive processes”, the difference in quartz particles between these two samples can probably be attributed to differences in raw materials. Therefore, the difference in petrography between YJS17 and YJS8 was very likely due to different clay materials, which means that the provenance of these two samples likely differs as well.

Major and trace element composition analysis

It is believed that the trace element composition of ceramic objects carries characteristics of provenance since there are few differences between the composition and content of trace elements in porcelain of the same origin [42,43,44]. The Panlongcheng site and Wucheng site are two strongholds for the southern expansion of Shang culture during the Erligang stage. The Panlongcheng site belongs to orthodox Shang culture while the Wucheng site was originally a Shang colony but later turned into a localized polity [17].

Previous studies have shown that, in addition to the imported products from the Wucheng site, the Panlongcheng site may have also made proto-porcelain locally [45].

The Panlongcheng site is not far from the Yejiashan Cemetery, and both are located in Hubei Province. By collecting component data from a previous publication on proto-porcelain from the Wucheng and Panlongcheng sites [46] and comparing trace elements from proto-porcelain objects at the Yejiashan Cemetery, Panlongcheng site, and Wucheng site, Principal Component Analysis was conducted and box plots were drawn.

Based on the analysis of nine trace elements, namely Co, La, Sc, Eu, Fe, Mg, K, V, and Yb, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted. During the analysis, the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure was determined to be 0.631, with all the elements exhibiting sampling adequacy exceeding 0.660, indicating the suitability of the dataset for PCA analysis. The first and second principal components represented 44.3 and 20.6% of the total information, respectively, accumulating close to two-thirds of the total information. Consequently, groupings based on the first and second principal components were deemed appropriate. Among these, the contributions to the first principal component were, in descending order, Mg, Eu, Sc, V, Co, and Fe, while the second principal component mainly consisted of Yb, La, and K. The analytical results are presented in Fig. 8. In the diagram, the clustering of the Yejiashan proto-porcelain was observed in the upper left quadrant, while the distribution of Panlongcheng and Wucheng fell within the lower right quadrant, clearly demarcating two distinct groups. It is unlikely that the proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan cemetery originated from the Wucheng region. This indicates that in the early Western Zhou period, after the Zhou dynasty conquered the Shang dynasty, there was likely a shift away from importing proto-porcelain from the Wucheng region, instead opting for new sources of proto-porcelain production. There were two data points located a little far away from the clustering of the Yejiashan proto-porcelain, which were samples YJS17 and YJS18.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The Factor load diagram of Factor 1 and Factor 2 in the body of proto-porcelains from Yejiashan Cemetery(YJS), Panlongcheng site(HB) and Wucheng site (WY)

The box plot shows that the content of Cr in the Yejiashan Cemetery was much lower than that of the Panlongcheng site and Wucheng site (Fig. 9), suggesting different provenance. This confirmed the PCA results that proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan Cemetery was neither made locally nor from the Wucheng site.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Box plot of content of Cr in the body of proto-porcelains from three site

According to the results of the thin-section petrographic analysis, samples from Yejiashan could be divided into two groups (YJSa and YJSb) based on the glaze color and accumulative curves. The YJSa group includes YJS17 and YJS18, and YJSb includes all remaining samples. These two groups had significant differences in elemental composition (Tables 3 and 4), especially in the concentration of Ba and Sr (Fig. 10). It is not difficult to deduce that the samples of the two groups were made in different regions. Notably, Ba content in group YJSa was up to 635 ppm, which was higher than any other reported data on proto-porcelain bodies during the Shang and Zhou Dynasties [47]. Combined with evidence of typology and petrographic analysis, we believe that the YJSa group likely originated from Zhejiang Province, which is also partly supported by the latest technical analysis results [23]. The YJSb group likely originated from Northern China.

Table 3 The major chemical components of bodies of the proto-porcelains from Yejiashan Cemetery and Panlongcheng site (Wt %)
Table 4 Trace chemical components of bodies of the proto-porcelains from Yejiashan Cemetery and Panlongcheng site (ug/g)
Fig. 10
figure 10

Box plot of content of Ba, Sr in the bodies of samples from Yejiashan Cemetery

Regarding the analysis of the glaze layer on samples from Yejiashan, the compositional analysis revealed that its primary fluxing agent was calcium oxide, indicating a high-temperature calcium glaze (Table 5). This aspect indirectly corroborates its status as a proto-porcelain.

