Skip to main content
Heritage Science
Download PDF
Download ePub

Functionality of early medieval roasters studied using archaeobotany and chromatography: preliminary studies

Heritage Science volume 10, Article number: 55 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Roasters are clay, quadrilateral vessels that are found in areas of whole Slavic region. For years, there has been a discussion on their functionality, in which various concepts of their use keep appearing. In this paper we present the results of botanical and gas chromatographic studies carried out on several fragments of roasters that originated in the Sudetes Mountain area and Sudetic Foreland. The analyzed artefacts in total of 26 pieces come from three early medieval sites: Gilów, Jelenia Góra–Grabary and Kamieniec Ząbkowicki. The obtained results allowed to concluding that these were the vessels used for thermal processing of cereal grains in both processes of food processing and food preservation. The results made it possible to move the beginnings of agrarian activity in the Sudetes Mountains by 400 years, earlier than it was thought, which has a key meaning for observation of the economy development in mountainous areas in the early Middle Ages.

Introduction

Clay roasters can be found mainly in the Western and Southern Slavic region and on its borderlands. They have been found in over 200 sites in Poland, the Czech Republic, Germany, Slovakia, Ukraine, Belarus, as well as the Baltic and Balkan countries [1,2,3,4] and are considered to be a product typical of Slavs living in Central Europe from the sixth to the tenth century [2, 5,6,7,8]. According to some authors, they were also used sporadically between the eleventh and thirteenth century [6, 9, 10]. Linguists and ethnologists also point out to the origin of its name (prażnica), identified with the preparation of the so-called roast (prażmo), i.e. dried or toasted unripe wheat or rye grains [11]. The prevailing opinion in the literature on the subject is that roasters were mainly used for heating and roasting grain and legumes in order to clean it before grinding or preparing the roast [2, 10,11,12,13,14,15]. Such usage is also indicated by ethnographic sources: “The benefits of roasting have been long recognized as it significantly increases the taste of grain, makes it more digestible, changing starch into dextrin and sugar, and also partially transforming protein. It was used to thoroughly dry grain, but also to remove the unpleasant smell from stale grain. Its use was quite extensive.” ([16]–author’s own translation).

In the discussion on the function of roasters, some researchers also identified them with hardening metal products [17] or smelting [18]. However, they are mostly associated with the processing of crops, less often of animal-based products. Jaroslav Škojec [10] suggested as many as 10 potential functions they could have. In addition to the above, on the basis of a rich collection of more than 800 roasters from the early medieval site Mikulciče in Czech Republic, he also distinguished roasters that could be used as portable fireplaces, bread baking forms, malt-making vessels and accessories related to grinding grain.

The aim of the article is to present the results of chromatographic and botanical studies carried out on roaster fragments from the Sudetes and Sudetic Foreland. No previous research employing these methods has been conducted in the context of the function and use of these vessels. The article aims to be a contribution to a broader discussion on their function. In addition, research on roasters from mountainous areas will provide new information on the economy and processing of agricultural crops in regions where agriculture played a marginal role in the early Middle Ages. Settlement and agriculture are well confirmed in the Sudetic Foreland, but such studies are particularly important for the area of the Sudety Mountain (Jelenia Góra example), considered anecumenical or subecumenical in terms of medieval settlement and agricultural activity before the thirteenth century [19, 20].

The archaeological sites where fragments of roasters were found are located in Gilów (Sudetic Foreland–Niemczańsko-Strzelińskie Hills), Kamieniec Ząbkowicki (Sudetic Foreland–Otmuchów Depression) and Jelenia Góra Grabary (Western Sudetes – Jelenia Góra Valley). All these sites come from the same, tribal period of the Early Middle Ages and they are dated back to the ninth–tenth centuries. A total of 26 pieces of roasters were analyzed from these sites. It is worth pointing out that Sudetic Foothills and Sudety Mountains represent different types of geomorphological conditions, suitable for settlements in lower parts and rather inhospitable in the higher parts of the main Sudetic range.

Roaster form and construction

Roasters are rarely preserved in fragments that allow a complete reconstruction of their form. Researchers draw attention to the fact that often in the absence of characteristic edge and bottom parts, roasters may be confused with fragments of earthen floor and treated marginally in the subject literature [8]. Preserved and reconstructed roasters have the form of a quadrilateral tray with side lengths varying between 30 and 200 cm and a height of 4 to 20 cm [11, 21, 22] (Fig. 1). These shallow, thick-walled containers are made of poorly fired clay, thinned with organic admixture and sand [21]. Usually, their surfaces bear imprints of fragments of leaves and grass blades, grains and small twig fragments.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Form reconstruction b Method of placing roaster. (based on [23], drawing by E. Trawińska)

Full size image

Another type of such a vessel (called baker) with a round outline was distinguished in the Czech, Slovak, Bulgarian and Balkan sites. According to ethnographers and archaeologists, these forms were used to bake bread. Thus, the nomenclature distinguishes between the tray-shaped roasters and round bakers [11]. So far, none of the latter have been identified among early medieval finds from the territory of Poland.

Roasters were situated directly on the ground, in deliberately dug pits, hollows or placed on stones which enabled lighting a fire underneath [23]. Some roasters were moved from one place to another, as indicated by the board imprints on the outer parts of some bottoms and through-holes [8], which made it possible to hold the vessel during transport [8]. Due to their weight and dimensions, they were probably transported short distances within settlements. According to some researchers, the board imprints and holes were made by a pallet during roaster production and are not related to transportation [8].

Material and methods

Materials

Apart from the sites discussed in this paper, several dozen fragments of roasters have been discovered in the Sudeten Foreland and Western Sudety Foothills, namely the following locations: Chwałków (settlement, eighth-ninth century, Ślęża Massif), Koźlice (hillfort, ninth-tenth century, Upper Lusatia), Krzepice (settlement, ninth–tenth century, Strzelińskie Hills), Tylice (hillfort, ninth–tenth century, Upper Lusatia) and Wójcice (settlement, eighth–ninth century, Otmuchów Depression) [24,25,26,27]. From the geographic point of view, most of the sites where fragments of roasters were (7 out of 8) are located in hilly areas, adjacent to the dense settlement zone of the lowlands. Only the settlement in Jelenia Góra–Grabary represents the remains of the ninth–tenth century activities in the internal part of Sudetes. The analysis included fragments available in museum inventories, well preserved and from structures with well-established chronology. Additionally, the artifacts had to be stored in dry and ventilated rooms, free from mold. After taking these factors into account, fragments from three archaeological sites were selected for pilot studies: Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, Gilów and Jelenia Góra (Fig. 2). The remaining roasters from the Sudetes were not available for studies or their condition did not allow it.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Map of the sites discussed in the article (background, Openstreetmaps contribution, by E. Lisowska)

Full size image

The first group of the selected roaster fragments was discovered in the ninth–tenth century settlement in Kamieniec Ząbkowicki. As a result of excavations led by Leszek Lenarczyk in 1984 [28,29,30] 12 structures were uncovered, 8 of them interpreted as remains of log-frame huts. In two of the buildings, a total of 135 roaster fragments were discovered, including 10 in the building designated as structure 11 and 125 in the hut designated as structure 12. The second group of the selected fragments comes from the Gilów stronghold, considered a short-term Great Moravian investment in Lower Silesia [25]. Several dozen roaster fragments were discovered in the Ninth–tenth century complex, in buildings located both within and outside the stronghold walls. Four fragments come from the excavation of the layer located on the borough embankment slope. They were accompanied by scattered, worn-out millstones. The context of these finds indicates that both artifacts were not fit for use and disposed by the dwellers of a nearby hut. Two roaster fragments from Gilów were discovered in building 4, having a much more solid structure than others within the stronghold. Its beams, with the diameter of up to 0.35 m, were placed on a layer of clay isolating the building from the ground. It is one of the few residential structures in Gilów with a hearth, which could have been related to the use of the roaster.

The last of the studied sites is the ninth-tenth century settlement, discovered in 2018 in Jelenia Góra–Grabary. Only 6 roaster fragments were found here, embedded in partially burnt orange clay with numerous charcoals, marked as structure 5 (Fig. 3a). The roaster was located on the edge of a larger building, most probably residential (structure 1). Micromorphological soil studies carried out by Mateusz Krupski allowed for the conclusion that these fragments were located in a heavily ground and mixed layer, most probably thrown out of the original context, similarly to the four fragments from Gilów.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Roasters: a Roaster in situ, Jelenia Góra–Grabary site b, e Roaster fragments from Gilów c Roaster fragments from Jelenia Góra–Grabary site d Roaster fragment from Kamieniec Ząbkowicki (photos by A. Sady; E. Lisowska)

Full size image

Methods

Seven inventory numbers containing 23 samples were subjected to botanical analysis, three inventory numbers containing one sample each were analyzed with gas chromatography (Table 1).

Table 1 List of examined samples
Full size table

Two samples from Kamieniec Ząbkowicki have the same inventory number, which is the result of assigning one number to all artefacts from one feature in the late 80’s. The archaeobotanical study was carried out on samples of roasters and sediments from Gilów, Jelenia Góra and Kamieniec Ząbkowicki. Three samples were analyzed with gas chromatography: two from Jelenia Góra and one from Gilów. Such a choice was conditional on the consent of the institutions storing the artefacts for research (some of the roasters must have been slightly damaged).The archaeobotanical study was conducted in accordance with generally accepted principles [31,32,33]. All roaster fragments were measured and described, then, if necessary, cleaned with a soft brush and observed under a stereoscopic microscope (magnification 7 to 45×). All observed traces were recorded. The fragments were not broken during the analyses; thus their results pertain to imprints visible on the surface, or fragment edges.

Samples with traces collected inside the fragments were initially segregated without washing (sludging) under magnification. Several pieces of charcoal were isolated and analyzed further in terms of their origin. The fragments were measured before observation (longest dimension). A stereoscopic microscope was used for initial observation, followed by the analysis of anatomical structure details under a metallographic microscope (Olympus BX53M). The charcoals were observed in three planes: transverse, tangent and radial. Identification keys were used for marking [34, 35].

Preparation of samples for chromatographic analysis consisted of weighing out about 5 g of the material, which, after grinding, was extracted in a Soxhlet apparatus in a mixture of dichloromethane and methanol (2:1 v/v) for 4 h. The extracted lipid fraction was evaporated to dryness on a rotary evaporator. The resulting residue was dissolved in 2 mL of hexane. 0.5 mL of the solution was transferred to a glass vial and evaporated under a stream of nitrogen. The analytes included in the lipid fraction were derivatized by adding 100 µL of the mixture of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide and trimethylchlorosilane (100:1 v/v). The process was carried out for 30 min at the temperature of 75 °C. The vials were then supplemented with 300 µL hexane and subjected to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis.

GC–MS analysis was performed using a 6890 N Network GC System gas chromatograph connected to a 5973 Network Mass Selective Detector quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies) equipped with an HP–5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm). A 1 µL sample was injected at the temperature of 250 °C. The carrier gas was helium with a flow rate of 0.9 mL/min. The chromatograph oven temperature program was as follows: starting temperature 60 °C (0 min); temperature increase by 12 °C/min; final temperature 300 °C (0 min). The quadrupole mass spectrometer was operated in the electron ionization (EI) mode. The ion source temperature was 230 °C and the detector temperature was 150 °C. During the analysis, a solvent delay of 4 min and a scan of the mass to charge ratio (m/z) 50–550 were used.

Qualitative analysis of fatty acids and archaeological biomarkers was carried out on the basis of Wiley mass spectra library and NIST08. All acids were determined as trimethylsilyl derivatives. The quantitative analysis of fatty acids was performed using the internal normalization method.

Results of botanical tests

Kamieniec Ząbkowicki

The material from this site consisted of roaster fragments with the maximum dimensions of 8.5 × 5.6 × 3.6 cm, 8.7 × 6 × 3 cm and 12.4 × 8 × 3 cm, brown and dark gray (Fig. 3d). All fragments showed elements of mineral admixture and clear traces of organic admixture. Most of them were incalculable and difficult to accurately determine imprints of straw, i.e. fragments of leaves and blades of undefined cereals or wild grass (Cerealia indet./Poaceae indet.). Among the intersecting imprints of these elements, the presence of grain imprints was discerned that allowed for identifying three imprints of barley (Hordeum vulgare), one imprint of probably barley (cf. Hordeum vulgare), one imprint of (probably) millet (cf. Panicum miliaceum) and one imprint of (probably) oats (cf. Avena sp.). Moreover, three impressions of unspecified cereal grains (Cerealia indet.) and one imprint of an unspecified grain ear fragment (Cerealia indet.) were found. Burned grains of barley were also found in two of the prints.

Gilów

Four roaster fragments obtained during excavations in 1982 and four fragments from 2002 (Fig. 3b, e) were selected for the analysis. They measured from 2 to 10.3 cm, and were light brown-gray, dark gray and orange. Relatively few traces of plant admixture were visible on their surface and one of the fragments did not contain any. The preserved traces consisted of flat, elongated and ribbed straw imprints (Cerealia indet./Poaceae indet.) (Fig. 3b).

Jelenia Góra–Grabary

During the segregation of the sediment samples (BotJGG4), four pieces of charcoal were separated, with dimensions of 9, 12, 13 and 18 mm. Preliminary evaluation under a magnifying glass showed that they all originated from coniferous trees. The microscopic analysis of the anatomical structure confirmed the presence of small pits in the cross fields visible in the radial section. No resin channels were observed. These features indicated that the examined fragments probably come from silver fir (cf. Abies alba). Similar features were visible on the fragments of the other separated coals. In this case, three fragments measuring 12, 15 and 23 mm were analyzed. Probably these fractions originally belonged to one larger roaster fragment, which broke into 12 smaller lumps, which made it impossible to notice specific species of crops or grass on its surface (Fig. 3c). No plant residues were observed in the sediment sample (sample BotJGG6).

Results of chromatographic analyses

Different groups of organic compounds were determined in lipid extracts by gas chromatography, including mainly aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons (e.g. tetradecane, nonadecane), organic acids and alcohols (like hexadecanol, octadecanol or eicosanol). A variety of determined compounds and their derivatives may be the result of decomposition of the organic substance with which the examined samples were in contact. Fatty acids and biomarkers were the most important groups of the determined compounds.

An exemplary chromatogram for sample JGGGC-MS5 is shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Chromatogram for sample JGGGC-MS5: C7:0–enanthic acid, C8:0–caprylic acid, C9:0–pelargonic acid, C10:0–capric acid, C12:0–lauric acid, C14:0–myristic acid, C15:0–pentadecanoic acid, C16:0–palmitic acid, C18:0–stearic acid (by J. Kałużna-Czaplińska, A. Rosiak)

Full size image

The fatty acid percentages for each sample are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Fatty acids content (in %) in examined samples
Full size table

The samples essentially contained saturated acids from caproic acid C6:0 to stearic acid C18:0. Only in sample GilGC-MS4 the presence of two unsaturated acids was detected: oleic C18:1 and linoleic C18:2. The absence of unsaturated acids in sample JGGGC-MS5 and sample JGGGC-MS6 is not common, usually palmitoleic C16:1 and oleic C18:1 acids are present [36, 37]. The highest amount of acids were determined in sample GilGC-MS4—12 different acids, the lowest in sample JGGGC-MS6—only 3 acids. Palmitic acid C16:0 was the dominant acid in samples JGGGC-MS5 and JGGC-MS6, while stearic acid C18:0 was the most abundant in sample GILGC-MS4. Pentadecanoic acid C15:0, which is considered an indicator of bacterial activity, was determined only in sample JGGGC-MS5. Such a significant difference is puzzling and may indicate a different purpose and perhaps the origin of the examined vessel fragments. However, based on the presence of acids, it is not possible to directly infer the source of the studied organic residues. as acids are present in almost all types of plant and animal materials. Therefore, for the purposes of this publication the discussion on the results is based on the study by Eerkens [38], who selected the proportions characteristic of various types of food on the basis of experimental studies. The calculated proportions and their interpretation are presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Proportions of fatty acids in the examined samples
Full size table

The calculated fatty acid proportions indicate plants as the main source of origin for the studied residues. Sample GilGC-MS4 and sample JGGGC-MS5 were likely in contact mainly with seeds and nuts. This is consistent with the archaeologists’ assumption as to the essential function of roasters as vessels for heating and roasting cereal grains. Sample JGGGC-MS6 is difficult to interpret due to the low number of determined acids. However, it should be remembered that relying solely on such proportions raises some doubts. As already mentioned. fatty acids are ubiquitous, found in both plant and animal products [36,37,38]. This is especially true of palmitic acid C16:0 and stearic acid C18:0. Many studies show that significant amounts of these two acids in organic residues may result from the conversion of unsaturated to saturated acids. e.g. by the degradation of oleic acid C18:1 to stearic acid C18:0.

In addition to fatty acids, the studies also showed the presence of biomarkers that can facilitate conclusions on the origin of residues [39,40,41,42]. Even in low concentrations, they can clearly indicate the type of a studied residue [36]. Several compounds were determined in the studied samples. Sample GilGC-MS4 contained phenylacetic acid of the phenolic acids family, whose presence may indicate the processing of plant-based foods, and benzene, a phthalic acid confirming the probability of thermal treatment of dishes (products) [43].

Three compounds, determined in sample JGGGC-MS5, indicate waxes: benzoic acid esters [44], olefin-17-Pentatriacontene [45] and 1-Heptatriacotanol, a long-chain alcohol that often occurs in beeswax or vegetable waxes [46]. This may suggest that the roaster was in contact with some beeswax product. A derivative of cholestane was also determined in this sample.

Sample JGGGC-MS6 among the studied compounds contained carotenoid–rodopine (rhodopine), 1–monolinoleoylglycerol consisting of a single chain of fatty acid (linoleic acid), glycerol, which is the end product of digestion in animals, and cholesterol—a lipid from the steroid group, a compound characteristic of animals [36]. The presence of these compounds may indicate a mixed, plant-animal origin of organic residues. For the first time, chromatography was used to analyze the organic residues from the early medieval roasters. However, when comparing the results with the analyses of other historical vessels e.g. from the western part of the Prussian territory [37]; Podlasie Province [47] or Pomeranian Voivodeship [48], they seem to be similar. This indicates that clay vessels, including medieval ones, were mainly used to stored or prepared plant material.

Discussion

The use of two complementary methods in identifying the functions of early medieval roasters allowed for the establishment of several important conclusions. Thanks to archaeological studies we can state that roasters were produced from clay with a large amount of organic admixture in the form of vegetative parts of cereal plants and grasses (Cerealia indet./Poaceae indet.). The domestic nature of their production indirectly indicates the presence of these plants in the vicinity. They were produced directly in the settlement by its inhabitants, because they were too heavy for further distribution. Roasters were thick-walled containers and lack of finesse in their manufacture and high degree of wear result in finding them mainly in fragments [1, 49]. An additional factor affecting the degree of fragmentation of these artefacts may also be connected with site taphonomy as well as firing conditions. From the observations and botanical analyses of the traces of plant admixture carried out so far, it can be assumed that the fragility of the vessels could also be influenced by quite abundant, in some cases, plant admixture, and voids in the surface resulting from burning out the plant tissue. Due to their thick walls, roasters did not heat up too quickly and kept warmth well, which made them appropriate for drying or roasting grains [1]. During heating the voids were filled with warm air, which was then evenly distributed within the vessel. The presence of fine charcoals in the sediment samples can be explained by the fact that roaster fragments are very often found within houses or huts in or near hearths [1]. Some authors also theorize about using roasters as portable heat sources [8], so the fragments of burnt wood preserved in the vessel fill are most likely the remains of material used in the hearth. In this case of the studied roasters it was coniferous in origin, probably fir.

Chromatographic studies with the use of a gas chromatograph combined with a mass spectrometer allowed to establish that the basic substance in contact with the internal walls of roasters are acids of plant origin, probably the result of heating seeds and nuts. This is also confirmed by the biomarkers found in the roaster, indicating the plant origin of the studied residues. In the case of one roaster from the site in Jelenia Góra–Grabary, biomarkers also directly indicated thermal treatment of animal origin substances.

In connection with the above findings, one should agree with most concepts concerning the use of roasters as containers for thermal treatment of plant products, and in some cases plant and animal products. However, the hypotheses connecting these vessels with metal hardening or smelting processes [17, 18], forms for baking bread or producing malt, as well as identifying them as accessories related to grain grinding [10] were not confirmed. The hypothesis about their use as portable hearths is also uncertain, as in such case we would only discover acids produced by heat treatment of various species of shrubs and trees. Perhaps a larger-scale study will allow for expanding the range of roaster usage.

Gas chromatography was performed for early medieval roasters for the first time, and preliminary results open a wide range of possibilities for analyzing such artifacts from sites covering the entire Slavic region. Conducting the above study on artifacts excavated in the Sudetes also allowed for moving the beginnings of agriculture in the early Middle Ages in Central European mountainous areas by almost 400 years. Based on C14 results (Fig. 5) as well as the analysis of pottery manufacturing style typical of late ninth and tenth century, the site in Jelenia Góra–Grabary confirms the existence of the settlement in the Sudety Mountains in such an early period.

Fig. 5
figure 5

AMS radiocarbon dating results of charcoal samples from Jelenia Góra–Grabary site. Calibrated with the OxCal v4.2.3. software [50]. Produced by M. Furmanek

Full size image

Thanks to the discovery of grains, straw as well as the unpublished palynological analyzes carried out by M. Malkiewicz from the Institute of Geological Sciences of the University of Wroclaw, we now know that the soil cultivation process in this area began as early as in the ninth century, and not in the thirteenth century, as previously thought [19, 20]. This is also confirmed by the early medieval settlements and strongholds discovered in recent years, recorded during planned and rescue excavations in the Sudetes [51]. Such sites were detected in the Central Sudetes within Kłodzko Valley and the Stołowe Mountains, in the Eastern Sudetes. New botanical evidence comes from the hillfort in Opava-Kylešovice [52]. It can be clearly seen that the cultural landscape of the Sudety mountains during the older phases of the Early Middle Ages (ninth–tenth centuries) includes settlement enclaves, which were self-sufficient in the production and processing of the basic agricultural products. An additional argument for such an early, medieval activity is the iron coulters discovered in Jelenia Góra–Grabary, Gilów and several other archaeological sites in Sudetic Foreland and Upper Lusatia [25].

Conclusion

Botanical and gas chromatographic studies were carried out on several fragments of roasters that originated in the Sudetes Mountain area and Sudetic Foreland. Thanks to the archaeological research, it can be concluded that roasters were made of clay with a large amount of organic admixture in the form of vegetative parts of cereal plants and grasses. They were used as containers for thermal treatment of plant products, and in some cases probably also for plant and animal products. Plant material, probably seeds and nuts, was the main material with which the examined fragments of roasters were in contact. This is evidenced not only by the presence of fatty acids, but also by the presence of biomarkers characteristic of this type of material.

The application of modern analytical techniques (such as gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry) in archaeological studies not only helps to confirm the previously stated hypotheses, as in the case of the discussed roasters, but also provides the opportunity to obtain new information on historical objects. New information combined with archaeological knowledge and practice contributes to a better understanding of the habits and lives of our ancestors.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials used during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable requests.

Abbreviations

GC-MS:

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

References

  1. Malinowski T. Wczesnośredniowieczne prażnice w Wielkopolsce (Early medieval roasters in Greater Poland). Przegląd Archeologiczny. 1959;11:68–80 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Malinowski T. Prażnice (Roastes). Słownik Starożytności Słowiańskich. 1970;4:332 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simonova E. Materialnaja kultura slavjanskogo naselenija Severo-Vostočnoj Vengrii VII–XI w. [Material culture of the Slavic population of North-Eastern Hungary in the 7th–11th centuries]. In: Čaplovič D, Doruľa J, editors. Central Europe in 8–10 Centuries, International Scientific Conference. Bratislava: Ministry of Culture in the Slovak Republik and Slovak Akademy of Sciences; 1997. p. 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tomka P. Kleine öfen – grosse Wannen. Die Besonderheiten einen spätawarenzeitlichen Siedlung [Small furnaces - large tubs. The special features an spätawarenzeitlichen settlement]. In: Fusek G, editor. Zbornik na počesť Dariny Bialekovej [Proceedings in honor of Darina Bialeková]. Nitra: Archeologický Ústav Slovenskej Akadémie Vied; 2004. p. 419–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beranová M. Diskuse o tzv. pražnicích (Discussion about the so–called roasters). Archeol Rozhl. 1979;31:101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kudrnáč J. Několik upozornění k tzv. pražnicím (A few notices about so–called roasters). Archeol Rozhl. 1981;33:209–12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parczewski M. Początki kultury wczesnosłowiańskiej w Polsce. Krytyka i datowanie źródeł archeologicznych (The beginnings of early Slavic culture in Poland. Criticism and dating of archaeological sources). Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk–Łódź: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich; 1988. (in Polish)

  8. Paternoga M, Rzeźnik P. Problem funkcji i sposobu użytkowania wczesnośredniowiecznych tzw. prażnic w świetle wybranych znalezisk z Dolnego Śląska (The problem of the function and method of use of the so–called early medieval roasters in the light of selected finds from Lower Silesia). Dolnośląskie Wiadomości Prahistoryczne. 2007;6:81–105 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brzostowicz M. Bruszczewski zespół osadniczy we wczesnym średniowieczu (Bruszczewo settlement complex in the Early Middle Ages). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk; 2002. (in Polish)

  10. Škojec J. Lehmwannenfunde aus Mikulčice (Roaster finds from Mikulčice). In: Poláček L., editor. Studien zum Burgwall von Mikulčice 5; 2003. p. 421–96.

  11. Skružný L. Pekáče – jejich výskyt, funkce a datování (Baking pans – their occurrence, functions and dating). Pamatky Archeol. 1964;55(2):370–91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eisner J. Rukověť slovanské archeologie. Počátky slovanů a jejich kultury (Handbook of Slavic archeology. The beginnings of the Slavs and their culture). Prague: Academia nakladatelství Ceskoslovenské akademie věd; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gruszka B. Osada z najstarszej fazy wczesnego średniowiecza w Stożnem, stan. 2, pow. Zielona Góra. Wstępne wyniki badań (A settlement from the oldest phase of the Early Middle Ages in Stożne, site 2, Zielona Góra district. Initial research results). Archeol Środ Nadodrza. 2007;5:299–307 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kudrnáč J. Výzkum na klučovském hradišti v roce 1952 (Excavation at the Klučov stronghold in 1952). Archeol Rozhl. 1954;6:54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mařík J. Panvé klučovského typu (Klučov type pans). Zprávy české archeologické společnosti, Praha: Česká archeologická společnost - Sdružení archeologů Čech, Moravy a Slezska; 1997.p. 32.

  16. Maurizio A. Pożywienie roślinne i rolnictwo w rozwoju dziejowym (Plant food and agriculture in the development of history). Warszawa: Kasa Mianowskiego; 1926. (in Polish)

  17. Szafrański W. Wyniki badań archeologicznych w Biskupinie, pow. Żnin, na stan. 6 (The results of archaeological research in Biskupin, district Żnin, site No. 6). In: Szafrański W, Szafrańska Z, editors. Z badań nad wczesnośredniowiecznym osadnictwem wiejskim w Biskupinie (From the research on early medieval rural settlement in Biskupin). Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich; 1961, p. 7–144. (in Polish)

  18. Zoll–Adamikowa H. Wczesnośredniowieczne cmentarzyska ciałopalne Słowian na terenie Polski, cz. II: Analiza i wnioski (Early medieval Slavic burials on Polish territory, part. II: Analysis and conclusions). Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich; 1979. (in Polish)

  19. Boguszewicz A. Z badań nad przemianami osadnictwa w Sudetach śląskich w XII–XIII w. (From the research on the changes in the settlement in the Silesian Sudetes in the 12th–13th centuries). In: Boguszewicz M, Boguszewicz A, Wiśniewska D, editors. Człowiek i środowisko w Sudetach (Man and environment in Sudety Mountains), Regionalny Ośrodek Studiów i Ochrony Środowiska Kulturowego we Wrocławiu. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Wrocławski; 2000. p. 151–68. (in Polish)

  20. Migoń P, Latocha A. Human impact and geomorphic change through time in the Sudetes, Central Europe. Quat Int. 2018;470:194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Foltyn E. Podstawy gospodarcze wczesnośredniowiecznej społeczności plemiennej na Górnym Śląsku (Economic basis of the early medieval tribal community in Upper Silesia). Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski; 1998. (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gruszka B. Wczesnośredniowieczne zabytki ceramiczne ze stan. 2 w Nowińcu, gm. Lubsko, woj. lubuskie w ujęciu stylistyczno-technologicznym (The early medieval pottery from Nowiniec site 2 in the light of techno-stylistical analysis). In: Gruszka B, editor. Nowiniec, stan. 2 – wczesnośredniowieczny gród na pograniczu śląsko-łużyckim (Nowiniec, site 2 – the stronghold of Early Middle Ages on Silesian-Lusatian borderland in the light of interdisciplinary research). Zielona Góra: Wydawnictwo Fundacji Archeologicznej; 2012. (in Polish)

  23. Moszyński K. Kultura ludowa Słowian. Tom I: Kultura materialna (Folk culture of the Slavs. Volume I: Material Culture). Warszawa: Książka i Wiedza; 1967. (in Polish)

  24. Jahn M. Eine frühgeschichtliche Mahlsteinindustrie am Siling (Zobten). Altschlesien. 1929;2:282–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jaworski K. Grody w Sudetach (VIII–X wiek) [Strongholds in Sudety (8th–10th centuries). Wrocław: Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego; 2005. (in Polish)

  26. Krawczyk M. Wyniki badań wykopaliskowych na osadzie wczesnośredniowiecznej w Wójcicach, województwo opolskie (The results of excavations on the early medieval settlement in Wójcice, Opolskie Voivodeship). Badania archeologiczne na Górnym Śląsku i ziemiach pogranicznych w latach 1999–2000 (Archaeological research in Upper Silesia and borderlands in the years 1999–2000). Katowice: Regionalny Instytut Kultury; 2002. p. 267–74. (in Polish)

  27. Lodowski J. Dolny Śląsk na początku średniowiecza (VI–X wiek). Podstawy osadnicze i gospodarcze (Lower Silesia at the beginning of the Middle Ages (6th–10th century). Settlement and economic basis). Wrocław: Ossolineum; 1980. (in Polish)

  28. Jaworski K. Problem wytwórczości kamieni żarnowych w regionie sudeckim we wczesnym średniowieczu (Problem of quern production in the Sudety mountain region in the early Middle Ages). In: Přichystal A, Krmiče L, Halavínová K, editors. Petroarchaeology in the Czech Republic and Poland at the beginning of the 21th century, Proceedings of the 4th International Petroarchaeological Symposium in Wrocław, October 2007, 11–13. Brno: Moravské zemské muzeum; 2008. p. 75–94. (in Polish)

  29. Lisowska E. Badania dawnej eksploatacji łupków łyszczykowych w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim (Investigating early medieval exploitation of mica schist at Kamieniec Ząbkowicki). Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne. 2011;53:131–50 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lisowska E. Wydobycie i dystrybucja surowców kamiennych we wczesnym średniowieczu na Dolnym Śląsku (Production and distribution of stone raw materials in the Early Middle Ages in Lower Silesia). Wrocław: Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego; 2013. (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jacomet S. Identification of cereal remains from archaeological sites. 2nd ed. Basel: Archaeobotany Lab IPAS; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lityńska-Zając M. Man and a plant: archaeobotany. In: Pişkin E, Marciniak A, Bartkowiak M, editors. Environmental archaeology. Current theorethical and methodological approaches. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 75–110.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lityńska-Zając M, Wasylikowa K. Przewodnik do badań archeobotanicznych (A Guide to Archaeobotanical Research)(= Vademecum Geobotanicum). Poznań: Sorus; 2005. p. 295–300. in Polish

  34. Schweingruber FH. Microscopic wood anatomy: structural variability of stems and twigs in recent and subfossil woods from Central Europe. 3rd edition. Birmensdorf: Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research; 1990.

  35. Schoch W, Heller I, Schweingruber FH, Kienast F. Wood anatomy of central European Species. 2004. http://www.woodanatomy.ch. Accessed 9 Nov 2021.

  36. Rosiak A, Kałużna-Czaplińska J, Gątarek P. Analytical interpretation of organic residues from ceramics as a source of knowledge about our ancestors. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2020;50(3):189–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kałużna-Czaplińska J, Gątarek P, Rosiak A, Kobylińska U, Kobyliński Z. Zawartość kwasów tłuszczowych w ceramice pochodzącej z pradziejowych i średniowiecznych grodzisk z zachodniej części ziem pruskich (Fatty acids contents in potery vessels from the Prehistoric and Medieval strongholds in the western part of the Prussian territory). In: Kobyliński Z, editor. Archaeologica Hereditas 7. Grodziska Warmii i Mazur, Tom 2. Nowe badania i interpretacje (Archaeologica Hereditas 7. Strongholds of Warmia and Masuria, Volume 2. New research and interpretations). Warszawa: Fundacja Res Publica Multiethnica; 2016. p. 173–209. (in Polish)

  38. Eerkens JW. GC–MS analysis and fatty acid ratios of archaeological potsherds from the Western Great Basin of North America. Archaeometry. 2005;47:83–102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Evershed RP. Organic residue analysis in archaeology: the archaeological biomarker revolution. Archaeometry. 2008;50:895–924.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hammann S, Cramp LJE. Towards the detection of dietary cereal processing through absorbed lipid biomarkers in archaeological pottery. J Archaeol Sci. 2018;93:74–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kałużna-Czaplińska J, Rosiak A, Kwapińska M, Kwapiński W. Different analytical procedures for the study of organic residues in archaeological ceramic samples with the use of gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2016;46(1):67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lucejko JJ, La Nasa J, Porta F, Vanzetti A, Tanda G, Mangiaracina CF, Corretti A, Colombini MP, Ribechini E. Long–lasting ergot lipids as new biomarkers for assessing the presence of cereals and cereal products in archaeological vessels. Sci Rep. 2018;8:3935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Poulain M, Baeten J, De Clercq W, De Vos D. Dietary practices at the castle of Middelburg, Belgium: organic residue analysis of 16th–to 17th–century ceramics. J Archaeol Sci. 2016;67:32–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Baron J, Miazga B, Ntaflos T, Puziewicz J, Szumny A. Beeswax remnants, phase and major element chemical composition of the bronze age mould from Gaj Oławski (SW Poland). Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2016;8:187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Çelemli ÖG. Chemical classification of propolis samples collected from different regions of Turkey in geographical region base. Hacettepe J Biol Chem. 2015;43(1):49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hadi MY, Mohammed GJ, Hameed IH. Analysis of bioactive chemical compounds of Nigella sativa using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Pharmacogn Phytother. 2016;8(2):8–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rosiak A, Kałużna-Czaplińska J. Analiza chromatograficzna pozostałości organicznych w masie ceramicznej ze stanowiska 1 w Grądach-Woniecko, gm. Rutki, woj. podlaskie (Chromatographic analysis of organic residues in clay body from site 1 in Grądy-Woniecko, Rutki municipality, Podlachian Voivodeship). In: Wawrusiewicz A, Kalicki T, Przeździecki M, Frączek M, Manasterski D, editors. Grądy-Woniecko. Ostatni łowcy-zbieracze znad środkowej Narwi (Grądy-Woniecko. The last hunter-gatherer communities from middle Narew river valley). Białystok: Muzeum Podlaskie; 2017. p. 298–302. (in Polish)

  48. Kałużna-Czaplińska J, Rosiak A, Felczak O. Analiza pozostałości organicznych zachowanych w ściankach naczyń ceramicznych z wczesnego i środkowego neolitu, pozyskanych z badań archeologicznych na Pojezierzu Starogardzkim (Analysis of organic remains in the walls of early and middle Neolithic pottery vessels obtained during archaeological excavations in the Starogard Lakeland). In: Felczak O, editor. Wczesny i środkowy neolit na Pojezierzu Starogardzkim w świetle badań nad dolną Wierzycą i Janką. Seria: Fontes Commentationesque ad Res Gestas Gedani et Pomeraniae, tom. VIII (Early and middle neolithic in the Starogard lakeland in the light of research in the lower Wierzyca and Janka rivers area. Series: Fontes Commentationesque ad Res Gestas Gedani et Pomeraniae, vol. VIII). Gdańsk: Muzeum Archeologiczne w Gdańsku; 2020, p. 306–16. (in Polish)

  49. Malinowski T. Wczesnośredniowieczne naczynia słowiańskie do prażenia zboża (Early medieval Slavic vessels for roasting grain). Dawna Kultura. 1955;1:30–2 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reimer PJ, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Bronk Ramsey C, Buck CE, Cheng H, Lawrence ER, Friedrich M, Grootes PM, Guilderson TP, Haflidason H, Hajdas I, Hatté C, Heaton TJ, Hoffmann DL, Hogg AG, Hughen KA, Kaiser KF, Kromer B, Manning SW, Niu M, Reimer RW, Richards DA, Scott EM, Southon JR, Staff RA, Turney CSM, van der Plicht J. Intcal13 and marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon. 2013;55(4):1869–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lisowska E, Jaworski K. 8th–10th century hillforts in Sudetes – exploring current state of research and observations, towards new horizons. Acta Archaeol Carpath. 2021;56:335–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kouřil P, Gryc J. Early medieval stronghold in Opava-Kylešovice and its importance for the understanding of the Silesian region in the tenth-eleventh centuries. In: Kouřil P, Procházka R, editors. Moravian and Silesian strongholds of the tenth and eleventh centuries in the context of Central Europe. Brno: The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archaeology; 2018. p. 185–213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank prof. Krzysztof Jaworski from the Institute of Archeology of the University of Wroclaw for scientific consultation.

Funding

The study was financed from the National Program for the Development of Humanities and grant 2aH 15 0283 83 Economic development in early medieval mountainous areas of the Sudetes compared to the Central European background.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Archeology, Faculty of Historical and Pedagogical Sciences, University of Wrocław, Szewska 48, 50-139, Wroclaw, Poland

    Ewa Lisowska

  2. Institute of General and Ecological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Lodz University of Technology, Żeromskiego 116, 90-924, Lodz, Poland

    Angelina Rosiak & Joanna Kałużna-Czaplińska

  3. Archeobotanical Laboratory, Department of Archeology, Silesian Museum, Dobrowolskiego 1, 40-205, Katowice, Poland

    Agata Sady-Bugajska

Authors
  1. Ewa Lisowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angelina Rosiak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Agata Sady-Bugajska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joanna Kałużna-Czaplińska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: EL, JKC; Methodology: EL, AR, ASB, JKC; Formal analysis and investigation: EL, AR, ASB, JKC; Writing—original draft preparation: EL, AR, ASB, JKC; Supervision: EL, JKC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna Kałużna-Czaplińska.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lisowska, E., Rosiak, A., Sady-Bugajska, A. et al. Functionality of early medieval roasters studied using archaeobotany and chromatography: preliminary studies. Herit Sci 10, 55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00691-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00691-9

Keywords

  • Roasters
  • Chromatographic analysis
  • Botanical studies
  • Slavic region