Skip to main content

Blue pigments in Cave 256, Mogao Grottoes: a systematic analysis of murals and statues in Five dynasties, Song Dynasty and Qing Dynasty

Abstract

Murals of Cave 256, Mogao Grottoes consist of several layers, with the outermost layer overlays all others. The bottom layer was painted in the five dynasties. The outermost layer was mural of the Song Dynasty. Statues were repainted in the Qing Dynasty. We found that different blue pigments are used in multilayer murals which reflects the social development at that time to a certain extent. In order to know the type of blue pigments, technology such as X-ray diffraction, microscopic FTIR spectroscopy and polarizing microscope were used for analysis of trace samples based on non-destructive research through the portable X-ray fluorescence. As a result, we know that Lazurite was used as blue pigment in murals of the Five Dynasties and Azurite was used in the Song Dynasty. Smalt used in statues of the Qing Dynasty was first discovered in Mogao Grottoes. It can be inferred from the discovery of smalt that statues of the Qing Dynasty in Cave 256 were repainted in the first half of the nineteenth century.

Introduction

Dunhuang Mogao Grottoes (莫高窟) is a comprehensive art combining architecture, sculpture and mural painting. It is the largest, longest lasting and the most informative site of grottoes temples in China and the whole world. Construction of Mogao Grottoes lasted for almost a thousand years from the second half of the fourth century to the fourteenth century. There was no new cave were excavated after the Ming Dynasty (明, 1368–1644 A.D.). A large number of murals and statues were repainted in the Qing Dynasty (清, 1636–1912 A.D.). There are about 45,000 m2 of murals and over 2200 statues in Mogao Grottoes [1], which are important physical materials for studying the history of materials and craftsmanship of ancient Chinese murals and statues.

Mogao Grottoes is located 24 km southeast of present-day Dunhuang City. The caves are distributed in four layers. Cave 256 is located on the second floor of the central area of the southern area of Dunhuang Mogao Grottoes, about 200 m north of the nine storeys pagoda (九层楼) of Mogao Grottoes (Fig. 1). It has a relatively large area, with over 500 m2 of murals and seven statues [2]. According to scholars, Cave 256 was built by Cao Yuanshen (曹元深), the third military governor of Guiyi (归义) Army (a local armed regime that originated from the Tang Dynasty (唐, 618–907 A.D.). It was founded in the Five Dynasties (五代, 907–960 A.D.) [3] and repaired during the Zhenzong (真宗) period of the Northern Song Dynasty (北宋, 960–1127 A.D.) by Murong Yanchang (慕容言长), the military director of Yu Men (玉门) Town of the Guiyi Army, and his wife Yan (阎氏). The bottom layer was covered and a new layer of murals was painted [4,5,6]. Statues were repaired and repainted in the Qing Dynasty.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location of Cave 256

Blue is highly regarded in ancient Chinese culture [7]. As one of the three primary colors, it is the most basic color in painting. It symbolizes eternity, nobility and purity and is loved by people in different times. It is also one of the most important colors of murals in the Mogao Grottoes. Based on previous research results, blue pigments used in murals and statues of the Mogao Grottoes are lazurite ((NaCa)8(AlSiO4)6(SO4, Cl, S)2) [8, 9] [from the Sixteen Kingdoms (十六国, 304–439 A. D.) to the Northern Zhou Dynasty (北周, 557–581 A.D.), azurite (Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2] [10] [the Sui Dynasty (隋, 581–618 A.D.) to the Five Dynasties (五代)], indigo blue (C16H10N2O2) [11] found in individual caves and artificial ultramarine used in repainting in Qing Dynasty [12]. In terms of analytical techniques used to characterize pigments, since most of the above literatures are relatively early, XRD, XRF and SED-EDS are mainly used, and Raman spectroscopy is used for the characterization of indigo in Cave 465.

In this study, scientific analysis methods are used to study types, usage techniques and sources of different blue pigments used in murals and statues of Cave 256 in the Five Dynasties, the Song Dynasty(宋, 960–1279 A.D.) and the Qing Dynasty, providing new ideas for analysis of history of blue pigments used in the Mogao Grottoes.

Materials and methods

Analysis equipment and parameters

  1. 1.

    Portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer

    The Thermo XL3t-800 Portable X-ray fluorescence analyzer is used for element analysis of pigments. It uses silver target. The spot diameter is 1 cm. The analysis condition is 50 kV/40 μA (maximum), the detection time is 1 min, and the soil mode is used.

  2. 2.

    X-ray diffraction analyzer

    The Rigaku Dmax/2500 X-ray diffraction analyzer is used for phase analysis of pigments. It has copper target. The analysis voltage is 40 kV and the current is 100 mA. Scanning is continuous. The scanning range is 5°–70°. Graphite monochromator is used for filtering.

  3. 3.

    Microscopic FTIR spectroscopy

    The Thermo Scientific Nicolet iN10 MX Microscopic FTIR spectroscopy is equipped with liquid nitrogen cooled MCT/A detector and has transmission mode. The measuring range is 4000–675 cm−1, and the spectral resolution is 4 cm−1, with 128 time scanning.

  4. 4.

    Polarizing microscope.

    DM2700P polarizing microscope (Leica, Germany) is equipped with DMC 2900 camera (magnification 50× , 100× , 200× , 500× and 1000×). M256-03 sample is mounted as cross section, the minute pigments are embedded in epoxy resin and polished with dry abrasive papers down to 0.5 μm to obtain sufficiently polished surface, and then observe it under a microscope.

  5. 5.

    Micro-area X-ray fluorescence spectrometer

    As for German Bruker ARTAX-400 mobile micro-area X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, input voltage is 30 kV, input current is 900 μA, test time is 300 s, X-ray tube uses Mo target with fine focal spot and helium gas environment is used for test. The analysis and test results are compared with the standard working curve fitted by glass standard samples (Corning-B, Corning-C, Corning-D glass). Quantitative analysis is made to element contents of sample M256-06.

Non-destructive testing location and micro-destructive sampling information

The portable XRF is used to perform non-destructive analysis and testing of blue pigments used in murals of different eras in Cave 256, including blue pigment areas in the bottom layer, dark blue pigment and blue pigment areas in the surface layer, and blue pigments used in statues repaired in the Qing Dynasty. Moreover, taking the pXRF detection results as a reference, only one sample was taken from the area with the same elemental composition, and four blue and one green pigment trace samples were obtained. Table 1 and Fig. 2 for details of non-destructive testing location and micro-destructive sampling information.

Table 1 pXRF non-destructive testing location and micro-destructive sampling information
Fig. 2
figure 2

pXRF testing and micro-sampling location of Cave 256

Results

XRF fluorescence spectrum analysis

XRF analysis results show that the two blue pigments used in murals of the Five Dynasties of Cave 256 mainly contain Fe and Ca (Fig. 3a). The chemical composition of blue pigment cannot be determined through XRF results. In murals of the Song Dynasty, the dark blue is similar in composition to the blue pigments, mainly containing Cu and a small amount of Fe and Ca (Fig. 3b). The color rendering component may be copper-containing azurite. The blue pigments in the statue of the Qing Dynasty mainly contain Pb, Fe, and Co (Fig. 3c), which are possibly cobalt-containing compounds, the high signal of Pb in the spectrum comes from the lead-containing white pigment in the prime-coat layer.

Fig. 3
figure 3

XRF patterns of blue pigments used in different dynasties in Cave 256. a Murals of the Five Dynasties. b Murals of the Song Dynasty. c Statues of the Qing Dynasty

XRD phase analysis

The XRD phase analysis results of the trace samples are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 4. The result shows that the blue pigments used in the Five Dynasties (M256-01) have strong diffraction peaks when 2θ is 23.999, 19.393 and 13.694, and corresponding d values are 3.704, 4.571 and 6.441, which is consistent with characteristics of diffraction peak of lazurite. Other phases include talc (Mg3Si4O10(OH)2), calcite (CaCO3), and quartz (SiO2), all of which come from the white background layer of the mural. The XRD pattern of statues repainted in the Qing Dynasty (M256-07) shows a dispersive peak, and the color rendering component was amorphous, which cannot be determined for the time being. The deep blue pigment used in the Song Dynasty (M256-03) has strong diffraction peaks when 2θ is 25.193, 17.033, 24.240, and the corresponding d values are 3.534, 5.181, and 3.675, which are consistent with the characteristic of diffraction peaks of azurite. It also has strong diffraction peaks when 2θ is 16.223, 17.697 and 32.375 and the corresponding d values are 5.480, 5.018, and 2.771, which are consistent with the characteristic diffraction peaks of atacamite (Cu2Cl(OH)3). Other phases include small amounts of quartz and calcite. The color rendering component of the blue pigment used in the Song Dynasty (M256-04) is only azurite. Other phases include talc, calcite, quartz, and mica from the background layer. Sample M256-05 is the green pigment next to Sample M256-04, and the XRD results show strong diffraction peaks of atacamite.

Table 2 XRD phase analysis results of trace samples in Cave 256
Fig. 4
figure 4

XRD patterns of pigments used in different dynasties in Cave 256. a Five Dynasties and Qing Dynasty. b Song Dynasty

Microscopic FTIR spectroscopy analysis

Microscopic FTIR spectroscopy is used to study the dark blue pigment samples (M256-03) of the donor’s streamers on the south wall of the tunnel. Under the microscope, it can be seen that there are blue and green pigment particles distributed. The blue pigment particles have absorption peaks at 3427 cm−1, 1463 cm−1, 1408 cm−1, 1090 cm−1, 948 cm−1, 837 cm−1 and 767 cm−1, which are very close to the peak positions of azurite in the literature (Fig. 5a). Among them, 3427 cm−1 should belong to the O–H stretching mode, the absorption at 1463, 1408 cm−1 is the asymmetric stretching of carbonate C–O(ν3), the absorption peak at 1090 should belong to the C–O symmetric stretching mode(ν1), 948 cm−1 is the out of plane bending vibration of O–H, the signal at 837 cm−1 is the out of plane bending of \({\text{CO}}_{3}^{{2{ - }}}\)2), and the peak at 767 cm−1 belongs to in-plane bending (ν4) [13]. The green pigment particles showed the characteristic O–H stretching modes at 3441, 3346 cm−1 and a series of weak bands due to the O–H bending modes between 800 and 1000 cm−1, which are close to the peak position of atacamite (Fig. 5b) [14, 15]. Figure 5c shows the infrared spectrum of blue pigments used in statue repainted in the Qing Dynasty (sample M256-07). Through the absorption bands observed at about 1053 cm−1 can be assigned to the Si–O antisymmetric stretching band. Two bands located at 3309 cm−1 and 1652 cm−1 can be assigned to the adsorbed water during the exposure of dried powder to air. The bands present at 795 cm−1 may be attributed to the vibrations of aluminosilicate compounds in the glass pigment. A weaker Co–O band is found at 578 cm−1 as shown. The presence of the blue pigment smalt was identified with μ-FTIR spectroscopy [16, 17].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Infrared spectrum of blue pigment used in Cave 256. a Infrared spectrum of blue pigment particles. b Infrared spectrum of green pigment particles. c Infrared spectrum of blue pigment used in the Qing Dynasty

Microscopic analysis

The blue pigment used in the Five Dynasties (M256-01) shows a very uniform bright blue under single polarized light, with different particle sizes, and is completely extinct under orthogonal polarized light, which is consistent with the XRD analysis result, and so it is lazurite mineral (Fig. 6a and b). There are blue and green particles in the dark blue pigment used in the Song Dynasty (M256-03). Under single polarized light, the blue pigment particles are of different sizes. Large particles are dark blue and small particles are light blue. Blue particles mostly extinct under orthogonal polarized light and should be azurite. Under single polarized light, the green pigment particles are in the form of massive rocks, which should be natural atacamite (Fig. 6c and d). Blue pigment used in the Qing Dynasty (M256-07) looks like sharp-edged glass shards under single-polarized light, varying from light blue to dark blue. They are completely extinct under cross-polarized light, with a refractive index of 1.55, which are identified as smalt (Fig. 6e and f).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Polarized microscope photos of blue pigments used in different dynasties in Cave 256. a, b blue pigment used in the Five Dynasties; c, d dark blue pigment used in the Song Dynasty; e, f blue pigment used in the statue in the Qing Dynasty

In order to make out whether azurite and atacamite in the dark blue pigment are used separately or mixed with each other, the M256-03 dark blue block sample is embedded with resin. The result shows that green atacamite and blue azurite particles mixed with each other (Fig. 7). It can be speculated that the dark blue pigment used in the Song Dynasty is the mixture of green pigment and blue pigment. There are three reasons. First, the dark blue pigment has good uniformity and their positions are regular. It is mainly used to express the hair and clothing edges of the donor. Second, there are large areas of blue pigment and green pigment on this portrait of the donor. According to the XRD results, the blue pigment is pure azurite, and the green pigment is pure atacamite. Except for the dark blue pigments, no atacamite was found in other blue pigments areas. Finally, according to the literature, high pH value, humid environment and chloride invasion are the main reasons why azurite discolor into atacamite [18]. The high pH value and humid environment are difficult to achieve in Mogao cave 256. The current research has not found any evidence that azurite in the murals of the Mogao Grottoes has discolored into atacamite. In conclusion, it is more convincing that the dark blue pigment is the result of the mixed use of azurite and atacamite than the result of the discoloration of the azurite.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Cross-section photos of dark blue pigment used in the Song Dynasty in Cave 256. a 100×. b 200×

Quantitative analysis of micro-area X-ray fluorescence spectrometer

The micro-area X-ray fluorescence spectrometer is used for quantitative analysis of smalt pigment used in the Qing Dynasty. The result shows that the percentage of oxides in smalt pigment is: SiO2: 72.13%, K2O: 15.90%, CaO: 5.03%, Fe2O3: 2.83%, CoO: 1.26%, NiO: 0.23%, and PbO: 2.62%.

Discussion

Actually, the lazurite pigment was introduced into the Western Regions from Afghanistan through the Silk Road in the third century A.D., and then to the Central Plains through the Hexi (河西) Corridor [19]. Mr. Su believes that lazurite was used as a pigment from the Jin (晋, 265–420 A.D.) Dynasties. Since then, lazurite pigments have been found in major grottoes in the northern region [20,21,22]. Lazurite were also used in the early Dunhuang murals. However, it gradually decreased after the seventh century, and the use of azurite gradually increased. Azurite has already occupied a dominant position in Dunhuang murals of the Tang Dynasty, which might be related to the discovery of azurite in the Qilian (祁连) Mountains of Gansu in the Tang Dynasty [23]. Cave 256 of Mogao Grottoes was built in the Five Dynasties. Azurite was used as the blue pigment in most caves at that time. However, expensive lazurite was used in Cave 256. The repainting period of murals on the surface layer was about 60 years later than the excavation of Cave 256. Azurite was used here instead of lazurite. There are two main reasons for this difference. Firstly, Cave 256 was the merit cave of Cao Yuanshen, the third military governor of Guiyi Army (a local armed regime that originated from the Tang Dynasty). During this period, the regime of Guiyi Army was stable and the economy developed rapidly. As the supreme ruler at the time, Cao Yuanshen had sufficient funding support to build caves and paint. The repainted cave belonged to Murong Yanchang, the military director of Yumen Town of the Guiyi Army, and his wife Yan in the Song Dynasty during the Cao Zongshou (曹宗寿) period. At this time, the Guiyi army regime began to go downhill. The Ganzhou (甘州) Uighurs and Gaochang (高昌) Uighurs continued to invade, and internal contradictions were numerous. As a result, they were short of money. They only afforded repainting an old cave because it cost too much to open a new one. Moreover, the cheaper azurite was used in a large area. Secondly, due to the unobstructed Silk Road, flourishing trade and the prosperity of the pigment market during the Cao Yuanshen period, lazurite was also relatively easy to obtain as an imported pigment. In the Cao Zongshou period (after the eleventh century), frequent battles in the Hexi Corridor, traffic obstruction and social restlessness affected the source of pigments used in Dunhuang murals [24].

Smalt is a glassy pigment that develops color with cobalt element. It has been industrialized in Europe since the fifteenth century and it has been widely used in European oil paintings and church murals [25,26,27,28,29,30]. In the nineteenth century, it was gradually replaced by other inexpensive artificial blue pigments. The usage of smalt pigment in China mostly occurred in the Qing Dynasty. The earliest evidence at present is the land-and-water drawing of Luochuan (洛川), Shaanxi painted in the thirtieth year of Kangxi (康熙) (1691 A.D.) [31]. This pigment is concentrated in Beijing and Shanxi and scattered in other areas [32,33,34]. The forms of cultural relics are mainly architectural murals, colored paintings and statues. The smalt pigment used in statue of the Qing Dynasty in Cave 256 is reported for the first time in the murals and statues of Mogao Grottoes.

Oxide percentages of the smalt pigment used in colored paintings found in Beijing, Shanxi, Inner Mongolia and Sichuan, blue and white porcelains of the Yuan (元,1271–1368. A.D.) Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty, Greek murals and European oil paintings are listed in Table 3. It can be seen that the oxide content of smalt pigment used in China was close to that of European murals and oil paintings: they all contained about 70% SiO2, the content of K2O generally exceeded 10%, and the content of the color rendering element Co was 1–5%. In addition, they also contained Fe, Ca, Ni, As, Pb and other elements. The smalt pigment found in Cave 256 is also one of this type of material. However, as for the smalt pigment used in blue and white porcelains of the Yuan Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty, the content of SiO2 was close, K2O was relatively low, Al2O3 was about 15% and the content of the color rendering element Co was generally lower than 0.5%. In summary, the smalt pigment used in statue of Cave 256 should be imported from Europe.

Table 3 Comparison of element content of smalt pigment in different regions [31, 35, 36]

In this study, the smalt pigment is firstly found in statues of the Qing Dynasty in Mogao Grottoes in Dunhuang. According to previous literature, artificial ultramarine pigments were generally used for remodeling and repainting of statues of Mogao Grottoes during the Qing Dynasty. The smalt pigment discovered this time can be used as a reference for us to study the history of repainting and repairing of statues in Cave 256. The smalt pigment was a very important blue paint in the history of European art. It was regarded as the only artificial substitute for azurite and lazurite until the invention of other inexpensive artificial blue pigments. There is evidence that the export of smalt pigment from Europe to China covered almost the entire eighteenth century and continued into the nineteenth century [37, 38]. After the mid-nineteenth century, artificial ultramarine entered China. With low price and strong hiding power, it quickly replaced smalt. Kangxi actively explored the Western Regions in his later years. Taking this as a chance, he began to manage the area west of Jiayuguan (嘉峪关). During the 5–6th year of Yongzheng (雍正), 2405 households, about 10,000 people, immigrated to Dunhuang. The arrival of immigrants laid the foundation for the development of Dunhuang in the Qing Dynasty and even in modern times [39]. According to Inscriptions for Donors of Mogao Grottoes in Dunhuang (Cave 454), the pedagogue Lei Jixiang (雷吉祥) completed his donation on February 15th of the lunar calendar in the first year of Yongzheng [40]. It can be concluded that the first year of Yongzheng (1723 AD) should be the earliest date for the reconstruction of the Mogao Grottoes in the Qing Dynasty. Based on the history of the introduction of smalt into China and the history of the reconstruction of Mogao Grottoes in the Qing Dynasty, it is believed that the statues of Cave 256 were rebuilt in the first half of the nineteenth century, that is, during the reign of Jiaqing (嘉庆) and Daoguang (道光) in the Qing Dynasty.

Conclusion

Pigment is an indispensable and the most important material in the process of making murals and statues. Pigments used in murals and statues in different historical periods of Mogao Grottoes are also different because of factors such as the origin of the pigments, processing techniques, prices, etc. In this paper, blue pigments used in murals and statues of the Five Dynasties, the Song Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty of Cave 256 are studied. The result shows that expensive lazurite pigment was used in the murals of the Five Dynasties and azurite was used on a large scale in the repainted murals of the Song Dynasties, which was closely related to the social status of the cave owner and the historical background at that time. The blue pigment in the repainted statues of the Qing Dynasty was smalt, which was first discovered in the Mogao Grottoes. It is judged that it is an imported pigment from Europe based on the element composition. Based on the history of the reconstruction of Mogao Grottoes in the Qing Dynasty, it is believed that the statues of Cave 256 were rebuilt in the first half of the nineteenth century, that is, during the reign of Jiaqing and Daoguang in the Qing Dynasty.

In summary, the analysis and research of pigments in a specific historical period can reflect the social development at that time on the one hand, and on the other hand can provide scientific evidence for us to analyze the reconstruction and repainting history of the murals and statues of Mogao Grottoes.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

pXRF:

Portable X-ray fluorescence

μ-FTIR:

Microscopic Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

PLM:

Polarizing microscope

ED-XRF:

Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence

References

  1. Chen GQ. Study on salting damage analysis and treatment of wall paintings at Mogao Grottoes, Dunhuang. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University; 2016. p. 1–4 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Academy D. Summary of the contents of the Dunhuang Grottoes. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press; 1996. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. He SZ. More about the cave built by Cao Yuanshen. Dunhuang Res. 1994;3:33–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen M. The travel map of Murong family. Dunhuang Res. 2006;4:25–31 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng JJ. Research on the control of the Murong family in Yumen area during the Late Tang to the early Song Dynasty: centered on the Dunhuang documents and Murals. J Dunhuang Stud. 2020;2:108–16 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng BL. Ethnic population in the Western Corridor during the Late Tang and the Five-Dynasty period. J Lanzhou Univ Soc Sci. 2006;02:9–21 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen XM. Preferences to color of Cerulean blue in ancient Chinese culture. J Nantong Univ Soc Sci Ed. 2008;3:78–81 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang JY. Study on Lazurite pigments in Grottoes of Dunhuang, Maiji mountain and Bingling temple. Archeology. 1996;10:77–92 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang JY. Pigment of for polychrome arts on ancient China summary. Wenbo. 2009;6:396–402 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li ZX. Pigment analysis on Tang dynasty Murals at The Mogao Grottes. Dunhuang Res. 2002;4:11–8 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kogou S, Shahtahmassebi G, Lucian A, Liang HD, Shui BW, Zhang WY, Su BM, Van Schaik S. From remote sensing and machine learning to the history of the Silk road: large scale material identification on wall paintings. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang JY. Study on synthetic Ultramarine pigment in Dunhuang Grottoes. Dunhuang Res. 2000;1:76–81 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miliani CF, Rosi F, Daveri A, Brunetti BG. Reflection infrared spectroscopy for the non-invasive in situ study of artists’ pigments. Appl Phys. 2012;106:295–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Emilio C, Giorgia S, Silvia P, Jia Y, Rocco M. Characterization of outdoor bronze monument patinas: the potentialities of near-infrared spectroscopic analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:24379–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedegaard SB, Delbey T, Brns C, Rasmussen KL. Painting the Palace of Apries II: ancient pigments of the reliefs from the Palace of Apries, Lower Egypt. Herit Sci. 2019;1:7–54.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jonynaite D, Senvaitiene J, Beganskiene A, Kareiva A. Spectroscopic analysis of blue cobalt smalt pigment. Vib Spectrosc. 2010;52:158–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sfarra S, Cheilakou E, Theodorakeas P, Paoletti D, Koui M. S.S. Annunziata Church (L’Aquila, Italy) unveiled by non- and micro-destructive testing techniques. Appl Phys. 2017;123:215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma Q, Pan L. Translators. In: Scott D, editor. Copper and bronze in art: corrosion, colorants, conservation. Beijing: Science Press; 2009. p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li HL. The study on color technology and application of Mural paintings in Northern China in 4–6th century. Shanghai: Shanghai University; 2019. p. 152 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Su BM, Li ZX, Ma ZF, Li S, Ma QL. Study on the Pigments used in Murals of Kizil Grottoes. Dunhuang Res. 2000;1:65–75 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xia Y. Exploring Chinese historical pigments by optical microscopy. Wenbo. 2009;6:342–5 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen GL. Analysis of pigments and clay of the polychrome statue and wall paintings in the No. 9 Tiantishan Grottoes. Sci Conserv Archeol. 2010;4:91–6 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu Y. Study of pigments used in Dunhuang in the Late Tang Dynasty and the Five Dynasties. J Dunhuang Stud. 2006;4:80–4 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Academy D. Chinese Grottoes: Anxi Yulin Grottoes. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press; 2012. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Corregidor V, Oliveira AR, Rodrigues PA, Alves LC. Paintings on copper by the Flemish artist Frans Francken II: PIXE characterization by external microbeam. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B. 2015;1:291–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalinina KB, Bonaduce I, Colombini MP, Artemieva IS. An analytical investigation of the painting technique of Italian Renaissance master Lorenzo Lotto. J Cult Herit. 2012;3:259–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rebollo E, Nodari L, Russo U, Bertoncello R, Scardellato C, Romano F, Ratti F, Poletto L. Non-invasive multitechnique methodology applied to the study of two 14th century canvases by Lorenzo Veneziano. J Cult Herit. 2013;3:153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Civici N. Non-destruction identification of inorganic pigments used in 16–17th century Albanian icons by total reflection X-ray fluorescence analysis. J Cult Herit. 2006;4:339–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Daniilia S, Minopoulou E, Andrikopoulos KS, Tsakalof A, Bairachtari K. From Byzantine to post-Byzantine art: the painting technique of St Stephen’s wall paintings at Meteora. Greece J Archaeol Sci. 2008;6:1695–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bianchin S, Favaro M, Vigato PA, Botticelli G, Germani G, Botticelli S. The scientific approach to the restoration and monitoring of mural paintings at S. Girolamo Chapel-SS. Annunziata Church in Florences. J Cult Herit. 2009;3:379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hui N. Analysis and research on Smalt pigment in the Ming dynasty and Qing dynasty of China. Xi’an: Northwest University; 2015. p. 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lei Y, Qu L, Cheng XL, Yang H, Wang SW. The discovery of Smalt in Jianfu palace in Forbidden city. Wenbo. 2009;6:276–9 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xu N. Analysis of the production technology of the painted statues at Qinglian temple in Jincheng Shanxi and a preliminary study on its virtual restoration. Xi’an: Northwest University; 2014. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Liu MY, Lei YX. A preliminary exploration of Colored drawings on Rafters in Wanfo Hall of Zhenguo temple, Pingyao county. Shanxi Prov Archit Hist. 2012;3:36–54 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Du F. Two different imported Smalt pigments: (“Samarra” and “Sumatra”). Science in China (Series E). Tech Sci. 2007;5:636–43 ((in Chinese)).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Riedrerer J. Die Smalte Sammelmappe - DEUTSCHE- ZEITSCHRIFT. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft. 1968;9:386–95.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Giannini R, Freestone IC, Shortland AJ. European cobalt sources identified in the production of Chinese famille rose porcelain. J Archaeol Sci. 2017;80:27–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu MY. 2019. Research on pigments for decorative polychrome painting in official handicraft regulations and precedents of Qing dynasty. Beijing, Tsinghua University. 318 (in Chinese).

  39. Chen GW. Study on Dunhuang population issues in Qing dynasty. J Dunhuang Stud. 2018;1:55–67 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Academy D. Inscriptions for Donors of Mogao Grottoes in Dunhuang. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press; 1986. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Li Na at the National Museum of China, for her guidance and expertise. Authors would like to thank the peer reviewers and editors for providing valuable feedback.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51962001), the Local Project Guided by the Central Government of Gansu Province, Science and Technology Project of Gansu Province (Grant No. 21JR7RA759) and Joint Fund for Regional Innovation and Development of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20282).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BMS and MLS provided support and guidance for this study. BWS and ZRY performed XRD, PLM and performed the analysis. QC, ZRY performed XRF and prepared the manuscript. ZW performed μ-FTIR and prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boming Su.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shui, B., Yu, Z., Cui, Q. et al. Blue pigments in Cave 256, Mogao Grottoes: a systematic analysis of murals and statues in Five dynasties, Song Dynasty and Qing Dynasty. Herit Sci 10, 89 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00722-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00722-5

Keywords