Table 5 the primary chemical components of glazes of the proto-porcelains from Yejiashan Cemetery and Panlongcheng site (Wt%)

Finally, a ternary diagram of Cr-Ba-Sr was drawn (Fig. 11). In the diagram of Ba-Sr-Cr, samples from the Yejiashan and the Panlongcheng sites were plotted. The data points of samples from Yejiashan and Panlongcheng in the graph were widely separated, implying a limited relationship between the two locations. Within the Yejiashan samples, a few data points were notably distant from the rest, suggesting an alternative origin.

Fig. 11
figure 11

ternary diagram of Cr, Ba, Sr in the bodies of samples from Yejiashan Cemetery(YJS) and Panlongcheng site(HB)

In summary, it can be seen from the above results there are at least two different sources contributing to the provenance of proto-porcelain unearthed in the Yejiashan Cemetery. Most samples likely came from Northern China, and a few (YJS17 and YJS18) came from Southern China. This phenomenon and result were extremely rare in previous studies and is likely related to the special geographical location of the north–south intersection of the Yejiashan Cemetery. It indicates that the early civilization of the Western Zhou Dynasty in the Han River basin, represented by the Yejiashan Cemetery, also absorbed the local cultural factors from the Yangtze River basin during the close interaction with the central plains culture.


Twenty-one pieces of proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan Cemetery (Additional file 1: Fig. S1) and 3 shards from the Panlongcheng site were analyzed in this study. Results of the typological analysis showed that the majority of samples shared a similar type, shape, decoration, and glaze color with proto-porcelain found in Northern China, while a few samples (YJS17 and YJS18) show typical southern characteristics.

In thin-section petrographic analysis, samples YJS17 and YJS18 had different quartz grain sizes and distribution patterns from other samples. The quartz particles in the bodies of YJS17 and YJS18 were smaller with clustering around about 25 μm, while other samples scattered from 0 to 250 μm. This phenomenon can be seen in the samples of the same type, indicating they were made by different clay materials from different places. In the chemical composition analysis, the bodies of samples YJS17 and YJS18 also had some richer trace elements such as Ba and Sr, suggesting their raw materials differed from other samples.

Our study identified at least two different provenance sources for the proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan Cemetery. Most samples probably came from Northern China, while there were still several vessels (YJS17 and YJS18) that were possibly imported from Zhejiang Province, Southern China. The pattern of provenance distribution indicated that the ancient kingdom of Zeng had economic and cultural exchanges with areas of the central plains.

As this study was confined by the number of samples, the complete picture of the provenance of proto-porcelains from the Yejiashan Cemetery is still not clear. However, evidently, by combining archaeological cultural analysis methods and scientific methods, studies on the provenance of proto-porcelain could be more systematic and multi-dimensional, with a more reasonable and reliable conclusion.

Availability of data and materials

The data used in this research are published in this paper, and they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. Zhu L-T, Gao X-L, Zhang B, Bao Y, Zheng J-M. PIXE and FCA study on the provenance of proto-porcelain of Xia and Shang Dynasty unearthed from Erlitou and Yinxu sites, China. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect. 2023;540:110–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shanghai Management Committee Commission for Cultural Relics. 1993–1995 excavated report of the Maqiao site at Minhang. Shanghai Acta Archaeol Sini. 1997;2:197–236.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yan L-T, Liu M, Sun H-Y, Li L, Feng X-Q. A comparative study of typical early celadon shards from Eastern Zhou and Eastern Han dynasty (China). J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2020;33: 102530.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li W-J, Chen Y, Pollard MA, Wang C-S. The definition and origin of celadon—A re-discussion on the name of proto-celadon. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2022;46: 103687.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li Z-Q, Xiong Y-F, Zheng J-M, Wang X-Q, Zhou J-Z, Chen J, et al. Provenancing eastern Zhou proto-porcelain wares in the circum-Tai region. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2020;29: 102179.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang S, Freestone I-C, Zhu Y-S, Shen L-H. The introduction of celadon production in North China: Technological characteristics and diversity of the earliest wares. J Archaeol Sci. 2020;114: 105057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Z, Zhang L. Compositional characteristics of proto-porcelain production sites in the Dongtiaoxi river valley in Southeastern China. Archaeometry. 2021;63:577–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li J-Z, Luo H-J, Gao L-M. Further study of the process of technological evolution of ancient Chinese pottery and porcelain. MRS Online Proc Libra. 1992;267:571–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hao W-T, Zheng T-X, Li Y-D, Zheng J-M, Jian Zhu, et al. Provenance study of Chinese proto-celadon in Western Han Dynasty. Ceram Int. 2013;39:6325–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu J, Solbrekken G, Hao W-T, Li Y-D, Zhen J-M, Zhen T-X, et al. Neutron activation analysis of bulk samples from Chinese ancient porcelain to provenance research. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2013;298:237–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu J, Wu J-M, Li Q-J, Li J-Z, Luo H-J, Deng Z-Q. Scientific studies on pottery and pro-porcelain from group of graves in Henglingshan Guangdong Province. Sci China Technol Sci. 2009;52:3085–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yin M, Rehren T, Zheng J-M. The earliest high-fired glazed ceramics in China: the composition of the proto-porcelain from Zhejiang during the Shang and Zhou periods (c. 1700–221 BC). J Archaeol Sci. 2011;38:2352–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu G, Jin Z-Y, Chen L-F, Wang F, Wang X-R, Wu X-T, et al. Analyzing the earliest Chinese proto-porcelain: study on the materials from Liaotianjianshan kiln sites, Dehua County, Fujian Province (China). Ceram Int. 2018;44:21648–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan L-T, Huang Y, Liu L, Li L, Feng S-L, Feng X-Q, et al. A comparative study of the early high-fired ceramic shards from Dongtiaoxi, Zhejiang (China). Archaeometry. 2018;60:76–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rehren Th, Yin M. Melt formation in lime-rich proto-porcelain glazes. J Archaeol Sci. 2012;39:2969–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y, Zhang B, Cheng H-S, Zheng J-M. The earliest Chinese proto-porcelain excavated from kiln sites: an elemental analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li H-C. The center and periphery of the Early and Middle Shang Dynasty based on the production and circulation of bronze, stamped hard pottery, and proto-porcelain. Annu Rev Cult Herit Stud. 2018;51:108–23.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lan Z, Gong Y-H. the Kinds and development of ancient kingdoms in Hanjiang River basin. J Yunyang Teach Coll. 2005;5:20–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li X-Q, Li B-Q, Zhu F-H, et al. Conversation of Yejiashan Cemetery in Suizhou. Hubei Cultural Relics. 2011;11:64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li H-C, Chen J-L, Cui J-F, Wu X-H, Yang Y-L, Huang F-C, et al. Production and circulation of bronzes among the regional states in the Western Zhou Dynasty. J Archaeol Sci. 2020;121: 105191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo C-J, Hu T. A preliminary study of the proto-porcelain unearthed from the Western Zhou cemetery of Yejiashan Hubei Suizhou County. Hubei: Hubei Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology; 2013. p. 220–34.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu Y-B, Cui J-F, Chen J-L, Huang F-C, Guo C-J. The chemical composition and production area of early Western Zhou proto-porcelain unearthed from Yejiashan Cemetery, Suizhou, China. Archaeometry. 2018;60:19–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Robert T-N, Shadreck C. Archaeological implications of ethnographically grounded functional study of pottery from Nyanga, Zimbabwe. Quat Int. 2020;555:150–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jillian MJ, Meaghan MP-B, Sylvestro C, Aurora S, Frank T. It’s what’s inside that counts: developing a paste group typology in Belize. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2021;37: 103019.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roxana B, Alexandra T, Iulia I, Daniela D, Bogdan M, Daniele C. Shedding new light on late antique pottery from Histria, Romania. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2023;528:138–43.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology of Henan province, Pingdingshan heritage administration. Yingguo cemetery in Pingdingshan. 1st ed. Zhengzhou: Elephant press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Institute of Archaeology Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Qianzhangda cemetery in Tengzhou. 1st ed. Beijing: Cultural relics publishing house; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Luoyang municipal archaeological team. Western Zhou tombs at Beiyao, Luoyang. 1st ed. Beijing: Cultural riclics publishing house; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Beijing cultural relics research institute. Yan state cemetery of the Western Zhou period at Liulihe. 1st ed. Beijing: Cultural riclics publishing house; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lu L-C, Hu Z-C. Yuguo Graveyard in Baoji. 1st ed. Beijing: Cultural relics publishing house; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology of Zhejiang Province, Deqing county museum. Excavations of the mounded tombs in the ducangshan and nanwang mountains in deqing county, Zhejiang province. Archaeology. 2001;10:46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cultural Relics management commission of Quzhou. the proto-celadon in Quzhou, Zhejiang. Archaeology. 1984;1:130–4.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mou Y-K, Mao Z-T. Reconnaissance and trial diggings at the ancient sites and tombs in the southern district of Jiangshan country. Beijing: Cultural Relics press; 1981. p. 57–84.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology of Hubei province, Suizhou museum. Excavation report of Yejiashan M65 in Suizhou, Hubei province. Jianghan Archaeol. 2011;3:3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Druc I, Underhill A, Wang F, Luan F-S, Lu Q-Y, Hu Q-T, et al. Late Neolithic white wares from southeastern Shandong, China: The tricks to produce a white looking pot with not much kaolin. Results from petrography, XRD and SEM-EDS analyses. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2021;35:102673.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Guo Y, Jiang Q-Y, Liu Y, Huang W-D, Wu Y-L, Yang Y-M. Provenance analysis of pottery from the neolithic Diaolongbei site, Hubei Province, China by using NAA and petrography analysis. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2018;21:200–7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stoltman JB, Yue Z-W, Jing Z-C, Tang J-G, Burton JH, Raudsepp M. New insights into the composition and microstructure of ceramic artifacts associated with the production of Chinese bronzes at Yinxu, the last capital of the Shang dynasty. Archaeol Res Asia. 2018;15:88–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yuan C, Zhao C-Q, Wang F, Yuan S-L. Characterization of ceramic from the Early Bronze Age Xinzhai site, Henan Province, China, by using a multi-analytical approach. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2022;44: 103551.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu J, MacDonald BL, Hang T, Zhu Z-W, Glascock MD. Compositional characterization of Zisha clay from the Yixing area (Jiangsu, China) by neutron activation analysis. Microchem J. 2019;147:1117–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chang L-H, Chen M-Y, Jin W, et al. Identification manual for transparent mineral thin-section. Beijing: Geological publishing house; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gao X-L, Zhu L-T, Zhang B, Wu S, Zheng J-M. PIXE and FCA study on the provenance of early celadons unearthed from Nanjing. China J Cult Herit. 2023;62:65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang E-Y, Xiong Y-F, Zhu Y-B, Wu J-W. Provenance study of ceramic sherds excavated from Qinglong Town site during Tang and Song Dynasties by composition and petrography analysis. J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2021;38:103112.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pareja D, Inanez J, Amara AB, Diaz L, Arana G, Chapoulie R. The Ychsma ceramic provenance from Armatambo, 1250–1532 CE (Lima, Peru). A local or imported production? J Archaeol Sci Rep. 2023;47:103772.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chen T-M, Rapp GJ, Jing Z-C, He N. Provenance study by neutron activation analysis of proto-porcelain in Shang Dynasty. Archaeology. 1997;7:615–28.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chen T-M Jr, Rapp G, Jing Z-C, He N. Provenance studies of the earliest Chinese protoporcelain using instrumental neutron activation analysis. J Archaeol Sci. 1999;26:1003–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen T-M, Rapp GJ, Jing Z-C. Discussion on neutron activation analysis and related problems of primitive porcelain in Shang and Zhou Dynasties. Archaeology. 2003;7:69–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the quality of the manuscript.


This research is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (No. 20VJXG018), the Beijing Social Science Fund Project (No. 21DTR046), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (E2ET0910X2), the Social Science General Project of Beijing Municipal Education Commission (SM202111417012) and the Research Project Funding of Beijing Union University “Exploration, investigation and research of archaeological resources in Beijing” (JS10202001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



LWG and WCS designed the research project; HFC provide the sample; LWJ and CY were responsible for the data collection and analysis; LWJ wrote the publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wugan Luo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Ternarydiagram of SiO2+Al2O3+[Na2O+K2O+CaO] in the body of Yejiashan samples and proto-porcelain from Shang Dynasty.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Luo, W., Huang, F. et al. Integrating typological and stylistic characteristics with scientific results on the provenance study of of proto-porcelain from the Yejiashan Cemetery dating to the early western Zhou Dynasty. Herit Sci 11, 229 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: