Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Developing a non-invasive tool to assess the impact of oxidation on the structural integrity of historic wool in Tudor tapestries

Heritage Science20175:49

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-017-0162-1

  • Received: 23 March 2017
  • Accepted: 11 November 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Near infrared spectroscopy (NIR) can be a useful diagnostic tool in the assessment of quality in textile, agricultural and various other industries. In cultural heritage applications, NIR as a non-invasive assessment tool is advantageous for understanding the composition or degradation of fragile historic objects that cannot be sampled. The direct interpretation of measured NIR spectra is complicated by overlapping bands produced from overtone and combination bands of chemical bonds. However, in combination with multivariate partial least squares (PLS) models and principal component analysis, the physicochemical properties of historic materials can potentially be identified by calibrating against a measured component. In this research, wool fibres from a sacrificial collection of historic tapestry fragments housed at Hampton Court Palace were analysed. The cystine oxidation products of historic wools which can be related to the embrittlement of fibres and ultimately fibre loss, were recorded using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. A PLS predictive model was then developed using previously measured NIR spectra for the same historic tapestry fragments to predict the ratios of the cystine oxidation species in historic wools measured in this research. The prediction of a validation set of historic tapestry fragments with known oxidation product ratios was found to be accurate to root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEP) of 0.11 for cysteic acid/cystine dioxide, 0.03 for an oxidation ratio of cysteic acid/cystine monoxide and 0.06 for cystine dioxide/cystine monoxide. The model was applied successfully to an independent set of historic tapestry fragments with unknown oxidation ratios with an M-distance pass limit of 3. The models were also applied to NIR measurements of historic tapestries on open display with limited success. Alternative methods to investigate and account for errors in this research are proposed. The potential for NIR to be used by conservators as a non-invasive tool for the assessment of textiles, complementing current condition audit practices in use at heritage institutions is also discussed.

Keywords

  • Near infrared spectroscopy
  • Oxidation
  • Historic tapestries
  • Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

Background

The preservation of historic tapestries is essential for the longevity of future public engagement with these objects. These highly elaborate objects consist of organic animal protein fibres (silk and wool) and inorganic material (silver or gold and silver gilt metal threads). During their construction, historic tapestries were often woven sideways due to loom width restrictions. Consequently, they are hung in the weft direction when on display rather than the warp direction, which is the structural frame on which the pictorial element is built. Wool fibres are a major structural and decorative component in tapestries and may arguably play a significant role in enabling the tapestries to bear their own weight.

Previous research

During their lifetime, historic tapestries have been exposed to various physical and environmental changes that pose a risk of damage to their fibres. Concerns for the mechanical stability of historic tapestries led to “the monitoring of damage to historic tapestries” (MODHT) project through which the highly fragile nature of the tapestries became known [1, 2]. In this European-wide project, a variety of instrumental techniques including Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR), liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) and tensile measurements were used to analyse dyed and unaged model fibres, historic, and artificially light degraded and thermally aged materials [24]. The results of this research identified several chemical markers of degradation for materials in historic tapestries. These markers included the presence of cystine oxidation products in historic and artificially light aged wool fibres [3].

Chemical stability and the oxidation of historic wool fibres

A key feature of the chemical structure of wool keratin proteins is their high cystine content. These amino acids with disulfide cross-links are important for the structural integrity of the fibres [5, 6]. Weaker hydrogen bonds and salt bridges between COO and NH3+ ions also influence the structural properties of wool. In the assessment of wool degradation, the integrity of protein backbone and crosslinks are the “main chemical entities of interest” as noted by Weatherall [7]. For this reason, the cystine breakdown products formed from scission of disulfide bonds warrant study for historic tapestries and were investigated in this research. The intramolecular and intermolecular disulfide network is a significant component of the wool keratin cellular substructure [8]. The arrangement of cells within the wool substructure essentially define the physical properties of the fibre, providing resistance to chemical attack.

The mechanism for the process of disulfide oxidation in wool keratins is uncertain. One proposed pathway [9, 10] is thought to proceed as described in Fig. 1 with light being one known cause of oxidation, although other environmental risks may contribute. In terms of quantitative detection, lower concentration intermediate products like cystine dioxide (CD) and cystine monoxide (CM) are diminished over time as they are converted to other products [11]. Cysteic acid (CA), a more stable oxidation product is easily identified and has been used as a marker for physicochemical change in historic and model tapestries in the past [3, 12].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Proposed oxidation breakdown pathway for wool keratin drawn in ChemDraw (version 15.1) [9, 10]

Through FTIR, SO and SO2 peaks related to wool oxidation breakdown products (such as CM, CD and CA) can easily be identified. Other peaks relevant to the oxidation process such as the peaks relating to the disulfide (450–550 cm−1), thiol (2500–2600 cm−1) or sulfur carbon groups (590–700 cm−1) can appear as very weak bands that may be masked by background noise [13, 14]. Rather such groups are often identified through Raman spectroscopy [1518], where such bands are typically stronger than in FTIR and NIR. Though useful in following chemical changes that occur in wool proteins [1922], FTIR-ATR is ultimately destructive, requiring sacrificial samples that are not always accessible in historic collections. For historic tapestries, it is not possible to take samples from the front of the tapestry. In the MODHT project this sampling issue was addressed by removing fibres from the back of the tapestries. Behind the tapestry the microclimate may differ from that experienced on the surface of the tapestries. Fibres at the back of the tapestries are also better protected from the effects of exposure to light. In FTIR-ATR analysis sample compression is necessary and may cause further physical damage to already vulnerable objects. Diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTS) can be used for a non-invasive approach, however the rough and uneven surface of fibres in tapestries may produce erroneous results and spectra that are difficult to interpret [23]. In previous unpublished research by McCullough1, DRIFTS was unable to produce spectra containing useful chemical information for historic tapestry fragments at Hampton Court Palace.

Following the MODHT project, other studies have investigated the strain experienced by tapestries as well as the chemical degradation pathways leading to the loss of fibre strength. Through finite element analysis, concentrated areas of stress were pinpointed within the slits in the tapestry weave structure (in Ph.D. research by Duffus2 unpublished). Digital image correlation is another method that has been used to non-invasively monitor strain deformation in tapestries while on display [26, 27]. The development of a science based strategy for the conservation protection of the 16th century tapestries in the GH and GWC at Hampton Court Palace led to the establishment of an ongoing long-term environmental monitoring campaign known as the “Tudor tapestry environmental protection project”.3 A large number of sensors were deployed in front of the tapestries, where the data collected revealed the distribution of the environmental risks (relative humidity, temperature, light and dust) on these large objects. The strain experienced by the tapestries because of these environmental changes has stimulated another area of this investigation, as well as the development of a non-invasive tool for the in situ condition assessment of the tapestries.

Since the late 20th century conservation practices for tapestries have evolved from reweaving and restoration to a minimally invasive approach [29, 30]. To evaluate the state of historic tapestries and other historic textiles, condition is commonly described using a visual set of criteria that relies on the conservator’s expertise [31]. Observations are of cumulative damage that has already occurred to the material to the point that fibre strength and image detail of areas may already be compromised. It is therefore difficult to anticipate damage since structural and fibre loss has already occurred and the uncertainty on how best to prioritise the treatment of these objects remains [32].

Through non-invasive quantitative assessments, there is the potential to address the need for objective and semi-quantitative condition assessments of historic tapestries by predicting areas that are susceptible to physical and chemical damage. As a technique NIR is non-invasive, portable and easy to use but must be calibrated against reference data. Multivariate analysis is then needed to extract information from both the NIR spectra and measured reference data. On its own NIR, can be difficult to interpret because of the overlapping overtones and combination bands that dominate in the near infrared region. These overlapping bands make it difficult to extract quantitative information from spectra due to the overlap of spectral features in this region (700–2500 nm) compared to the intense absorptions observed from fundamental vibrations in the mid infrared region (2500–25,000 nm) used in FTIR [33]. The condition and physicochemical properties of materials gained through NIR and multivariate analysis has been widely researched in agriculture, the textile industry, as well as in cultural heritage for historic silk and cellulosic materials [3439]. NIR has also been used to determine material quality as seen in the development of partial least squares (PLS) regression models for alpaca wool [40]. As NIR provides an in situ non-invasive approach to understanding the mechanical or chemical properties of a material, NIR was used in a recent study by McCullough to assess the physical damage that occurs to historic tapestries and was based on tensile reference data measured for yarns removed from a collection of historic tapestry fragments housed at Hampton Court Palace (unpublished).

Research aims

The aim of this research was a continuation of the previously mentioned work, focusing on the development of a non-invasive tool to measure chemical damage specifically the oxidation of historic wool yarns. Degradation can be caused by light, though there are other factors that contribute to the oxidation of wool such as temperature, dyes and mordants. The oxidation products formed as a result of cystine scission can result in further fibre degradation through acidic hydrolysis and autocatalytic breakdown processes [6, 41]. Through the examination of the cystine breakdown products and peak intensity changes, the extent of protein degradation can be inferred [2022]. The NIR measurements had already been recorded for the historic tapestry weft yarns in McCullough’s work and are relevant for this research as they were used to calibrate the PLS models against the oxidation products measured in this study. New NIR spectra were then recorded in an on-site non-invasive application to predict the oxidation products of the tapestries on display in the great watching chamber (GWC) and great hall (GH). On-site NIR measurements could be useful in predicting the chemical changes that occur and manifest as fibre strength loss. The knowledge of chemical properties such as the presence of oxidation products may then assist conservators in prioritising areas for treatment using NIR as non-invasive diagnostic instrument complementing existing audit practices.

Experimental

Sampling strategy

With permission from Historic Royal Palaces, wool fibres from a sacrificial collection of historic tapestry fragments housed within the scientific laboratory at Hampton Court Palace were analysed (Fig. 2). As the conservation of historic tapestries at Hampton Court Palace has been in practice for over 100 years, these tapestry fragments are most likely the remnants of past interventive treatments where weak areas were removed and rewoven. The collection of these tapestry fragments constitutes a valuable source of sacrificial samples, presenting similar manufacturing and ageing characteristics to the historic tapestries on display at Hampton Court Palace. These yarns were dyed different colours during original manufacture although the dyes were not identified. Like the tapestries on display, the historic tapestry fragments yarns will have experienced varying levels of light exposure, temperature and RH differences and other environmental parameters. These tapestry fragments were the same sample sets used to develop the previously mentioned NIR model. Where possible yarns were unravelled from the same weft areas adjacent to where they had been removed previously (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Examples from the sacrificial collection of historic tapestry fragments housed at the scientific laboratory at Hampton Court Palace. These pieces had been removed from the tapestries during restoration (image courtesy of Historic Royal Palaces)

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Graphical representation of methodology on historic fragments. Red and black arrows = work carried out in this research and blue arrows = previous work carried out by McCullough (unpublished). a Example of a historic tapestry fragment where yarns removed in earlier work for NIR are denoted as “1”. Yarns removed for FTIR analysis in this research (“2”) were adjacent to previous yarns in “1”. b 3 spectra were recorded per measurement for “1” yarns and averaged for each yarn, c averaged raw NIR spectra for 5 yarns, d 5 adjacent yarns in “2” were unravelled and cut to approximately 0.5 mm, with 3 FTIR spectra recorded for each piece from one yarn and averaged, e averaged raw FTIR spectra of 5 yarns from area “2” adjacent to “1”. f Multivariate analysis = principal component analysis and cross validation experiments, g validation of model on validation sets (known oxidation ratios) and independent set (unknown ratios)

Weft yarns were unravelled and removed from the weave structure prior to FTIR measurements to reduce the likelihood of spectra being recorded for the underlying warp fibres especially where weft threads had significant material loss. The reproducibility of conducting FTIR measurements on removed historic yarns was assessed in a pilot study for replicate measurements (unpublished results). Five unravelled yarns were removed per weft area in a tapestry fragment with 37 different weft areas of varying condition analysed and 190 unravelled yarns removed in total for FTIR analysis (Fig. 3a, d, e). The yarns were then prepared by cutting to approximately 0.5 mm in length. Each piece of yarn was analysed separately and the spectra for all pieces from one yarn were averaged.

FTIR-ATR method

FTIR spectra was collected for 180 yarn fibres from historic tapestry fragments that were dyed a range of colours during original manufacture, for 5 model undyed and unaged wool tapestry yarns and 5 undyed artificially light degraded tapestry yarns (aged at 600 h of 150,000 lx in a Xenotest light aging chamber) from the MODHT project. FTIR-ATR was used to measure the peak intensities of the functional groups related to cystine oxidation products (see Fig. 3a, d, e). Spectra were recorded using a Bruker Alpha FTIR spectrometer (Ettlingen, Germany) with an ATR Platinum Diamond single reflection module. Sixty-four scans were collected with a 4 cm−1 resolution over the range of 4000–375 cm−1. Results were processed using Opus software (version 7). The spectra were averaged and normalised by dividing by the amide III absorption band resulting from C–N stretching and N–H bending vibrations at 1232 cm−1 following procedures used in other research [3, 10, 42, 43].

Multivariate analysis

For the NIR spectra recorded on-site and previously (see Figs. 3a–c, 4) on the historic tapestry fragments, principal component analysis (PCA) was applied using OriginPro software (version 9.3). A covariance matrix was used to explore variance in the spectra and identify outliers within the data set. The NIR data was mean centred prior to PCA to remove offsets within the spectral data [44, 45]. In this research, the previously measured NIR results were used to create a calibration model using the oxidation peak intensity ratios of wool calculated from FTIR. The PLS models were built separately for three oxidation product ratios, cysteic acid/cysteic dioxide (CA/CD), cysteic acid/cystine monoxide (CA/CM) and cystine dioxide/cystine monoxide (CD/CM) in GRAMS IQ software (version 9.1). NIR spectra were analysed over the spectral range of 1400–2400 nm to remove the effects of dyed samples and to exclude regions where peaks related to wool keratins were not found [46, 47]. The range between 1820–1840 nm was also excluded. Within this region, the detector within the spectrometer switches to cover the full spectral region and is observed as a step in the NIR spectra (Fig. 4). Leave-one-out cross validation experiments were set up where one sample (i.e. fragment weft area) was removed from the training set to select the optimal spectral pre-processing methods. Two methods for pathlength correction of the NIR data were attempted, standard normal variate (SNV) detrend and multiplicative scatter correction (MSC). These corrections account for pathlength changes and scaling effects in the spectra caused by diffuse light scattering [48, 49]. A Norris Gap 1st derivative algorithm was used with 10 points to amplify differences in regions of the spectra collected. The Savitzky–Golay 1st derivative algorithm (SG) was also initially explored but ultimately the Gap 1st derivative produced slightly better correlations between measured and predicted oxidation ratios. When determining the number of factors, examination of the prediction residual error sum of squares (PRESS) or standard error of cross validation (SECV) curves can help to identify the most suitable number of factors for each model. These curves should usually decrease before reaching a minimum as the number of factors increase. The models were selected based on a combination of different parameters. The R2 of the measured vs predicted oxidation ratios for the calibration set was used along with the SECV and PRESS curves, which were examined to determine the optimum parameters and number of factors to train the model. The SECV curves were used to give an initial indication of the behaviour of the model while the PRESS curves were used to fine tune the model. The best models were then chosen from the lowest PRESS, SECV and highest R2 of the calibration set achievable. Each model was later validated using an independent test set of historic fragment yarn samples that had not been used for calibration with known oxidation ratios calculated from the results of FTIR spectra. The R2 of prediction was then calculated for each model from the independent set. The confidence in the model prediction of the validation set was expressed as the root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP). Grams IQ predict software (version 9.1) was later used to validate and predict separate set of historic tapestry fragment yarns with unknown oxidation product ratios. The software was also used to predict the unknown oxidation ratios of the on-site analysis at Hampton Court Palace on tapestries within the GH and GWC.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

NIR spectrum of a historic wool yarn. The peak observed at 2180 nm is used to indicate the presence of proteins as it relates to different functional groups that reside along the protein backbone. Note the step circled around 1820–1840 nm where the detector changes to accommodate longer wavelengths

On-site NIR procedure

Measurements were recorded using a Labspec 5000 spectrometer (ASD, Colorado, United States) equipped with a fibre optic probe (3 mm diameter) and a spectralon white reflectance standard. NIR spectra were collected over 100 scans (10 nm resolution) over a wavelength range of 1000–2500 nm to include the region used in protein determination [50] at around 2168–2180 nm (Fig. 4). The visible range was excluded as peaks in this region may be linked to mainly colour properties from the dyes present in the historic yarns rather than molecular changes related to fibre strength properties. A review of the literature did not reveal cystine peaks that could be used directly and while S–H groups have been reported as presenting weak overtone bands [51] in the near infrared (at around 1970–1980 nm), tertiary amides, OH groups and other functional groups can also absorb in this spectral region [52]. For each sampling area, 5 points were measured with 3 repeat measurements averaged at each point (Fig. 5). The results were processed using Indico Pro Spectral Acquisition Software. The NIR measurements of the historic tapestry fragments analysed in the previous unpublished report, were performed using the same method and were subsequently used in this study to calibrate PLS models investigated in this research.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

a NIR sampling area from “the meeting of Abraham and Melchizedek” in the GH. b The sampling points within the area are numbered 1–5. c A microscopic image of the sampling area taken using a DinoCapture® 2.0 digital microscope. At each point, 3 NIR spectra were recorded, background subtracted and averaged. d Raw averaged spectra for 5 of the points (images courtesy of Historic Royal Palaces)

The 16th century tapestries on display at Hampton Court Palace within the GH are thought to originate from the same artisan workshop and contain wool, silk and metal threads. Conversely the tapestries within the GWC contain no metal threads. Sampling areas were provided from microscopy and digital images taken during a previously conducted dust microscopy survey that took place at the locations of environmental monitors within the GH and GWC. NIR spectra were collected at the lower (0.4 m height) and middle levels (1.2 m height) at a spacing interval of approximately 2 m. Measurements were taken from tapestries along the north and south walls in the GH and GWC (see Table 1). Additional measurements were taken along the east and west wall in the GWC. More measurements were recorded in the GWC because these tapestries were thought to have more variability in the material composition as they are older than the GH tapestries. Areas with varying condition were selected based on the dust microscopy survey and the modified criteria mentioned from the previous work.
Table 1

Locations and description of analysed tapestries within the GWC and GH (courtesy of Historic Royal Palaces)

Room

Location

Code

Tapestry

Date

Dimensions (m)

Great hall

North wall

N1

The departure of Abraham

c.1541–43

4.82 × 7.80

N2

The separation of Abraham and Lot

c.1541–43

4.88 × 7.92

N3

The meeting of Abraham and Melchizedek

c.1541–43

4.78 × 7.90

South wall

S1

The sacrifice of Isaac

c.1541–43

4.83 × 7.93

S2

The oath and departure of Eliezar

c.1541–43

4.88 × 8.54

S3

Eliezar and Rebekah at the well

c.1541–43

4.77 × 7.77

Great watching chamber

North wall

N1

Romance

c.1515

3.95 × 7.56

East wall

E1

Triumph of fame over death (triumph)

c.1515

4.08 × 8.10

E2

The virtues challenge the vices as Christ begins his ministry (Anglesey)

c.1515

4.08 × 4.29

South wall

S1

Justice disarmed by mercy (music)

c.1515

3.92 × 5.70

West wall

W2

The death of Hercules (Hercules)

c.1515

3.915 × 5.28

W3

Aeneas departing from Carthage (Aeneas)

c.1525

3.45 × 3.90

Results and discussion

Comparison of peak intensities for unaged, light aged and historic wool

The key peaks in FTIR spectra related to the oxidation products of interest can be seen in Table 2. There is a relationship between oxidation products and photo-ageing which can be observed when comparing the spectra for an artificially light aged yarn and historic yarn to an unaged wool yarn (Fig. 6). The FTIR spectra for an unaged and undyed yarn sample had lower peak intensities for what appears to be a mixture of CM and CA components. The artificially light aged sample displays a higher intensity peak for what may represent a mixture of CM and CA or the conversion of the monoxide into the acid. When compared to the historic fibre removed from a sample area in poor condition, this peak is mainly dominated by the presence of CA indicating full conversion towards this product and a more progressed state of oxidation [12].
Table 2

Typical peak absorption frequencies associated with cystine oxidation products [3, 10]

Chemical functional group

Chemical names

Wavenumber (cm−1)

–SO2–S–

Cystine dioxide (CD)

1121

–SO–S–

Cystine monoxide (CM)

1071

\({\text{SO}}_{3}^{ - }\)

Cysteic acid (CA)

1040

–S–\({\text{SO}}_{3}^{ - }\)

S-sulfonate

1022

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

FTIR spectra of a historic yarn (black solid line), an artificially light aged yarn (black dotted line) for 600 h at 150,000 lx and an unaged undyed yarn sample of wool (grey dashed line). Normalized to 1232 cm−1 amide III peak

NIR model development

Using the NIR spectra collected from historic tapestry fragments as part of McCullough’s previous unpublished study, a model was developed to test whether NIR spectroscopy could be used as a non-destructive tool to predict the ratios of FTIR peaks relevant to oxidation products such as CA, CD, CM. As stated, although FTIR in DRIFTS mode can be used as a non-destructive technique on historic objects, previous work has shown that it is not possible to obtain usable FTIR spectra from tapestry samples using DRIFTS. When using FTIR-ATR, it is necessary to remove yarns for analysis to be able to identify the relevant peaks. FTIR-ATR analysis can thus be considered a “destructive” technique in this context, with NIR acting as a surrogate technique to predict the outcomes of FTIR-ATR analysis non-destructively. The developed model was validated using a separate training set of spectra, before being trialled on-site at Hampton Court Palace.

PCA spectral outliers of NIR measurements

PCA was conducted on the NIR spectral data from the previous study. This analysis was necessary to identify possible outliers from spectra that would be introduced into the training set when creating PLS calibration models. The PCA for the NIR data identified fibres from artificially aged, 28.2, 99.1, and 106.1 weft areas as outlier data points that did not cluster with the rest of the group in the PCA score plots (Additional file 1). These points were then considered as potential samples to be removed from the data set during PLS cross validation experiments. The identification of the artificially aged sample as an outlier may be explained by the FTIR results, since the artificially aged samples are potentially at an earlier stage of oxidation than yarns from the historic tapestry fragments. This result also supports the findings from the MODHT project where model samples though artificially aged, were much stronger chemically and physically than the historic tapestries on display (Hacke4 [53] unpublished).

Calibration model development

The optimal parameters for the calibration model can be found in Table 3. The models with the lowest correlation were found for the CA/CM ratio. As the monoxide is an unstable intermediate product that is often difficult to detect, it is possible that the intensities were too low or too varied to produce meaningful results. The best calibration models from the leave-one-out cross validation experiments were found for the CD/CM and CA/CD ratios which both had calculated R2 values of measured vs predicted results above 0.6 (Table 3). These results were comparable to the previous work where similar R2 values were reported. A R2 value of 0.6 is inadequate in the case of quantitative applications where high correlations are necessary (i.e. in agriculture and drug applications). These correlations though not excellent, are useful as they help interpret the variability observed in the results for the historic wool fragments. An R2 of 0.69 CA/CD may be potentially acceptable given the complexity of analysing highly variable historic samples, while the remaining correlations for the CA/CM and CD/CM ratios are mainly promising for future experiments with enlarged datasets. To test whether the R2 values were the result of random correlations, a series of permutation tests were performed for each oxidation ratio and repeated 3 times for each ratio. The results of the permutation tests were significantly lower than the original R2 values, confirming that the correlations were not coincidental (Additional file 2). The usefulness of the R2 values is discussed further in the validation of the calibration models. The mahalanobis distance (M-distance) [54, 55] measures the distance of outlier points from the mean of the group samples, according to a scale derived from the variability in the training set. This method was found to be unsuccessful in identifying outliers in cross-validation experiments as none of the samples were identified as outliers except for the model unaged and light aged samples. The M-distance limit is set to 3 which means that samples within the training set that lie outside 3 standard deviations from the group mean, will be classified as separate from the group. Instead the model was optimized by removing spectral and concentration residual outliers using an F-ratio probability that samples differed from the training set by a probability of 99%.
Table 3

Optimal parameters determined for Gap 1st derivative cross validation experiments

Product ratio

Spectral region (nm)

Pathlength correction (1st derivative)

SECV

Factors

R2

PRESS

Number of outliers (spectral, residual outliers with F test uncertainty 99%)

CA/CD

1400–1820

1840–2300

SNV-detrend

0.09

7

0.69

1.21

4

CA/CM

1300–1820

1840–2300

SNV-detrend

0.03

4

0.50

0.11

19

CD/CM

1400–1820

1840–2300

MSC

0.07

6

0.66

0.72

5

Validation of the calibration models

Approximately a third of the historic fragment yarn samples with known oxidation ratios were not introduced to the calibration model and used as a validation set, initially with the unaged and artificially light degraded samples included. The models struggled to predict a value for the unaged wool sample, which reduced the efficiency of the model when initially introduced as part of the training set and appeared as significant outlier when removed from the training set and used for validation. This outlier had the greatest deviation from the slope and difference between measured and predicted results of − 0.55 for CA/CD. Having experienced negligible oxidation, the unaged undyed model samples are unlikely to be comparable to the significantly more degraded and oxidised historic fragments which are over 500 years old (see Fig. 6). The historic tapestries at Hampton Court Palace have been exposed to an open environment with temperature and humidity fluctuations while on open display over the last century. These fluctuations are in addition to various other environmental risks that have contributed to their fibre weakening and material loss over 5 centuries. The ageing of these historic objects is therefore significantly more complex and cumulative compared to what is simulated in artificial light ageing conditions. The artificially light aged samples are arguably more comparable to the historic fragments than the unaged samples due to the oxidation experienced through artificial ageing, however this oxidative degradation had not progressed to the extent that the historic fragments had degraded (Fig. 6). In fact, during the CA/CD cross-validation experiments (a potentially more progressed state of oxidation) the artificially light aged fibre samples occasionally appeared as outliers. This difference correlates with results from the MODHT where artificially aged model samples (dyed and undyed) remained stronger and in better condition than their historic counterparts. In this research, the undyed unaged and undyed artificially light aged fibre samples are less useful to the models needed to assess historic fibres susceptible to further damage. Both the undyed unaged and undyed light aged samples ignore other parameters that play a role in the degradation of the exposed wool fibres in the historic tapestries on open display (such as the original dyes, their deterioration and subsequent impact on the degradation of wool). Therefore, these model undyed samples which have stronger properties even when some oxidation has taken place for the light aged model samples, are a less useful benchmark and are less representative than the historic fragments for the historic tapestries. However, these unaged and light aged model samples do provide useful insight into how the oxidative degradation process progresses in historic wools. Upon removal of the unaged sample from the validation set, the R2 of prediction was improved. On comparison of the measured vs predicted results for the validation set, all the R2 values for the oxidation ratios were close to 0.6 (Fig. 7). The CD/CM ratio produced the best correlation (R2 = 0.63) and calculated RMSEP (no units) of 0.06 followed by CA/CD (R2 0.57 of and RMSEP 0.11) and CA/CM (R2 = 0.58 and RMSEP 0.03). The results from the PLS models, though not excellent are promising as they assist in interpreting the variability observed in the NIR and FTIR results of the historic fragments. With the introduction of larger data sets there is the potential to improve future results. A value of 0.6 may be considered a sufficient correlation as it explains at least 60% of the variance for complex non-homogeneous historic materials. For this research, higher R2 values are not necessarily the goal. It is assumed that there are many factors that influence the degradation pathways for historic wools that are over 500 years old and the damage they have experience is the result of cumulative effects. Wool fibres themselves can differ chemically by: the age, location, breed of sheep [56] and the resultant macrostructure of wool, by the presence of dyes and dye deterioration over time due to exposure to environmental risks which may increase the rate of oxidation of the wool fibres further. Higher R2 values would be more suitable for more quantitative analyses in areas that require a high degree of correlation, e.g. in agricultural or pharmaceutical applications. However, since we are dealing with complex non-homogeneous materials with varying states of degradation there is a more semi-quantitative element of the research. Therefore, an indication of areas that are more oxidised and potentially more susceptible to fibre loss or damage compared to less oxidised areas is likely more useful to conservators. This information could be then used as a screening tool to target and examine these areas that at risk of damage and prioritise treatment of these areas.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Measured vs predicted results of independent validation set in a CA/CD, b CA/CM and c CD/CM oxidation product ratios

An independent set of historic fragments not introduced to the calibration model with unknown oxidation products was predicted in GRAMS IQ predict software. The software determines the efficacy of the prediction using a threshold based on M-distance pass/fail limits. Where values were above 3, samples were flagged as outliers and deemed a “fail”. At values between 1–2, samples were described as “possible” or marginal and below 1 a “pass” or acceptable. Of the 50 independent samples tested, 2 samples failed the limit test. 22 samples resulted in a “possible” match with M-distances between 1–2 and total were tested and 26 passed the threshold limit below an M-distance of 1. This pass criteria gives confidence that the model can be used on independent sets of samples of historic wool fragments.

On-site trial of the predictive model

On-site analysis of the historic tapestries at Hampton Court Palace took place, to trial the developed model in a real heritage setting. NIR spectroscopic analysis of the tapestries was performed and then assessed in relation to the spectra used to develop the model. Unfortunately, the on-site measurements did not meet the pass criteria of an M-distance of 3, meaning that predictions of oxidation products, although possible, were not performed as confidence in them would have been low. The prediction of unknowns also proved to be difficult when the previous specific stress model was applied to these areas. This prediction points to a discrepancy between the developed model and the on-site results. One possible reason for this difference may be explained by the scale of the oxidation product ratios seen in Fig. 7. The ratios varied over small ranges (0.9–1.2 for CD/CM) and in some cases had a relatively high error (RMSEP 0.11 CD/CM). This error could translate into a larger error in the on-site trial measurements as indicated by the much higher M-distances that ranged between approximately 4–20. Other reasons for the discrepancy in results may relate to soiling differences between the tapestries on display within the GH and GWC and the laboratory historic pieces. There may have been errors in the measurement as the probe was held perpendicular to a vertical surface that was not flush against the wall, compared to the samples used for the model which were analysed on a laboratory bench. The environment may have played a detrimental role as measurements were conducted during the summer and due to its hygroscopic properties, the wool fibres will adsorb moisture from the surrounding air as the humidity increases. Environmental data from the surface of the tapestries was missing as the monitors had been removed prior to the surface cleaning of the tapestries. However, ambient data for the GWC revealed minimum and maximum RH levels of 48 and 65% RH respectively over 1 week with an average of 58% RH. These RH levels were higher in comparison to 39–51% RH when the previous laboratory NIR measurements were conducted. Though it is not possible to control the environment, by excluding the region where bound water appears (1940 nm) it may be possible to improve results. This research also highlights an issue with using previously conducted NIR results to calibrate the predictive model as instrumental deterioration may have played a significant role in the discrepancy between predicted and measured results. Another important factor that may have played a role can be found in the optics of the spectrometer which are known to degrade over time and after regular use [57]. Since the measurements in this research were recorded 2 years since the previous model measurements, some wear on the instrument during this time may have contributed to the error observed. To avoid this issue, the instrument should be calibrated against samples with known FTIR data prior to use on-site by conservators to account for such discrepancies.

It is possible that the M-distance limit of 3 is unrealistic for this series of experiments. In the on-site trial reported here, M-distance values were well above 3. In some discrimination methods, M-distance limits of 10–15 for maximum variance have been reported for classifying samples but threshold values vary according to the type of sample and application [44]. Raising the M-distance limit should therefore be done with some caution. This research therefore demonstrates the complexity of translating a model developed in the laboratory to a real heritage setting. Consistency between the analysis procedure used for both model development and on-site work is paramount, including sample preparation, environmental conditions and instrument performance.

For future work, near infrared hyperspectral imaging may improve the relationship between the predicted quantities of oxidative damage to an area within a tapestry, as both spatial and spectral information is collected using a mapping method for the distribution of chemical damage within tapestry areas [58]. To investigate the possible link between fibre strength loss and oxidation a combination of both FTIR and FT-Raman spectroscopy (FTR) could be used. FTR is often used to assess the loss of disulfide functionality in studies of hair and wool [12, 15, 16, 20] since sulfur itself is not NIR active [59]. In combination with the oxidation products measured through FTIR, it may be possible to understand the effects of oxidation on fibre strength more closely.

Conclusion

In this research, FTIR was used to examine the cystine oxidation products in wool yarns removed from historic tapestry fragments housed at Hampton Court Palace compared to undyed unaged wool and undyed artificially light aged undyed wool yarns. The level of oxidation of artificially aged wool was found to be lower than that of historic wools, supporting previous research carried out as part of the MODHT that the historic yarns were significantly more fragile than the artificially aged model samples. This research has demonstrated that it is possible to observe the progression of oxidation that historic wools in historic tapestries experience, potentially highlighting areas more susceptible to fibre strength and material loss. In this work, a conservative calibration model was developed using previously measured NIR spectra of historic tapestry fragments and the oxidation products of the same historic tapestry fragments measured in this research. Ratios were predicted for a validation set of historic tapestry fragments with known oxidation product ratios accurate to RMSEP of 0.11 for cysteic acid/cystine dioxide, 0.03 for an oxidation ratio of cysteic acid/cystine monoxide and 0.06 for cystine dioxide/cystine monoxide. Within a laboratory context it was demonstrated that it is possible to predict the unknown oxidation ratios of historic fragments using previous NIR results as demonstrated with an M-distance pass limit of 3, however this prediction does not yet translate to real on-site applications within a heritage context. While there is a known relationship between light induced oxidation and the formation of cystine breakdown products, historic wool yarns in tapestries are non-homogeneous materials having undergone cumulative damage due to exposure to various environmental risks. This oxidation process may have been influenced by the original chemicals treatments to fibres through dyeing and early conservation methods used to treat the tapestries. These risks may have both accelerated the formation of oxidation products and may have produced chemical breakdown products other than those caused by light. For this reason, there are likely other additional factors that influence the relationship between chemical degradation products and strength.

The number of different weft areas and subsequently yarns used to calibrate the model should be reviewed as more measurements may be necessary to better represent the tapestries on display. The issue of representativeness becomes amplified when using a predictive model to predict unknown areas that have undergone chemical damage in an on-site heritage application. To improve NIR spectral data collection, the instrument should be recalibrated with the same samples before use if possible. Near infrared hyperspectral imaging may also help to improve the relationship between the predicted quantities of oxidative damage to an area within a historic tapestry, as it allows for both spatial and spectral information to be collected. The environment may play a role in the discrepancy between model and on-site measurements particularly if there was a difference in the moisture content of the fibres. For further research, wavelengths at which moisture plays a role could be excluded during development of the model. It may also be useful to investigate the use of FT-Raman in addition to FTIR spectroscopy as the oxidation products may then be related to the disappearance of the disulfide band which cannot be observed NIR. If calibration of the model is carried out prior to in situ measurement, there is the potential to use NIR as a quantitative non-invasive tool to complement audits used by conservators to quantitatively assess the condition of historic tapestries and other heritage textiles. The addition of the data used to measure the chemical breakdown processes that manifest as a loss of fibre strength and predict such losses may assist in prioritising textile for treatment.

Footnotes
1

See Ref. [24].

 
2

See Ref. [25].

 
3

See Ref. [28].

 
4

See Ref. [53].

 

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

NK, KC and CV developed the concept of this work. CV provided the samples for the research and participated with NK in the set up for the on-site measurements. NK conducted sample preparation and measurements. NK, KC and TF participated in the development and interpretation of the models. LM provided the previous NIR data from which the model was developed and advised on the development of the model. NK wrote the manuscript KC, TF and CV edited parts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This collaborative research project was conducted within the frame of the MRes SEAHA programme at UCL and the Historic Royal Palaces Heritage Science Scholarship scheme of which financial support is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are extended to Matija Strlič and Josep Grau-Bové for their help and advice on this research. Many thanks to Eveliina Ojanne, Ian Gibb and the tapestry conservators at Hampton Court Palace for their help and insight to the research.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Sustainable Heritage, University College London, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, WC1H 0NN, UK
(2)
Conservation and Collections Care, Historic Royal Palaces, Hampton Court Palace, Surrey, KT8 9AU, UK
(3)
Department of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
(4)
National Trust, 20 Grosvenor Gardens, Belgravia, London, SW1W 0DH, UK

References

  1. Band J. The survival of Henry VIII’s History of Abraham tapestries: an account of how they were perceived, used and treated over the centuries. In: Lennard F, Hayward M, editors. Tapestry Conserv Princ Pract. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006. p. 20–7.Google Scholar
  2. Quye A, Hallett K, Herrero Carretero C. “Wroughte in gold and silk”: preserving the art of historic tapestries. Edinburgh: National Museums Scotland; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. Odlyha M. Studies on woolen threads from historical tapestries. AUTEX Res J. 2007;7:9–18.Google Scholar
  4. Odlyha M, Wang Q, Foster MG, de Groot J, Horton M, Bozec L. Thermal analysis of model and historic tapestries. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2005;82:627–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Feughelman M. Mechanical properties and structure of alpha-keratin fibres: wool, human hair, and related fibres. Sydney: UNSW Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Tímár-Balázsy Á. Chemical principles of textile conservation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.Google Scholar
  7. Weatherall IL. The aging of wool fibers. In: Cardamone JM, Baker MT, editors. Hist Text Pap Polym Mus. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2000. p. 115–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2001-0779.ch009.Google Scholar
  8. Marshall RC, Orwin DFG, Gillespie JM. Structure and biochemistry of mammalian hard keratin. Electron Microsc Rev. 1991;4:47–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Douthwaite FJ, Lewis DM, Schumacher-Hamedat U. Reaction of cystine residues in wool with peroxy compounds. Text Res J. 1993;63:177–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kan CW, Chan K, Yuen CWM. Surface characterization of low temperature plasma treated wool fiber. Fibers Polym. 2004;5:52–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Carr CM, Lewis DM. An FTIR spectroscopic study of the photodegradation and thermal degradation of wool. J Soc Dye Colour. 1993;109:21–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones DC, Carr CM, Cooke WD, Lewis DM. Investigating the photo-oxidation of wool using FT-Raman and FT-IR spectroscopies. Text Res J. 1998;68:739–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Stuart BH. Organic molecules. In: Infrared Spectrosc Fundam Appl. London: Wiley; 2004. p. 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011149.ch4.
  14. Stuart BH, Ando DJ. Spectrum interpretation: sulfur compounds. In: Biol Appl Infrared Spectrosc. London: Wiley; 1997. p. 68–9. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EX-Sy7dvA_EC.
  15. Doherty B, Miliani C, Berghe IV, Sgamellotti A, Brunetti BG. Micro-Raman spectroscopic study of artificially aged natural and dyed wool. J Raman Spectrosc. 2008;39:638–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pande CM. FT-Raman spectroscopy—applications in hair research. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1994;45:257–68.Google Scholar
  17. Kuzuhara A, Hori T. Analysis of heterogeneous reaction between reducing agents and keratin fibers using Raman spectroscopy and microspectrophotometry. J Mol Struct. 2013;1037:85–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter EA, Fredericks PM, Church JS, Denning RJ. FT-Raman spectroscopy of wool—I. Preliminary studies. Spectrochim Acta Part Mol Spectrosc. 1994;50:1927–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ji Y, Chen J, Lv J, Li Z, Xing L, Ding S. Extraction of keratin with ionic liquids from poultry feather. Sep Purif Technol. 2014;132:577–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wojciechowska E, Włochowicz A, Wesełucha-Birczyńska A. Application of Fourier-transform infrared and Raman spectroscopy to study degradation of the wool fiber keratin. J Mol Struct. 1999;511–512:307–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wojciechowska E, Włochowicz A, Wysocki M, Pielesz A, Wesełucha-Birczyńska A. The application of Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy (FTR) to the evaluation of structural changes in wool fibre keratin after deuterium exchange and modification by the orthosilicic acid. J Mol Struct. 2002;614:355–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wojciechowska E, Rom M, Włochowicz A, Wysocki M, Wesełucha-Birczyńska A. The use of Fourier transform-infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy (FTR) for the investigation of structural changes in wool fibre keratin after enzymatic treatment. J Mol Struct. 2004;704:315–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith MJ, Thompson K, Hermens E. Breaking down banners: analytical approaches to determining the materials of painted banners. Heritage Sci. 2016;4:1–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. McCullough L. A non-destructive method for assessing the degradation of wool yarns within historic tapestries while in situ. London: UCL; 2014.Google Scholar
  25. Duffus P. Manufacture, analysis and conservation strategies for historic tapestries. Oxford: University of Manchester; 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Khennouf D, Dulieu-Barton JM, Chambers AR, Lennard FJ, Eastop DD. Assessing the feasibility of monitoring strain in historical tapestries using digital image correlation. Strain. 2010;46:19–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lennard F, Dulieu-Barton JM. Quantifying and visualizing change: strain monitoring of tapestries with digital image correlation. Stud Conserv. 2014;59:241–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Frame K, Vlachou-Mogire C, Hallett K, Takami M. Balancing significance and maintaining ‘sense of place’ in the sustainable display of Tudor tapestries in the Great Hall, Hampton Court Palace. In: The 2018 International Institute for Conservation Turin Congress. (2017) (submitted).Google Scholar
  29. Lennard F. Preserving image and structure: tapestry conservation in Europe and the United States. Stud Conserv. 2006;51:43–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Finch K. Tapestries: conservation and original design. In: Conserv Tapestries Embroideries Proc Meet Inst R Patrim Artist. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute; 1989. p. 67–74.Google Scholar
  31. Lennard F. The art of tapestry conservation. In: Hayward M, Lennard F, editors. Tapestry Conserv Princ Pract. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006. p. 3–12.Google Scholar
  32. Cardamone JM. Historic textiles and paper. In: Hist Text Pap Polym Mus. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 2001. p. 2–7.Google Scholar
  33. Weyer L, Workman J Jr. Introduction to near-infrared spectra. In: Pract Guide Interpret Infrared Spectrosc. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420018318.ch1.
  34. Garside P, Wyeth P, Zhang X. Use of near IR spectroscopy and chemometrics to assess the tensile strength of historic silk. E-Preserv Sci. 2011;8:68–73.Google Scholar
  35. Luxford N. Reducing the risk of open display: optimising the preventive conservation of historic silks. Southampton: University of Southampton; 2009.Google Scholar
  36. Kim J, Wyeth P. Towards a routine methodology for assessing the condition of historic silk. E-Preserv Sci. 2009;6:60–7.Google Scholar
  37. Trafela T, Strlič M, Kolar J, Lichtblau DA, Anders M, Mencigar DP, et al. Nondestructive analysis and dating of historical paper based on IR spectroscopy and chemometric data evaluation. Anal Chem. 2007;79:6319–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Lichtblau D, Strlič M, Trafela T, Kolar J, Anders M. Determination of mechanical properties of historical paper based on NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics—a new instrument. Appl Phys A. 2008;92:191–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Saeys W, Mouazen AM, Ramon H. Potential for onsite and online analysis of pig manure using visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Biosyst Eng. 2005;91:393–402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Gishen M, Cozzolino D. Feasibility study on the potential of visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to measure alpaca fibre characteristics. Anim Int J Anim Biosci. 2007;1:899–904.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Millington KR. 9—improving the whiteness and photostability of wool. In: Adv Wool Technol. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2009. p. 217–47.Google Scholar
  42. Coderch L, Pons R, Erra P. A Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopic study of wool subjected to permonosulphuric acid treatments. J Soc Dye Colour. 1991;107:410–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Signori V, Lewis DM. FTIR investigation of the damage produced on human hair by weathering and bleaching processes: implementation of different sampling techniques and data processing. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1997;19:1–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Workman J, Springsteen A. Applied spectroscopy: a compact reference for practitioners. London: Elsevier Science; 1998. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=OzAnX25h4soC.
  45. Brereton RG. Experimental design. In: Appl Chemom Sci. London: Wiley; 2007. p. 9–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470057780.ch2.
  46. Weyer L, Workman J. Amino acids, peptides, and proteins. In: Pract Guide Interpret Infrared Spectrosc. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 93–6. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420018318.ch11.
  47. Weyer L, Workman J. Amines and amides. In: Pract Guide Interpret Infrared Spectrosc. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420018318.ch8.
  48. Geladi P, MacDougall D, Martens H. Linearization and scatter-correction for near-infrared reflectance spectra of meat. Appl Spectrosc. 1985;39:491–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Barnes RJ, Dhanoa MS, Lister SJ. Standard normal variate transformation and de-trending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Appl Spectrosc. 1989;43:772–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Workman Jr. J. 15—interpretive spectroscopy for near-infrared. In: Handb Org Compd. Burlington: Academic Press; 2001. p. 143–82.Google Scholar
  51. Weyer L, Workman J. P-H and S-H Pract Guide Interpret Infrared Spectrosc. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 87–8. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420018318.ch9.
  52. Weyer L, Workman J. NIR absorption band charts ? An overview. In: Pract Guide Interpret Infrared Spectrosc. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 113–5. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420018318.ax1.
  53. Hacke A-M. Investigation into the nature and ageing of tapestry materials. Manchester: University of Manchester; 2006.Google Scholar
  54. Duckworth J. Spectroscopic qualitative analysis A2—workman, Jerry. In: Springsteen AW, editor. Appl Spectrosc. San Diego: Academic Press; 1998. p. 165–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Sharif MH, Djeraba C. A simple method for eccentric event espial using mahalanobis metric. In: Bayro-Corrochano E, Eklundh J-O, editors. Prog Pattern Recognit Image Anal Comput Vis Appl 14th Iberoam Conf Pattern Recognit CIARP 2009 Guadalaj Jalisco Mex Novemb 15–18 2009 Proc. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 417–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10268-4_48.
  56. Johnson NAG, Russell I. Advances in wool technology. London: Elsevier Science; 2008. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=qQykAgAAQBAJ.
  57. Pasquini C. Near infrared spectroscopy: fundamentals, practical aspects and analytical applications. J Braz Chem Soc. 2003;14:198–219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Manley M. Near-infrared spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging: non-destructive analysis of biological materials. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:8200–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Buchanan B. Recent advances in the use of near-IR spectroscopy in the petrochemical industry. In: Handb Infrared Anal. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007. p. 521–7. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420007374.ch26.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement